- Who is the biggest, baddest bully on the block? That
would have to be the out-of-control US government, right? Maybe
- Let's go back in time a bit and trace how we got to
where we are today. In retracing our steps, we might discover that
we've missed a few clues...
- In the US before WW ONE, there was:
- * No Federal Reserve Bank - banking power was
decentralized and thus much more democratic
* No IRS - wages of
workers were not taxed! all federal revenues came from levies on
imports. personal financial matters were entirely private
national propaganda office - ex. the Kreel Committee created to "sell"
the war to a skeptical public
- The formation of the FBI followed soon after the
- And there you have modern America in a
- A banking system controlled by a handful of private
interests; the government with the ability to impoverish and terrorize
productive people by controlling their take home pay and profits; a
secret police bureau to track, harass, and occasionally murder
dissenters while covering the crimes of the elite; and a policy of
social engineering in which the federal government actively forms
- Many theorize that these "innovations" were
engineered by JP Morgan who had loaned enormous amounts of money to
England and had a vested interest in getting it paid back through an
English victory over Germany. He therefore, got the US involved in the
war and perverted the banking and tax system to help the US pay for
- Then there are those who believe that it was England
itself with its age old skill at conniving that accomplished this for
the purposes of staging a quiet takeover of the United States banking
system as a prelude to eventual re-absorption of the country
- Another faction, believes that the Bank of England
is controlled by a group of crypto-Socialists, the Fabians, whose
members included people like Cecil Rhodes who for philosophical
reasons want to see the world fall under One World socialist rule and
that the Fed-IRS monster among others was their invention to bring the
US into the fold.
- For some reason, another plausible theory - that
this can all be traced to the Vatican - is not in as common
circulation, yet among all the groups accused, they had the clearest
means, motive and opportunity to create and install such systems. More
on that later, but if you grant the possibility that banking empires
like Rothschild's and Morgan's were in fact created and controlled
behind the scenes by another set of very worldly, very experienced and
very rich bankers, it's not so far fetched.
- For an idea of just how powerful these bankers can
be take a look here at their own official (and sanitized) history:
- "Behind the scenes, the Rothschilds were principal
actors in most of the 19th century's major events. The Duke of
Wellington could not have paid his army at Waterloo without
Rothschilds' assistance. Rothschilds' intervention enabled Disraeli to
acquire the Suez Canal for Britain. A Rothschild-led syndicate enabled
France to discharge its reparations debt early after the
Franco-Prussian war. Such transactions, and many more, have entered
banking legend. Then, as now, speed, efficiency and discretion were
qualities highly prized by governments."
- Note that the Rothschilds were the official bankers
for numerous European countries including Catholic countries like
Spain. (It's hard to imagine a private bank getting a monarch-granted
monopoly in a Catholic country where monarchs served at the pleasure
of the Pope.)
- Our founding fathers and many 19th century
luminaries including Samuel Morse, the inventor of the telegraph, were
well aware and outspoken on the dangers of foreign intrigue on the
part of bankers and religionists. Somehow the danger of these forces
is no longer taken seriously and those who even contemplate them are
deemed "conspiracy theorists" and exiled from public dialogue,
"excommunicated" so to speak.
- In any event, whoever was behind the deeds, the WW I
era changed the basic structure of the US and the meaning of
- Gause's somewhat disjointed book "The Secret World
of Money" explains why bankers, especially central bankers, like the
Fed have so much power. In essence, they create and are in a position
to destroy the money supply and thereby control the fate of
- This is particularly noteworthy since the Fed is NOT
a government institution. It is a privately owned bank that has been
given the monopoly to create money by Congress. The ownership in 1983
broke down this way:
- * Citibank 15%
* Chase Manhattan 15%
Morgan Guaranty 9%
* Manny Hanny 7%
* Chemical Bank 8%
- The names have changed, but the basic structure and
ownership of the US's central bank remains. The key points are that it
is in private hands, its financial activities are not subject to
government audit, and it pays no taxes.
- As astonishing as this arrangement may sound, it is
not conspiracy theory. It's the actual legal facts of the situation
and has been since the bank's formation.
- The dangerous ambitions of central bankers have at
previous times in our history been thoroughly appreciated.
- Thomas Jefferson: "If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will
grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until
their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers
- In fact, this has already happened to a significant
portion of the population. They work, but after taxes and inflated
prices for their sustenance, there is nothing left over. They are "one
paycheck away" from financial catastrophe. The number of people on
that precipice has grown steadily and, thanks to the excesses of the
90s, their numbers include millions of the middle class.
- A jump in unemployment (here now) and re-igniting of
inflation (coming) and many of these millions are going to see a
significant drop in their income.
- Here's the key: It's the Fed - a privately owned
institution of murky origins - that calls the tune. Presumably,
Greenspan's bumbling demeanor notwithstanding, the fellows at the top
plan ahead. In other words, they know well in advance that the party
will end with a thud and a lot of Americans are going to be
financially traumatized. The predictable response to such things is
outrage, bitterness, and search for a scapegoat.
- Since not one in ten thousand knows to blame it on
the Fed, the scapegoat will be "the government." The government knows
this and has been preparing for it. Note that, for reasons that make
little sense otherwise, the military has been conducting training
operations INSIDE US cities. The claim made is that this is to prepare
for urban warfare overseas. It makes far more sense that the
preparation is for military work right here in the US. Now, of course,
thanks to 9-11, armed National Guard troops are an every day sight in
US airports, train stations and other public places. In short, they're
- Now, let's look at history.
- WW ONE era Germany was morally neither better or
worse than its opponents. But one thing it was NOT, was
Vatican-friendly. In fact, it was the bastion of Protestantism, and a
rejector of Vatican power in Europe. WW I destroyed that
- After crushing German society, the major New York
banks (which owned the Fed), and the corporations they controlled,
started to rebuild Germany under Hitler. In fact, they were quite
generous to him during a time when the US economy was starving for
investment. Why did they do this?
- Did they simply see Hitler as someone who would do
their bidding. i.e. build a strong, anti-labor industrialized state
that they could "deal with. That's the story most often told, but it
does not ring true because the aid they gave to Germany was clearly
being used to build a huge military machine, not a productive economy.
In fact, Hitler was not only provided with military capacity, he was
provided by nominally US corporations with technology that was well in
advance of what was available to the US military of the time.
- Clearly, the Fed which controls the US money supply
and the banks which doled out the loans had to know they were building
a Europe-conquering army and putting it in the hands of Hitler, a
personally violent, anti-Semitic, anti-Slav militarist with huge
ambitions. What sense did that make? Why did the New York banks care
about destroying Jewish and Slavic (i.e. Christian Orthodox)
populations in Europe? Did they merely "tolerate" this personal quirk
of the Nazis in order to get what they wanted - a captive client
controlling industrial Europe - or was the destruction of non-Catholic
populations in eastern Europe and Russia an essential part of their
plan. (Recall that Hitler eliminated Catholics too, but that was early
on and they were mostly *liberal* Catholics or those who for whatever
reason refused to accept his Reich.)
- Now, what the the Reich anyway? It was supposed to
last 1,000 years. It proposed to rule the entirety of Europe. It
incorporated Roman elements in architecture and design. It showed a
positive genius for iconography and pageantry. It very quickly
developed a massive and highly sophisticated terror apparatus.
- And supposedly all this was accomplished by a
handful of penniless, street fighting thugs in what amounted to a
historical eye blink.
- I've already shown direct, close and very personal
links between Himmler and the hierarchy of the Jesuit order. It's
known that the Vatican was actively involved in helping Nazis escape
Europe and that some of these Nazis even found high level employment
waiting for them at the Knights of Malta-controlled OSS/CIA who since
WW II have, against all common sense and logic, engaged in similar
population destroying campaigns (Orthodox Christians in Yugoslavia,
Buddhists in Vietnam, Mayans in Guatemala, Liberal Catholics in Chile,
animists in Africa, Kurds and Muslims in Iraq)
- Given these facts, is it a stretch to speculate that
independent, socially progressive, prosperous pre WW ONE anti-Vatican
Germany was destroyed specifically so that it could be rebuilt again
under Vatican control and that the New York banks, given dictatorial
power during the same war, consciously aided that effort? And that the
Third Reich was intended, from the start. to: 1) eliminate Jews and
Orthodox Christians from Europe and 2) rule Europe Roman-style with
the Vatican as its banker/controller?
- Somewhere along the line, the plan changed. Perhaps
the Vatican lost control of Hitler or it decided to go after the
bigger prize, the US. In any event, by engineering the destruction of
the Third Reich, it was able to see the uncontrollable Nazis killed
off while the cooperative ones were rewarded with positions in the US
(or criminal empires in the drug trade in South America supported by
- How can one fully explain that fact that Bill
Donovan, founder of the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA and Reinhard
Gehlen, Hitler's Intelligence Chief for East Europe, become such fast
friends after the war?
- Perhaps by this simple fact: BOTH were members of
the Knights of Malta, a Vatican-controlled military society. Both
received high honors from the Order after the war, the highest of
honors going to Gehlen, the Nazi in 1948!
- Donovan was not the only Knight of Malta to have a
controlling position in the formation of post War US intelligence. Far
from it. Henry Luce, James Angleton, Allen Dulles, John McCone, and
William Casey were all members too.
- Doesn't this simple fact help explain the perverse
and bizarre "work" the CIA has perpetrated over the past fifty odd
years better than any other analysis?
- After all what has been the CIA's work?
Coincidentally, if you study it in its actual details, it dovetails
precisely with very specific goals the Vatican and Jesuits publicly
vowed to achieve nearly 500 years ago: the destruction of the
Reformation and other "heresies" and the re-imposition of Vatican
control over the entire world. Just like the old days. All
institutions (education, medicine, entertainment, scholarship,
banking, the military, government, science) under the Pope.
- Here's the "legal" argument the Vatican made (and
has never retracted) on this very point:
- "Christ is the Lord of the whole world. At his
departure he left his dominion to his representatives, Peter and his
successors. Therefore the fullness of all spiritual and temporal power
and dominion, the union of all rights and privileges, lies in the
hands of the pope. Every monarch, even the most powerful, possesses
only so much power and territory as the pope has transferred to him or
finds good to allow him."
- It sounds like grandiose, wishful thinking on the
Vatican's part from a distant time in its history, but one can read
the following on the Vatican's own web site today: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/index.htm
- "In exercising supreme, full, and immediate power in
the universal Church, the Roman pontiff makes use of the departments
of the Roman Curia which, therefore, perform their duties in his name
and with his authority for the good of the churches and in the service
of the sacred pastors."
- Supreme authority over a UNIVERSAL church.
- In the "old days" this massively wealthy, highly
sophisticated manipulator of minds, nations and rulers, believed that
all the world belonged to it and that any other entity professing
sovereignty independent of it was an interloper and therefore,
according to Jesuit doctrine, deserving of total annihilation by any
means fair or foul. This activity of deliberately destroying of the
Vatican's enemies was determined by jesuitical analysis to be a
positive, spiritual good. (By the way, "jesuitical" is a word you'll
find in most serious dictionaries.)
- When exactly did this policy of destroying others in
order to enhance the authority of the pontiff change?
- After training Nazis like Himmler and fencing vast
quantities of gold stolen from Jews and others and then helping
countless Nazis escape prosecution and then placing several of them at
the heart of the US intelligence apparatus... when exactly did the
Vatican reform itself?
- What are they up to now and, most intriguing to me,
why is there total silence on the subject today, right, left, and in
the middle? Even "conspiracy theorists" are silent, prefering to trace
the world's sorrows to an a vaguely defined "Illuminati."
- One last thing to chew on:
- "(In addition to diplomatic relations with 172
countries), (t)he Holy See has Diplomatic Relations also with the
European Union and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
- The Holy See has relations of a special nature with
the Russian Federation and with the Palestine Liberation Organization
- They're busy alright, but doing what exactly? And
why do so few people ask?
Site Served by