Based on the FBI's most recent (1998) Uniform
Crime Report, the statistics don't support his
utopian view of the issue of personal safety in
the United States.
Though violent crime is at it's lowest in years,
consider these numbers and see if it makes
you feel safe enough to give up the best form
of personal protection available today, in lieu
of being "protected" only by the police:
Law enforcement agencies nationwide
recorded a 21 percent Crime Index
clearance rate in 1998, which means that
79 percent of crimes went unsolved. The
clearance rate for violent crimes was 49
percent, meaning 51 percent went
unsolved, while the figure for property
crimes was 17 percent cleared and 83
percent uncleared.
The crime clearance rate was lowest for
burglary and motor vehicle theft, with 14
percent solved and 86 percent unsolved.
How much would armed home invasions
or carjackings increase if nobody were
allowed to be armed, except the police?
There are only 641,208 police officers and
253,327 civilian assistance personnel
"guarding" over 260 million Americans.
That's a whopping 2.5 officers for every
1,000 people -- do you feel "safe?"
In "liberal" northeastern states like
Maryland, the highest officer-to-civilian
ratio already exists, with 2.8 officers for
every 1,000 residents. But that's not good
enough for Mr. Curran -- he still wants
residents in his state to be almost totally
disarmed, as if this "higher" police officer
figure is adequate to protect everyone
from harm, theft, or property crimes.