- The following
information was emailed tonight, 07/25/06, to Drs. Fetzer and Jones with
Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
-
- Hello, Drs.
Fetzer and Jones,
-
- Thank you for all
your efforts and hard work in getting at the real truth about
9/11.
-
- I discovered last
night information I think you should see. It is about the discrepancy in
the precise times of the airplane impacts into the Towers:
-
- Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory at Columbia University vs the 9/11 Commission
Report.
-
- The bottom line
(I am a corporate controller) is that according to the differences, the
seismic readings happened before the planes hit.
-
- Last night and
tonight I sent two posts to Liberty Forum about this, and so I am
copying and pasting them here for you (as they tell the entire matter;
or at least enough to get you thinking).
-
- I have looked
high and low, but can not find this new information anywhere on the
internet.
-
- Post to
Conspiracy 911 7/24/06
-
- WTC7 must be the
focal point to exposing the govt's coverup...HOWEVER I'd like to take a
sharp turn if I may and give you something else to think about:
-
- The official 9/11
Commission Report (your tax dollars wasted) states the following:
-
- http://www.9-11commission.gov/
-
- Impact time, AA
Flt 11: 8:46:40 a.m.
-
- Impact time, UA
Flt 175: 9:03:11 a.m.
-
- .......HOWEVER,
-
- http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html
-
- the official data
readings from Lamont-Doherty give the following seismic events:
-
- time 8:46:26: 0.9
Richter, signal duration 12 seconds [reported as first impact,
WTC1]
-
- time 9:02:54: 0.7
Richter, signal duration 6 seconds [reported as second impact,
WTC2]
-
- Conclusion:
-
- Two notable
seismic events occurred before the planes ever hit the towers and were
so close timewise to the actual impacts of the planes that
Lamont-Doherty reported them as the impacts. The logical conclusion
(which coincides with many eyewitnesses in the basements, e.g., William
Rodriquez) is that these were explosives detonated to coincide with the
aircraft hitting the towers. They were very close to getting the timing
right. This is one time I'm going to believe the gov't; I think their
times are correct, down to the second!
-
- And, oh yes,
getting back to WTC7, it did have quite a conflagration of fire that day
on the south side of the building, and yes, it did have fairly large
damage to the south face from debris of WTC1 hitting it...HOWEVER, there
is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that these caused it to collapse IN
NEAR-PERFECT SYMMETRY EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION; there is
also no evidence to back a claim that support trusses for the floors 5
through 7 were damaged so as to cause the building to collapse.
-
- Putting
hypotheticals and conjectures aside (which are not evidence), we do have
the fact that WTC7 fell in near-perfect symmetry at free-fall speed,
exactly like a classic controlled demolition, and this is for all the
world to see.
-
- ONE OTHER THING:
if you view the video "Eyewitness 9/11", you will see indisputable
evidence by scientific sound analysis of the collapse of WTC1 that shows
massive explosions occurred before the tower began to collapse; and, as
would be expected, the first notable came from the basement.
-
- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-349898043858
7461603&q=9%2F11+eyewitness
-
- A real
investigation is needed NOW, and not like the first disgraceful one that
didn't even resemble one.
-
- Post to
Conspiracy 911 7/25/06
-
- Hiya,
SlackerSlayer,
-
- I read it
differently. Here is what the Commission wrote about its task:
-
- "The National
Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an independent,
bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the
signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to
prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the
immediate response to the attacks. The Commission is also mandated to
provide recommendations designed to guard against future
attacks."
-
- They failed
miserably in the "full and complete account" part.
-
- (see David Ray
Griffin: "9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions")
-
- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398081814159578985
-
- BTW, I can't find
evidence anywhere on the internet about the information contained herein
this post, about the discrepancy of time of plane impacts
[Lamont-Doherty vs the 9/11 Commission Report].
-
- I discovered this
last night when I thought it funny that Lamont-Doherty could even pickup
seismic data from airplane impacts 80 floors up in the air. I thought
that most of the energy would be absorbed by the building before it got
down to the ground, so how could Lamont-Doherty pick up a seismic
reading? That's when I noticed the time of impacts were precise and
thought, "Hmm, I wonder what the official government times are for the
impacts?...and are they precise also?...and, what if they're
different?"
-
- OK, I admit it; I
was hoping I could find more evidence of duplicity and coverup.
-
- AFTER ALL, WE ARE
DEALING WITH MURDER AND TREASON
-
- So, I ended up
with this: The seismic readings happened before the planes hit! How
could this be? What does this mean?
-
- I can only come
up with one conclusion: VERY LARGE EXPLOSION(S).
-
- The
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University has its data
precise to plus or minus one second, and just now I found that the 9/11
Commission based their times on FAA radar data and air traffic control
software logic. (see note 130 in this link):
-
- http://www.insightful.com/infact/911/corpus/report_470_460.html
-
- Actually, it was
you who got this going, SlackerSlayer! You were questioning the claim
from the skeptics that it took 18 seconds for WTC7 to come down in, and
I knew they were referring (deceptively I might add) to the
Lamont-Doherty data because I had seen it last week. When I went back to
that data is when I found this huge discrepancy that leads directly to
government coverup.
-
- Thanks for your
efforts, my friend.
-
- FYI, I am
forwarding this to the Scholars immediately because they have the best
group going right now, and we are all in this together whether we like
it or not.
-
- Craig T.
Furlong
-
- Huntington Beach,
California
|