Subj: ADV3-6-99: A Trial in Jasper
Date: 3/6/99 5:16:54 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: (American Dissident Voices)
To: (National Alliance)

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 6, 1999

A Trial in Jasper
by Dr. William Pierce

Last week they had a trial in Jasper, Texas, of 24-year-old John King,
one of three White men accused of killing a Black by dragging him behind
their pickup truck. The media made a real circus of the trial. Every
night on the television news programs Tom Brokaw and the other network
news announcers reminded us with a grim face and a sober tone about the
gruesome nature of the killing. Over and over again they showed us the
chain which had been used to drag the Black. They showed us the asphalt
road along which he was dragged, with painted circles on the road
wherever the police had found blood. Ajd they told us what an awful
White racist John King was. They showed us his tattoos. They told us
that he was a petty criminal who had been in prison. They read us some
of the letters he had written expressing his dislike for Blacks. And the
media people really rubbed all of this in hard -- "White racist,
gruesome killing, Black victim, hate crime, evil Whites, good Blacks" --
it was like a ritual chant, over and over again, until they even had a
hardened cynic like me flinching. That's the power of television.

And now they've got the trials of the other two White men accused in the
killing to look forward to: more circus, more ritual. And I hardly need
to tell you what the purpose of the circus is. The media bosses are
pushing hard to have new "hate crime" legislation enacted, and their
step'n'fetchit in the White House is eager to oblige. These circus
trials are intended to make the White couch potatoes, the White
lemmings, feel just a little guiltier for being White and soften them up
so they won't object to having their freedom taken away. And really,
that's where all of this is headed: the goal is "hate speech"
legislation of the sort they've already gotten enacted in Canada,
Britain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and a dozen other countries,
where it is now illegal to say or write or publish anything Politically

You know, there are many conservative Americans who sneer at that
prognosis. They believe that I am just a doom-sayer. They believe that
Americans are too smart and too independent to surrender their freedom.
Well, sir, I wish that they were right, but I'm sure they aren't. These
days, whenever there's an argument about the good common sense or the
rugged independence of the American people, about their devotion to
principles and to freedom, all we have to do is look at what they
elected President -- twice. That should settle the argument. That
raping, lying, draft-dodging, coke-snorting piece of filth in the White
House, who is still overwhelmingly popular with the American people, is
not a figment of my imagination. He is, unfortunately, all too real. And
believe me, anyone who would choose Clinton to be his President, will
not put up even the slightest objection to having his freedom taken away
in return for the promise of more security. That is how far America has

Let's look at the details. During the television coverage of the trial
in Jasper I did not once hear it mentioned that the Black who was killed
was himself a convicted criminal. Instead he was held up to the
television audience as a devoted family man, a choir boy, a Black man
loved by all who knew him, almost a saint -- brutally murdered by three
low-life White thugs who were racists. And to be sure, there hardly can
be any doubt that the three young Whites who killed him were low-lifes.
All three of them were convicted criminals, just like their Black
victim. And the killing itself was a pretty good indicator that they
were low-class people, certainly not the sort anyone would want for
neighbors. The killing was an act of drunken hooliganism, done on the
spur of the moment without a thought for the consequences. It was done
stupidly, in a way that was certain to result in the perpetrators
getting caught.

The media suggested that they believed they were engaged in a race war,
Whites against Blacks, and that their killing of the Black was part of
that war. If that was so -- and I really doubt that they had any
coherent reason for their actions that night -- but if they thought that
they were part of some White army, they should have understood that in
any White army worth its salt such drunken foolishness would not be
tolerated. Such an act of indiscipline and hooliganism would have
resulted in a court martial and a firing squad for the three low-lifes
who did it.

The media also made much of John King's racial beliefs. He was a nice
boy before he went to prison and was exposed to White racist gangs, they
said. After he came out of prison he hated Blacks, they said, and they
implied that it was because he had been indoctrinated with racial hatred
by these racist gangs while in prison. Another good reason for a "hate
crime" law: keep these White racist gangs from poisoning the minds of
nice, non-racist boys like John King used to be. Actually, what happened
to John King while he was in prison was not indoctrination by White
gangs. It was direct contact with the reality of the Black nature. It
was direct exposure to the wonders of life with the colored brother.

Let me tell you, I've lived in East Texas. I graduated from a military
school in a small East Texas town only about 100 miles from Jasper, and
I have a pretty good feeling for what it's like in that part of the
country. There are, of course, too many Blacks there, just as in most
other parts of the country. But in the small towns like Jasper the
Blacks are moderately well behaved. The police don't coddle them like
they do in the big cities. The White people in East Texas aren't
terrorized by them. And so John King didn't think much about Blacks or
about the racial situation in this country -- until he was sent to
prison for burglary and was exposed to a majority prison population
consisting of Black criminals like James Byrd, the Black ex-convict he
was convicted of killing.

I don't want to get into all of the gory details about what young White
men are exposed to in prisons these days, where the majority of the
inmates very often are Black. It is a hell almost beyond imagining for
White Americans brought up in a genteel environment. For Blacks
homosexual rape is accepted behavior. It is not a rare occurrence; it is
routine. It's the way they establish their barnyard pecking order. They
rape each other when they must, but they much prefer to rape Whites.
They get away with it because the government's official position is that
it doesn't happen, or at worst is only a very minor problem. And of
course, the media don't like to talk about such things. It doesn't fit.

And even if a young White man doesn't get raped, it is something he is
constantly aware of, something which he must constantly be on guard
against. He is surrounded by Blacks who no longer feel that they must
ape the White man in their behavior. Instead they behave in prison in
the way that is natural for them, the way they behaved in the jungles of
Africa. And you know, everyone in the government understands this racial
situation in the prisons. They make jokes about it at their cocktail
parties in Washington. Most of them know some fellow bureaucrat or
politician who has been sent to prison for taking bribes or committing
perjury or the like, and the reality of being thrown into a cage with a
mob of unrestrained Blacks is something which is never too far below the
surface of their consciousness. But of course, in their public
statements they pretend that they believe that Blacks and Whites are the
same and that there's nothing in particular to worry about if one is
locked up with Blacks.

Well, John King was exposed to the brutal truth when he was sent to
prison for burglary, and he learned to hate Blacks in a hurry. He turned
to White gangs in prison in order to survive, and when he came out he
was indeed a changed man. If there's anything good that can be said
about America's prisons today it is that they provide a strong dose of
racial reality to those Whites unfortunate enough to be forced to spend
some time in them.

John King was sentenced on Thursday of last week, and NBC anchorman Tom
Brokaw announced the news of the sentencing on the NBC Evening News with
these words, and I quote: "And in Jasper, Texas, today the racist got
the death penalty." That's the way Brokaw introduced the news: not "John
King got the death penalty" or "the man who was convicted in a dragging
death got the death penalty," but "the racist got the death penalty."

Do you believe that was a slip of the tongue? Listen, Tom Brokaw is paid
seven million dollars a year to read his news scripts. He is paid seven
million dollars a year because he is a very good actor and says --
convincingly -- exactly what the Jews who formulate his news program
want him to say. He is paid seven million dollars a year for his
half-hour appearance every evening because he uses his words, his facial
expressions, his tone of voice to convey exactly the message that his
bosses want conveyed. And that message in this case was "racism is a
crime, and racists deserve the death penalty." That was Tom Brokaw's
subliminal message to us, and it was a calculated message.

Of course, media people do sometimes make slips of the tongue. On
Wednesday of last week, with the Jasper trial on everyone's mind, a
well-known White disk jockey, Doug Tracht, at Washington, DC, radio
station WARW-FM, played part of a song by Grammy-winning Black hip-hop
performer Lauryn Hill. Well, Doug Tracht, who is best known by his
nickname, "the Greaseman," didn't like the Black woman's song, and so he
commented as he stopped it -- quote -- "No wonder people drag them
behind trucks."

Now, that was a slip. Within hours the CBS-owned station had fired
Tracht. Before the day was over he also had lost his job as part-time
deputy sheriff in suburban Falls Church, Virginia. And you can bet your
bottom dollar that he never will be allowed to work again in the
controlled media. He made the mistake of saying what was on his mind.

But Tom Brokaw didn't make a slip when he introduced the news the
following day about John King's sentencing with the words, "And in
Jasper, Texas, today the racist got the death penalty." Tom Brokaw was
delivering a subliminal message calculated by Neal Shapiro, the Jewish
executive producer of the NBC Evening News, and Brokaw's other Jewish
bosses. The message again was: "Racism is a crime. Not liking Blacks or
Jews or mestizos or Asians is a crime. Racism deserves the death
penalty. We need a law against racism." Tom Brokaw is paid seven million
dollars a year by his Jewish bosses because he delivers subliminal
messages like that very skillfully, very convincingly. Tom Brokaw is
paid to be a Judas goat, to lead the sheep to the slaughter.

Now, perhaps you think that I am imagining things. Perhaps you think
that I am way off target first in imagining that the media coverage of
the news has the effect of making White people feel guilty and of
conditioning them to give up their freedom without protest, and second
in imagining that this is the result of a deliberate plan by the Jews
who control the media.

Well, I wish that it were just my imagination. But you know, the
panicked reaction to the Greaseman's casual comment, "No wonder they
drag them behind trucks," -- his immediate firing by his radio station,
where he was by far their highest rated announcer, and his firing by the
sheriff's department for his Politically Incorrect slip of the tongue --
that wasn't my imagination. White people do feel intimidated by the
media propaganda. In Jasper, Texas, the White people are falling all
over themselves in their efforts to apologize for being White. The
effect of all of the media publicity has been guilt, guilt, guilt. White
men, as well as women, in Jasper have been wringing their hands in
anguish and begging not to be judged as racists, just because of John
King and his two companions. One of the first things the White people of
Jasper did was tear down a fence which had divided the White and Black
sections of their cemetery. And the 11 White people on John King's jury
chose the one Black man on that jury to be the foreman, so that they
could show the world that they aren't racists. Now they've built
themselves a new city park and named it James Byrd Junior Park. How many
other towns in America have named city parks after local ex-convicts?
Indeed, James Byrd was an ex-convict who happened to be in the wrong
place at the wrong time and got himself killed in an especially messy
way -- but he's still only an ex-convict, a petty criminal and ne'er do
well. And it's quite clear that if he'd been White instead of Black, no
city park would have been built in his honor, no matter how messily and
painfully he died. And so the effect of the media coverage of his
killing has been to create a sense of White racial guilt in the

What about the motivation behind the media coverage? Why did this trial
in Jasper get such enormous media coverage all over the country? Was it
just because the defendant had committed an especially gruesome crime?
The more gruesome the crime, the more coverage the trial will get -- is
that it?

No, not really. You know, another murder trial opened the same day that
John King's trial did. While John King was being tried in Jasper, Texas,
last week for killing James Byrd, Danny Martinez was being tried in
Denver, Colorado, for the rape, torture, and murder of 14-year-old
Brandy Duvall. But of course, unless you live in Denver, you haven't
heard a word about the Martinez trial. Tom Brokaw didn't even mention
it. All you've heard about is the King trial. Is it because the murder
Martinez committed wasn't as gruesome or newsworthy as the murder King
committed? Well, I'll let you be the judge.

Martinez and six other members of the mestizo gang to which he belongs,
the Bloods, grabbed 14-year-old Brandy Duvall from a Denver bus stop,
where she was waiting for a bus. They took her to a house where one of
the gang members lives, and they held the 14-year-old White girl down on
a mattress while she was gang-raped for several hours. The gang members
then took turns sexually torturing the White junior high school student.
They repeatedly rammed a broomstick into her vagina while she screamed
and begged for her life. Then, after they had finished amusing
themselves, Martinez and the other mestizos handcuffed the bleeding
White girl, put a hood over her head, and drove her to a drainage ditch.
There they stabbed Brandy Duvall 28 times with a butcher knife and then
dumped her body into the ditch, where she bled to death. After that the
gang members went back to the house and disposed of the bloody mattress
on which she had been gang-raped and sexually tortured.

And as I just told you, Danny Martinez was being tried for this horrible
crime last week at exactly the same time John King was being tried. So
why do you think the media focused so heavily on Jasper, Texas, and
didn't have a word to say about the trial in Denver? Could it be that
the Jasper trial served their propaganda purpose and the Denver trial
didn't? Could it be that the Jewish media bosses wanted to make White
people feel guilty and intimidated, and the Jasper trial served that
purpose, while the Denver trial didn't? Could that be the only reason
why they covered up the horrible rape, torture, and murder of
14-year-old Brandy Duvall while they beat us over the head with the
dragging death of a Black ex-convict in Texas? Could it be that they
kept quiet about Brandy Duvall because she was White and her murderers
were mestizos? Did they make a circus out of the Jasper trial just
because the victim was Black and the murderers were White? That's what I
think. What do you think?

Let me just recap this for you, because it really is extraordinarily
important. What happened in Jasper, Texas, to a Black ex-convict
shouldn't have happened in a civilized society. It was an especially
gruesome murder. And there is no doubt that John King hated Blacks as a
consequence of his own experiences with them in prison. All of that is a
legitimate subject for news coverage.

But what happened to 14-year-old Brandy Duvall in Denver is even more
terrible than what happened to James Byrd. It is more newsworthy,
something which the White citizens of this country should be more
concerned about, because it was an organized, gang attack by non-White
racists, by mestizo racists, on a White person. An innocent White child
was killed in Denver, while the victim in Jasper was a Black criminal,
an ex-convict.

The news media have gone all-out on the Jasper trial and have been
completely silent on the Denver trial, not because the killing of James
Byrd was more gruesome than that of Brandy Duvall or more newsworthy or
more interesting to television viewers, but solely because in Jasper the
victim was Black and the perpetrators were White, while in Denver the
victim was White and the perpetrators were mestizos. That is the only
reason for the enormous disparity in the news coverage of the two
trials: the only reason. The Jasper trial suited their purpose and the
Denver trial didn't.

And that purpose -- the purpose of the Jewish media bosses -- is to make
White people feel guilty, so that they won't oppose the Jews' campaign
for so-called "hate crime" legislation, the same sort of legislation
which the Jews have succeeded in having imposed on the people of Canada
and Britain and France and Germany and Switzerland and much of the rest
of Europe. It is legislation whose real aim is to keep White people from
defending themselves against the Jews, to keep White people from
criticizing the Jews or speaking out against their activities.

And this White guilt campaign by the media is working; it is having the
desired effect. Many White people are feeling guilty as a result. Many
White people are feeling ashamed of their natural dislike of Blacks.
That's why Doug Tracht, the Greaseman, lost both his jobs so quickly
when he made a Politically Incorrect remark about the Jasper trial.
That's why the White citizens of Jasper have named a new city park after
a convicted Black criminal. That's why there will never be a park in
Denver named after Brandy Duvall.

Yes, the media bosses planned this propaganda campaign, and Tom Brokaw
is doing a very effective job as a Judas goat. But you know, if this
campaign doesn't work for the Jews -- if it backfires in the long run
and White Americans reject the effort of the media bosses to take away
their freedom, Tom Brokaw may decide that seven million dollars a year
was nowhere near enough payment for his treachery. Let's aim for that.
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribes of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to:

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at or

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

or e-mail: please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address

--> TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to: which has "unsubscribe" as the subject of the

(c) 1999 National Vanguard Books

----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Received: from ( []) by (v56.26) with SMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 1999 17:16:54 1900
Received: from ( [])
by (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id RAA08377;
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:15:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ( [])
by (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA01754;
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 18:08:14 -0500
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 17:03:15 -0500
Message-Id: <>
Subject: ADV3-6-99: A Trial in Jasper
From: "American Dissident Voices"
To: National Alliance
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: Bulk