Henry Makow

Join our
Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Subscribe | Unsub.

Receive a reminder of Henry's latest column.

Sorry, you need to update your browser to view this flash animation

War as Deception--Winnipeg Cops Sued in Court for "Zero Tolerance" (scroll down)

Was Hitler a "British" Agent ?

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
January 26, 2006

HallettBy Henry Makow Ph.D

Greg Hallett's provocative book "Hitler Was A British Agent" depicts war as a ghoulish illusion conjured by occult magicians in order to gradually degrade, destroy and eventually enslave humanity in world government.

Hallett's claim that Hitler was a "British" agent is based on the testimony of a shadowy network of retired intelligence agents. While he fails to provide documentary proof, Hallett does offer persuasive circumstantial evidence.

For example, Adolph Hitler was in England in 1912-1913, a fact supported by his sister-in-law's book: "The Memoirs of Bridget Hitler"(1979). Many historians including Hitler biographer John Toland have ignored this startling information. (If Hallett is right, historians like Toland have sanitized Hitler and made him more credible than he actually was.)

Hallett says Hitler spent February to November 1912 being brainwashed and trained at the British Military Psych-Ops War School at Tavistock in Devon and in Ireland. "War machines need war and [that means they need] funded, trained and supported double agents to be their patsies, their puppets and their puppet enemies," Hallett writes (38).

His sister-in-law describes Hitler as completely wasted when he arrived baggageless. "I had an idea he was ill, his colour was so bad and his eyes looked so peculiar," she wrote. "He was always reading, not books, little pamphlets printed in German. I don't know what was in them nor exactly where they came from." (pp. 29,35) Hallett says these were Tavistock training manuals.

"Hitler was a British Agent" is useful as an alternative paradigm. (Usually we cannot recognize truth because we have the wrong paradigm, i.e. our "education.") When Hallett says "British", he means Illuminati, the Masonic cult of super rich bankers who control an interlocking network of megacartels. This cult is based in the City of London but uses England and most nations and "ideologies," as sock puppets in a the Punch and Judy Show called modern history.

Hallett's claim would clarify many improbable events in the Second World War. For example, why did Hitler let 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk? This quixotic gesture was explained as a peace overture, but surely England would have been more attentive if its army were in Nazi POW camps.

The Nazi triumph in Feb. 1940 was like a knock-out in the first round. The Illuminati did not intend for the match to end so soon, nor for the Nazis to win.

In the summer of 1940, when the Nazis was triumphant and Britain prostrate, Nazi Military Intelligence Chief (Abwehr) Admiral Wilhelm Canaris told Romanian Foreign Minister Prince Michael Sturdza to stay neutral because England would win the war. He also gave this message to Spanish dictator Franco.

Hallett's theory also explains why Hitler, supposedly the arch enemy of Jewish bankers, acted like he didn't know the Rothschilds controlled England (and America) when this was practically common knowledge. If Hitler were for real, he wouldn't have tried to accomodate these countries. England would have been invaded and conquered before Russia was attacked.

Hallett's hypothesis explains 1)Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland etc. without fear of retaliation. 2) Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England and a Who's Who of Anglo American corporations controlled by the Illuminati. 3) Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar; and why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral, despite the huge debt he owed the Nazis from the Civil War. 4) Why I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt was never bombed. This became CIA headquarters (the Illuminati like to economize on rent.)

It would explain why Hitler gave his ridiculous racial policies priority over actually winning the war. He could have enlisted millions of Slavs (and even many Jews) in overcoming Communist Russia. Instead, he made them implacable enemies willing to fight to the death.

We could question why Japan attacked the US instead of Russia; why the Nazis never figured out that their communications were compromised; why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East when he had the chance etc. but you get the picture. The fix was in.


The biggest improbability of all is that an Austrian tramp, street cleaner and gay prostitute could become the Chancellor of Germany. Hitler joins a long list of obscure blackmailable figures who have been catapulted to world prominence with the aid of an unseen hand.

Hallett writes that Hitler's grandfather was Nathan Meyer Rothschild. Maria Schickelgruber, Hitler's grandmother, was a maid in the Rothschild's Vienna mansion when his father, Alois was conceived "in fear" in a satanic ritual rape. The Rothschilds could only marry within their extended family so they had illegitimate children who functioned as anonymous agents.

(Apparently this is a pattern with the Illuminati. Bill Clinton is rumored to be a Rockefeller.)

His grandmother received child support from a Jewish businessman who was probably an intermediary.

Rothschild's son, Alois Hitler's third marriage was to his niece, Klara, who became Hitler's mother. His father was overbearing and his mother over- compensating. Hitler became destitute at age 18 when his mother died, and he lived in a men's hostel that was a honey pot for homosexuals.

In 1912, Hitler traveled to England for training as an Illuminati agent which took place in German. This "training" ranged from imbibing a sense of his role in Germany's destiny to learning how to mesmerize audiences.

It also included trauma brainwashing. The "alter's" consciousness is shattered by witnessing savage atrocities and suffering sexual abuse, all of which is filmed. Then the various fragments of consciousness are programmed and can be accessed with special code words. (Read Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler for a detailed description of Illuminati mind control techniques. )

Hitler returned to Germany in May 1913 and enlisted in the German army. During World War One, he served as a runner and was captured twice by the English. On both occasions, he was spared execution by an "angel" in British intelligence.

According to Hallett, Hitler was a bisexual who enjoyed having women defecate and urinate on him. He also had undersized genitals and only one testicle. (Many women whom he courted committed suicide. The love of his life was his 17-year-old half-niece Geli whom he murdered in 1931 when she became pregnant by his chauffeur.)


History is unfolding according to the Illuminati's long-term plan. Wars are plotted decades in advance and orchestrated to achieve the following goals: destruction of nations and natural elites, depopulation, degradation, power and profit. You can bet the next World War will fit this pattern.

The super rich have organized themselves in a satanic cult to prey on mankind and to establish permanent hegemony. Put yourself in the central bankers' shoes. The nations of the world owe you trillions based on money you printed for the cost of paper and ink. The only way to protect this "investment" is to establish a thinly disguised new world order dictatorship, using sophisticated methods of social and mind control. This is the true meaning of the "War on Terror." It's not directed at "Muslim terrorists." It's directed at you and me.

According to Hallet, Joseph Stalin was another Illuminati "agent of war" who attended the Tavistock Psyche Ops training school in 1907. Clifford Shack has suggested that Stalin was also an illegitimate offspring of a Rothschild.

Hallett says Hitler's death was faked (a double was killed) and Hitler escaped to Barcelona where he lived until 1950, when he died of stomach cancer.

Greg Hallett is a maverick and his rambling book is full of repetition and digressions. I wouldn't swear by any of Hallett's claims as yet. But he deserves our thanks for advancing an alternative view of history that while far- fetched is more plausible than what supposedly transpired. We should be able to entertain speculative views without feeling compelled to accept or reject them.

World War Two achieved all of the Illuminati's goals. Europe and particularly Germany was turned into a wasteland. So was Japan. Sixty million people were slaughtered. The Holocaust motivated Jews to establish the Rothschild's world government headquarters in Israel. Idealists and natural leaders on both sides were slaughtered. Nations were laden with debt and bankers' vaults were filled with gold. The United Nations rose like a phoenix from the ashes.

Hiroshima cast a pall of terror over the world.

The stage was set for the next act...the Cold War!


See also my "Countdown to World War Three"

and my "Winston Churchill, Illuminati"

printTo print this article, go to the Articles and open this article from there. All articles in the archives are printer friendly.

War as Deception--Winnipeg Cops Sued in Court for "Zero Tolerance" (scroll down)

Comments for "Was Hitler a "British" Agent ?"

Dan said (January 27, 2006):

Hitler remains one of the most enigmatic personages of modern history, considering his universal high profile. There no shortage of first hand accounts by people who were close to him all the way back to grade school. From what I've read, including a book by his high school friend August Kuzibeck (Hitler, meine jungen freund), There was always something unusual and inexplicable about Hitler even in school Kuzibeck mentioned an episode of a prominent local man speaking to the boys in a park, and seeming familiar with Hilter. The man closed the discussion by inviting Kuzibeck to feel free to drop by his home anytime to discuss intellectual subjects. Kuzibeck was flattered, but Hitler knowingly said, "that man is a homosexual. do not visit him". Kuzibeck wrote that at 14, he had only a vague idea of what a homosexual even was, and was impressed by Hitler's seeming knowlege of adult topics.

Many Americans who had met Hitler, such as Orson Wells at the 1936 Olympics, remarked they were shocked that in person, Hitler did not impress at all. Perhaps they were actually meeting doubles. Or more likely, Hitler did have the form of multiple identity disorder ('alters') described by victims of secret mind control programs.

Much has been written by those who witnessed Hitler's oratory. It's said that he literally changed into someone else, described as 'supernatural' and hypnotic, long before Albert Speir's expensive sets and sound amplification aoustics and spot lighting enhanced the effect at the Nuremburg rallies. Hitler's involvement with the documented Thule Society is also very odd. Or used to be considered odd for the later leader of a civilized first world 20th century nation, before what we now know of our high ranking government and presidential officials involvement in Skull and Bones. S$B, whose symbold is the very death's head and bones worn by the Waffen SS., originated from the very same German Luciferian cult: The Fraternus Saturnis. Thule being on of many 'outer' of 'funnel' front clubs controlled by the more secret FS, which was/is elite Immuminati.

Whether or not it can be proven without doubt that Hitler's year in Britain was in training at Tavistock, the depth of his involvement with real German Satanism/Illuminism is well documented. He recieved his training in oratory under the auspices of an infamous Thulean. Training included invocation of specific Enochian demons to channel for mesmeric public speaking.

We may never know the full story of Hitler, how far back his grooming for the role of an anti-Christ went, and the crititcal missing links between the known Satanist groups of the day, and the British secret services.

Tavistock is certainly a key. Since I learned of what Tavistock is and how long they've been around, I'm coming upon more and more names of people who were documented as having been trained by there, or attended seminars there. Irrefutably documented examples include, Angela Davis and founding members of the Black Panther movement. Attended seminars on Marxism and revolution, 1963-64. Also 'Cinque' of the 'Symbionese Liberation Army', of Patty Hearst fame.

One week before he was murdered, John Lennon revealed on an New York radio interview (which I've heard several times), that the Beatles were created by Tavistock to launch a new paradigm for youth to abandon traditonal values for sex, drugs, and rock n' roll. He said he was he was going to reveal the whole secret and had come out of hiding to do so. Aside from this astounding revelation, Lennon never got the chance to tell all he knew.

Tavistock as we know it did not exist in 1912-1913. The Marquis of Tavistock, Duke of Bedford, didn't give the properties at Tavistock Square to MI-5 until 1921, ostensibly as a research institute to study shell shock and battlefield trauma after the first world war. If Hallet said Tavestock, I suppose that spy training (brainwashing) had in fact been conducted there as early as 1912, since Illuminati operatives in the British secret goverment were certainly aware of what was coming, no doubt even before the Kaiser and Czar were aware that they would soon be manipulated into a great war neither intended.
Lyndon LaRouche has put together the pre-history of wwI and points to King Edward VII of Great Britain as the mastermind, even though he died in 1910.

And there is nothing new about spies, double agents, brainwashing, and blackmail. All the crowned heads of Europe and Russia employed highly sophisticated spy networks, and they are well known to have practiced all of the above. We have examples of sophisticated espionage during the American Civil War, (John Wilkes Booth, member Golden Circle. Belle Star, Confederate 'Madda Hari'). These are well documented as agents working directly for British Intelligence for the prevention of the United States attaining independent world power.

What amazes me today is that the Tavistock Institute has a very wholesome looking web site, with smiling faces, and offers seminars, and scholarships.

I can't prove a thing of course, but my impression of Hitler since reading Hitler meine jungen freund in the late 1970's, is that someone was guiding and grooming him since childhood, and that he was to some extent aware of this, though thoroughly mind contolled and never given the full story.

Larry said (January 27, 2006):

Hello, Henry!

Austrian born Arnold Schwarzenegger's middle name is Alois.

Could his hanging out at the Rothschild mansion be more like a family reunion?

Rachel said (January 27, 2006):

You have managed to arrange words in the English language into the most ignorant display of an opinion I have ever seen. Your perspective does not reflect my reality. I hope you don't stay this ignorant.

Exclusive!--An Ex-Gay Man Evaluates Brokeback Mountain (Scroll Down)

Pokeback Mount'in: Hymn to Dysfunction

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
January 21, 2006

PokebackBy Henry Makow Ph.D.

I enjoyed
Pokeback Mount'in.

Director Ang Lee's tale of "forbidden love on the range" evokes the honest feelings and tensions of rural life in the 1960's and 70's. The panoramas of the Canadian Rockies and abstract images of the sheep herd were soothing to watch. The film reminds us that cinematic art could nourish the human spirit instead of poison it.

Unfortunately, under its artistic veneer, Pokeback Mount'in advances the Illuminati plan to destroy the nuclear family (also a plank in their Communist Manifesto.)

The movie preaches that homosexuality is normal and natural. In fact, in most cases, homosexuality is a developmental disorder that the Illuminati wishes to foster in order to destabilize and depopulate society. Throughout history, the enemies of society have used "art," "tolerance," "progress," "cool" and "chic" to trick people into behaving self-destructively.

Effective propaganda mixes Truth with Deception. Pokeback Mount'in acknowledges that male homosexual love often has tragic consequences. At the end, Ennis Del Mar is a pathetic figure living alone in a dilapidated trailer. He treasures items of clothing that once belonged to his lover Jack Twist, who died in a suspicious accident.

The Deception lies in the movie's implication that it is normal and natural for men to indulge in homosexual behavior. To begin, these men do not look or act gay and as cowboys they engage in masculine activities. "I ain't queer," one says. "Me neither," the other replies.

Then they jump into the sack together.

In reality, men and women naturally find homosexual sex repugnant, a fact the movie tacitly recognizes by mercifully portraying little of it. (The movie image of homosexuality is sanitized and made to seem comparable to heterosexuality. In fact, a monogamous long-term relationship like this one is exceptional.)

These two cowboys aren't typical homosexuals and they certainly are not normal heterosexuals.

If you listen closely, you'll hear them both mention they were alienated from their biological fathers at a young age. Ennis' parents died in a car accident while Jack's father shunned him. Homosexual males typically are trying to compensate for this loss. Another cause is sexual abuse in youth. A small minority may have been "born that way" because of a testosterone imbalance during gestation.

Although Ennis had an attractive and loving fiancee, Alma, we are expected to believe his first emotional embrace was from Jack. The plot's main weakness is its failure to communicate what they have found in each other. Is it just sexual?


There is an amazing scene when Alma accidentally witnesses her husband Ennis passionately kissing Jack. She has two daughters and this is her first realization her husband is gay. You can see from her expression that her life is crashing down around her. After tolerating this long-distance romance for a few years, she finally gets a divorce.

Jack's marriage to Lureen is also a sham, also headed for divorce. If the Illuminati (and their feminist go'fers) have their way, fathers will be removed from families altogether and homosexuality will explode. The ultimate aim is to replace the nuclear family with state-sponsored childbirth as in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

I apologize for repeating myself but some things need to be reiterated. We are soaked in a toxic media bath that trashes the family and considers homosexuality cool. Heterosexuality is much more than opposite-sex attraction. It is about monogamy (marriage) reproduction and child-rearing. This is how most of us develop and fulfill ourselves. Obviously, this natural process is also essential for society's health.

Our culture militates against healthy marriage and families. Men no longer learn that the true standard of manhood is supporting and raising a family. Women waste their most fertile years at university learning to fear and compete with men. The media encourages them to be sluts, and experiment with lesbianism.

Homosexuality is a developmental disorder resulting in failure to permanently bond with a member of the opposite sex. This has become a common social affliction as divorce rates soar and marriage and birth rates plummet. Generally speaking (but not always) homosexuality is characterized by a belief in sex for its own sake and a fixation on sex appeal as the main criterion of personal worth. Haven't we all succumbed in this respect?

Our attitude to children is also homosexual. Children are viewed as a nuisance rather than as an extension of ourselves, organic growth, and a source of infinite love and joy.

Cheating is cheating, even when it's same-sex. In the movie, the two men betray their wives and children in the most egregious fashion. Yet the movie ends on a nostalgia note recalling the glory days having sex on Brokeback Mountain. In our Illuminist-controlled culture, self-indulgence will always trump personal and social responsibility.

The human race is a dysfunctional family too. Our leaders are betraying us in the most egregious fashion. They have literally sold out to the Illuminati, a Luciferian cult that promotes pedophilia, human sacrifice, and every form of degradation, corruption and organized crime. They stage wars and atrocities, incl. the Sept. 11 massacre, for profit and power. They secretly plot a world police state called "the New World Order."


Is it "intolerant" to refer to this movie as Pokeback Mount'in ?

In the Illuminati-controlled USSR, all cinema was "agitprop" or indoctrination. This applies to us as well. Pokeback Mount'in is being made into a social phenomenon with the potential to influence millions. It had the top box office, won the Golden Globe for Best Picture and is likely to win many Oscars.

One of the Illuminati's techniques is to misname things. Thus "masculinism" is called "feminism," "tyranny" is called "peace." A War of Terror is called a War on Terror. Similarly, we must rename their propaganda to remove its effectiveness.

We have no argument with homosexuals who behave responsibly. Our argument is with the Luciferian (i.e. Rockefeller Foundation) social engineers who peddle homosexuality as a weapon to shred the social fabric and enslave us. We are not going to be fooled by their smears and hypocritical appeals to "tolerance". We will defend ourselves.

A Southern Baptist's View by Jeff Adams

See also my Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution

Is this Gay Behavior Sick?

Why I'm Proud to be Homophobic

Heterosexual Society is Under Siege

Gradual Genocide: Fertility Feminism and Fascism

printTo print this article, go to the Articles and open this article from there. All articles in the archives are printer friendly.

Exclusive!--An Ex-Gay Man Evaluates Brokeback Mountain (Scroll Down)

Comments for "Pokeback Mount'in: Hymn to Dysfunction "

Chris said (January 26, 2006):

Being a homosexual, I have been reading your writing with much interest. You would be surprised at how much I agree with you about the distortion of society. Certainly Hugh Hefner has contributed much to cause changes in society that are unhealthy and yet seemed to make sense at the time. The reason his ideas gained a following is because be was fighting the conformist, narrow minded, tightly structured society of the 50's.

Most men are naturally repulsed by homosexuality and only about 2% of the population are gay as far as I know. I had a terrible time accepting my gayness, have never had a gay relationship, and struggled to conform with society clear into my 50's with the false hope that I would somehow fall in love and marry a woman. I can never move back to my small hometown because I would be ostricized and fear for my safey.

You are very clear and accurate about how society has been altered and how men and women have to return to their old, natural way of relating. However, very little of the social distortion is actually due to homosexuality. It is absurd to think that gays can influence society to be more gay.


Thanks. We disagree. It is not homosexuals but homosexual activists sponsored by the Rockefeller
social engineers, gender feminists and the media who have a major influence on making more people experiment with homosexuality and adopt jomosexual patterns.


Chris said (January 26, 2006):

Being a homosexual, I have been reading your writing with much interest. You would be surprised at how much I agree with you about the distortion of society. Certainly Hugh Hefner has contributed much to cause changes in society that are unhealthy and yet seemed to make sense at the time. The reason his ideas gained a following is because be was fighting the conformist, narrow minded, tightly structured society of the 50's.

Most men are naturally repulsed by homosexuality and only about 2% of the population are gay as far as I know. I had a terrible time accepting my gayness, have never had a gay relationship, and struggled to conform with society clear into my 50's with the false hope that I would somehow fall in love and marry a woman. I can never move back to my small hometown because I would be ostricized and fear for my safey.

You are very clear and accurate about how society has been altered and how men and women have to return to their old, natural way of relating. However, very little of the social distortion is actually due to homosexuality. It is absurd to think that gays can influence society to be more gay.

Feroz from Riyadh said (January 25, 2006):

Your pen might creat a revolution, bring the misguided folk to the right path and it will not go unrewarded by God or Allah whom you believe.

May I urge you draw an Action Plan apart from writing campaign to create an alternate climate against their satanic arrangements (those you have mentioned in your articles) where one can specially the women folk can raise their moral and find economic emanicpation.

Waiting to see more feedback and informative article. With warm regards and personal esteem

Carolyn said (January 25, 2006):

I am a 44 year old woman from the Great State of Maine. I am writing to tell you how much i appreciate what you have to say.

Your common sense mirrors my own and as a result of what you write.,i have found that i am much better able to accept how i really feel and ignore what The World tries so desperately to sell. Growing up in the 70's was a confusing time and i always had a vague unease about my femininity and my relationships. It if funny i know ,but after reading your articles, i have a much better sense of what i am supposed to be doing as a woman at this stage of my life. No more striving for the unattainable and you have helped me to grow up and my marriage is improved.

So thanks a lot. You are a very brave Man.
P.S. Today i saw for the very first time, a t.v. ad for home financing featuring among the happy new homeowners, a homosexual couple...... We People of Faith are in a heap of trouble and are waking up too late to save this country, i fear

Patrick said (January 23, 2006):

For any straight male it is not easy to watch to males kiss, fondled and screw each other and also be in loved on the silver screen. I too felt
discomfort but why ? Because like millions I too was brainwashed by my religious Catholic up bringing and traditional society institutions that it was a sin since childhood.

To me this film depicts that homosexuals today no longer must play the game and be forced in pretending in being straight like in the past by getting married while proving their manhood in having kids while leading a double life which can lead to destruction and so many hardship.

Films like this in today's world are a blessing and teach that homosexual genetic make up cannot be tossed away or put on a back burner. It is very present and you cannot hide from your original genetic make up. It is part
of life and it is part of nature and if there is a God he created you that way.

At yesterday's screening I was surprise to see parents with young kids that is boys and girls aged 10 to 14. I was amazed how they reacted, enjoyed the film and understood all of its implications. To them watching two men kiss
and copulated was far from being a problem and a big deal. I was surprise how they could easily grasp and understand this whole film and not be shy about it and this in front of their parents.

The parody of it all is that 40 years a go a father would bring is two boys to watch a homosexual being lynched of have his nuts cut off. Now in today's world both parents bring their offspring to view this film and all can
celebrate the diversity of differences. And while I was leaving watching and
listening to grand mothers, grand fathers, straight couples, comments on how
they enjoyed the film I was still shock at how times at change.

The only remorse I felt was pity for the wives because just like their respective husbands they were victims of religious and society intolerance and did not deserve to be treated in such way.

Those two homosexuals lovers where victims of the ignorance of the times and
had no choice that covering up. Maybe in marriage they thought they could
masked for ever the homosexual impulses but just like millions of other such
marriages around the world this was an illusion.

This film is an eye opener and far from your words........... Homosexuality
is a developmental disorder that the Illuminati wish to foster in order to
destabilize and depopulate society............. this film teaches that
homosexuality is normal and instead of behaving into a self-destructive life
one as to be a man or a woman and accept their sexual orientation without
fear of being chastised and outcast.


Thanks Patrick,

You make my point more effectively than i could.


Tina said (January 23, 2006):

In response to your recent article.

1. You know what Henry, I have read some of the emails posted on your website regarding homosexuality and one thing that sticks out from the homosexual community is the denial of their choice they have made.

2. Each and every homosexual that I know personally all had no relationship with their fathers. Each and every one of those homosexuals that I know were all over babied by their mothers and were completely ignored by their fathers.

3. No women can give her son what a father can and when a mother is the sole provider and caretaker, it only creates more unnecessary problems later in life, like for example the fear of intimacy.

3. There is also the fact that homosexuality is considered a sexual addiction, as homosexuality has nothing to do with love but everything to do with sex.

3. What about the fact that the homosexual sexual act is unhealthy too. I had read sometime ago in a book on Taoist that the sexual act of two men together is very unhealthy and deadly. The homosexuals who do live a long life would most likely not have had much anal sex. The damage that homosexuals do to their bodies is irreparable.

4. Now, the homosexuals are comfortable with being a group a minority because the Court decided they were a minority group. Fact is, the Court enables anyone with any addictions. Canada is a country without morals and any values.

5. Certainly we should be treated with respect and this includes homosexuals but that does not mean we must enable homosexuals in their addiction by agreeing with their conduct.

Finally, the issue of homosexuality has nothing to do with homophobia but everything to do with a natural response to feeling repulsed. Men need to get back on track and seriously take their role seriously and stop acting irresponsibly otherwise Henry, there is not much hope for this civilization.

C said (January 23, 2006):

Henry, I agree with you that the family, religion, and the nation have been
targeted for destruction. And, that the film industry pushes certain themes
at the request of its owners. The recognition of three gay themed films at
the Golden Globe ceremony does not reflect the pulse of popular culture, but
merely another calculated tear in the social fabric of North America. But,
I have to disagree with your theme that homosexuality is disgusting. Its
promotion and increased acceptance may not be good for social order, but it
is certainly not innately disgusting.

Those who are disgusted ought to consider that they may be repressed
homosexuals. But, then again, if they are repressed homosexuals they
probably won't consider it at all.

Guy said (January 23, 2006):

As a non- effiminate gay male trying to survive in this testosterone-laden world as a minority group, I find it incredulous that you, as an educated person, believe that homosexuality would "explode" if father figures were removed at childhood.

What nonsense. Ask any gay person Mr Makow, ours is not a choice but something which was 'gifted' at or before birth. Who would want to choose the lonely & difficult path of growing up gay, in this world of stigmas which people like you perpetuate? My only understanding is that possibly we were given breath at this time to help stop the population explosion.

Your comments about homosexuality being an 'agenda' of sorts, is way off base. I only hope you don't have a gay son but if you did, then he would echo my sentiments. Do you know the origin of the word gay? I thought not, it comes from WW2 & stands for 'Good As You'.

Police Chief Takes Cover! Winnipeg Cops Sued for Zero Tolerance Abuse

January 27, 2006

No zero-tolerance policy: chief

Police approach to domestic violence spelled out for jury

Thursday, January 26th, 2006

By Mike McIntyre

THE Winnipeg police department does not have a zero-tolerance policy on domestic violence, police Chief Jack Ewatski told a civil jury trial yesterday.

Angele Jensen is seeking unspecified financial damages from her ex-husband, Gordon Stemmer, for "malicious prosecution" and from city police for "false imprisonment" by not properly investigating his allegations.

Jensen subpoenaed Ewatski to testify yesterday about the "zero-tolerance" policy she claims made her a victim.

Ewatski denied her allegations.

"There is no such thing as a zero-tolerance policy. There never has been, never will be," he said on the witness stand.

Ewatski said zero tolerance is an often-used expression but that police have never included it in their internal literature on how to deal with issues of domestic violence.

The distinction is an important one, as the Winnipeg Police Service is fighting Jensen's lawsuit on the technical grounds they can't be sued over a nonexistent policy.

Ewatski said officers are clearly instructed to make arrests in domestic violence cases provided there is "supporting evidence for a charge". He said the alleged victim doesn't need to be co-operative, and there doesn't even have to be physical evidence such as injuries, but that officers must still be satisfied something happened.

"The key is to have reasonable grounds. You need factors or circumstances to lead an (officer) to believe, and that belief has to go beyond mere suspicion," he said.

"It is our duty and responsibility to take matters of domestic violence very seriously and do everything within our lawful authority to try and deal with a very serious situation that has potential to have very serious consequences."

Making an arrest and laying a charge is the "preferred method to end that cycle of violence", he said.

Ewatski said he believes the two constables who arrested Jensen in April 2000 acted appropriately based on what they knew at the time.

Police were called to a St. Mary's Road townhouse, where Jensen's estranged spouse claimed she had threatened to kill him and flashed a knife. Jensen had just served Stemmer earlier that day with legal papers seeking custody of their two children, court was told.

Jensen denied making the threats or using a knife and got into a heated argument with Stemmer in front of the two officers.

She admitted yesterday the situation was "tense" and that police likely had reason to believe the situation could escalate. Jensen repeatedly called her husband a liar, while Stemmer told officers he felt threatened by her.

"I can't tell you what was going through their minds, but I could see that they would have that point of view," Jensen testified.

"The police said they didn't want to be called back, that they weren't baby-sitters, and that the situation was intolerable."

Police told the couple one of them had to leave the home, which Jensen said only led to more arguments. By this time, their two children had come out of their bedrooms and were sitting at the top of the stairs, crying, she said.

Finally, the officers told Jensen she had run out of time and they were taking her away and charging her based on Stemmer's allegations.

A charge of uttering threats was later stayed by the Crown.

"The dynamics involved in domestic violence must be kept in mind. When an allegation is made, it is most common for people to deny it," Ewatski said yesterday.

In this case, police said they had other grounds besides just Stemmer's word - including the continuing argument between the couple, a brief background on their recent problems and the presence of two upset children in the home.

Jensen's case has taken several years to come to trial.

She was set for a hearing in January 2004, but the case was adjourned indefinitely to examine the potential impact of a Queen's Bench ruling in a similar case.

Justice Holly Beard upheld police enforcement of their domestic violence policy and ruled against a man seeking more than $1 million from the city and a declaration that the policy is unlawful.

Randy Tymkin filed his lawsuit in 1999 after he was arrested in October 1998 and charged with assault. His ex-wife claimed she was punched two months earlier, court was told.

Her complaint was made the same day Tymkin allegedly violated a non-molestation order by coming to her home and taking her two dogs. Police interviewed the woman and a roommate, then went to Tymkin's home and arrested him. Tymkin was held in custody for two hours and refused to make a statement. The assault charges were stayed 10 months later.

Ultimately, a decision was made to go ahead with Jensen's case.

EXCLUSIVE! An Ex-Gay Man Evaluates Brokeback Mountain

January 25, 2006

PokebackIn advance, I had concluded that the movie would advance some important moral claims about homosexual freedom, and that those pretensions would dovetail with conventional views of moral equivalency between lifestyles. I wanted to see if it was honest or not. As it turned out, the answers were "yes" and "no."

Where did it faithfully represent reality? I think in these respects:

1. It makes sense that two horny young men out in the wilderness with a lot of time on their hands might fall into sexual exploration.

2. As it followed the lives of the characters, it rang true that they would for the most part return to regular, heterosexual relationships. Most studies of same-sex behaviour confirm that a lot of people who dabble in the gay lifestyle--for whatever reason, a temporary thrill or curiousity--do that for a very brief time and never consider it again.

3. It honestly depicted the norm of tom-cat gay behaviour in the further adventures of the Jack Twist character, who sought and was sought out for further homosexual trysts with other people.

Where did it stray from the truth? I think in these ways:

1. The pattern of these two cowboys returning for regular visits because they are in "love," as the script clearly implies, is completely unknown to me in my own experience of gay behaviour and the gay culture. I think the film-makers wanted to convey homosexuality as "normal," and by implying that these chaps would engage in this sort of romantic longing for each other, just like any other lovers separated by fate, they would capture that value. That essentially turns the movie into propaganda.

I found myself comparing it, for example, to "My Private Idaho," where the lead characters did have a strong emotional bond, but one that only applied to the short space of time where their lives were interconnected. Afterwards, one died and the other went on his merry way. The idea that gay lovers somehow extend their longing over a period of years is, I suppose, possible. But I've never heard of it or seen it.

2. The character of Ennis's wife also rings false. It is highly implausible that a woman would see her husband making a pass at another man and not kick up a fuss about it, right there and then. Since both he and his wife were from a conventional, religious background, in the real world this would immediately have prompted a harsh, negative reaction. I've seen wives suffer in silence based on rumours and speculation about their mates, but never a case where they witnessed the infidelity and then stayed silent about it for years.

3. The anguish of the Ennis character, and his guilt about his relationship with Twist, is presented in a confused manner. The movie leads you to believe that he is suffering because he couldn't find it in himself to face up to his identity. But it also implied what is more likely to be real, that it was the social taboos about homosexuality that were causing his moral dilemma. Could both be true? I suppose, but it rings truer to me that he is feeling guilty because he committed those acts, not because he misses his paramour.

So, in terms of the moral honesty of the film, I conclude that it has some, but not nearly enough. A more honest rendition of the psychological dynamics of homosexuals can be found in the TV series "Queer as Folk," which portrays the lifestyle warts and all, and doesn't pretend to symbolize such pretensions as star-crossed lovers as part of the plot. It's "wham, bam, thank you, (not) ma'am." That's what mostly goes on in the real world.

The fundamental problem with "Brokeback Mountain" is that it uses a homosexual template to describe a long-term relationship that is not only the exception in the gay culture, but almost unheard of. It also takes as its underlying theme that homosexual identity is locked in, which I know from personal experience to be false. I found out the hard way that, like all other human behaviours, homosexuality is a chosen pursuit, not a Twist of fate.

Svali Describes Illuminati Plan for Military Takeover

January 24, 2006

cops"When I was a child, I was taught we were chosen to rule over and make the world a better place. But as I got older, I saw the real intention of the "Chosen Ones," understanding it was nothing more than a ruthless plan to obtain money and power by any means possible, including torture and killing."

Like many others born into the Illuminati, from her birth in Germany Svali had no choice in her future, as her wealthy, rich and powerful parents charted her course as a "Chosen Child" from an early age.

Told she was "special and born to rule over the masses" to make a better world, Svali recalls going to regular Illuminati meetings with other "chosen children" at least three times a week after moving from Germany to Virginia and then finally to San Diego.

"I was born into it and long before the induction ceremony when I was 12, intensive training began to instill into me that I was special and the New World Order was good for the world," said Svali.

"When you grow up with wealthy parents like this, always being told you are special, it takes a long time to figure out the truth and a way out. I worked my way up the Illuminati ladder to the rank of head trainer, overseeing 60 other trainers. People have a hard time believing or understanding just how organized the Illuminati really are here in America, comprising about 1-2 percent of the total population.

"Yes, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Kerry, the Clintons and the others in power are all a part of it and they are in the governmental division of the Illuminati. However, I do not want to mention other members not in public office for fear of getting sued.

Saying that the Illuminati's main goal is to depopulate the world and create a unified, one world government, Svali said to fully understand Illuminati cult programming it's first important to comprehend the structure and philosophy of the worldwide organization as she learned it as a child growing up in the ranks.

In a manuscript from a book she is trying to publish, written after she ran from the Illuminati in San Diego, Svali explains:

"The Illuminati are a group of people who follow a philosophy known as "Illuminism" or "enlightenment". The Illuminati were named several hundred years ago, but trace their roots and history to the ancient mystery religions of Egypt, ancient Babylon, and even Mesopotamia. Out of these ancient religions, which were practiced secretly over hundreds and hundreds of years, there arose esoteric groups which continued to practice the rites, traditions, and enculturation brought in from the original groups.

"Over the centuries, these groups practiced openly in some countries, and covertly in countries where Christianity or other religions opposed their practices. Some of the groups which came out of these ancient roots included the order of the Knights Templar, Rosicrucian's, Baphetomism, and Druidic cults. These groups were the forerunners, or roots, of modern day Illuminism. The original Illuministic leaders chose to take what they felt were the best practices of each root religion, combine them into principles, then organized these principles according to specific guidelines.

"Modern day Illuminism is a philosophy funded by the wealthy, but practiced in all social strata. It is a philosophy whose tenets have spread across the world. It started with the German branch of Rosicrucian's, spread to England, then came to the United states with the first settlers."

Svali said during her 30 years with the Illuminati she witnessed a lot of violence from programs stemming from the CIA's MK ULTRA, as well as other mind control programs utilized by the cult.

Working a steady job in the day and then attending heavily guarded, secret meetings three times a week during the evening near San Diego, Svali said she learned "from the inside" the Illuminati plan to rule the world, also known as Novus Ordem Seclorum, is very real, very dangerous and being played out right before the eyes of Americans, as the cult's stepped up plans to take over the U.S. is underway and in full-throttle.

What better way to learn about the plan then to listen from an insider, trying to make amends with herself and the world. The following is from Chapter 3 of her yet to be published manuscript:

"All groups have goals, and the Illuminists are no exception. Money making is not their final goal - it is a means to an end. This end point, or goal, is no less than to rule the world. The Illuminati has a set plan similar to the Soviet Union's previous "5- year" and "10- year " plans. This is what the Illuminists themselves believe and teach their followers as gospel truth.

"Whether they will actually succeed is another matter altogether. The following is the Illuminist agenda at ALL levels of the Illuminati. As with any goal, the Illuminati has specific steps which it plans to implement to reach its objectives. Briefly, each region of the United States has "nerve centers" or power bases for regional activity. The United States has been divided up into seven major geographical regions. Each region has localities within it that contain military compounds and bases that are hidden in remote, isolated areas or on large private estates.

"These bases are used intermittently to teach and train generational Illuminati in military techniques, hand- to- hand combat, crowd control, use of arms, and all aspects of military warfare. Why? Because the Illuminists believe that our government, as we know it, as well as the governments of most nations around the world, are destined to collapse. These will be planned collapses, and they will occur in the following ways:

"The Illuminati has planned first for a financial collapse that will make the great depression look like a picnic. This will occur through the maneuvering of the great banks and financial institutions of the world, through stock manipulation, and interest rate changes. Most people will be indebted to the federal government through bank and credit card debt, etc. The governments will recall all debts immediately, but most people will be unable to pay and will be bankrupted. This will cause generalized financial panic which will occur simultaneously worldwide, as the Illuminists firmly believe in controlling people through finances.

"Next there will be a military takeover, region by region, as the government declares a state of emergency and martial law. People will have panicked, there will be an anarchical state in most localities, and the government will justify its move as being necessary to control panicked citizens. The cult trained military leaders and people under their direction will use arms as well as crowd control techniques to implement this new state of affairs. This is why so many survivors under 36 years of age report having military programming. People who are not Illuminists or who are not sympathetic to their cause, will resist.

"The Illuminists expect this and will be (and are BEING) trained in how to deal with this eventuality. They are training their people in hand-to- hand combat, crowd control, and, if necessary, will kill to control crowds. The Illuminati is training their people to be prepared for every possible reaction to the takeover. Many mind control victims will also be called into duty with preset command codes. These codes are meant to call out a new, completely cult loyal presenting system. Shatter codes programmed under trauma will be used to destroy or bury non-cult loyal alters.

"Military bases will be set up, in each locality (actually, they are already here, but are covert). In the next few years, they will go above ground and be revealed. Each locality will have regional bases and leaders to which they are accountable. The hierarchy will closely reflect the current covert hierarchy.

"About five years ago, when I left the Illuminati, approximately 1% of the US population was either part of the Illuminati, sympathetic to it, or a victim of Mind Control (and therefore considered useable). While this may not sound like many, imagine 1% of the population highly trained in the use of armaments, crowd control, psychological and behavioral techniques, armed with weapons and linked to paramilitary groups.

"These people will also be completely dedicated to their cause. The Illuminati firmly believes that it can easily overcome the other 99% of the population, most of whom are untrained, or poorly trained, such as "weekend hunters." Even the local military will be overcome as the Illuminati will have regional cell groups with highly trained leaders. They also count on the element of surprise helping them during their takeover. Many of the highest leaders in the militia branch of the Illuminati are or have been officers in the military, and so already have a good knowledge of which techniques will work best to overcome a region's or locality's defenses.

"After the military takeover, the general population will be given a chance to either espouse the Illuminati's cause, or reject it (with imprisonment, pain, even death being possible punishments). These people very much believe that the intelligent, or "enlightened" or Illuminated, were born to rule. They are arrogant, and consider the general population as "dumb sheep" who will be easily led if offered strong leadership, financial help in an unstable world economy, and dire consequences if the person rebels. Their utter ruthlessness, and ability to implement this agenda, should not be minimized.

"The Illuminati banking leaders, such as the Rothschilds, the VanderBilts, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, and the Mellons, as examples, will reveal themselves, and offer to "save" the floundering world economy. A new system of monetary exchange, based on an international monetary system, and based between Cairo, Egypt, and Brussels, Belgium, will be set up. A true "one world economy", creating the longed for "one world order", will become reality."

Svali said this is the tip of the iceberg of the Illuminati agenda in America and she has been disowned by her family for leaving. Although recently offered $15,000 to return home, Svali has refused, saying her ministry to awaken the American people is her first priority.

Through years of special training, she learned members of the Illuminati are willing to give up their lives for their cause, as they believe their children are their legacy.

"I was told that my children's generation would see this takeover, sometime in the 21st century. At present, the Illuminati have quietly and covertly fostered their takeover plan by their goals of the infiltration of the media, the banking system, the education system, the government at all levels, the sciences and the churches," said Svali.

From Greg Szymanski's Arctic Beacon

Are Chemicals Neutering Us? by Steve Davis

January 23, 2006

herm RE:

While I pretty much agree with your analysis of this film,
and the overall agenda of elites etc. it now has a deeper
recent scientific paradigm that presents hard evidence to deal with.

Specifically, the research about the feminization of male fetuses,
by the incredible powerful pseudo/phyto estrogenic chemicals we are
bombarded with. While these chemicals may cause all sorts of
weakening of adult systems, it is readily apparent in fetal development
and virtually explains all types of male homosexuality and sexual defects.

So it now appears that these chemicals, especially bis Phenol A
and Phalates in plastics and paper...hence the question,
"Plastic or Paper? ;-) are two of the main culprits of these
homosexual/sexual "birth defects" which have been shown to include
both physically manefested defects such as hypospadia, the number
one birth defect in males, undescended testicles and stunted penis etc,
and such brain defects as sissy gays, flame gays, transvestites, shemales,
gender disphorias and full blown transsexualism.

Hypospadia is so common it may be over 25% of males, but it is usually just
stitched up and never mentioned again. It may be far more epidemic in
Japan, and far more hidden, but it is revealed in their widely popular Hentai porn
cartoons, and many closet favorites there are of such Hypospadia Shemales ! Quite shocking indeed, and essentially the only pictures ofthis condition available anywhere, amazing considering the complete coverage of all sexuality and bizarreness online. No pics of a hypospadia.

I think that this amazing coverup is not accidental, and far beyond just
some simple personal psych explanation, and is clearly far far more insidious and on purpose.

Discussion and bringing this out would expose the whole array, continuum and
diversity of the corporate chemical induced fetal gay syndrome.

In many species all around us and worldwide, we see all sorts of gay and
tranny fish, amphibians, birds, gay florida panthers, smal penis gators, and on and on, leading to a complete collapse in some small and/special ecosystems and nitches.

There are almost no male salmon in the Columbia River, they are all
transsexual, and other shocking manifestations often downstream from sewage outfalls, where clearly, the inability of these systems to remove estrogens and
pseudo/phyto estrogens has poisoned all fetal development.

Now this has been demonstrated and reproduceable experiments are published,
One experiment in Canada was shocking. A small pristine lake was chosen,
fully tested for estrogen activity and then contaminated with just parts per
TRILLION of estrogen.

The result, nothing apparent at first in existing wildlife of all phylums,
then all gay male offspring, then a rapid complete and total collapse of all animal populations then extinction ! and so what is the next step?

Well, look at all the special interests here, gays sure dont want to be
labeled as "birth defects", hypospadia is never mentioned, ever, and gays are
fighting hard for some respect and rights, although the agenda is as messed up as it could be by media mind control and just plain reckless behavior and bizarreness by gays.

Then you have the religious zealots with a major historical hatred to
preserve. We should not have to explain this further except to say it is simply not based on science, and primarily on ignorance, bigotry, fear and outright hate.

Then there is the govt who sure doesnt want to accept this proven science,
nor have to cut a Social Security Check to birth defected gays !
Plus all sorts of other political and election propagandas and hypocracies.
The govt complicities are enormous, all encompassing and clearly

Then of couse, the source, yes lets explore a little tip of that cold hard

Bis Phenol A numero uno mfg. is DOW's Freeport Texas plant which produces
a sprem numbing 400,000 TONS/year which is used in products that have
exceptionally close contact with humans, especially pregnant women.

Numero Dos is of course China, 200,000 tons,
and their anti life anti reproduction agenda is well known,
except for this unrecognized mega conspiracy.

Sorry, Duct Tape and Plastic Sheeting will only exacerbate this

Oh yea, what about Lesbians? Well research is pointing to another set of
chemicals in utero for that, mostly amphetamines and thyroid chemicals are implicated so far. And it affects and crosses all lines, as we see from Cheney's daughter and many elite "Ellen" children.

So Henry, we need to expand the dialogue and get serious about this
incredible threat to mankind and nature, and move away from old psychobabble and religious rants about gays, as most of that is a major diversion from the real chemical criminals of the New World Disorder.

God Bless
Steve Davis

Refs. Simply Google any of the keywords above to learn more.

More on Gender Bending Chemicals from The Independent

Russian General Ivashov: "International Terrorism Does Not Exist"

January 20, 2006

General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international terrorism does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a "world war on terror" the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.

Today's international terrorism is a phenomenon that combines the use of terror by state and non-state political structures as a means to attain their political objectives through people’s intimidation, psychological and social destabilization, the elimination of resistance from power organizations and the creation of appropriate conditions for the manipulation of the countries’ policies and the behavior of people.

Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same time, international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes the manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis between media and terror, which allows modifying international politics and the exiting reality.

In this context, if we analyze what happened on September 11, 2001, in the United States, we can arrive at the following conclusions: 1. The organizers of those attacks were the political and business circles interested in destabilizing the world order and who had the means necessary to finance the operation. The political conception of this action matured there where tensions emerged in the administration of financial and other types of resources. We have to look for the reasons of the attacks in the coincidence of interests of the big capital at global and transnational levels, in the circles that were not satisfied with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction.
Unlike traditional wars, whose conception is determined by generals and politicians, the oligarchs and politicians submitted to the former were the ones who did it this time.

2. Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude. Generally, secret services create, finance and control extremist organizations. Without the support of secret services, these organizations cannot exist – let alone carry out operations of such magnitude inside countries so well protected. Planning and carrying out an operation on this scale is extremely complex.

3. Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders. Thus, a team of professionals had to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the operation.
The September 11 operation modified the course of events in the world in the direction chosen by transnational mafias and international oligarchs; that is, those who hope to control the planet's natural resources, the world information network and the financial flows. This operation also favored the US economic and political elite that also seeks world dominance.