In July and August I will be revising and reposting essential
articles from the past year or so. This originally appeared as
"Proof! World Government is a Banker Ruse" in May 2004.
On Independence Day, it is sobering to remember that the
U.S. has been a financial colony of Britiain for at least 100 years.
This is confirmed by the "Col. E.M. House Report", a chilling
10-page "progress report" dated June 10, 1919, which portrays the
United States in these terms.
The author is Col. Edward
Mandell House (1858-1938), the Rothschild agent who secretly
directed U.S. affairs during the Woodrow Wilson administration. Col.
House was known as Wilson's friend and "alter ego." (He had not
served in the military and the term "Colonel" was merely honorary.)
The report is addressed to British Prime Minister David Lloyd
George, whose career was made as a lawyer for the World Zionist
The report details Col. House's progress in preparing "for the
peaceful return of the American colonies to the dominion of the
Crown." The League of Nations was a facade for British hegemony,
which means the hegemony of London-based international bankers.
House writes: "We have wrapped this plan in the peace treaty so
that the world must accept from us the League or a continuance of
the war. The League is in substance the Empire with America
admitted on the same basis as our other colonies." (Emphasis
The report oozes contempt for Americans. "The plain people of
this country are inveterate and incurable hero worshipers," Col.
House explains. A man with a slogan that expresses their "undefined
aspirations" can manipulate them easily.
Afterwards, they will trust the sloganeer no matter what he does.
[Woodrow] Wilson has gained this trust and this accounts for "his
exceptional usefulness to us."
Rep. Jacob Thorkelson (1876-1945) introduced The House Report to
Congress in Oct.1939 and published it in the Congressional Record
(Oct. 13 1939, pp.598-604). Attempts to delete it were thwarted. The
complete text is available on
British bankers took over the U.S. during the Teddy Roosevelt
Administration (1901-1909) when Rothschild front J.P. Morgan alone
controlled 25% of American business.
"Crown" refers to the owners of the Bank of England. Their
identities are an offical secret. According to E.C. Knuth, the
"international financial oligarchy uses the allegoric 'Crown' as its
symbol of power and has its headquarter in the ancient city of
London...the giant Bank of England, a privately owned institution...
is not subject to regulation by the British parliament and is in
effect a sovereign world power." (The Empire of the City, p.
Col. House continues: The "peaceful return of the American
colonies" can only be brought about with "the consent of the
dominant group of the controlling clans."
Col. House relates how these classes are being taught to accept
"British" leadership. He details how the universities and press are
staffed by "British-born" or Canadians.
"Through the Red Cross, the Scout movement, the YMCA, the church,
and other humane, religious, and quasi-religious organizations, we
have created an atmosphere of international effort which strengthens
the idea of unity of the English speaking world."
The Overseas Clubs, service clubs, and war charities "enable us
to pervade all sections and classes of the country."
We "hold all American newspapers as isolated from the
non-American world as if they had been in another planet instead of
another hemisphere. The realization of this by the Associated Press
and the other universal news gatherers, except Hearst, was most
helpful in bringing only our point of view to the papers they
He boasts that the United States "while still maintaining an
outward show of independence" is identical with other colonies in
its relationship to the Crown. "Has not President Wilson cancelled
the big Navy program and dutifully conceded to us the command of the
He boasts that "the Anglo American alliance" has become "the
unchallenged financiers of the world."
He congratulates "our fiscal agents Messrs Pierpont Morgan &
Company" for "putting this country into the war." They exert
"widespread influence on newspaper policy" through advertising and
lent $200,000,000 to Japan to build a fleet to compete with America
(making the U.S still more dependent on England.)
Col. House boasts that the "Crown" used money lent by the U.S.
government for war purposes to buy up oil fields in California,
Mexico and Latin America. "The war has made us custodians of the
greater part of the world's raw materials... [We] now largely
control the oil fields of the world and thereby the world's
transportation and industry."
THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS RUSE
The pressing issue now is to "transfer its dangerous
sovereignty from this colony to the custody of the Crown. We must,
in short, now bring America within the Empire."
The first step was Wilson's plan for the League of Nations "which
we prepared for him."
"Any abrupt change might startle the ignorant American masses and
rouse them to action against it. And us. Our best policy therefore
would be to appoint President Wilson the first president of the
League... he will be able to satisfy [Americans] that far from
surrendering their independence to the League, they are actually
extending their sovereignty by it..."
Foreshadowing The Patriot Act, Col. House says Woodrow Wilson
"alone can father an anti-Bolshevik act which judicially interpreted
will enable appropriate punitive measures to be applied to any
American who may be unwise enough to assert that America must once
again declare her independence."
Col. House goes into great detail about how Wilson must be
messaged and manipulated. Many people think someone else wrote this
Report but only Edward Mandell House knew Wilson this well.
For example he says Wilson "is easily slighted and remarkably
vindictive." The new British ambassador should be a "Wilson
worshipper" and "a gentleman-in-waiting to the President." He lists
the gifts Wilson already has been given.
"OUR ENTIRE SYSTEM OF THOUGHT CONTROL" IS AT WORK
Col. House suggests staging the first session of the League
of Nations in Washington.
"This will convince these simple people that they are the League
and its power resides in them."
He recommends a "series of spectacles by which the mob may be
diverted from any attempt to think too much of matters beyond their
"While awaiting these diversions for the vulgar, we are
incessantly instructing them in the wonders of the league. Its
praises are thundered by our press, decreed by our college
presidents, and professed by our professors. Our authors, writers
and lecturers are analysing its selected virtues... we have enlisted
8000 propagandists for the League. We have organized international
and national synods, committees, conferences, convocations,
conventions, councils...to herald the birth of the League as the
dawn of universal peace."
"Agriculturalists, bankers, brokers, accountants, chemists, and
all other functional groups capable of exerting organized
professional, business, financial or social pressure are meeting to
endorse the League in the name of peace, progress and
prosperity...Our film concerns are preparing an epoch-making
"In short, our entire system of thought control is working
ceaselessly, tirelessly, ruthlessly, to ensure the adoption of the
League. And it will be adopted, for business wants peace, the
righteous cannot resist a covenant, and the politicians, after
shadow boxing for patronage purposes, will yield valiantly lest the
fate of the wanton and wilful pursue them."
The House Report unveils the reality behind globalization and
the United Nations. If ever we needed proof of a long-term
conspiracy to subvert national sovereignty and ensnare humanity,
this is it.
Thanks to the valiant opposition of Republican Senators, the
United States rejected the Peace Treaty and with it the League of
Nations Nov. 19,1919. The plot was temporarily foiled.
But the British bankers' covert campaign to impose world tyranny
has not abated. They financed Hitler and engineered the Depression
and World War Two. The League of Nations was resurrected as the
United Nations in 1945 and the "Cold War" hoax initiated. Many
believe we are in the early stages of "World War Three."
The New World Order, world government and globalization are all
extensions of British imperialism which itself is the expression of
the financial hegemony of central bankers and their minions.
All segments of society continue to be propagandized with the
virtues of the UN. National institutions are subverted. The press
and education continue to be controlled. Politicians are
Americans are helping to build the 'new world order' for its
master, "the Crown." In Col. House's words, Americans will be
colonists who have to "petition at the foot of the throne."
The references to control of oilfields suggest that oil is first
and foremost an instrument of world domination. The final stage of
world tyranny involves gaining complete control of Middle Eastern
oil. This explains Iraq and portends an invasion of Iran.
The threat cannot be characterized as strictly "Jewish." The
Rothschilds have received a degree of collaboration from the world's
financial, cultural and political elites so as to render this point
mute. [Essentially collaboration is the price of admission.]
Lemming-like, Western elites have embraced a death-wish for
Americans surround themselves with symbols that
represent who they think they are or want to be. Symbols and slogans
conveniently defer introspection and curiosity.
True patriotism and love of country requires we go beyond
putting Support Your Troops magnets or flags on our cars. The
Great American experiment in democracy is in crisis and immediate
jeopardy. The most secretive administration ever has installed a
repressive security apparatus paving the way for dictatorship and
martial law awaiting an 'event' to trigger the trap set for us.
Unless we become active participants and educate ourselves about the
crisis that is rapidly enveloping us the Great Experiment will end.
Americans aren't stupid but uninformed of what is really
happening in their country and the world because of the dumbed down
content and propaganda they consume in the mainstream media (MSM)
and the public educational system. Recent studies have declared that
high school graduates are unable to write a coherent sentence;
schools teach information and expect students to retain and
regurgitate data, not connect them. This is by design; the elite do
not want too many critical thinkers in a diminished economy.
Information is the currency of the realm. The Internet today
offers our best hope for our education and research, at least until
the Elite figure out how to replace it with the restricted and
establishment controlled Internet 2 currently being developed.
Information is managed and edited in the MSM and propaganda is an
acceptable tool long used in media and education. Spin is the method
of the day used to confuse and deflect. The Infotainment
IndustryMSM and Hollywood combinedshare financial, operational and
propaganda interests. A recent example is the TV docudrama Oil
Storm on Fox TV on June 5 that served the goals of putting fear
into Americans about losing their oil lifeline and their American
way of life and to gather support for the 21st Century Oil Wars by
calling them the War on Terror, which is phony and being used by the
psychopaths to divide us and reduce our numbers. The Bush
administration is supported by Fox (aka GOP TV) owner Rupert
Murdoch. Similarly, other media events usually have some ulterior
motive to influence the public in some way.
For us to fully appreciate our current crisis we have to review
our media history.
Walter Lippmann, the prominent journalist in the 1920s, said that
the public must be put in its place. He believed, as did Woodrow
Wilson and the Elite, that the responsible men (Elite) should manage
the 'common interests' and 'live free of the trampling and the roar
of a bewildered herd,' the ignorant and meddlesome outsiders. The
only function the 'herd' has was to trample periodically in support
of one or another element of the leadership class in an
As the 'herd' in the last century became more enlightened ever
more sophisticated mechanisms for controlling information and
perceptions have developed. The manufacture of consent, a term
created by Edward Bernays, the father of the Public Relations
industry, author of Propaganda and coincidentally Sigmund
Freud's nephew, has become an art form and required of journalists.
Bernays says: "Those who manipulate the organized habits and
opinions of the masses constitute an invisible government which is
the true ruling power of our country. . . . we are dominated by a
relatively small number of persons. . . as civilization has become
more complex. . . . the technical means have been invented and
developed by which opinion may be regimented. . . . I must lead the
people. Am I not their servant?
"The invisible government tends to be concentrated in the
hands of the few because of the expense of manipulating the social
machinery which controls the opinions and habits of the masses. It
is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of
our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons
operating behind the scenes."
Expanding on this understanding about the MSM and the Public
Relations industry (the propaganda machine) we can include
gatekeepers, or sources considered to be on the left (so-called
liberals), who are charged with making sure that dissent and
alternative views do not stray too far off the reservation of Elite
Excluded topics include the 9/11 Truth Movement, the New World
Order, the City Of London financial center, chemtrails, the Federal
Reserve, Inc., etc. It is safe to assume that your letters to the
editor are monitored and pre-selected prior to printing. I suspect
that some letters and articles in The New York Times (as elsewhere)
are fictitious, manufactured and planted, like the Judith Miller
articles on WMDs (with con man Chalabi as her source) in the NYT
prior to the current Iraq War that encouraged the congressional vote
to go to war. MSM always supports and benefits from war. CNN's Aaron
Brown declared that now that we are at war we have to get behind the
government and the troops disregarding CNN's obvious cheerleading
efforts to build support before the war.
My purpose of this article is to address the obvious fantasies
about our democracy and the so-called free press (MSM) and their
failure to provide Americans with real information for making
educated decisions; we are considered the least informed population
in the world. The MSM and most gatekeepers are believed to be
infiltrated with CIA personnel and work explicitly for the Elites in
power, in corporations, government and banking and serve to protect
their interests in the US and abroad. My ultimate purpose is to
compel Americans to wake up and begin to explore what is going on
and to become engaged in their lives and their children's futures.
It is not my intent here to go into all the aspects that
constitute the over arching plan (conspiracy, some would say) to
create a One (New) World (Order) Governmenta generational and
incremental implementation process that, now in its final stages,
presently threatens the world with the 21st Century Oil Wars and the
destruction of what little sovereignty is left in America and
elsewhere (observe this process in the EU).
Neo-liberalism / Globalism (imperialism disguised as democracy
and free trade) are names used to describe the acquisition and
consolidation of ever greater wealth, natural resources, total
political power and control over others and are the motivational
forces which drive the decisions by the international Elite. They
control the transnational corporations, the 200-plus think tanks
(the Council On Foreign Relations being foremost in the US) which
exist to facilitate their goals, the foundations (Carnegie, Ford,
Rockefeller, etc), the World Bank, IMF, WTO, the Federal Reserve (a
private corporation never audited and with no congressional
oversight); this influence is pervasive and can only be truly
appreciated as one researches the various issues.
Themes and Trends
The recent Online Journal report on Bilderberg 2005 confirms the
intent and complicity of our leaders and the transnational
corporations and banking interests they serve to create a One World
Government using the UN, or similar institution, and to further
diminish America economically and to ultimately abdicate US
sovereignty and the Constitution to a Regional and subsequent World
Power while enriching themselves and accumulating power in the
The Congress, MSM (including CPB, NPR and PBS), all academic and
other Institutions, with rare and generally marginalized,
individuals as exceptions, are in general alignment with this
'conspiracy.' This diverse involvement is reflected in the roster of
the 4,000 or so members of the Council on Foreign Relations, a group
described as, superficially an innocent forum for academics,
businessman, politicians, contains within its shell, perhaps unknown
to many of its members, the power elite that unilaterally determines
US foreign policy. The major objective of this submerged - and
obvious subversiveforeign policy is the acquisition of markets and
economic power (profits) for a small group of giant multi-nationals
under the virtual control of a few banking investment houses and
The Royal Institute of International Affairs, in London (the
center of power for the New World Order elite), founded its American
wing, the CFR, funded by the Rockefellers, in 1921. The RIIA's
patron is the Queen of England.
CNN has recently been using CFR 'spokespeople' to get Americans
to accept them as 'mainstream' and also uses other conservative
think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings
and CATO Institutes to disseminate their views designed to shape
American perceptions and beliefs.
Think tanks provide the two supposedly oppositional political
parties with intellectual material and propaganda. Issues are used
as smokescreens and for public distraction and confusion while
greater and more relevant issues are ignored or downplayed. What we
witness in MSM is the allowed official version of realitymuch of it
staged theatre. It is apparent as one examines (CFR, TC, Bilderberg
member) Bill Clinton's record (presiding over NAFTA, media
consolidation, FDA approval of GMO going into the world's food
supply via Monsanto, laid the foundations for the USA PATRIOT Act,
passed welfare 'reform' etc.) and associations that he is as much
(if not more so) a Globalist / New World Order operative as George
Bush is. Both parties serve the same masters as one can see from the
Bilderberg attendance list.
John Edwards auditioned at the annual Bilderberg meeting in 2004;
apparently the elite chose to stay the course with George Bush. One
cannot become president of the US without the Elites' explicit
approval. The election is a formality and exercise for the benefit
of creating the illusion of an ongoing democracy. The 'free speech
zone' areas created by both parties in 2004 were their version of
democracy. The MSM (already) is focusing on the battle for the White
House 2008, creating mythologies of opposing individuals and
distracting the public with a hope for change that never comesas
both parties work towards the creation of a New World Order with the
United States as a much reduced power, economically and militarily.
Remember that politicians are the fronts for (or part of) the Elites
and as such share in their fortunes and power. One need only look at
the Bush dynasty and their involvement in and creation of their
fortunes and power by the Military / Industrial / Intelligence
Complex. War is profitable.
Henry Kissinger (perennial Bilderberg, Trilateral, CFR member)
received knighthood from the Queen of England in 1995 for his
lifelong devoted service to the Crown; after years of trying to
retake the American colonies the City of London decided to
infiltrate through the CFR and other ways to reclaim their perceived
influence over their new addition to the Empire; and so it appears
it has. Their conspiracy has become our fact.
Conspiracy theories are a convenient 'slide' term used by MSM and
others to short circuit further inquiry into a matter. The greatest
conspiracy is the one created by this concept that keeps people from
being inquisitive and concerned about the health and direction of
their country. As noted, only a small group of Elites know the full
scope of their agenda while those outside are given information on a
need to know basis and as loyalty and subservience is developed move
closer to the center of affluence and control. A corporation is a
perfect example of this where one can succeed and move up the
hierarchy as long as one fulfills the needs of the corporation but
if one challenges the system, then you could be ejected and possibly
blacklisted from entry into other corporations. In this way, people
buy into the system and by being invested in it are reluctant to
jeopardize their position and wealth. Hierarchy assures compliance,
promotions or corrective actions if needed. America is a
transnational corporation (an Enron) disguised as a government; a
form described as totalitarian corporatism.
What can you do?
As Catherine Austin Fitts and others suggest, voting, writing to
your representatives or editors has limited, if any effect, but
continue letting them know what you think. The system is generally
rigged with gatekeepers to marginalize any dissent or
The only practical options open are to divert our financial and
personal support for the tapeworm (the system) by withdrawing our
attention from TV (shut it off) and its mind control and our money
out of large multinational banks and corporations that depend on our
money to survive, and putting it into local banks and businesses;
cut up all your credit cards. Support local efforts to develop
sustainable economies and environmental initiatives; get to know
your neighbors and share what you know.
Ultimately, the tapeworm will have only itself to devour.
Stop supporting the so-called two-party system that is really two
groups belonging to the same business party that share the One World
Government agenda. The continuity of bipartisan corruption clearly
shows that, with rare exceptions like Reps Cynthia McKinney and Ron
Paul, their allegiance is to the international elite and not to the
To print this article, go to the Articles and open
this article from there. All articles in the archives are printer
This is our legacy to our children? A porn generation? I was
talking with a sweet young 14-year-old girl the other day. She was
depressed. "All the boys I've been friends with at school, really
friends with, they're now acting so inappropriately."
No, she wasn't hurt by anyone. But, she says, "I have to slap
them and it's really upsetting. I know they're watching
pornography,"she adds. "That's where they get all that stuff from.
And it hurts, also because they are ruining their own lives." She
chokes back the tears.
Don't expect Dr. Phil or any other television maven to reveal
pornography for what it is: a major erototoxic virus infecting most
exposed. The virus was released into society December 1953 when Hugh
Hefner used it to emasculate Joe College. Rendered impotent without
fantasy sex, millions of men over time crossing every political,
racial, religious, educational and socioeconomic boundary lost the
virility and virtue needed to protect their wives and children from
the current porn deluge. And when men are emasculated, popping
Viagra while lusting after tragic centerfold paper and celluloid and
computer dollies, women turn away from home and embrace work that
may be empty but is reliable.
Benjamin Shapiro, a strapping young 21-year-old author,
columnist, survivor of UCLA and current Harvard Law s\School
warrior, has written the book for parents and youths, Porn
Generation: How Social Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future
(published by Regnery, a Human Events sister company). Shapiro's
Judeo-Christian advocacy is sane, compassionate, documented and easy
to take, although he has drawn the wrath of many suffering the pains
Shapiro tells the baby boomers and liberals who make up the
current leadership in this country that they need to take
responsibility for what they've done to American society.
Shapiro observes that if children infected with venereal disease
from oral sodomy at age 12 are not seen as a broken nation, we
aren't looking hard enough. The baby boomers and grown-up flower
children became the mass media and education authorities who have
corrupted society, writes Shapiro.
Of course, I find this young man especially wise in his awareness
of the role of Alfred Kinsey in normalizing the porn generation.
Describing Kinsey's impact he says, Kinsey claimed that Americans
were secret perverts and sex maniacs. By lying about our parents and
grandparents, Kinsey invalidated morality as a a social ideal. Then,
using the old bait and switch trick, says Shapiro, Kinsey pulls out
the tattered hypocrisycharge.
The only way to alleviate guilt became abdication of moral sexual
standards, he says. And when the chief goal is erasing guilt, even
for immoral actions, all that remains is narcissism.
Shapiro argues, with strong support, that discarding traditional
morality gave our children over to social liberals, who control our
culture through music, film, television and other mass media so that
the normal is now considered deviant. He says the effects upon his
generation are disastrous.
I do not think Shapiro exaggerates. Like it or not, the porn
generation is the future of this country, says Shapiro. Think of
that and consider what decisions will be made by future judges,
juries, legislators, prosecutors and Presidents who are pornography
It is not a good era for parents to rear their young. They try to
restrict the erotically laced videos, rap, adverts and Internet
porn. Now they are faced with Rainbow Party, a Simon Pulse book (a
division of Simon & Schuster) by Paul Ruditis that has little
girls pick out different lipstick colors to practice for some
boy-girl oral sex orgies. The boomer generation led to Gen X that
logically has produced the X-Rated Porn Generation.
Shapiro's writing is crisp and right on target. And take a deep
breath folks, because the young man is pointing his finger at most
of adult society, for children now are paying with their lives for
the adult selfishness and abandonment of strong moral standards.
Most parents are not nearly in the know enough about the problems
their children face in trying to survive their toxic porn
environment. Shapiro's is a critical wake-up call for parents and it
is a book that can give them the knowledge necessary to begin to
turn around the amorality that is destroying their children.
"I am a member of a lost generation," Shapiro writes. "Never in
our country's history has a generation been so empowered, so
wealthy, so privileged-and yet so empty."
Pornography will not go away unless we treat it like an
environmental toxin. Pornography was never about sex. It was always
about emasculating men and neuro-chemically linking sexual lust with
shame, fear, violence and degradation.
Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, has written
frequently for HUMAN EVENTS on Alfred Kinsey. She is the author of
Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences The Red Queen and the Grand
Scheme" and the soon to be released Kinsey's Attic: How One
Man's Sexual Pathology Changed the World.
All in all, it is an impressive bit of work for a mere 38
years. The same-sex marriage bill that passed the House of Commons
yesterday was the final chapter in a story that began in 1967, when
then-justice minister Pierre Trudeau introduced his Omnibus Bill.
Famous for its decriminalizing of homosexual acts (" ... the state
has no place in the bedrooms of the nation"), it was the
liberalization of divorce laws that led more directly to where we
And where we are is that civil marriage in Canada is simply the
conferring of legal recognition and benefits upon a conjugal
relationship, with no reference in principle to permanence, progeny
or public benefit. We have achieved, with the redefinition of
marriage to include homosexual partners, the reduction of marriage
to a mere sexual relationship.
That is an astonishing accomplishment in less than four decades.
Mobilizing the resources of the state behind sex seems rather
superfluous; there has never been a lack of interest. An older
wisdom sought to mobilize the state behind marriage, which at its
core was about bridling unruly passions for the purposes of social
stability and the upbringing of children.
What happened back in 1967? Trudeau's Omnibus Bill made divorce
easier, which would in due course flower into full no-fault divorce,
which renders marriage the only contract unilaterally breakable by
either party, at any time, for any reason.
It was from there a short step to the conferring of spousal
benefits on those who weren't married, but in conjugal relationship.
Common-law "spouses" get the benefits without the commitment.
When civil marriage is thus stripped of its permanence and its
commitment, what is left to distinguish a married relationship from
any friendship? Sex. Hetero or homo, it doesn't matter. Ergo,
So we have arrived at the curious position that the state doesn't
much care about what goes on in the rest of the house, but is
mightily interested in what goes on in the bedroom. Civil marriage
is now not about anything else.
One of the incongruities of debate over homosexual marriage is
that advocates argued that it would encourage monogamy and
stability. As my colleague, Andrew Coyne, has put it: "The
conservative case for gay marriage expresses itself in the hope that
marriage may have the same civilizing effect on homosexuals that it
does on heterosexuals, encouraging stable, monogamous relationships
and the social values that go with them."
It was an incongruous argument because we have been, post-1967,
busily undermining all that makes marriage stable and
Now, barring a reversal in a future Parliament, we have same-sex
marriage. How about we start shoring up those civilizing effects in
law, on the principle that what is good for two ganders might be
good for the goose and gander too?
A good place to start might be the treatment of common-law
spouses. The research data show that cohabiting couples split up
more often than married ones do, and married couples who were
cohabiting before marriage have a higher divorce rate than those who
were not. Cohabitation is a recipe for social instability, exposing
women and children in particular to the insecurity of sequential
What public good is served by encouraging cohabitation? The
principle that state benefits should be available wherever there is
regular sex is not conducive to social stability. Now that
homosexuals have the ability to contract civil marriage, and no
vestige of "discrimination" holds, why shouldn't the government
insist that marital benefits require marital promises?
And while we're at it, why shouldn't those marital promises mean
what they say? Namely, that the bond of permanence cannot be broken
unless the terms of the (civil) marriage contract have themselves
been broken, or that the parties mutually agree to break the
contract? Why shouldn't marital contracts be at least as strong as,
say, the contract to renovate the kitchen, where one party cannot
unilaterally break it?
Such reforms are hardly on the political agenda, but they should
have the support of those who argued so passionately that marriage
needed to be radically changed to accommodate homosexuals. If that
support is not there, it will be clear that the same-sex marriage
debate had little to do with marriage, and everything to do with
state-sanctioned homosexual sex. Indeed, a long road has been
travelled since 1967.
But the burden of carrying this debate forward does not lie
principally with the advocates of same-sex marriage. It was not they
who dismantled marriage these past four decades. That was done long
beforehand, and now we will see if there is any constituency for
reversing that trend. If not, yesterday definitively marked the
consummation of the decline of marriage.
Thank you SO much for your candidness in your
articles [on relationships.] You hit the nail on the head, as far as
I am concerned. My husband and I have had MANY discusions on this
very topic. We are both 24 years of age (young - I know), but I
think it is so sad that the male gender has been"emasculated," as
you say. I've heard my husband say those exact words before. It
happens in everyday life, in plitics, in families, even in TV
I was raised to be, and still am very much so, a
strong woman. So is my mother, and my grandmother before that.
However, my parents felt strongly that marriage, ordained of God,
was designed to work a specific way, and anything other than that
plan would be a feeble attempt at what a real marriage should be. As
young as I am, I have NO problem accepting and rejoicing in the fact
that I am a woman. My mind and emotions work differently than do my
My goal as his wife is to do whatever I can to help him be all
that he has the potential to be. What kind of wife would I be if I
did not place all my turst in him and enable him to live up to his
fullest potential? On the flip-side, he has a responsibility to care
for, love, and support me. That's what makes me a good wife (I hope)
and him a wonderful husband.
I love the fact that you point
out how a woman who trusts a man will be able to give him her power.
I agree completely. I trust my husband so much that, in times when
we may disagree in a course of action, I am able to trust him to
have MY best intrest at heart and choose his way.
That is how a marriage should work. Likewise, he knows that I am
devoted to him and heeds my opinion as sound advice.
Again, I cannot begin to tell you how true this rings in my
heart. Knowing that there are others who see marriage and modern
feminism in the way you described in your article, only deepens my
determination to love my husband more and raise my children to value
these same priciples.
Thank you, T
horrid thing about living in a society under fascism is how
it distorts positive things, like friendships. It is around my
friend that I have to be most chameleon. It is emotionally
taxing. Fascist brainwashing makes such situations much more than
mere difference of opinion. The brainwashed part of that person's
perception of reality has been deliberately tied into a deep,
territorial/defence part of the brain. To disagree with such a
mind, is to trigger a primitive response. From that state of
mind, the person is quite capable of 'turning you in to the
Gestapo', and hating you because their mind is conditioned to see
disagreement as 'the enemy', in black and white.
I do not understand the process by which he can see reality this
way. I can only guess. In his case, he has so many years invested
in a right wing, 'conservative' world view, that as it was
progressively infiltrated by neocon PysOps manipulators, he's
been drawn further and further in.
Now, this is a subtle aspect of what I see going on in the
psychology of citizens I know in the American environment. To
have wanted Bush president because of moral disgust at Clinton's
sexual sleazyness, in the belief that Bush is a Christian, 'God
Fearing' and 'Bible based' man. To learn to hate 'liberals and
democrats', for crying foul over the 2000 election, delaying the
precious leader's ascent to the White House, where he would make
America a great and moral nation again. To learn to hate the
entire muslim world of 'rag heads' for blowing up the WTC.
To have totally supported invasion of the Middle East at any
point of entry, on any excuse, in order to fulfill America's
Chritian destiny to bring Jesus to the heathens. Onward Christian
soldiers...... To finally feel strange feelings when reports from
the front aren't coming in as envisioned. But having gone so far,
rationalizing and agreeing with anything Rumsfeld or Rove spins
on it. 'We are right, get over it'.
I think it's a matter of long term emotional investment. Self
identity investment, too.
Very sad. Really. I can't risk challanging my best oldest friend
on the most important issues of our time, because in this area,
he is brainwashed and could be dangerous if triggered.
So this is what life in Germany felt like back in the
30's. What's most disturbing to me about that fact, is that the
Germans were still behind Hitler until the very end. The only
thing that stopped fascism in Germany was overwhelming military
force from the outside. Short of Divine Intervention or the
appearance of benevolent beings from outer space, I don't see any
light at the end of this tunnel, and it depresses me. I really
don't know what to do.
For years, I struggled to comprehend how the good people of
Germany could allow someone such as Adolph Hitler to lead them into
what became World War II. After all, before Hitler's rise to power,
Germany had a rich Christian heritage. The Reformation out of the
Dark Ages had its roots deeply imbedded in Germany and surrounding
Furthermore, Germany has long produced some of the most
intelligent and creative people on the planet! Many of the world's
greatest engineers and scientists have come from Germany and
Austria. When it comes to knowledge and education, the Germanic
people take a back seat to no one.
How, then, could the good, intelligent people of Germany follow
and support someone such as Hitler? For years I struggled to find
the answer to that puzzle. Now, I believe I understand.
Obviously, one does not gain the trust and confidence of people
by portraying himself as a monster. Does anyone truly believe that
the German people would have supported Hitler if they had thought he
was some kind of ogre? As with most leaders, Hitler preached faith,
family, and patriotism. His speeches were laced with references to
God. He personally claimed Christ to be his Savior. Even his adopted
Nazi symbol was created around the Christian cross. As far as the
German people were concerned, Adolph Hitler was loyal to historic,
conservative Christian values. Why should they have thought
However, it did not take long for Hitler to begin turning Germany
from an independent, peaceful republic into an aggressive global
empire. And it is at this point that the German people, and
especially the German church, must share culpability for Hitler's
First, On March 23, 1933, the newly elected members of the
Reichstag (the German Parliament) met in the Kroll Opera House in
Berlin to consider passing Hitler's "Erm䣨tigungsgesetz" or, The
"Enabling Act." This Act was officially called the "Law for Removing
the Distress of the People and the Reich."
Opponents of the "Enabling Act" rightly warned that, if adopted,
the Act would make Hitler a de facto dictator. They worried that the
Act would dismantle constitutional liberties. History would prove
that their worries were valid.
At the time, however, it was anything but certain that Hitler
would prevail in convincing German lawmakers to pass his "Enabling
Act." Then, suddenly, terrorists struck the Reichstag building.
After the Reichstag was burned on February 28, 1933, President
Hindenburg and Hitler invoked Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution,
which permitted the suspension of civil liberties during national
emergencies. As a result, freedom of the press, free expression of
opinion, individual property rights, right of assembly and
association, right to privacy of postal and electronic
communications, states' rights of self-government, and protection
against unlawful searches and seizures were suspended. Shortly
afterward, the "Enabling Act" was passed, and the rest, as they say,
Of course, historians have widely speculated that it was Nazis,
themselves, that had set the fire in order to facilitate passage of
the "Enabling Act" and ensconce Hitler as Germany's Fuhrer. No one
knows for sure who burned the Reichstag, but what we do know is that
Hitler used that act of terrorism to gain the support of the people
as a "wartime president."
The German people were convinced that their country was under
attack and that Hitler was the leader who could protect them.
Consider the statement of one of Hitler's most trusted cabinet
members, Hermann Goering, "The people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell
them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to danger." (Source: Transcript
of Nuremberg Trials)
Compare Goering's statement to former Attorney General John
Ashcroft who, in defending the USA Patriot Act (which does much the
same thing as Hitler's "Enabling Act") said, "To those who scare
peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is
this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national
unity and diminish our resolve." (Source: Press Report, Center for
Is it only a coincidence (or a repeat of history) that
Republicans have introduced a bill in Congress to nullify the 22nd
Amendment thereby opening the door for President George W. Bush to
become permanent president? (Source: U.S. House of Representatives,
H.J. Res. 24 "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the
United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution"
introduced February 17, 2005.)
Add to H.J. Res. 24 the World Net Daily report that "A former
Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing
serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on Sept.
"Morgan Reynolds, former chief economist for the Department of
Labor during President George W. Bush's first term, says the
official story about the collapse of the Twin Towers is 'bogus' and
that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed them
and adjacent Building No. 7."
WND quotes Reynolds as stating further, "Only professional
demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated
with the collapse of the three buildings."
Whether the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down via "an
inside job" or not, one thing is certain: the attacks of September
11, 2001 became the catalyst that propelled Congressmen to quickly
pass the USA Patriot Act even though none of them had read it.
Much is being made over the fact that on Wednesday of this week,
the House of Representatives removed some "sneak and peek" features
regarding public libraries from the Patriot Act. Of course,
President Bush is livid and is threatening to veto the bill without
that segment of the Act included. However, what few people seem to
notice is that a host of egregiously unconstitutional abridgments of
freedom remain intact in the Patriot Act.
Under the Patriot Act, government agents can conduct searches in
your home or business and search your belongings without informing
you and without a court order. Government agents are permitted to
arrest and detain individuals and to hold them indefinitely, without
being charged with a crime, and without being allowed access to an
attorney. In other words, the Patriot Act (like Hitler's "Enabling
Act") expunges our Fourth Amendment protections against illegal
searches and seizures and our right to be secure in our persons,
houses, papers, and effects.
Furthermore, the Patriot Act (like Hitler's "Enabling Act")
destroys our Fifth Amendment right to be held for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, without an indictment of a grand jury. The
Patriot Act also eviscerates a citizen's constitutional right of
The point is, as with Hitler's Germany, so, too, the American
people, and especially America's churches, are willingly and
enthusiastically surrendering constitutional liberties in order to
accommodate President Bush's desires for authoritarian power as a
Consider, too, Hitler's invasion of Germany's neighbors. People
cheered as German troops attacked other nations. And even though
those nations had not participated in any attack against Germany,
Hitler had convinced people that preemptive attacks against those
nations were necessary as they would make Germany "more secure."
Does this or does this not sound just like President Bush's
justification for invading Iraq?
Once again, please remember that the German people believed
Hitler to be a patriotic, Christian man. As a result, Hitler had the
unflinching support of Germany's conservative Christian ministers.
How else would they be persuaded to follow Hitler into the nightmare
of the Nazi regime?
Remember, also, that to most German ministers, the Nazi Party was
"God's Party." They really believed they were being faithful to God
by being faithful to Hitler. Therefore, should we not be concerned
today when we hear of Christian ministers excommunicating church
members who do not support President Bush or the Republican Party?
Should not "red flags" go up in our minds when we hear Christian
ministers excuse Bush's unconstitutional conduct by proclaiming,
"Bush is God's man for America, therefore, we cannot criticize
Yes, my friends, it is now obvious to me how Adolph Hitler seized
power in Germany, because the same principles that Hitler used in
the 1930's are being used by America's leaders today.
Am I saying that I believe President Bush is another Hitler? Of
course not. I am saying, however, that the same tactics and
strategies being used by President Bush are eerily similar to those
of the former German leader's. Certainly, we all pray for a fate far
better than that of Hitler's Germany. But to obtain a better future
for America, it is obligatory that we remember the lessons of
Baldwin is Founder-Pastor of Crossroads Baptist Church in Pensacola,
Florida. In 1985, the church was recognized by President Ronald
Reagan for its unusual growth and influence.
While he originally planned on a career in law enforcement, Chuck
"answered the divine call to Gospel ministry" and decided instead to
attend Bible school. He ultimately earned his Bachelor's and
Master's degrees in theology, and was later awarded two honorary
doctorates in the field.
He is the host of Chuck Baldwin Live, a daily, two hour long
radio call-in show on the events of the day. In addition to writing
two books of theology "Subjects Seldom Spoken On" and "This Is The
Life" he has edited and produced "The Freedom Documents," a
collection of fifty of the greatest documents of American
In 2004, Chuck was the vice presidential nominee for the
Constitution Party. Chuck, 52, and his wife Connie are the parents
of three children and grandparents of six.
A former high-ranking Republican official, also a
well-respected author, tells the American people to stop listening
to Bush administration lies about Iraqi war and claims the
mainstream media will not publish anything he writes against Bush
or his policies.
By Greg Szymanski
June 22, 2005: A former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under
President Reagan stepped back into the political spotlight this
week, expressing doubt about the official 9/11 story and claiming
"if they lied to us about Ruby Ridge, Waco and weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq, why should we believe them now."
Paul Craig Roberts, listed by Whos Who in America as one of the
1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world, has evolved
over the years into a major Bush basher as well as neo con critic.
Roberts said he hasnt changed his political ideology or jumped from
the Republican-conservative ship but "just cant respect a party
leadership who doesnt respect the truth."
He is another in the long list of "Republican faithful,"
including top-ranking government and military officials who have
left or been pushed out Washington, since Bushs neo con followers
continue demonstrating a lack of desire and patience to compromise
even with conservatives refusing "to toe the neo con line."
Expressing doubt about the governments official version of 9/11
but deferring detailed criticism to the experts, Roberts concerns
come on the heels of recent criticism leveled by Morgan Reynolds, a
former chief economist in the Bush I administration.
Reynolds is the highest-ranking public official so far to step
forward and criticize the government account of 9/11, calling the
government story "bogus" and saying the WTC most likely fell from a
Saying 9/11 is only a part of a mysterious but deadly neo- con
puzzle, Roberts looked back at history for some answers
"They (neo cons) are making such fatalistic mistakes and are
about as insane as Hitler and the Nazi Party when they invaded
Russia in the dead of the winter," said Roberts who now, as a hobby,
syndicates a national newspaper column, adding to his long and
impressive list of academic, journalistic and political
Serving under President Reagan in 1981-82, Treasury Secretary
Regan credited him with having a major role in the Economic Recovery
Tax Act of 1981. He was then awarded the Treasury Departments
Meritorious Service Award for "his outstanding contributions to the
formulation of United States economic policy."
Roberts is given much of the credit for structuring and drafting
a major portion of the famous Kemp-Roth bill as well as having a
leading role in developing bipartisan support for a supply-side
economic policy. In 1987, the French government recognized him as
"the artisan of a renewal in economic science and policy after half
a century of state interventionism," inducted him into the Legion of
Even with his impressive background, Roberts, once a former
columnist for Business Week and a thorn in the side of liberals back
then, said "the times have drastically changed," adding his views
are no longer welcome in the mainstream media if they are critical
of Bush or any of his policies.
" It's like the Nazis removing dissent without using the
Gestapo," said Roberts, whose articles are circulated widely on the
Internet and appear regularly in the American Free Press, an
alternative publication. "Most publications, like the Washington
Times, for example, will not print anything critical of Bush,
his strategies and, definitely, anything seriously opposing the war
is off base."
Although professing to know "a little about engineering" from his
undergraduate days at Georgia Tech, Roberts deferred formulating any
serious conclusions about the fall of the WTC, but expressed doubt
as to the credibility of the entire official version based on past
government lies uncovered at Waco, Ruby Ridge and the threat of WMD
Roberts said the recent statements made by Reynolds, however,
reveals just how flimsy and unbelievable the government story comes
"This is not some kind of conspiracy nut or kook talking. He is a
man with extremely qualified credentials, whose opinions I respect,"
said Roberts referring to Reynolds comments which have been highly
publicized across the country.
"The real story is not Morgan Reynolds or myself, but why have so
many former Republican conservatives and top ranking officials who
disagree with the neo cons been systematically run out of
Washington? And, also, why is the media so intent on covering up the
Bush-neo con agenda and all the mistakes surrounding it?
"I guess the real story about 9/11 is about what the people are
actually saying. Ive gotten hundreds of emails in response to my
columns and many of them talk about not getting the truth from the
government or the media about what really happened at the World
Trade Center. I know many qualified engineers and scientists have
said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the
manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions
Besides 9/11 and blasting the neo con economic agenda as suicide
for America, Roberts in his latest column seriously attacks the Bush
Iraq war policy. Without mincing words, he wrote:
" The reasons they (the American people) were given by their
president, vice president, secretary of defense, national security
adviser, secretary of state, and the sycophantic media were nothing
but a pack of lies."
Accusing Bush of also lying to the American people in his recent
June 18 radio address, he added:
"Bush again lied to the American people when he told them that
the U.S. was forced into invading Iraq because of the Sept. 11
attack on the WTC.
"Bush, the greatest disgrace that America has ever had to suffer,
actually repeated at this late date the monstrous lie for which he
is infamous throughout the world: We went to war because we were
attacked, and we are at war today because there are still people out
there who want to harm our country and hurt our citizens."
Roberts' other impressive credentials include being awarded a
John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy, a Senior
Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and
Research Fellow at the Independent Institute.
In 1992, he received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in
Journalism and, a year later, the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as
one of the top seven journalists in the country. He was also
Distinguished Fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996 while
also from 1982 through 1993, holding the William E. Simon Chair in
Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International
Well, I finally received my copy of the second half of
Rabbi Antelman's work.
Again, it's a disappointment.
The one thing that is good is the premise. For that reason alone,
his books are important. That is, of identifying the Illuminati
as rooted in the Shabbatean heresy. It explains a lot.
Particularly how Lurianic Kabbalah would be introduced to the
Illuminati, in the likes of Hegel and Marx.
It also explains their hatred towards Jews, as they reject the
Torah in favor of the Kabbalistic Zohar. This also helps to
explain how the Illuminati could consider themselves Aryans,
though they are largely composed of Jewish families, like the
Rothschilds, Warbugs, Schiffs, and so on. Because it is they who
were responsible for, along with Rockefeller, who were Marrano
Jews, for financing Hitler and bringing him to power.
Other than that, wherever Antelman pores into ancient history,
his evidence is spurious at best. For instance, he provides an
entire discussion of Sufism, by relying on Idris Shah. That's
like relying on Lawrence Gardner on British genealogy, or Sitchin
on Sumerian mythology.
There were too points that I found interesting though.
First is that Marx was a Shabbatean, his father Heinrich having
been inducted into the heresy.
Also, there is a common rumour that Hitler was an illegitimate
Antelman instead says he was a Shabbatean. Here is the entire
"Now there are some rumblings that Adolf Hitler may have had some
Jewish blood imparted to him by a Jew named Frankenberger, who
supposedly had a liaison with his grandmother Maria Anna
Schicklgruber (1795-1847). Indeed, a prominent attorney in New
York City, Jerold Morgulas, wrote a book called The Torquemada
Principle (Wade Rawson, 1980) which advocates this thesis. There
is no truth to it. Rather, Hitler was really the product of
an adulterous relationship between his mother, Klara Polzl, and a
Sabbatian Frankist (1861-September 21, 1928), who was Hitler's
The Frankist Shabbatians had a ritual on the 9th of Av, which is
observed by Jews as a fast day commemorating the destruction of
the First and Second Temples [it's also the birthday of Shabbatai
Zevi]. This night, the Sabbatians secretly observed as incest and
adultery night. However, there is a persistent rumor that Klara
was artificially inseminated that night.
Since the Jewish calendar is lunar, the 9th of Av can occur in
July or August. Checking the calendar, the 9th of Av, 1988, --
the date of Hitler's probable conception -- fell on July 20,
1888, approximately nine months prior to April 20, 1889, the
birthday of Adolf Hitler.
A 1933 New York Times article dealing with Hitler's alleged
Jewish origins maintained that there was Jewish blood on the
Stronnes side -- Hitler's maternal grandmother -- a family which
converted to Catholicism from Judaism in Vienna in the 1850's.
Rabbinic Court testimony claims that not only Hitler's real
father was a Sabbatian, but his material great grandfather as
well; ie. Klara's material grandfather, who fathered her out of
There is evidence that Hitler maintained close contact with
Sabbatians throughout his lifetime. In fact, his personal
astrologer Erik J. Hanussen (murdered in the woods outside of
Berlin in February 1933) was a Sabbatian who was called "the
prophet of the Third Reich" and "magician of Berlin". His real
name was Hershel Steinschneider, born in Vienna in 1889, and he
was the first cousin of Moritz Steinschneider (1816-1907),
discussed in chapter XII."