Fedgovt is now in deep deep shit! The whole story is coming apart at an
accelerating pace! Keep hitting 'em!
Official Transcript: President Bush
admits bombs were in World Trade Towers [Really]
From: Nadia Sindi
<firstname.lastname@example.org> From: <email@example.com>
Official Transcript: President Bush admits bombs were in World Trade
"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of
attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were
to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us
have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us
operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went
at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people
above from escaping. " Posted Oct 31, 2006 08:13 AM
There you have it. President Bush had admitted what the
reported on 9-11; that there were bombs inside the World
Of course, Bush pins the blame for the bombs on Al
Qaeda, which is
sort of accurate when you consider that most of Al
Qaeda is a creation
of US and Israeli intelligence.
in trying to explain away the eyewitness reports of bombs, Bush
himself into a deeper logic hole. How did these "Al Qaeda"
manage to spend at least a week (according to witnesses who
saw them) working inside the buildings under the noses of
and brother, who were in charge of security for the
World Trade Center?
Security at the towers was tight following the
1993 attempted bombing.
You could not simply walk into an elevator
unless you could document
employment or a meeting. Yet as one can tell
from the tell-tale marks
left by the cutter charges, these
preparations took a great deal of
time and materials to carry out.
Why did these "Al Qaeda" bombers
go to the extra effort to drop all
three buildings straight down
instead of toppling them sideways,
maximizing the damage?
If Al Qaeda succeeded in bombing the buildings, why bother with
airplanes? Why bother hiding the bombing itself, if it was truly
work of terrorists out to make a statement?
admitting the bombs, Bush has opened up the inquiry to include the
great amount of incriminating evidence found near the airplanes
the attacks to Arab nations, versus the total absence of any
evidence near the bombs. This contrast is ONLY explained if
evidence left with the airplanes was planted, to frame
Why did it take 5 years for the government to admit what
to everyone right from the start; that explosives were used
down the buildings, unless the original plan was not to admit
bombs in the first place?
Dubya, in his pathetic
attempt to pin the blame for the now-admitted
bombs on Al Qaeda, has
created far more logical problems then he has