We ask all that read this report to copy it and send
a copy to every public official you know. Send it return receipt
requested and demand a response as to what action they intend to
take to force an independent investigation into the events of
9-11-01.
From Deception to Revelation Part I
An
Analysis of the Attack of the Pentagon
By Dave
vonKleist
Introduction
The events of September 11, 2001 are undeniably and inarguably
the most significant acts of terrorism and aggression ever
perpetrated against this country. It is indisputable that the three
destructive occurrences at the World Trade Center's north tower,
south tower and the Pentagon, were well-planned, orchestrated and
coordinated events and are inescapably tied to one another. It is
safe to say that the guilty parties would do anything to remain
cloaked in secrecy and will create "rabbit trails" to divert
attention away from significant information as they attempt to
cover-up and obfuscate any data that would lead to their discovery.
Additionally, those guilty would of course make every attempt to
discredit or otherwise destroy the credibility of anyone who might
raise revealing questions. To expose one of these entities involved
in this deception would be a most significant and vital clue that
could reveal the perpetrators of these events.
At the outset, it is safe to assume that this paper and analysis
will most likely be looked upon as the most outrageous and
delusional proposal ever conceived, the product of the most extreme
of conspiracy theorists, or it may provoke the reader to think
beyond the intellectual boundries which have been imposed by the
daily repetitions of the "conventional wisdom" of governmental
agencies and the mainstream media. The approach of this
investigation is simply to ask questions and utilize common sense as
the facts and evidence are compared to what has been purported by
"official" sources.
Many readers are naturally be inclined to gravitate toward the
former when confronted with ideas considered "outside the box",
therefore it is necessary to define the phrase "conspiracy theory".
The term "conspiracy theory" consists of two words, the active
word being "theory". By definition, a theory is a concept, an idea,
a proposal, a supposition. Example: "In theory, if I purchase a
raffle ticket, I could win the prize." However, once the first
ticket is purchased, winning is no longer a theory, but rather a
possibility. The more tickets that are purchased, the more possible
and eventually probable the win becomes. The same can be said about
a conspiracy theory. As long as there is no evidence to support the
conspiracy theory, it remains a theory. Once however there is one
piece of evidence to support the theory, no matter how flimsy or
circumstantial it may be, the conspiracy is no longer a theory, but
a possibility! And the more evidence there is that is gathered, the
more possible and eventually probable the conspiracy becomes.
There is no disputing that an explosive event large enough to
demolish a portion of the Pentagon occurred on the morning of Sept.
11, 2001. For argument sake, let's take the approach of a police
investigator or a detective as we begin to attempt to solve this
crime. Using this perspective, we will only deal with known facts
and the available photographic evidence to determine the validity of
the reports and explanations of media and government officials.
Media News Reports
With this in mind let us now look at the report of a plane
hitting the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001. As
reported, at 8:10 AM EST, Flight 77 departed Dulles International
Airport bound for Los Angeles, California, a distance of almost 2700
miles. It was also reported that the Boeing 757 slammed into the
northwest face of the Pentagon at 9:40 AM, destroying three of its
five rings. If, as investigators, we had come upon a crime scene
such as the Pentagon, the first task would be to examine the
building and surrounding area, and employ common sense and the
available evidence to support the "theory" of a Boeing 757 hitting
the building.
The first and most important task after arriving at the scene of
a crime would be to examine the plane wreckage and determine the
point of impact, the trajectory, angle and speed of the aircraft at
the point of impact. There is only one problem. There is no trace of
recognizable wreckage from a Boeing 757! There is no fuselage, no
tail section, there are no wheels, engines, wings, luggage or
passenger seats, nor are there any bodies to be found. This leads us
to our first and foremost question, if a Boeing 757 crashed into the
Pentagon as was reported by the media and government officials,
where did it go? What evidence is there to support the theory of an
airliner careening into the building?
According to Boeing, the 757 has a wingspan of 124 ft., 10 in.,
an overall length of 155 ft., 3 in., a tail height of 44 ft., 6 in.,
and the maximum fuel capacity is 11,489 gallons. With these
statistics in mind let's begin our examination of the photographic
evidence.
Critical Analysis of Photographic Evidence
This first photo shows an overhead view of the Pentagon with an
outline of a Boeing 757 overlay to show the proposed point of impact
and relative size. Note the charred "horseshoe" that extends from
the inner portion of the building to the area of the supposed crash
site, along the outer ring to the east, and then back to the inner
ring. More on this later.
Photo #2 shows an aerial view looking down to the northwest face
of the Pentagon. One can plainly see that there are no apparent skid
marks where a 757 might have hit the ground and slammed into the
building. That would indicate that the plane was indeed still
airborne when making contact. Also note once again the charred roof
damage as in the previous picture.
In photo # 3, we begin to get a closer look at the proposed point
of impact. There are several important issues that are raised by
this photograph. First, the most obvious question to ask is: "Where
is the wreckage of a 757?" There are no signs of wreckage
whatsoever! As stated earlier, there is nothing in this or any other
photograph available at this time that indicates that an aircraft
the size of a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Notice the size
of the demolished area. The Pentagon is four stories high, and if
each story is 10-12ft in height, and the added height for the roof
area is another 10ft., the total height of the building would be
approximately 58ft. The width of the hole according to this and
other photos would be about 60-65ft. The wingspan of a 757 as stated
earlier is almost 125ft. Why is there no visible damage on either
side of the hole where the wings would have struck? Keep in mind
that the fuel is carried in both the fuselage and the wing tanks.
Notice also the lack of roof damage to the immediate right of the
hole and the area just beyond it heading into the center of the
Pentagon where it appears the charred roof continues. Finally, once
again, there is no indication that a plane hit the ground at any
time before making contact.
Photo #4 illustrates the approximate size of a 757 in relation to
the hole that is claimed to be the result of such a plane slamming
into the building. It is self-explanatory.
Photo #5 shows the roof area that collapsed into the demolished
area. Notice that the roof for the most part is still intact and
came down in mostly one piece. It is also important to note that the
area just below the roof also remained relatively intact. Given the
tail height of almost 45 ft., and the fact that there is no evidence
that an aircraft hit the ground and slid into the Pentagon, how is
it possible that the roof and area immediately below remained
virtually undamaged save for the collapse?
Photo #6 is a vital piece of this puzzle. There have been
hundreds of photos from this angle of the gaping hole in the
Pentagon, but this one was chosen for two reasons. First, it was
scanned from one of the countless publications by Time, Newsweek,
People, and others, to commemorate the event because of the caption.
The final sentence reads: "The jagged wound cut through three of the
buildings five rings, trapping hundreds of people." On reviewing the
first three pictures, one can easily see that only one of the
buildings rings was penetrated.
To make the next and possibly the most important point of this
report, let us recall the other events that happened earlier that
day. At 8:45 AM EST, American flight #11 slammed into the North
Tower at the World Trade Center. The resulting fireball was so huge
and so hot, that as reported, it melted and fatigued the supporting
steel girders to the point that the building collapsed. At 9:03 AM
EST, United flight #175 slammed into the South Tower at the World
Trade Center. The resulting fireball was so huge and so hot, that as
reported, it melted and fatigued the supporting steel girders to the
point that the building collapsed. At 9:40 AM, EST, American flight
#77 reportedly slammed into the Pentagon. All three of these planes
had embarked on a trans-continental flight and carried approximately
8,600 remaining gallons of fuel at the time of their respective
impacts. The first two crashes caused intense fires hot enough to
melt steel. Now look very closely at photo #6. Notice the left side
of the hole and note that the walls of the interior are not only
unblemished, but show no signs of soot, smoke or heat damage. On the
upper floor, to the left of one of the support columns, one can
plainly see a green file cabinet with a computer monitor or TV on
top of it. Two floors below one can plainly see a wooden stool with
an open book on top of it. Are we to believe that a plane with 8,600
gallons of fuel would not generate a fireball and enough heat to
singe the pages of an open book only feet away? or to melt the
plastic case of a monitor?
If the fire was so localized, how is it when we look at photo #7,
we can see farther down on the left side of the building, flame
shooting out of the window? If there was a fireball as reported, and
as is illustrated in the recently released surveillance film from
the Pentagon, how could the fire have directed itself in such a way
as to create a "horseshoe" of roof damage, damaging a major part of
the north rings.
Was the damage of the Pentagon caused by a Boeing 757 as reported
by government officials, or was it the result of some other event
which is being covered up in an attempt to mislead and manipulate
the American people into a war and into the willing relinquishment
of their rights?
Conclusion
Please note that there are no accusations being made and
there are no "theories" being proposed in this report. Questions
however have been raised that demand answers. The implications are
far too important to be ignored. If the government agencies and
mainstream media choose to ignore the facts and evidence presented
by this and many other articles addressing these issues, than their
silence can only be interpreted as consent to the vilest of
deceptions the world has ever known.
From Deception to Revelation Part II
Newly revealed photos are irrefutable proof that
a Boeing 757
did NOT hit the Pentagon!
By Dave vonKleist
Within 12 hours of posting the first part of this analysis,
photos were discovered that show that a fire truck had responded to
a fire that had been possibly caused by a small aircraft hitting the
lower portion of the Pentagon. The area had not yet collapsed and
firefighters were working to contain the flames. The collapse
occurred after fire retardant foam had extinguished a portion of the
fire. These photos are self-explanatory and are irrefutable evidence
that the damage to the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, was not
caused by a Boeing 757, and in fact the story about the airliner is
a complete fabrication.
The implications are of indescribable significance and it must be
assumed the Pentagon, the U.S. military, the government and the
media are engaged in the biggest cover-up in the history of this
country, if not the world. As stated in the first part of this
analysis, the events of September 11, 2001 are inescapably tied to
one another, and if one group can be tied to one of these events, it
would be safe to assume that they would be tied to all of them. No
one wants to even entertain the idea of our own government being
responsible for the horrific slaughter on innocent lives, police
officers and firefighters, but the evidence is now before us that
this might very well be the case.
Note that the area in question had not yet collapsed. The area
being sprayed in the above picture is the apparent point of impact
of a small aircraft, possibly a Piper Cub or as some may have
postulated, an F-16 fighter.
Note the large wire spools in the center of this picture. It had
been reported that the Pentagon had been in the process of being
renovated in this area and had just been re-wired. The roof-line and
face of the building is still visible and had not yet collapsed.
We now see the damage that we have all seen in prior photos. The
official story was released by the Pentagon and the mainstream media
that a Boeing 757 had slammed into the Pentagon. Note also the wire
spools still in place.
These photos are just a few of hundreds that have been available
but show clearly and undeniably that America and the world have been
manipulated and lied to. We owe it to the victims, their families,
the firefighters, the police officers, America and the world, to
demand that the real guilty parties, THE REAL TERRORISTS, be
brought to justice. The madness must be stopped before we are led
into a third world war because of a lie. Is there no one willing to
stand up against this horrendous injustice? In America, are we truly
the land of the free?.. or the home of the brave? Let’s prove
it.
A Few Extra Photos: ONE
TWO
THREE | 
