WorldNetDaily          
     
| Contact WND | WND Page One | Search WND |
   
           
    Click here for more information!  
   

       
TUESDAY
JUNE 22
1999
         
     



WND Exclusive Commentary
The New Left's
feminine mystique



By Jerome Zeifman
© 1999 Jerome Zeifman

"Mystique, a complex of quasi-mystical attitudes and feelings surrounding some person, institution, activity, etc."
-- Webster's New World Dictionary


One night in the late 1950s I went to a Halloween party in "Grand View," on the left bank of the Hudson River. I'll never forget the tipsy woman who was dressed as a witch -- and kissed me. Then she introduced herself with: "I'm Betty Friedan -- and I graduated summa cum laude from Smith."

I also met Betty's husband Carl. He was more popular with the ladies than was Betty with men. But Betty was soon to acquire a fame that fate denied to Carl.

In 1963 Betty published her famous book, "Feminine Mystique." I recall that when the book first came out, a Grand View neighbor of the Friedans had quipped, "Betty envies Carl's masculine mystique." But based on the assertion that the identity of women was independent of their family roles, Betty's book helped cause a cultural revolution.

By another quirk of fate, in the 1960s I served as a counsel to the House Judiciary under the Chairmanship of antifeminist "Manny" Celler of Brooklyn. Celler made me the chief counsel to the Subcommittee on Civil Rights to which he referred the "Equal Rights Amendment" -- that he hoped to kill. The subcommittee was chaired by Congressman Don Edwards of California, who had read Friedan's book and was a champion of ERA.

In retrospect, Manny and Don both had much in common with Carl Friedan. In the 1930s, long before the term "womanizer" came into fashion, Celler had been a "lady's man" -- as was sun tanned Californian Don Edwards in the 60s and 70s. Twice divorced, Don dated a young feminist whom he later married. His office staff also included another feminist: present-Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren. Zoe took Edwards' seat after he retired. In 1998 she shamelessly defended President Clinton against impeachment.

In the 60s, as an advocate of affirmative action from a Mexican-American district, Don had pressed me to find an Hispanic for the Judiciary Committee staff. At that time, Linda Chavez was working for the Democratic National Committee -- and I recruited her. She was both feminine and intellectual. She also had a Jewish mother-in-law -- which pleased Manny. He cheerfully agreed to put Chavez on our payroll. But some years later the liberal Democrats were stunned when President Reagan appointed her Chairperson of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission.

In the 1970s Celler and Edwards remained good friends -- and often joked about their different perceptions of women. In that regard, I recall two of Manny's jokes. One was about the 1930s, when he had advocated the repeal of "Prohibition." At that time the Women's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) had denounced both Manny and Franklin Roosevelt. One day an irate WCTUer shouted at him: "Alcohol is sinful. I would sooner commit adultery than take a drink." Manny replied, "Madam, so would I."

The other joke was that one day at lunch in the Capitol, three octogenarians (Celler, House Speaker John McCormick, and Senator Carl Hayden) discussed their preferred forms of death. McCormick wanted to go swiftly with no warning. Hayden wanted a good last dinner followed by slumber. Celler said, "I want to get shot by a jealous husband."

In the early 1970s Edwards and I cautioned Celler that if he fought ERA he could be swept away in the rising tide of feminism. We then brought ERA up on the House floor. In addition to women's groups, it was also supported by John Conyers and the Congressional Black Caucus -- but not without a few reservations. In that regard, I also recall Conyers' cloakroom joke: "I'm for giving 'em equal rights, but I don't want one to marry my sister."

Celler could not restrain himself. He stood stumped over in the well of the House chamber and said things that shocked the 60s generation, such as:

    The difference between a man and woman is like between lightning and lightning rod -- and between a horse and horse chestnut. ... The fallopian tube will never be obsolete.

I was saddened but not surprised when Celler was defeated in Brooklyn by strident feminist Elizabeth Holtzman. In her freshman year on the Judiciary Committee Elizabeth's own office staff gave her the behind-the-scenes nickname "Ms. Brillo Pad." In 1999 I was again saddened but not surprised when she defended President Clinton against impeachment charges.

Recently, my recollections of Betty and Carl Friedan in Grand View were revived by a May 9, 1999, New York Times book review. Judith Shulevitz, a senior editor of Salon, criticized two recent biographies of Betty Friedan, stating:

    The Feminine Mystique and the National Organization for Women [founded by Friedan] changed the world. ... It is [now] fully accepted that women will work, and somewhat accepted that their children, if women choose to have them, will receive part-time mothering. ... Liberal feminism will probably be the only global revolution of this century to make it to the next unreversed. ... When future generations go for its heroine they'll sure choose Friedan.

Consistent with my recollection of Carl Friedan at the Grand View Halloween party, Ms. Schulevitz described him as "handsome," "funny," "lively" and "young." She describes Betty as having a "big nose and a bossy manner" -- and anxious to forge "links between the Old Left of the 1940s and 1950s and the second-wave feminism of the 1960s."

In her review, Salon's editor defends Betty Friedan from criticism by her current biographer, Smith College Professor Daniel Horowitz (author of "The Feminine Mystique -- the American Left, the Cold War, and Modern Feminism"), stating,

    Horowitz's main objective appears to be to wag his finger at Friedan for not writing as a member of the American left -- for hedging "her discussion of a capitalist conspiracy [against women]"

Significant for its omission from her N.Y. Times review is any mention that on Jan.18, 1999, Ms. Shulevitz's Salon magazine had also published an article titled "Betty Friedan's Secret Communist Past," by a David Horowitz (no relation to Daniel) stating that,

    A new book establishes beyond doubt that the woman who has always presented herself as a typical suburban housewife until she began work on her ground-breaking book was in fact ... a political activist and professional propagandist for the Communist left for a quarter century of a century ... from her college days, and until her mid-30s, a Stalinist Marxist ... and for a time even the lover of a young Communist physicist working on atomic bomb projects in Berkeley's radiation lab with J. Robert Oppenheimer.

    Her famous description of America's suburban family household as "a comfortable concentration camp" in "The Feminine Mystique" therefore had more to do with her Marxist hatred for America than with any of her actual experience as a housewife or mother.

I am also reminded of a conspiracy theory that I learned in 1963 -- some months before the publication of "Feminine Mystique." On pages A34 - A35 of the Jan. 10, 1963, Congressional record there was a summary of a book titled "Naked Communists" by Cleon Skousen.

Skousen, a long time FBI agent had exposed 45 specific objectives of the American Communist Party. In the context of the history of feminism from Betty Friedan to Hillary Clinton, two of the objectives now have an ironic timeliness. According to Skousen, Stalinist objective 28 was "Discredit the family as an institution and encourage promiscuity and easy divorce." Objective 29 was "Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents."

Today, some conservatives believe that both Betty Friedan and Hillary Clinton are part of a radical left-wing conspiracy. A not-inconsistent theory can also be advanced that both Betty and Carl Friedan were likewise part of a profit-making scheme to over-inflate our economy. They realized that the more women went to work, the more wages would be lowered. Likewise, the more divorces, the greater the demand for separate housing, cars, appliances, etc.

Consistent with that theory, I often wonder whether Carl Friedan had a form of "masculine mystique" that manipulated Betty into writing a best selling book. Similarly, these days one can also speculate on the extent to which Bill Clinton now manipulates Janet Reno, Madeleine Albright and the National Organization of Women -- for whom Betty Friedan was the founding mother.

Recently, on Chris Matthews' show "Hard Ball," Germain Greer, the internationally famous champion of women's liberation, chastised Reno, Friedan, and NOW, stating, "Of course Clinton, like all other libertine males, is for abortion."

Last year New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd reported that Betty Friedan, Geraldine Ferraro, Gloria Steinem, and NOW president Patricia Ireland all basked in presidential mystique at Hillary Clinton's White House Christmas Party. According to Dowd, Friedan (who I suspect may have again been tipsy) proclaimed, "If Clinton and Monica Lewinsky had sex in the oval office, who cares?"

Dowd described the celebration as heralding the "Death of Feminism." I suspect that if the ghost of Manny Celler were at the party he would have kissed Maureen and whispered, "You're a darling -- and I hope you're right."


Jerome Zeifman is the author of "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Clinton and the Crimes of Camelot." Send comments to: jzeifman@yahoo.com.

A differently titled and edited version of this article appears in the July 25 issue of Insight Magazine.

   
   

Click here for more information!

CONTACT WND | GO TO PAGE ONE | SEARCH WND

 
     
WorldNetDaily.com

© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
This page was last built 6/22/99; 1:48:07 AM    Direct corrections and technical inquiries to webmaster@worldnetdaily.com