The role of teevee has been paramount in both the physical degeneration of our people and their mental somnolence. During the last few years, the typically overweight White adult has been joined by a startling and ominous phenomenon: the obese child. Concurrent with the severing of ties to the land, the loss of imtimacy with our heritage, tradition and family/blood ties, television has--by default-- become the creator of social norms. Instead of the awkwardly blatant propaganda of 50 years ago, we now have a sinuously sly, continuous and often subtle form of cueing, in which politically correct beliefs and attitudes are conveyed to us non-verbally. For example, characters in a TV series who display the wrong attitudes are subject to the disapproving, contemptuous looks from other characters and major goals of the Propasphere are constantly reiterated: the supposed desireability of limitless non-White immigration, the trendiness of inter-racial marriage, and the rejection of traditional mores and loyalties. There is also the deliberate mutilation of our History--as when a fairly recent movie about Robin Hood included a Black among his merry men. There are numberless instances of such distortion, and the devaluation of our culture--along with accelerating debasement of quality in publiceducation--guarantees that even as young adults, the children who saw that movie will not realize its great lie--which, of course, goes far beyond the matter of casting.

The Fall of Rome was no sudden catastrophe but a slow, inexorable dissolution, during which the distinct Roman genotype was diluted and absorbed via the solvent of incoming peoples--Celts, Germans, Levantines, Greeks, etc. Yet all of these peoples had highly developed cultures, and, in the case of the "Barbarians", brought invigorating blood and spirit which eventually were manifested in the nation-states of Europe. The tragedy of the Fall of Rome was mitigated and transformed by the fact that the inheritors of Italy and the European part of the Roman Empire were (racially speaking) close relatives of the Romans--most being within the great Indo-European sub-race. They not only had uniquely beautiful cultures of their own, but were able to preserve the best that the Romans had achieved and develop it.

Our own situation is ominously different. The rough sketch of the world distribution of racial groups above is, of course, only an approximation, but it reflects the reality of the fact that just one place in the entire world remains an Aryan homeland: Iceland. Every other traditionally Aryan homeland---Europe and North America--has sustained such heavy non-White immigration, that the United States will see European-Americans become a minority in their own land within the next 40 years, Canada is headed in the same direction, and the handwriting is on the wall for even Europe. In fact, the actual situation is even more drastic than shown by the map, because a large part of Asia--Indonesia, etc.--isn't shown, and Australia, which once had a strictly preservationist immigration policy, has thrown open its doors to non-White new-comers. The very high birth-rate among the immigrants, combined with declining and even negative White birth rates tell us what too many of our people do not yet see : The genetic identity of Whites ---and only of Whites--is in jeopardy.

The great difference between the circumstances surrounding Rome's Fall and ours, is that in our case, massive non-White immigration is the result of lock-step policies of the New World Order--a cabal of international banking interests, mega-corporations, and social engineering academics (working through political puppets) who have existed as a powerful entity long before the phrase "New World Order" ever slipped George Bush's lips. Their desire for World Government, enforcing Egalitarian programs hostile to Whites (and, ultimately to all races and ethnicities) together with a history of the group and the identity of its major players, was described in a multi-volume work titled Tragedy and Hope by Dr. Carrol Quigley, who was an unabashed admirer of the group's goals and members; the work has been cited by Clinton as the book which most influenced his political thought. For decades, this group has worked and planned in semi-secrecy, and it still is fairly low-profile. From its beginnings, the role of Jewish "advisors" and bankers has been a prominent feature, following the age-old pattern of counselor-to- the-king found in the Biblical stories of Daniel and Joseph--and in the more modern examples of the Rothschilds and European royalty, the Rockefellers and Kissinger, the Kennedys and Schlesinger, Clinton and Albright. Their control of the media has been an indispensible part of the indoctrination of the West. Ultimately, however, the blame for our dilemma rests squarely upon our own shoulders. Those who wish nothing more fervently than to see us extinct have exploited weaknesses within us; their gains have come by default-- our default. If anything is to be hated, it is the greed, cowardly lust for security bought at the cost of freedom, pitiful craving for status, and abject fear of taking unpopular stands, which have allowed us to be pushed to the precipice of our own racial annhilation.

During the process of transfer of loyalty from kindred to government/social worker, the seldom-questioned but poisonous ethical standards of Christianity which are so alien to our ancient Aryan culture and spirit ("Love your enemies, bless them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you"; "For I am come to set a man at variance with his father, and the daughter against her mother, ...He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me", etc., etc.) become secular ethics by default--even though they are a clear prescription for a life of bondage and supine cowardliness. It's been exactly this set of monstrous "ethics" which has animated the unnatural corpse of Egalitarianism and which makes otherwise intelligent people pay tribute to the notion that some sort of muzzy-headed "love" for everyone, without discrimination is a laudable ideal, rather than a Levantine absurdity that is--at core--unclean and life-hating.

When Rome became decadent, her people alienated from Nature and the land, her borders a sieve, her old religion ossified into worship of the State, Chrsitianity rushed in to fill the vacuum; over the centuries--and not many of them-- Christianity became an institutional power. That is, it had continuity of discipline, unswerving purpose, and organized itself in a way which perpetuated and increased its power. Certainly not every priest, monk, or nun viewed his or her role within the Church in such stark terms (although certainly some Machiavellian higher-ups did so!) but in whatever city or nation a member of the clergy happened to be living, he could be counted upon to serve the goals of the Church. So inculcated with Church views were most Church personnel, that their actions for the Church often needed no conscious deliberation, planning, or decision-making. Although Christianity as a religious belief and institutional power is well into its ebb, the people from whence it sprang are at the zenith of their power; in Europe, those who publicly dispute Holocaust dogma--or even those who publish scientific findings whose truth is incontestible but which conflict with that dogma, can be and have been jailed as felons; large Internet corporations, schools and public libraries accept "hate filters" which prevent users from accessing websites disliked by them. Their presence in top positions in the government of the U.S. amounts to de facto control, as do their numbers and positions in all the media. Over the two millenia since the start of Christianity, they, too, have preserved an institutional integrity, a sense of racial identity, and remarkable cohesion when dealing with matters of concern to group welfare and power.