 Figures show that American Negroes in general
are 38 times more likely to commit interracial rape than
Whites (even with Mestizos counted as White).
by Greg Kay
In America, there is a
sexual holocaust in progress even as you read this. An
orgy of violent rape here at home dwarfs those
comparatively recent accounts of rapes in Iraq and the
Balkans, as well as the WWII Soviet invasion of Germany
and Japanese occupation of mainland Asia. A deliberate
program of violent sexual assault by one race upon
another: it’s called interracial rape.
Virtually
every case of Black on White rape qualifies as a "hate
crime," by legal description almost without exception,
due to the nature of interracial rape. Certainly every
rape by a Negro perpetrated upon a White woman where he
has had to leave his predominately Black neighborhood to
find her would easily meet that definition. And not only
because of the very real racial aspects, enhanced
psychological and social consequences to the victim,
for, in extreme cases, she may well be cut off from the
members of her own society. The reason goes far beyond
that.
It is often argued that rape is not a sex
crime, but a crime of violence or of power and control.
However, interracial rape, while it encompasses all such
motivations, is something more. Black-on-White rape is
usually a violent political act – a form of terrorism –
the ultimate statement of the Black Power Movement that
has disguised itself under an innocuous-sounding banner
called "civil rights."
Consider this: being able
to "take" the woman or women of someone else and use the
same for one’s own gratification as an extension of the
basic biological desire to breed that pits rutting
animals against each other for favor of the herd’s
females and passing on one’s genes, that is the ultimate
statement of superiority; and the utmost denigration of
the male or group to whom the woman in question belongs,
as well as the woman herself. That act demonstrates not
only to the victim, but also to the kin of both the
raped and the rapist, that the rapist has power.
Both the Negroes and their liberal White and
Jewish admirers, for having labored tirelessly to boost
this race into a position of political power all out of
proportion with its numbers and contributions to
society, have long recognized one simple if
media-overlooked fact: Black-on-White rape, as a
political act, has always been part of the world view of
radicals and Communists. For example, it was taught at
the infamous Jefferson School –- a well-known Marxist
training center that sent many prominent American
Communists of the ’60s to their activities –- by
Judeo-Communist historian Dr. Herbert Aptheker, among
others.
Besides being listed as a noted leader
in the Communist Party USA for decades, a delegate to
Hanoi with Tom Hayden during the Vietnam War and father
of Communist Party USA national committee member cum
prominent feminist Bettina Aptheker, this Jewish
professor Herbert Aptheker was also reportedly a close
associate of the Black Panthers, one who maintained
friendship with Panther leader Angela Davis, hence
certainly in a position to know what he was talking
about.
This rather strange Judeo-Communist
attraction to, and alliance with, the Black Power
Movement is not simply the product of comparatively
recent sixties radicalism and Jewish Communists like the
Aptheker Communist Party officers. It includes also
radical Youth International Party (Yippie) leaders such
as Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin and the closely related
Progressive Labor Party (PLP), along with the Young
Socialist Alliance (YSA) and Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS), the leadership of all three groups having
been heavy with leftist Jews. Then there was the
Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) and Student
Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, both with key Jewish
Marxist involvement at their founding. And all this is
certainly nothing new. As far back as 1912, Israel Cohen
referred to the total plot in A Racial Program for
the Twentieth Century:
"We must realize that
our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By
propounding into the consciousness of the dark races
that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites,
we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party.
In America we will aim for subtle victory. While
inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will
endeavor to instill in the Whites a guilt complex for
their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the
Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in
the professions and in the world of sports and
entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be
able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process
which will deliver America to our cause."
The
dedication to this course of action is reinforced by the
words of Rabbi Rabbinovich in Communist Hungary in 1952:
"We will openly reveal our identity with the
races of Asia or Africa. I can state with assurance that
the last generation of White children is now being born.
Our control commission will, in the interests of peace
and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the Whites
to mate with Whites. The White women must co-habit with
members of the dark races, the White man with Black
women. Thus the White race will disappear, for mixing
the dark with the White means the end of the White Man,
and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.
We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of
peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will
rule undisputed over the world. Our superior
intelligence will enable us to retain mastery over a
world of dark peoples."
Additionally, we see
that the majority of the founders and every president of
the radical Black organization, the NAACP, from its
inception in 1909 to well into the 1970s, were part of
an unbroken stream of leftist Jews rather than Negroes;
in fact, there was only one founding Negro (albeit a
light-skinned mulatto Communist) on the board that
founded the organization; most of the rest being Marxist
Jews. One of (the known Marxist) Martin Luther King’s
primary speech-writers and handlers was a Communist Jew
named Levinson. Jews made up the majority of those
"White" freedom riders, having bragged of giving more
than 90% of the funding behind their so-called "civil
rights movement," actually the Black Power Movement,
that continues as a major factor in the destruction of
our society particularly in the South. It should behoove
every White man to research and deeply consider the hows
and whys, and especially the implications behind this
seemingly strange bedfellows alliance.
The
American Communists denied at first that any
Black-on-White rapes ever occurred, such reports being
simply White capitalist propaganda. But when the facts
of several cases became too obvious for even them to
overlook, the party line switched to suggesting that
such acts were not condemnable, rather a semi-laudable
revolutionary statement by the most downtrodden sector
of the proletariat against the privileged and corrupt
elite; it was justified as a form of payback for all of
those White-on-Black rapes they claimed had occurred
both during slavery and after. To such leftists, the
actuality of rape was less "criminal" than for its White
victim to go reporting it to the authorities,
reinforcing the "racist" stereotype. Thus the victim, in
radical Marxist philosophy, became the oppressor –- the
rapist a brave and patriotic freedom-fighter throwing
off his shackles.
The class of educated Negroes,
many of whose most notable members were already either
openly Communist or sympathetic to them, quickly picked
up on this concept of rape as a justified revolutionary
act. Radical Negro and Black Panther leader Eldridge
Cleaver was quoted declaring so openly.
"Rape
was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was
defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his
system of values, and that I was defiling his women –
and this point, I believe, was the most satisfying to me
because I was very resentful. I was getting revenge."
Black sociologist Calvin C. Hernton, in his work
Sex and Racism in America, made the following
statements:
"I am well aware that, like murder,
rape has many motives. But when the motive for rape,
however psychotic, is basically racial, that is a
different matter. I think now that, at one time or
another, in every Negro who grows up in the South, there
is a rapist, no matter how well hidden." The reason for
this, he quickly goes on to indicate, is not the fault
of the Negro, but of the White man, thus reinforcing a
required dogma of radical Communist philosophy.
Although the FBI was inexplicably reluctant to
keep records of race in rape statistics for many years,
there are other figures out there. Consider the
implications of a study done in Washington, DC, a city
with a Black majority, by one Dr. Hayman. Hayman, in the
late ’60s and early ’70s, recorded the racial data of
those women who came to the DC General hospital for
medical examinations and treatment following reported
rapes. His figures are disturbing. In this particular
urban area, Black on Black rape accounted for 76% of all
reported cases of violent sexual assault, while White on
White rape made up 3%, and White on Black rape less than
˝%. Astonishingly, Black on White rape amounted to 21%
of the total, indicating very clearly that urban Blacks
raped not only at a rate of 97 to 3 in comparison to the
urban "White" population (a deceptive figure in itself,
since the statistically much more crime-prone
Mestizo-Hispanic population is considered White in most
official reports), but that they are far, far more
likely to choose White victims than a White rapist is to
choose a Black victim.
In the ground-breaking
study, The Color of Crime, the figures show that
American Negroes in general are 38 times more likely to
commit interracial rape than Whites (again, with
Mestizo-Hispanics who have a much higher crime rate than
ethnic Europeans counted as White) on a per-capita
basis. In fact, even though Blacks make up a fairly
small percentage of the population (about 13%), they
commit the vast majority of all interracial crimes,
including rape, in actual numbers of crimes. For
instance, in 1994, Negroes committed 30,000 interracial
rapes, while Whites (again, including Mestizo-Hispanics)
committed only 5,400, despite a White population several
times larger.
These and other studies have shown
conclusively what interracial rape is. For all practical
purposes, it must be seen that in the general public
rape follows the same pattern as in prison, almost
exclusively a Black on White phenomenon. Which leaves
one with the question: "Why?" Are Blacks simply more
culturally or genetically prone to rape than other
ethnic groups? That answer, from all available
statistics is obviously a resounding "Yes," but there’s
more to it. Radical Blacks and their leftist defenders
have given us that reason – but one we refuse to accept.
Do they know something we don’t, namely that we’re in a
war, not for "equality," as there can never be true and
total equality in an artificially integrated society of
two groups so very different, but a war for the
supremacy of the one and total subjugation and ultimate
destruction of the other, with no middle ground and no
neutrality? Could it be that Caucasians, the White race,
are in a war for their place in the world and,
ultimately, for their very survival, and nobody has told
them?
Or, worse, could it be they’ve been told
many times – by voices "crying in the wilderness" –- but
chose not to hear?
mailto:email@provider
From Council of
Conservative Citizens |
