|
Gandhi thought black people were subhuman
By Yasser Latif
Hamdani
Gandhi’s desire for Indians to be segregated from
blacks was so strong that he went to Johannesburg in late August of
1904 to protest the placing of blacks in the Indian section of the
city
LAHORE: Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1870-1948), the
man who inspired great leaders like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther
King, may have harboured racial sentiments against black people if
an article on Sulekha.com is to be believed.
The article
quotes a series of letters and petitions from Gandhi, linking the
black people of Africa to savages and portraying them as little
better than animals. Gandhi writes, “A general belief seems to
prevail in the colony that the Indians are little better, if at all,
than the savages or natives of Africa. Even the children are taught
to believe in that manner, with the result that the Indian is being
dragged down to the position of a raw Kaffir”.
According to
the article, part of Gandhi’s attitude stemmed from his belief in
the Aryan Invasion Theory, claiming that the superior white race
from the Steppes subjugated darker races all across Eurasia. Gandhi
refused to accept classification with ‘aboriginal’ looking
‘savages’: “A reference to Hunter’s ‘Indian Empire’, chapters 3 and
4, would show at a glance who are aborigines and who are not. The
matter is put so plainly that there can be no mistake about the
distinction between the two. It will be seen at once from the book
that the Indians in South Africa belong to the Indo-Germanic stock
or, more properly speaking, the Aryan stock.”
He believed
that White rule in South Africa – with the help of a reduction in
Asiatic immigration was necessary for civilising the blacks with
these characteristics: “We, therefore, have no hesitation in
agreeing with the view that in the long run assisted Asiatic
immigration - into the Transvaal would be disastrous to the white
settlement. People will gradually accommodate themselves to relying
upon Asiatic labour, and any White immigration of the special class
required in the Transvaal on a large scale will be practically
impossible. It would be equally unfair to the natives of the soil.
It is all very well to say that they would not work, and that, if
the Asiatics were introduced, that would be a stimulus to work; but
human nature is the same everywhere, and once Asiatic labour is
resorted to, there would not be a sustained effort to induce the
natives to work under what would otherwise be, after all, gentle
compulsion. There would be then less talk about taxing the natives
and so forth. Natives themselves, used as they are to a very simple
mode of life, will always be able to command enough wages to meet
their wants; and the result will be putting back their progress for
an indefinite length of time. We have used the words ‘gentle
compulsion’ in the best sense of the term; we mean compulsion of the
same kind that a parent exercises over children.”
Gandhi thus
remained a firm believer in white settlement and rule in South
Africa. More explicitly, he wrote that the White race deserved to be
the dominant race in South Africa: “What the British Indians pray
for is very little. They ask for no political power. They admit the
British race should be the dominant race in South Africa. All they
ask for is freedom for those that are now settled and those that may
be allowed to come in future to trade, to move about, and to hold
landed property without any hindrance save the ordinary legal
requirements.”
Along with the dominance of the white race in
South Africa, Gandhi also held dear the idea of racial purity: “We
believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we
believe that they would best serve these interests, which are as
dear to us as to them, by advocating the purity of all races, and
not one alone. We believe also that the white race of South Africa
should be the predominating race.”
Commenting on a petition
opposing interactions between the whites and the coloureds, Gandhi
wrote: “The petition dwells upon ‘the co-mingling of the coloured
and white races’. May we inform the members of the conference that,
so far as the British Indians are concerned, such a thing is
practically unknown? If there is one thing, which the Indian
cherishes, more than any other, it is the purity of type. Why bring
such a question into the controversy at all?”
Gandhi’s desire
for the Indians to be segregated from the blacks was so strong that
he went to Johannesburg in late August of 1904 to protest the
placing of blacks in the Indian section of the city: “Why, of all
places in Johannesburg, the Indian Location should be chosen for
dumping down all the Kaffirs of the town passes my comprehension.
...Of course, under my suggestion, The Town Council must withdraw
the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of Kaffirs with the
Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly.”
It is unclear
from the article whether Gandhi later changed his position. However,
it does shed some light on the ideas that shaped the mind of one of
the most successful political leaders of the 20th century. *
Home | Foreign
|
|
|