Greg Hallett's provocative book "Hitler Was A British
Agent" depicts war as a ghoulish illusion conjured by occult
magicians in order to gradually degrade, destroy and eventually
enslave humanity in world government.
Hallett's claim that Hitler was a "British" agent is based on the
testimony of a shadowy network of retired intelligence agents. While
he fails to provide documentary proof, Hallett does offer persuasive
circumstantial evidence.
For example, Adolph Hitler was in England in 1912-1913, a fact
supported by his sister-in-law's book: "The Memoirs of Bridget
Hitler"(1979). Many historians including Hitler biographer
John Toland have ignored this startling information. (If Hallett is
right, historians like Toland have sanitized Hitler and made him
more credible than he actually was.)
Hallett says Hitler spent February to November 1912 being
brainwashed and trained at the British Military Psych-Ops War School
at Tavistock in Devon and in Ireland. "War machines need war and
[that means they need] funded, trained and supported double agents
to be their patsies, their puppets and their puppet enemies,"
Hallett writes (38).
His sister-in-law describes Hitler as completely wasted when he
arrived baggageless. "I had an idea he was ill, his colour was so
bad and his eyes looked so peculiar," she wrote. "He was always
reading, not books, little pamphlets printed in German. I don't know
what was in them nor exactly where they came from." (pp. 29,35)
Hallett says these were Tavistock training manuals.
"Hitler was a British Agent" is useful as an alternative
paradigm. (Usually we cannot recognize truth because we have the
wrong paradigm, i.e. our "education.") When Hallett says "British",
he means Illuminati, the Masonic cult of super rich bankers who
control an interlocking network of megacartels. This cult is based
in the City of London but uses England and most nations and
"ideologies," as sock puppets in a the Punch and Judy Show called
modern history.
Hallett's claim would clarify many improbable events in the
Second World War. For example, why did Hitler let 335,000 Allied
soldiers escape at Dunkirk? This quixotic gesture was explained as a
peace overture, but surely England would have been more attentive if
its army were in Nazi POW camps.
The Nazi triumph in Feb. 1940 was like a knock-out in the first
round. The Illuminati did not intend for the match to end so soon,
nor for the Nazis to win.
In the summer of 1940, when the Nazis was triumphant and Britain
prostrate, Nazi Military Intelligence Chief (Abwehr) Admiral Wilhelm
Canaris told Romanian Foreign Minister Prince Michael Sturdza to
stay neutral because England would win the
war. He also gave this message to Spanish dictator Franco.
Hallett's theory also explains why Hitler, supposedly the arch
enemy of Jewish bankers, acted like he didn't know the Rothschilds
controlled England (and America) when this was practically common
knowledge. If Hitler were for real, he wouldn't have tried to
accomodate these countries. England would have been invaded and
conquered before Russia was attacked.
Hallett's hypothesis explains 1)Why Hitler was able to expand
into the Rhineland etc. without fear of retaliation. 2) Why the Nazi
war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England and a
Who's Who of Anglo American corporations controlled by the
Illuminati. 3) Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at
Gibraltar; and why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral,
despite the huge debt he owed the Nazis from the Civil War. 4) Why
I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt was never bombed. This became
CIA headquarters (the Illuminati like to economize on rent.)
It would explain why Hitler gave his ridiculous racial policies
priority over actually winning the war. He could have
enlisted millions of Slavs (and even many Jews) in overcoming
Communist Russia. Instead, he made them implacable enemies willing
to fight to the death.
We could question why Japan attacked the US instead of Russia;
why the Nazis never figured out that their communications were
compromised; why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and
the Middle East when he had the chance etc. but you get the picture.
The fix was in.
WHO WAS HITLER?
The biggest improbability of all is that an Austrian
tramp, street cleaner and gay prostitute could become the Chancellor
of Germany. Hitler joins a long list of obscure blackmailable
figures who have been catapulted to world prominence with the aid of
an unseen hand.
Hallett writes that Hitler's grandfather was Nathan Meyer
Rothschild. Maria Schickelgruber, Hitler's grandmother, was a maid
in the Rothschild's Vienna mansion when his father, Alois was
conceived "in fear" in a satanic ritual rape. The Rothschilds could
only marry within their extended family so they had illegitimate
children who functioned as anonymous agents.
(Apparently this is a pattern with the Illuminati. Bill Clinton
is rumored to be a Rockefeller.)
His grandmother received child support from a Jewish businessman
who was probably an intermediary.
Rothschild's son, Alois Hitler's third marriage was to his niece,
Klara, who became Hitler's mother. His father was overbearing and
his mother over- compensating. Hitler became destitute at age 18
when his mother died, and he lived in a men's hostel that was a
honey pot for homosexuals.
In 1912, Hitler traveled to England for training as an Illuminati
agent which took place in German. This "training" ranged from
imbibing a sense of his role in Germany's destiny to learning how to
mesmerize audiences.
It also included trauma brainwashing. The "alter's" consciousness
is shattered by witnessing savage atrocities and suffering sexual
abuse, all of which is filmed. Then the various fragments of
consciousness are programmed and can be accessed with special code
words. (Read Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler for a detailed
description of Illuminati
mind control techniques. )
Hitler returned to Germany in May 1913 and enlisted in the German
army. During World War One, he served as a runner and was captured
twice by the English. On both occasions, he was spared execution by
an "angel" in British intelligence.
According to Hallett, Hitler was a bisexual who enjoyed having
women defecate and urinate on him. He also had undersized genitals
and only one testicle. (Many women whom he courted committed
suicide. The love of his life was his 17-year-old half-niece Geli
whom he murdered in 1931 when she became pregnant by his
chauffeur.)
IMPLICATIONS
History is unfolding according to the Illuminati's long-term
plan. Wars are plotted decades in advance and orchestrated to
achieve the following goals: destruction of nations and natural
elites, depopulation, degradation, power and profit. You can bet the
next World War will fit this pattern.
The super rich have organized themselves in a satanic cult to
prey on mankind and to establish permanent hegemony. Put yourself in
the central bankers' shoes. The nations of the world owe you
trillions based on money you printed for the cost of paper and ink.
The only way to protect this "investment" is to establish a thinly
disguised new world order dictatorship, using sophisticated methods
of social and mind control. This is the true meaning of the "War on
Terror." It's not directed at "Muslim terrorists." It's directed at
you and me.
According to Hallet, Joseph Stalin was another Illuminati "agent
of war" who attended the Tavistock Psyche Ops training school in
1907. Clifford Shack has suggested that Stalin was also an illegitimate
offspring of a Rothschild.
Hallett says Hitler's death was faked (a double was killed) and
Hitler escaped to Barcelona where he lived until 1950, when he died
of stomach cancer.
Greg Hallett is a maverick and his rambling book is full of
repetition and digressions. I wouldn't swear by any of Hallett's
claims as yet. But he deserves our thanks for advancing an
alternative view of history that while far- fetched is more
plausible than what supposedly transpired. We should be able to
entertain speculative views without feeling compelled to accept or
reject them.
World War Two achieved all of the Illuminati's goals. Europe and
particularly Germany was turned into a wasteland. So was Japan.
Sixty million people were slaughtered. The Holocaust motivated Jews
to establish the Rothschild's world government headquarters in
Israel. Idealists and natural leaders on both sides were
slaughtered. Nations were laden with debt and bankers' vaults were
filled with gold. The United Nations rose like a phoenix from the
ashes.
Hiroshima cast a pall of terror over the world.
The stage was set for the next act...the Cold War!
Hitler remains one of the most enigmatic personages of modern
history, considering his universal high profile. There no shortage
of first hand accounts by people who were close to him all the way
back to grade school. From what I've read, including a book by his
high school friend August Kuzibeck (Hitler, meine jungen freund),
There was always something unusual and inexplicable about Hitler
even in school Kuzibeck mentioned an episode of a prominent local
man speaking to the boys in a park, and seeming familiar with
Hilter. The man closed the discussion by inviting Kuzibeck to feel
free to drop by his home anytime to discuss intellectual subjects.
Kuzibeck was flattered, but Hitler knowingly said, "that man is a
homosexual. do not visit him". Kuzibeck wrote that at 14, he had
only a vague idea of what a homosexual even was, and was impressed
by Hitler's seeming knowlege of adult topics.
Many Americans who had met Hitler, such as Orson Wells at the
1936 Olympics, remarked they were shocked that in person, Hitler did
not impress at all. Perhaps they were actually meeting doubles. Or
more likely, Hitler did have the form of multiple identity disorder
('alters') described by victims of secret mind control programs.
Much has been written by those who witnessed Hitler's oratory.
It's said that he literally changed into someone else, described as
'supernatural' and hypnotic, long before Albert Speir's expensive
sets and sound amplification aoustics and spot lighting enhanced the
effect at the Nuremburg rallies. Hitler's involvement with the
documented Thule Society is also very odd. Or used to be considered
odd for the later leader of a civilized first world 20th century
nation, before what we now know of our high ranking government and
presidential officials involvement in Skull and Bones. S$B, whose
symbold is the very death's head and bones worn by the Waffen SS.,
originated from the very same German Luciferian cult: The Fraternus
Saturnis. Thule being on of many 'outer' of 'funnel' front clubs
controlled by the more secret FS, which was/is elite Immuminati.
Whether or not it can be proven without doubt that Hitler's year
in Britain was in training at Tavistock, the depth of his
involvement with real German Satanism/Illuminism is well documented.
He recieved his training in oratory under the auspices of an
infamous Thulean. Training included invocation of specific Enochian
demons to channel for mesmeric public speaking.
We may never know the full story of Hitler, how far back his
grooming for the role of an anti-Christ went, and the crititcal
missing links between the known Satanist groups of the day, and the
British secret services.
Tavistock is certainly a key. Since I learned of what Tavistock
is and how long they've been around, I'm coming upon more and more
names of people who were documented as having been trained by there,
or attended seminars there. Irrefutably documented examples include,
Angela Davis and founding members of the Black Panther movement.
Attended seminars on Marxism and revolution, 1963-64. Also 'Cinque'
of the 'Symbionese Liberation Army', of Patty Hearst fame.
One week before he was murdered, John Lennon revealed on an New
York radio interview (which I've heard several times), that the
Beatles were created by Tavistock to launch a new paradigm for youth
to abandon traditonal values for sex, drugs, and rock n' roll. He
said he was he was going to reveal the whole secret and had come out
of hiding to do so. Aside from this astounding revelation, Lennon
never got the chance to tell all he knew.
Tavistock as we know it did not exist in 1912-1913. The Marquis
of Tavistock, Duke of Bedford, didn't give the properties at
Tavistock Square to MI-5 until 1921, ostensibly as a research
institute to study shell shock and battlefield trauma after the
first world war. If Hallet said Tavestock, I suppose that spy
training (brainwashing) had in fact been conducted there as early as
1912, since Illuminati operatives in the British secret goverment
were certainly aware of what was coming, no doubt even before the
Kaiser and Czar were aware that they would soon be manipulated into
a great war neither intended. Lyndon LaRouche has put together
the pre-history of wwI and points to King Edward VII of Great
Britain as the mastermind, even though he died in 1910.
And there is nothing new about spies, double agents,
brainwashing, and blackmail. All the crowned heads of Europe and
Russia employed highly sophisticated spy networks, and they are well
known to have practiced all of the above. We have examples of
sophisticated espionage during the American Civil War, (John Wilkes
Booth, member Golden Circle. Belle Star, Confederate 'Madda Hari').
These are well documented as agents working directly for British
Intelligence for the prevention of the United States attaining
independent world power.
What amazes me today is that the Tavistock Institute has a very
wholesome looking web site, with smiling faces, and offers seminars,
and scholarships.
I can't prove a thing of course, but my impression of Hitler
since reading Hitler meine jungen freund in the late 1970's, is that
someone was guiding and grooming him since childhood, and that he
was to some extent aware of this, though thoroughly mind contolled
and never given the full story.
Larry said (January 27, 2006):
Hello, Henry!
Austrian born Arnold Schwarzenegger's middle
name is Alois.
Could his hanging out at the Rothschild
mansion be more like a family reunion?
Rachel said (January 27, 2006):
You have managed to arrange words in the English language into
the most ignorant display of an opinion I have ever seen. Your
perspective does not reflect my reality. I hope you don't stay this
ignorant.
Exclusive!--An Ex-Gay Man Evaluates Brokeback Mountain (Scroll
Down)
Director Ang Lee's tale of "forbidden love on the range" evokes
the honest feelings and tensions of rural life in the 1960's and
70's. The panoramas of the Canadian Rockies and abstract images of
the sheep herd were soothing to watch. The film reminds us that
cinematic art could nourish the human spirit instead of poison
it.
Unfortunately, under its artistic veneer, Pokeback Mount'in
advances the Illuminati plan to destroy the nuclear family (also
a plank in their Communist Manifesto.)
The movie preaches that homosexuality is normal and
natural. In fact, in most cases, homosexuality is a
developmental disorder that the Illuminati
wishes to foster in order to destabilize and depopulate society.
Throughout history, the enemies of society have used "art,"
"tolerance," "progress," "cool" and "chic" to trick people into
behaving self-destructively.
Effective propaganda mixes Truth with Deception. Pokeback
Mount'in acknowledges that male homosexual love often has tragic
consequences. At the end, Ennis Del Mar is a pathetic figure living
alone in a dilapidated trailer. He treasures items of clothing that
once belonged to his lover Jack Twist, who died in a suspicious
accident.
The Deception lies in the movie's implication that it is
normal and natural for men to indulge in homosexual behavior.
To begin, these men do not look or act gay and as cowboys they
engage in masculine activities. "I ain't queer," one says. "Me
neither," the other replies.
Then they jump into the sack together.
In reality, men and women naturally find homosexual sex
repugnant, a fact the movie tacitly recognizes by mercifully
portraying little of it. (The movie image of homosexuality is
sanitized and made to seem comparable to heterosexuality. In fact, a
monogamous long-term relationship like this one is exceptional.)
These two cowboys aren't typical homosexuals and they certainly
are not normal heterosexuals.
If you listen closely, you'll hear them both mention they were
alienated from their biological fathers at a young age. Ennis'
parents died in a car accident while Jack's father shunned him.
Homosexual males typically are trying to
compensate for this loss. Another cause is sexual abuse in
youth. A small minority may have been "born that way" because of a
testosterone imbalance during gestation.
Although Ennis had an attractive and loving fiancee, Alma, we are
expected to believe his first emotional embrace was from Jack. The
plot's main weakness is its failure to communicate what they have
found in each other. Is it just sexual?
FAMILY BETRAYAL
There is an amazing scene when Alma accidentally witnesses
her husband Ennis passionately kissing Jack. She has two daughters
and this is her first realization her husband is gay. You can see
from her expression that her life is crashing down around her. After
tolerating this long-distance romance for a few years, she finally
gets a divorce.
Jack's marriage to Lureen is also a sham, also headed for
divorce. If the Illuminati (and their feminist go'fers) have their
way, fathers will be removed from families altogether and
homosexuality will explode. The ultimate aim is to replace the
nuclear family with state-sponsored childbirth as in Aldous Huxley's
Brave New World.
I apologize for repeating myself but some things need to be
reiterated. We are soaked in a toxic media bath that trashes the
family and considers homosexuality cool. Heterosexuality is much
more than opposite-sex attraction. It is about monogamy (marriage)
reproduction and child-rearing. This is how most of us develop and
fulfill ourselves. Obviously, this natural process is also essential
for society's health.
Our culture militates against healthy marriage and families. Men
no longer learn that the true standard of manhood is supporting and
raising a family. Women waste their most fertile years at university
learning to fear and compete with men. The media encourages them to
be sluts, and experiment with lesbianism.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder resulting in failure to
permanently bond with a member of the opposite sex. This has become
a common social affliction as divorce rates soar and marriage and
birth rates plummet. Generally speaking (but not always)
homosexuality is characterized by a belief in sex for its own sake
and a fixation on sex appeal as the main criterion of personal
worth. Haven't we all succumbed in this respect?
Our attitude to children is also homosexual. Children are viewed
as a nuisance rather than as an extension of ourselves, organic
growth, and a source of infinite love and joy.
Cheating is cheating, even when it's same-sex. In the movie, the
two men betray their wives and children in the most egregious
fashion. Yet the movie ends on a nostalgia note recalling the glory
days having sex on Brokeback Mountain. In our Illuminist-controlled
culture, self-indulgence will always trump personal and social
responsibility.
The human race is a dysfunctional family too. Our leaders are
betraying us in the most egregious fashion. They have literally sold
out to the Illuminati, a Luciferian cult that promotes pedophilia,
human sacrifice, and every form of
degradation, corruption and organized crime. They stage wars and
atrocities, incl. the Sept. 11 massacre, for profit and power. They
secretly plot a world police state called "the New World Order."
FINALLY
Is it "intolerant" to refer to this movie as Pokeback
Mount'in ?
In the Illuminati-controlled USSR, all cinema was "agitprop" or
indoctrination.
This applies to us as well. Pokeback Mount'in is being made
into a social phenomenon with the potential to influence millions.
It had the top box office, won the Golden Globe for Best Picture and
is likely to win many Oscars.
One of the Illuminati's techniques is to misname things. Thus
"masculinism" is called "feminism," "tyranny" is called "peace." A
War of Terror is called a War on Terror. Similarly, we must
rename their propaganda to remove its effectiveness.
We have no argument with homosexuals who behave responsibly. Our
argument is with the Luciferian (i.e. Rockefeller Foundation) social
engineers who peddle homosexuality as a weapon to shred the social
fabric and enslave us. We are not going to be fooled by their smears
and hypocritical appeals to "tolerance". We will defend
ourselves.
Comments for "Pokeback Mount'in: Hymn to Dysfunction "
Chris said (January 26, 2006):
Being a homosexual, I have been reading your writing with much
interest. You would be surprised at how much I agree with you about
the distortion of society. Certainly Hugh Hefner has contributed
much to cause changes in society that are unhealthy and yet seemed
to make sense at the time. The reason his ideas gained a following
is because be was fighting the conformist, narrow minded, tightly
structured society of the 50's.
Most men are naturally
repulsed by homosexuality and only about 2% of the population are
gay as far as I know. I had a terrible time accepting my gayness,
have never had a gay relationship, and struggled to conform with
society clear into my 50's with the false hope that I would somehow
fall in love and marry a woman. I can never move back to my small
hometown because I would be ostricized and fear for my
safey.
You are very clear and accurate about how society has
been altered and how men and women have to return to their old,
natural way of relating. However, very little of the social
distortion is actually due to homosexuality. It is absurd to think
that gays can influence society to be more gay. -----
Chris,
Thanks. We disagree. It is not homosexuals but homosexual
activists sponsored by the Rockefeller social engineers, gender
feminists and the media who have a major influence on making more
people experiment with homosexuality and adopt jomosexual
patterns.
henry
Chris said (January 26, 2006):
Being a homosexual, I have been reading your writing with much
interest. You would be surprised at how much I agree with you about
the distortion of society. Certainly Hugh Hefner has contributed
much to cause changes in society that are unhealthy and yet seemed
to make sense at the time. The reason his ideas gained a following
is because be was fighting the conformist, narrow minded, tightly
structured society of the 50's.
Most men are naturally
repulsed by homosexuality and only about 2% of the population are
gay as far as I know. I had a terrible time accepting my gayness,
have never had a gay relationship, and struggled to conform with
society clear into my 50's with the false hope that I would somehow
fall in love and marry a woman. I can never move back to my small
hometown because I would be ostricized and fear for my
safey.
You are very clear and accurate about how society has
been altered and how men and women have to return to their old,
natural way of relating. However, very little of the social
distortion is actually due to homosexuality. It is absurd to think
that gays can influence society to be more gay.
Feroz from Riyadh said (January 25,
2006):
Your pen might creat a revolution, bring the misguided folk to
the right path and it will not go unrewarded by God or Allah whom
you believe.
May I urge you draw an Action Plan apart from
writing campaign to create an alternate climate against their
satanic arrangements (those you have mentioned in your articles)
where one can specially the women folk can raise their moral and
find economic emanicpation.
Waiting to see more feedback and
informative article. With warm regards and personal
esteem
Carolyn said (January 25, 2006):
I am a 44 year old woman from the Great State of Maine. I am
writing to tell you how much i appreciate what you have to
say.
Your common sense mirrors my own and as a result of what
you write.,i have found that i am much better able to accept how i
really feel and ignore what The World tries so desperately to sell.
Growing up in the 70's was a confusing time and i always had a vague
unease about my femininity and my relationships. It if funny i know
,but after reading your articles, i have a much better sense of what
i am supposed to be doing as a woman at this stage of my life. No
more striving for the unattainable and you have helped me to grow up
and my marriage is improved.
So thanks a lot. You are a very
brave Man. P.S. Today i saw for the very first time, a t.v. ad
for home financing featuring among the happy new homeowners, a
homosexual couple...... We People of Faith are in a heap of trouble
and are waking up too late to save this country, i
fear
Patrick said (January 23, 2006):
For any straight male it is not easy to watch to males kiss,
fondled and screw each other and also be in loved on the silver
screen. I too felt discomfort but why ? Because like millions I
too was brainwashed by my religious Catholic up bringing and
traditional society institutions that it was a sin since
childhood.
To me this film depicts that homosexuals today no longer must
play the game and be forced in pretending in being straight like in
the past by getting married while proving their manhood in having
kids while leading a double life which can lead to destruction and
so many hardship.
Films like this in today's world are a blessing and teach that
homosexual genetic make up cannot be tossed away or put on a back
burner. It is very present and you cannot hide from your original
genetic make up. It is part of life and it is part of nature and
if there is a God he created you that way.
At yesterday's screening I was surprise to see parents with young
kids that is boys and girls aged 10 to 14. I was amazed how they
reacted, enjoyed the film and understood all of its implications. To
them watching two men kiss and copulated was far from being a
problem and a big deal. I was surprise how they could easily grasp
and understand this whole film and not be shy about it and this in
front of their parents.
The parody of it all is that 40 years a go a father would bring
is two boys to watch a homosexual being lynched of have his nuts cut
off. Now in today's world both parents bring their offspring to view
this film and all can celebrate the diversity of differences. And
while I was leaving watching and listening to grand mothers,
grand fathers, straight couples, comments on how they enjoyed the
film I was still shock at how times at change.
The only remorse I felt was pity for the wives because just like
their respective husbands they were victims of religious and society
intolerance and did not deserve to be treated in such way.
Those two homosexuals lovers where victims of the ignorance of
the times and had no choice that covering up. Maybe in marriage
they thought they could masked for ever the homosexual impulses
but just like millions of other such marriages around the world
this was an illusion.
This film is an eye opener and far from your words...........
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder that the Illuminati
wish to foster in order to destabilize and depopulate
society............. this film teaches that homosexuality is
normal and instead of behaving into a self-destructive life one
as to be a man or a woman and accept their sexual orientation
without fear of being chastised and outcast.
---
Thanks Patrick,
You make my point more effectively than i could.
henry
Tina said (January 23, 2006):
In response to your recent article.
1. You know what Henry, I have read some of the emails posted on
your website regarding homosexuality and one thing that sticks out
from the homosexual community is the denial of their choice they
have made.
2. Each and every homosexual that I know personally all had no
relationship with their fathers. Each and every one of those
homosexuals that I know were all over babied by their mothers and
were completely ignored by their fathers.
3. No women can give her son what a father can and when a mother
is the sole provider and caretaker, it only creates more unnecessary
problems later in life, like for example the fear of intimacy.
3. There is also the fact that homosexuality is considered a
sexual addiction, as homosexuality has nothing to do with love but
everything to do with sex.
3. What about the fact that the homosexual sexual act is
unhealthy too. I had read sometime ago in a book on Taoist that the
sexual act of two men together is very unhealthy and deadly. The
homosexuals who do live a long life would most likely not have had
much anal sex. The damage that homosexuals do to their bodies is
irreparable.
4. Now, the homosexuals are comfortable with being a group a
minority because the Court decided they were a minority group. Fact
is, the Court enables anyone with any addictions. Canada is a
country without morals and any values.
5. Certainly we should be treated with respect and this includes
homosexuals but that does not mean we must enable homosexuals in
their addiction by agreeing with their conduct.
Finally, the issue of homosexuality has nothing to do with
homophobia but everything to do with a natural response to feeling
repulsed. Men need to get back on track and seriously take their
role seriously and stop acting irresponsibly otherwise Henry, there
is not much hope for this civilization.
C said (January 23, 2006):
Henry, I agree with you that the family, religion, and the nation
have been targeted for destruction. And, that the film industry
pushes certain themes at the request of its owners. The
recognition of three gay themed films at the Golden Globe
ceremony does not reflect the pulse of popular culture,
but merely another calculated tear in the social fabric of North
America. But, I have to disagree with your theme that
homosexuality is disgusting. Its promotion and increased
acceptance may not be good for social order, but it is certainly
not innately disgusting.
Those who are disgusted ought to consider that they may be
repressed homosexuals. But, then again, if they are repressed
homosexuals they probably won't consider it at all.
Guy said (January 23, 2006):
As a non- effiminate gay male trying to survive in this
testosterone-laden world as a minority group, I find it incredulous
that you, as an educated person, believe that homosexuality would
"explode" if father figures were removed at childhood.
What nonsense. Ask any gay person Mr Makow, ours is not a choice
but something which was 'gifted' at or before birth. Who would want
to choose the lonely & difficult path of growing up gay, in this
world of stigmas which people like you perpetuate? My only
understanding is that possibly we were given breath at this time to
help stop the population explosion.
Your comments about homosexuality being an 'agenda' of sorts, is
way off base. I only hope you don't have a gay son but if you did,
then he would echo my sentiments. Do you know the origin of the word
gay? I thought not, it comes from WW2 & stands for 'Good As
You'.
Police Chief Takes Cover! Winnipeg Cops Sued for Zero Tolerance
Abuse
Police approach to domestic violence spelled out for jury
Thursday, January 26th, 2006
By Mike McIntyre
THE Winnipeg police department does not have a zero-tolerance
policy on domestic violence, police Chief Jack Ewatski told a civil
jury trial yesterday.
Angele Jensen is seeking unspecified financial damages from her
ex-husband, Gordon Stemmer, for "malicious prosecution" and from
city police for "false imprisonment" by not properly investigating
his allegations.
Jensen subpoenaed Ewatski to testify yesterday about the
"zero-tolerance" policy she claims made her a victim.
Ewatski denied her allegations.
"There is no such thing as a zero-tolerance policy. There never
has been, never will be," he said on the witness stand.
Ewatski said zero tolerance is an often-used expression but that
police have never included it in their internal literature on how to
deal with issues of domestic violence.
The distinction is an important one, as the Winnipeg Police
Service is fighting Jensen's lawsuit on the technical grounds they
can't be sued over a nonexistent policy.
Ewatski said officers are clearly instructed to make arrests in
domestic violence cases provided there is "supporting evidence for a
charge". He said the alleged victim doesn't need to be co-operative,
and there doesn't even have to be physical evidence such as
injuries, but that officers must still be satisfied something
happened.
"The key is to have reasonable grounds. You need factors or
circumstances to lead an (officer) to believe, and that belief has
to go beyond mere suspicion," he said.
"It is our duty and responsibility to take matters of
domestic violence very seriously and do everything within our lawful
authority to try and deal with a very serious situation that has
potential to have very serious consequences."
Making an arrest and laying a charge is the "preferred method to
end that cycle of violence", he said.
Ewatski said he believes the two constables who arrested Jensen
in April 2000 acted appropriately based on what they knew at the
time.
Police were called to a St. Mary's Road townhouse, where Jensen's
estranged spouse claimed she had threatened to kill him and flashed
a knife. Jensen had just served Stemmer earlier that day with legal
papers seeking custody of their two children, court was told.
Jensen denied making the threats or using a knife and got into a
heated argument with Stemmer in front of the two officers.
She admitted yesterday the situation was "tense" and that police
likely had reason to believe the situation could escalate. Jensen
repeatedly called her husband a liar, while Stemmer told officers he
felt threatened by her.
"I can't tell you what was going through their minds, but I could
see that they would have that point of view," Jensen testified.
"The police said they didn't want to be called back, that they
weren't baby-sitters, and that the situation was intolerable."
Police told the couple one of them had to leave the home, which
Jensen said only led to more arguments. By this time, their two
children had come out of their bedrooms and were sitting at the top
of the stairs, crying, she said.
Finally, the officers told Jensen she had run out of time and
they were taking her away and charging her based on Stemmer's
allegations.
A charge of uttering threats was later stayed by the Crown.
"The dynamics involved in domestic violence must be kept in mind.
When an allegation is made, it is most common for people to deny
it," Ewatski said yesterday.
In this case, police said they had other grounds besides just
Stemmer's word - including the continuing argument between the
couple, a brief background on their recent problems and the presence
of two upset children in the home.
Jensen's case has taken several years to come to trial.
She was set for a hearing in January 2004, but the case was
adjourned indefinitely to examine the potential impact of a Queen's
Bench ruling in a similar case.
Justice Holly Beard upheld police enforcement of their domestic
violence policy and ruled against a man seeking more than $1 million
from the city and a declaration that the policy is unlawful.
Randy Tymkin filed his lawsuit in 1999 after he was arrested in
October 1998 and charged with assault. His ex-wife claimed she was
punched two months earlier, court was told.
Her complaint was made the same day Tymkin allegedly violated a
non-molestation order by coming to her home and taking her two dogs.
Police interviewed the woman and a roommate, then went to Tymkin's
home and arrested him. Tymkin was held in custody for two hours and
refused to make a statement. The assault charges were stayed 10
months later.
Ultimately, a decision was made to go ahead with Jensen's case.
In
advance, I had concluded that the movie would advance some
important moral claims about homosexual freedom, and that those
pretensions would dovetail with conventional views of moral
equivalency between lifestyles. I wanted to see if it was honest or
not. As it turned out, the answers were "yes" and "no."
Where
did it faithfully represent reality? I think in these respects:
1. It makes sense that two horny young men out in the wilderness
with a lot of time on their hands might fall into sexual
exploration.
2. As it followed the lives of the characters, it rang true that
they would for the most part return to regular, heterosexual
relationships. Most studies of same-sex behaviour confirm that a lot
of people who dabble in the gay lifestyle--for whatever reason, a
temporary thrill or curiousity--do that for a very brief time and
never consider it again.
3. It honestly depicted the norm of tom-cat gay behaviour in the
further adventures of the Jack Twist character, who sought and was
sought out for further homosexual trysts with other
people.
Where did it stray from the truth? I think in these
ways:
1. The pattern of these two cowboys returning for regular visits
because they are in "love," as the script clearly implies, is
completely unknown to me in my own experience of gay behaviour and
the gay culture. I think the film-makers wanted to convey
homosexuality as "normal," and by implying that these chaps would
engage in this sort of romantic longing for each other, just like
any other lovers separated by fate, they would capture that value.
That essentially turns the movie into propaganda.
I found myself comparing it, for example, to "My Private
Idaho," where the lead characters did have a strong emotional
bond, but one that only applied to the short space of time where
their lives were interconnected. Afterwards, one died and the other
went on his merry way. The idea that gay lovers somehow extend their
longing over a period of years is, I suppose, possible. But I've
never heard of it or seen it.
2. The character of Ennis's wife also rings false. It is highly
implausible that a woman would see her husband making a pass at
another man and not kick up a fuss about it, right there and then.
Since both he and his wife were from a conventional, religious
background, in the real world this would immediately have prompted a
harsh, negative reaction. I've seen wives suffer in silence based on
rumours and speculation about their mates, but never a case where
they witnessed the infidelity and then stayed silent about it for
years.
3. The anguish of the Ennis character, and his guilt about his
relationship with Twist, is presented in a confused manner. The
movie leads you to believe that he is suffering because he couldn't
find it in himself to face up to his identity. But it also implied
what is more likely to be real, that it was the social taboos about
homosexuality that were causing his moral dilemma. Could both be
true? I suppose, but it rings truer to me that he is feeling guilty
because he committed those acts, not because he misses his
paramour.
So, in terms of the moral honesty of the film, I
conclude that it has some, but not nearly enough. A more honest
rendition of the psychological dynamics of homosexuals can be found
in the TV series "Queer as Folk," which portrays the
lifestyle warts and all, and doesn't pretend to symbolize such
pretensions as star-crossed lovers as part of the plot. It's "wham,
bam, thank you, (not) ma'am." That's what mostly goes on in the real
world.
The fundamental problem with "Brokeback Mountain"
is that it uses a homosexual template to describe a long-term
relationship that is not only the exception in the gay culture, but
almost unheard of. It also takes as its underlying theme that
homosexual identity is locked in, which I know from personal
experience to be false. I found out the hard way that, like all
other human behaviours, homosexuality is a chosen pursuit, not a
Twist of fate.
"When I was a child, I was taught we were chosen to rule
over and make the world a better place. But as I got older, I saw
the real intention of the "Chosen Ones," understanding it was
nothing more than a ruthless plan to obtain money and power by any
means possible, including torture and killing."
Like many others born into the Illuminati, from her birth in
Germany Svali had no choice in her future, as her wealthy, rich and
powerful parents charted her course as a "Chosen Child" from an
early age.
Told she was "special and born to rule over the masses" to make a
better world, Svali recalls going to regular Illuminati meetings
with other "chosen children" at least three times a week after
moving from Germany to Virginia and then finally to San Diego.
"I was born into it and long before the induction ceremony when I
was 12, intensive training began to instill into me that I was
special and the New World Order was good for the world," said Svali.
"When you grow up with wealthy parents like this, always being
told you are special, it takes a long time to figure out the truth
and a way out. I worked my way up the Illuminati ladder to the rank
of head trainer, overseeing 60 other trainers. People have a hard
time believing or understanding just how organized the Illuminati
really are here in America, comprising about 1-2 percent of the
total population.
"Yes, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Kerry, the Clintons and the others
in power are all a part of it and they are in the governmental
division of the Illuminati. However, I do not want to mention other
members not in public office for fear of getting sued.
Saying that the Illuminati's main goal is to depopulate the world
and create a unified, one world government, Svali said to fully
understand Illuminati cult programming it's first important to
comprehend the structure and philosophy of the worldwide
organization as she learned it as a child growing up in the
ranks.
In a manuscript from a book she is trying to publish, written
after she ran from the Illuminati in San Diego, Svali explains:
"The Illuminati are a group of people who follow a philosophy
known as "Illuminism" or "enlightenment". The Illuminati were named
several hundred years ago, but trace their roots and history to the
ancient mystery religions of Egypt, ancient Babylon, and even
Mesopotamia. Out of these ancient religions, which were practiced
secretly over hundreds and hundreds of years, there arose esoteric
groups which continued to practice the rites, traditions, and
enculturation brought in from the original groups.
"Over the centuries, these groups practiced openly in some
countries, and covertly in countries where Christianity or other
religions opposed their practices. Some of the groups which came out
of these ancient roots included the order of the Knights Templar,
Rosicrucian's, Baphetomism, and Druidic cults. These groups were the
forerunners, or roots, of modern day Illuminism. The original
Illuministic leaders chose to take what they felt were the best
practices of each root religion, combine them into principles, then
organized these principles according to specific guidelines.
"Modern day Illuminism is a philosophy funded by the wealthy, but
practiced in all social strata. It is a philosophy whose tenets have
spread across the world. It started with the German branch of
Rosicrucian's, spread to England, then came to the United states
with the first settlers."
Svali said during her 30 years with the Illuminati she witnessed
a lot of violence from programs stemming from the CIA's MK ULTRA, as
well as other mind control programs utilized by the cult.
Working a steady job in the day and then attending heavily
guarded, secret meetings three times a week during the evening near
San Diego, Svali said she learned "from the inside" the Illuminati
plan to rule the world, also known as Novus Ordem Seclorum, is very
real, very dangerous and being played out right before the eyes of
Americans, as the cult's stepped up plans to take over the U.S. is
underway and in full-throttle.
What better way to learn about the plan then to listen from an
insider, trying to make amends with herself and the world. The
following is from Chapter 3 of her yet to be published
manuscript:
"All groups have goals, and the Illuminists are no exception.
Money making is not their final goal - it is a means to an end. This
end point, or goal, is no less than to rule the world. The
Illuminati has a set plan similar to the Soviet Union's previous "5-
year" and "10- year " plans. This is what the Illuminists themselves
believe and teach their followers as gospel truth.
"Whether they will actually succeed is another matter altogether.
The following is the Illuminist agenda at ALL levels of the
Illuminati. As with any goal, the Illuminati has specific steps
which it plans to implement to reach its objectives. Briefly, each
region of the United States has "nerve centers" or power bases for
regional activity. The United States has been divided up into seven
major geographical regions. Each region has localities within it
that contain military compounds and bases that are hidden in remote,
isolated areas or on large private estates.
"These bases are used intermittently to teach and train
generational Illuminati in military techniques, hand- to- hand
combat, crowd control, use of arms, and all aspects of military
warfare. Why? Because the Illuminists believe that our government,
as we know it, as well as the governments of most nations around the
world, are destined to collapse. These will be planned collapses,
and they will occur in the following ways:
"The Illuminati has planned first for a financial collapse that
will make the great depression look like a picnic. This will occur
through the maneuvering of the great banks and financial
institutions of the world, through stock manipulation, and interest
rate changes. Most people will be indebted to the federal government
through bank and credit card debt, etc. The governments will recall
all debts immediately, but most people will be unable to pay and
will be bankrupted. This will cause generalized financial panic
which will occur simultaneously worldwide, as the Illuminists firmly
believe in controlling people through finances.
"Next there will be a military takeover, region by region, as the
government declares a state of emergency and martial law. People
will have panicked, there will be an anarchical state in most
localities, and the government will justify its move as being
necessary to control panicked citizens. The cult trained military
leaders and people under their direction will use arms as well as
crowd control techniques to implement this new state of affairs.
This is why so many survivors under 36 years of age report having
military programming. People who are not Illuminists or who are not
sympathetic to their cause, will resist.
"The Illuminists expect this and will be (and are BEING) trained
in how to deal with this eventuality. They are training their people
in hand-to- hand combat, crowd control, and, if necessary, will kill
to control crowds. The Illuminati is training their people to be
prepared for every possible reaction to the takeover. Many mind
control victims will also be called into duty with preset command
codes. These codes are meant to call out a new, completely cult
loyal presenting system. Shatter codes programmed under trauma will
be used to destroy or bury non-cult loyal alters.
"Military bases will be set up, in each locality (actually, they
are already here, but are covert). In the next few years, they will
go above ground and be revealed. Each locality will have regional
bases and leaders to which they are accountable. The hierarchy will
closely reflect the current covert hierarchy.
"About five years ago, when I left the Illuminati, approximately
1% of the US population was either part of the Illuminati,
sympathetic to it, or a victim of Mind Control (and therefore
considered useable). While this may not sound like many, imagine 1%
of the population highly trained in the use of armaments, crowd
control, psychological and behavioral techniques, armed with weapons
and linked to paramilitary groups.
"These people will also be completely dedicated to their cause.
The Illuminati firmly believes that it can easily overcome the other
99% of the population, most of whom are untrained, or poorly
trained, such as "weekend hunters." Even the local military will be
overcome as the Illuminati will have regional cell groups with
highly trained leaders. They also count on the element of surprise
helping them during their takeover. Many of the highest leaders in
the militia branch of the Illuminati are or have been officers in
the military, and so already have a good knowledge of which
techniques will work best to overcome a region's or locality's
defenses.
"After the military takeover, the general population will be
given a chance to either espouse the Illuminati's cause, or reject
it (with imprisonment, pain, even death being possible punishments).
These people very much believe that the intelligent, or
"enlightened" or Illuminated, were born to rule. They are arrogant,
and consider the general population as "dumb sheep" who will be
easily led if offered strong leadership, financial help in an
unstable world economy, and dire consequences if the person rebels.
Their utter ruthlessness, and ability to implement this agenda,
should not be minimized.
"The Illuminati banking leaders, such as the Rothschilds, the
VanderBilts, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, and the Mellons, as
examples, will reveal themselves, and offer to "save" the
floundering world economy. A new system of monetary exchange, based
on an international monetary system, and based between Cairo, Egypt,
and Brussels, Belgium, will be set up. A true "one world economy",
creating the longed for "one world order", will become reality."
Svali said this is the tip of the iceberg of the Illuminati
agenda in America and she has been disowned by her family for
leaving. Although recently offered $15,000 to return home, Svali has
refused, saying her ministry to awaken the American people is her
first priority.
Through years of special training, she learned members of the
Illuminati are willing to give up their lives for their cause, as
they believe their children are their legacy.
"I was told that my children's generation would see this
takeover, sometime in the 21st century. At present, the Illuminati
have quietly and covertly fostered their takeover plan by their
goals of the infiltration of the media, the banking system, the
education system, the government at all levels, the sciences and the
churches," said Svali.
While I pretty much agree with your analysis of this film, and
the overall agenda of elites etc. it now has a deeper recent
scientific paradigm that presents hard evidence to deal with.
Specifically, the research about the feminization of male
fetuses, by the incredible powerful pseudo/phyto estrogenic
chemicals we are bombarded with. While these chemicals may cause
all sorts of weakening of adult systems, it is readily apparent
in fetal development and virtually explains all types of male
homosexuality and sexual defects.
So it now appears that these chemicals, especially bis Phenol
A and Phalates in plastics and paper...hence the
question, "Plastic or Paper? ;-) are two of the main culprits of
these homosexual/sexual "birth defects" which have been shown to
include both physically manefested defects such as hypospadia,
the number one birth defect in males, undescended testicles and
stunted penis etc, and such brain defects as sissy gays, flame
gays, transvestites, shemales, gender disphorias and full blown
transsexualism.
Hypospadia is so common it may be over 25% of males, but it is
usually just stitched up and never mentioned again. It may be far
more epidemic in Japan, and far more hidden, but it is revealed
in their widely popular Hentai porn cartoons, and many closet
favorites there are of such Hypospadia Shemales ! Quite shocking
indeed, and essentially the only pictures ofthis condition available
anywhere, amazing considering the complete coverage of all sexuality
and bizarreness online. No pics of a hypospadia.
I think that this amazing coverup is not accidental, and far
beyond just some simple personal psych explanation, and is
clearly far far more insidious and on purpose.
Discussion and bringing this out would expose the whole array,
continuum and diversity of the corporate chemical induced fetal
gay syndrome.
In many species all around us and worldwide, we see all sorts of
gay and tranny fish, amphibians, birds, gay florida panthers,
smal penis gators, and on and on, leading to a complete collapse in
some small and/special ecosystems and nitches.
There are almost no male salmon in the Columbia River, they are
all transsexual, and other shocking manifestations often
downstream from sewage outfalls, where clearly, the inability of
these systems to remove estrogens and pseudo/phyto estrogens has
poisoned all fetal development.
Now this has been demonstrated and reproduceable experiments are
published, One experiment in Canada was shocking. A small
pristine lake was chosen, fully tested for estrogen activity and
then contaminated with just parts per TRILLION of estrogen.
The result, nothing apparent at first in existing wildlife of all
phylums, then all gay male offspring, then a rapid complete and
total collapse of all animal populations then extinction ! and so
what is the next step?
Well, look at all the special interests here, gays sure dont want
to be labeled as "birth defects", hypospadia is never mentioned,
ever, and gays are fighting hard for some respect and rights,
although the agenda is as messed up as it could be by media mind
control and just plain reckless behavior and bizarreness by
gays.
Then you have the religious zealots with a major historical
hatred to preserve. We should not have to explain this further
except to say it is simply not based on science, and primarily on
ignorance, bigotry, fear and outright hate.
Then there is the govt who sure doesnt want to accept this proven
science, nor have to cut a Social Security Check to birth
defected gays ! Plus all sorts of other political and election
propagandas and hypocracies. The govt complicities are enormous,
all encompassing and clearly conspiratorial.
Then of couse, the source, yes lets explore a little tip of that
cold hard reality.
Bis Phenol A numero uno mfg. is DOW's Freeport Texas plant which
produces a sprem numbing 400,000 TONS/year which is used in
products that have exceptionally close contact with humans,
especially pregnant women.
Numero Dos is of course China, 200,000 tons, and their anti
life anti reproduction agenda is well known, except for this
unrecognized mega conspiracy.
Sorry, Duct Tape and Plastic Sheeting will only exacerbate
this contamination!!!
Oh yea, what about Lesbians? Well research is pointing to another
set of chemicals in utero for that, mostly amphetamines and
thyroid chemicals are implicated so far. And it affects and crosses
all lines, as we see from Cheney's daughter and many elite "Ellen"
children.
So Henry, we need to expand the dialogue and get serious about
this incredible threat to mankind and nature, and move away from
old psychobabble and religious rants about gays, as most of that is
a major diversion from the real chemical criminals of the New World
Disorder.
God Bless Steve Davis
Refs. Simply Google any of the keywords above to learn more.
General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian
armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This
military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an
analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues.
As he did during the Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains
that international terrorism does not exist and that the September
11 attacks were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a
manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist
without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a "world war on
terror" the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through
respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among
countries and their citizens.
Today's international terrorism is a phenomenon that
combines the use of terror by state and non-state political
structures as a means to attain their political objectives through
peoples intimidation, psychological and social destabilization, the
elimination of resistance from power organizations and the creation
of appropriate conditions for the manipulation of the countries
policies and the behavior of people.
Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same
time, international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes
the manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis
between media and terror, which allows modifying international
politics and the exiting reality.
In this context, if we analyze what happened on September 11,
2001, in the United States, we can arrive at the following
conclusions: 1. The organizers of those attacks were the political
and business circles interested in destabilizing the world order and
who had the means necessary to finance the operation. The political
conception of this action matured there where tensions emerged in
the administration of financial and other types of resources. We
have to look for the reasons of the attacks in the coincidence of
interests of the big capital at global and transnational levels, in
the circles that were not satisfied with the rhythm of the
globalization process or its direction. Unlike traditional wars,
whose conception is determined by generals and politicians, the
oligarchs and politicians submitted to the former were the ones who
did it this time.
2. Only secret services and their current chiefs or those
retired but still having influence inside the state organizations
have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such
magnitude. Generally, secret services create, finance and control
extremist organizations. Without the support of secret services,
these organizations cannot exist let alone carry out operations of
such magnitude inside countries so well protected. Planning and
carrying out an operation on this scale is extremely complex.
3. Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" cannot be the organizers nor
the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the
necessary organization, resources or leaders. Thus, a team of
professionals had to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just
extras to mask the operation. The September 11 operation
modified the course of events in the world in the direction chosen
by transnational mafias and international oligarchs; that is, those
who hope to control the planet's natural resources, the world
information network and the financial flows. This operation also
favored the US economic and political elite that also seeks world
dominance.
By
Henry Makow Ph.D
To print this article, go to the 
By
Henry Makow Ph.D.
In
advance, I had concluded that the movie would advance some
important moral claims about homosexual freedom, and that those
pretensions would dovetail with conventional views of moral
equivalency between lifestyles. I wanted to see if it was honest or
not. As it turned out, the answers were "yes" and "no."
"When I was a child, I was taught we were chosen to rule
over and make the world a better place. But as I got older, I saw
the real intention of the "Chosen Ones," understanding it was
nothing more than a ruthless plan to obtain money and power by any
means possible, including torture and killing."
RE: http://www.rense.com/general69/poke.htm
Dan said (January 27, 2006):
Hitler remains one of the most enigmatic personages of modern history, considering his universal high profile. There no shortage of first hand accounts by people who were close to him all the way back to grade school. From what I've read, including a book by his high school friend August Kuzibeck (Hitler, meine jungen freund), There was always something unusual and inexplicable about Hitler even in school Kuzibeck mentioned an episode of a prominent local man speaking to the boys in a park, and seeming familiar with Hilter. The man closed the discussion by inviting Kuzibeck to feel free to drop by his home anytime to discuss intellectual subjects. Kuzibeck was flattered, but Hitler knowingly said, "that man is a homosexual. do not visit him". Kuzibeck wrote that at 14, he had only a vague idea of what a homosexual even was, and was impressed by Hitler's seeming knowlege of adult topics.
Many Americans who had met Hitler, such as Orson Wells at the 1936 Olympics, remarked they were shocked that in person, Hitler did not impress at all. Perhaps they were actually meeting doubles. Or more likely, Hitler did have the form of multiple identity disorder ('alters') described by victims of secret mind control programs.
Much has been written by those who witnessed Hitler's oratory. It's said that he literally changed into someone else, described as 'supernatural' and hypnotic, long before Albert Speir's expensive sets and sound amplification aoustics and spot lighting enhanced the effect at the Nuremburg rallies. Hitler's involvement with the documented Thule Society is also very odd. Or used to be considered odd for the later leader of a civilized first world 20th century nation, before what we now know of our high ranking government and presidential officials involvement in Skull and Bones. S$B, whose symbold is the very death's head and bones worn by the Waffen SS., originated from the very same German Luciferian cult: The Fraternus Saturnis. Thule being on of many 'outer' of 'funnel' front clubs controlled by the more secret FS, which was/is elite Immuminati.
Whether or not it can be proven without doubt that Hitler's year in Britain was in training at Tavistock, the depth of his involvement with real German Satanism/Illuminism is well documented. He recieved his training in oratory under the auspices of an infamous Thulean. Training included invocation of specific Enochian demons to channel for mesmeric public speaking.
We may never know the full story of Hitler, how far back his grooming for the role of an anti-Christ went, and the crititcal missing links between the known Satanist groups of the day, and the British secret services.
Tavistock is certainly a key. Since I learned of what Tavistock is and how long they've been around, I'm coming upon more and more names of people who were documented as having been trained by there, or attended seminars there. Irrefutably documented examples include, Angela Davis and founding members of the Black Panther movement. Attended seminars on Marxism and revolution, 1963-64. Also 'Cinque' of the 'Symbionese Liberation Army', of Patty Hearst fame.
One week before he was murdered, John Lennon revealed on an New York radio interview (which I've heard several times), that the Beatles were created by Tavistock to launch a new paradigm for youth to abandon traditonal values for sex, drugs, and rock n' roll. He said he was he was going to reveal the whole secret and had come out of hiding to do so. Aside from this astounding revelation, Lennon never got the chance to tell all he knew.
Tavistock as we know it did not exist in 1912-1913. The Marquis of Tavistock, Duke of Bedford, didn't give the properties at Tavistock Square to MI-5 until 1921, ostensibly as a research institute to study shell shock and battlefield trauma after the first world war. If Hallet said Tavestock, I suppose that spy training (brainwashing) had in fact been conducted there as early as 1912, since Illuminati operatives in the British secret goverment were certainly aware of what was coming, no doubt even before the Kaiser and Czar were aware that they would soon be manipulated into a great war neither intended.
Lyndon LaRouche has put together the pre-history of wwI and points to King Edward VII of Great Britain as the mastermind, even though he died in 1910.
And there is nothing new about spies, double agents, brainwashing, and blackmail. All the crowned heads of Europe and Russia employed highly sophisticated spy networks, and they are well known to have practiced all of the above. We have examples of sophisticated espionage during the American Civil War, (John Wilkes Booth, member Golden Circle. Belle Star, Confederate 'Madda Hari'). These are well documented as agents working directly for British Intelligence for the prevention of the United States attaining independent world power.
What amazes me today is that the Tavistock Institute has a very wholesome looking web site, with smiling faces, and offers seminars, and scholarships.
I can't prove a thing of course, but my impression of Hitler since reading Hitler meine jungen freund in the late 1970's, is that someone was guiding and grooming him since childhood, and that he was to some extent aware of this, though thoroughly mind contolled and never given the full story.