WHO WAS REALLY FLYING
THOSE PLANES ON 9-11?
Hours after the 9-11 attacks, authorities began to
find clues conveniently left for them to stumble upon. The Boston Globe reported
that a copy of the Koran, instructions on how to fly a commercial airplane and a
fuel consumption calculator were found in a pair of bags meant for one of the
hijacked flights that left from Logan. 64
Authorities
also received a "tip" about a suspicious white car left behind at Boston's Logan
Airport. An Arabic-language flight training manual was found inside the car. 65
How
fortunate for investigators that the hijackers "forgot" to take their Koran and
Arab flight manuals with them! Within a few days, all "19 hijackers" were
"identified" and their faces were plastered all over our television
screens.
Then, like a script from a corny "B" spy movie, the official
story gets even more ridiculous. The passport of the supposed "ringleader"
Mohammed Atta, somehow managed to survive the explosion, inferno, and smoldering
collapse to be oh-so-conveniently "found" just a few blocks away from the World
Trade Center! 66
It
is obvious that this "evidence" was planted by individuals wishing to direct the
blame towards Osama Bin Laden. How is it possible that Arab students who had
never flown an airplane could take a simulator course and then fly jumbo jets
with the skill and precision of "top-gun" pilots? It is not possible and the
fact is, the true identities of the 9-11 hijackers remains a mystery. In the
days following the disclosure of the "hijackers" names and faces, no less than 7
of the Arab individuals named came forward to protest their obvious innocence.
67
That's right!
Seven of the nineteen "hijackers" are alive and well. They
were victims of identity theft, some of whom had had their passports stolen.
They were interviewed by several news organizations including the Telegraph of
England. Here’s an excerpt from David Harrison’s Telegraph story entitled:
Revealed: The Men With Stolen Identities:
"Their names were
flashed around the world as suicide hijackers who carried out the attacks on
America. But yesterday four innocent men told how their identities had been
stolen…
The men - all from Saudi Arabia - spoke of their shock at being
mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the
United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home
country."
The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men
since they learnt that they were on the FBI's list of hijackers who died in the
crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
All four said
that they were "outraged" to be identified as terrorists. One has never been to
America and another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in
Tunisia at the time of the attacks. Saudi Airlines said it was considering legal
action against the FBI for seriously damaging its reputation and that of its
pilots." 68
(emphasis
added)
The story of these identity thefts was also briefly reported by
ABC 69 and BBC (England) 70 The FBI
does not deny this. Nobody denies this fact because it is easily verifiable.
Instead, the US media and government just ignore this inconvenient little fact
and keep right on repeating the monstrous lie that the hijacker identities are
known and that 15 of them were Saudis.
CNN revealed that FBI director
Robert Mueller openly admitted that some of the identities of the 9-11 hijackers
are in question due to identity theft. Here’s what CNN reported on September
21:
FBI Director Robert Mueller has acknowledged that some of those
behind last week's terror attacks may have stolen the identification of other
people, and, according to at least one security expert, it may have been
"relatively easy" based on their level of sophistication. 71
This opens
up a whole Pandora’s box of unanswered questions. First and foremost of which is
this: why would Osama Bin laden, the Saudi Arabian caveman, steal identities? To
cover his tracks you say? Next question: why would a Saudi Arabian, attempting
to cover his tracks, steal the identities of....fellow Saudi Arabians??? What
would be the point? Why go you through the trouble of stealing identities that
would point back to you? Why not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian
identities, or Turkish ones? A much more logical conclusion is that non-Arabs
stole these identities as part of a "false flag" operation designed to point the
blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabs in particular.
What kind of a corrupt
character is FBI boss Mueller? He initially admitted that false identities were
involved with 9-11, but then he allows the media to keep naming these innocent,
and alive, Arabs as the hijackers? Why doesn’t he correct them? More on the
slimy Mr. Mueller later on!
Now I'm really going to rock your faith in
the false religion of 9-11. In February of 2000, Indian intelligence officials
detained 11 members of what they thought was an Al Qaeda hijacking conspiracy.
It was then discovered that these 11 "Muslim preachers" were all Israeli
nationals! India’s leading weekly magazine, The Week, reported:
"On
January 12 Indian intelligence officials in Calcutta detained 11 foreign
nationals for interrogation before they were to board a Dhaka-bound Bangladesh
Biman flight. They were detained on the suspicion of being hijackers. "But we
realized that they were tabliqis (Islamic preachers), so we let them go, said an
Intelligence official."
The eleven had Israeli passports but were
believed to be Afghan nationals who had spent a while in Iran. …Indian
intelligence officials, too, were surprised by the nationality profile of the
eleven. "They say that they have been on tabligh (preaching Islam) in India for
two months. But they are Israeli nationals from the West Bank," said a Central
Intelligence official. He claimed that Tel Aviv "exerted considerable
pressure" on Delhi to secure their release. "It appeared that they could
be working for a sensitive organization in Israel and were on a mission to
Bangladesh," the official said." 72 (emphasis
added)
What were these 11 Israelis doing trying to impersonate Al Qaeda
men? Infiltrating?...perhaps. Framing?...more likely. But the important
precedent to understand is this: Israeli agents were once caught red handed
impersonating Muslim hijackers!
This event becomes even more mind
boggling when we learn that it was Indian Intelligence that helped the US to so
quickly identify the "19 hijackers"! On April 3, 2002, Express India, quoting
the Press Trust of India, revealed:
Washington, April 3: Indian
intelligence agencies helped the US to identify the hijackers who carried out
the deadly September 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, a media
report said here on Wednesday. 73
Ain't
that a kick in the ass?!! Did you catch that? The Indian intelligence
officials that were duped into mistaking Israeli agents for Al Qaeda hijackers
back in 2000- were the very same clowns telling the FBI who it was that
hijacked the 9-11 planes! Keep in mind that Indian intelligence has an
extremely close working relationship with Israel’s Mossad because both
governments hate the Muslim nation of Pakistan. 74
Now about Mohamed
Atta, you know, the so-called "ring leader". There are a number of
inconsistencies with that story as well. Like some of the 7 hijackers known to
be still alive, Atta also had his passport stolen in 1999, 75 (the same passport
that miraculously survived the WTC explosion and collapse?) making him an
easy mark for an identity theft. Atta was known to all as a shy, timid, and
sheltered young man who was uncomfortable with women. 76 The
5'7" 150 pound architecture student was such a "goody two shoes" that some of
his university acquaintances in Germany refrained from drinking or cursing in
front of him. How this gentle, non- political mamma's boy from a good Egyptian
family suddenly transformed himself into the vodka drinking, go-go girl groping
terrorist animal described by the media, has to rank as the greatest personality
change since another classic work of fiction, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Atta, or someone using Atta's identity, had enrolled in a Florida flight
school in 2001 and then broke off his training, making it a point to tell
his instructor he was leaving for Boston. In an October 2001 interview
with an ABC affiliate in Florida, flight school president Rudi Dekkers said that
his course does not qualify pilots to fly commercial jumbo jets. 77 He also
described Atta as "an asshole". 78
Part of the reason for Dekker's dislike for Atta stems from a highly unusual
incident that occurred at the beginning of the course. Here’s the exchange
between ABC producer Quentin McDermott and Dekkers:
MCDERMOTT: "Why do
you say Atta was an asshole?"
DEKKERS: "Well, when Atta was here
and I saw his face on several occasions in the building, then I know that
they're regular students and then I try to talk to them, it's kind of a PR -
where are you from… I tried to communicate with him. I found out from my people
that he lived in Hamburg and he spoke German so one of the days that I saw him,
I speak German myself, I'm a Dutch citizen, and I started in the morning telling
him in German, "Good morning. How are you? How do you like the coffee? Are you
happy here?", and he looked at me with cold eyes, didn't react at all and walked
away. That was one of my first meetings I had." 79
This is eerily similar to the way in which Zacharias Moussaoui (the
so-called "20th hijacker) became "belligerent" when his Minnesota flight
instructor tried to speak to him in French (his first language), at the
beginning of that course. The Minnessota Star Tribune reported on December 21,
2001:
"Moussaoui first raised eyebrows when, during a simple
introductory exchange, he said he was from France, but then didn't seem to
understand when the instructor spoke French to him. Moussaoui then became
belligerent and evasive about his background, (Congressman) Oberstar and other
sources said. In addition, he seemed inept in basic flying procedure, while
seeking expensive training on an advanced commercial jet simulator."
80
(emphasis added)
It truly is an amazing twist of fate that both Ata and
Moussaoui both had American flight instructors who spoke German and French
respectively. Even the great Mossad could not have foreseen such a coincidence!
The real Atta would have been able to respond to his instructor’s German small
talk and the real Moussaoui would have been able to respond to his instructor’s
French small talk. Ata just walked away and Moussaoui threw a fit! Neither
responded because neither could. They were imposters, whose faces were probably
disguised by a make up artist. Their mission was to frame the two
innocent Arabs who were probably targeted by the Mossad at random.
The imposter was able to create a new Ata by using Atta's stolen
passport from 1999 - the same passport that floated safely to the ground with a
few burnt edges on 9-11. These strange inconsistencies tend to give support to
Mohammed Atta's father's claim that he spoke over the phone with his son on
September 12th, the day after the attacks. 81 Could a group of
professionals have abducted and killed the real Atta in the days following the
9-11 attacks? Mossad agents, posing as "art students" were arrested after
conducting some type of operation in Hollywood, Florida, the same small town
that Atta stayed in! 82 So what
happened to the real Mohammed Atta? To quote his grief stricken father: "Ask
Mossad!".
So who, if not the "19 Arabs" was on those planes? That’s
the million dollar question! There are a number of alternative scenarios. Could
some Israelis have been fanatical enough to have volunteered for such a suicide
mission? Odd as that may sound at first, it is not out of the realm of
possibility. The fact is, hard-core Zionist extremists have proven themselves to
be every bit as fanatical, (more so), than Arab extremists.
A
nation which can produce thousands of bloodthirsty Zionist extremists,
Irgun war criminals, Mossad terrorists who blow up occupied buildings, assassins
who kill Israeli Prime Ministers in full view of policemen, and crazed killers
who have carried sickening massacres of Arab women and children; would surely be
capable of recruiting a few fanatics willing to sacrifice for "the
cause". This theory becomes even more plausible when we consider that only
the pilots would have needed to know that the planes were on a suicide mission.
Still don’t think Israel is capable of producing suicidal terrorists?
Have you already forgotten the case of Dr. Baruch Goldstein?. Goldstein was a
New York doctor and resettled in Israel. On February 25, 1994, Goldstein
walked into a crowded Arab mosque in the occupied West Bank. With hundreds
of worshippers kneeled in silent prayer, Goldstein sealed off the exit, and
opened fire with a rapid-firing assault rifle, killing 29 and wounding many
more. Goldstein, a father of four, was finally stopped and killed when
the frenzied crowd overpowered him. With as many as 800 worshippers packed into
the mosque, Goldstein surely could not have been expecting to come out alive.
This was clearly a suicide attack. And what did Goldstein’s mother
have to say about her son’s suicide attack? The Boston Globe
revealed:
"The mother of Baruch Goldstein, the Jewish settler who
massacred about 40 Palestinians in a Hebron mosque a week ago, says she is proud
of her son. "I always thought to myself, 'When would someone get up and do such
a thing?' And in the end, my son did it," Miriam Goldstein told the weekly
Shishi newspaper." 83
It gets
even more sickening than that. Baruch Goldstein has become a folk hero among
many of the crazed side-locked settlers who have encroached upon the West Bank.
They have turned Goldstein’s gravesite into a memorial and set up a website to
honor his murderous deed! Look what these fanatics posted on the Goldstein
memorial website:
"Over the years, the grave has become a site of
pilgrimage. Numerous people from all over the world come to pray
and honor his (Baruch’s) memory. 84
(emphasis
added)
One has to wonder if some of Goldstein’s admirers were flying
those planes on 9-11. There is one interesting side note here which may or may
not be of any significance. One of the two Israelis who died aboard the hijacked
planes was Daniel Lewin - who was aboard the first plane to crash into the Twin
Towers. The Ha‘aretz News Service of Israel revealed that Lewin, was a
one-time officer in the Israeli Defense Forces elite Sayeret Matkal commando
unit. 85
Oddly enough, Lewin’s name is missing from CNN’s comprehensive September 11
Memorial website.
Another possibility is that some other group of
"patsies" was recruited for the operation. Perhaps some anarchists, or
some leftover Marxists who thought they were going to bring down western
capitalism. Or perhaps, the hijackers were another group of angry Arabs
who weren’t even aware of who their true handlers really were or what the
broader strategic aim of the mission actually was. In the dark world of covert
operations, agents are often kept ignorant of who it is that orchestrating the
show.
Admittedly, these scenarios are speculative, but one thing that is
not speculative is this: the hijackers were not the 19 men whose faces
were shown on our TV screens!
GOLDSTEIN STILL ALIVE: AL
SHEHRI AL OMARI AL-MIDHAR
WHO PROVIDED THE PROTECTIVE COVER FOR THE 9-11
OPERATION?
On October 26, 1999,
the famous golfer Payne Stewart boarded a private Learjet in Florida and left
for Texas. Shortly after takeoff, Stewart's jet veered sharply off course and
began heading northwest. All contact with air controllers was lost. Within 15
minutes of having gone off course, US fighter jets had already intercepted the
jet. Everyone on board was likely dead due to depressurization. These fighter
jets were dispatched by NORAD, the branch of the US air force whose job it is to
monitor and defend US airspace 24 hours a day. NORAD maintains a huge array of
land based radar systems and has fighter jets on alert 24 hours a day so that
they can respond to a crisis. The jets escorted the doomed airplane until
another group of Air National Guard jets took over the escort mission. Finally,
Stewart's jet ran out of fuel a crashed in South Dakota. The quick reaction time
and military precision with which NORAD intercepted and escorted Stewart's jet
was impressive, and exactly what one would have expected from the greatest
military power in world history. 86
But on 9-11,
the same NORAD which had so effortlessly intercepted Stewart's jet in 1999, was
nowhere to be found during that two hour period between the first planes going
off course and the last one crashing in a Pennsylvania field. How is it possible
that the airspace between Boston and Washington DC, an area which contains the
political and economic heart of the nation, was left completely defenseless? The
second plane to hit the New York had flown off course without communication for
40 minutes. On its way to New York, it actually flew within a few miles of
McGuire Air Force base in New Jersey, after the first tower had already been
hit! And how is it possible that Washington DC was left undefended (long after
the New York attacks) when Andrews Air Force base is within car driving
distance? The air force jets which did finally arrive were too late. Was this
due to NORAD's incompetence, or was the order to scramble the fighter jets
deliberately delayed so that the terror attacks could take place. Given NORAD's
impressive performance in the 1999 Payne Stewart disaster, this would suggest
that someone high up in the Air Force establishment may have issued stand down
orders to some of our Air Force bases. Remember, the Pentagon's Defense Policy
Board is headed by Zionist Richard Perle and his gang of warmongering lackeys.87 The
civilians on this board wield the power to promote career minded Generals and
Admirals. Is it really that hard to believe that a highly placed military leader
could have collaborated with the true 9-11 planners?
What makes the Air
Force's slow response even more outrageous and suspicious is that previously
mentioned Newsweek article which revealed that several Pentagon leaders (Defense
Policy Board?) cancelled flight plans for September 11 due to security
concerns.88 There were other
warning signals too which we’re reviewed earlier. In light of all these
warnings, why wasn’t NORAD and it's armada of fighters placed on an even higher
alert than they already are? There is only one logical answer to these
questions: Certain Pentagon leaders were "in on it".
General Hamid Gul, a
former Director of Pakistani Intelligence hit the nail on the head with his
analysis:
"The attacks against New York and Washington were Israeli
engineered…"
"The attacks started at 8:45, and four flights are diverted
from their assigned air space and no Air Force fighter jets scramble until
10:00. Radars are jammed, transponders fail and no IFF - friend or foe
identification - challenge. In Pakistan, if there is no response to an IFF, jets
are instantly scrambled. This was clearly an inside job. Will this also be
hushed up in the investigation, like the Kennedy assassination?" 89
This
raises another troubling set of questions. Surely the masterminds of the 9-11
operation would
have taken the time to learn something about US air
defense procedures. They would therefore have realized that hitting New York
City with jets hijacked from Boston would have been difficult. New York is about
30 minutes away by airplane and jumbo jets fly very slowly when compared to US
fighter jets that can crack the sound barrier. Even with a 15-20 minute head
start, NORAD's jets could have easily intercepted them, especially the second
plane, which took a longer route to New York and flew way off course for 40
minutes. Why choose Boston's airport and jeopardize the success of the
operation? Wouldn't it be safer to just hijack planes from New York's Kennedy or
La Guardia Airports? Or even Newark, NJ which is just across the river. Any
plane hijacked from either of those three busy airports would have been
unstoppable. Even a plane from Philadelphia's Airport would have been much
closer to the target than far away Boston.
The planners were no dummies.
They must have counted on receiving protective cover and a window of opportunity
by someone high up at US Air command. Why else choose Boston? In addition to the
protection that the planners were to receive from certain Air Force elements,
there is another plausible theory for choosing Boston's Logan Airport as well as
United and American Airlines planes. It should be noted that the firm
which provides security at Boston's Logan Airport and also Newark Airport, and
also works extensively with United and American Airlines, is a company called
Huntleigh USA. 90
Claiming that Huntleigh USA's airport security was grossly negligent on 9-11,
family members of some of the victims are suing Huntleigh. 91
Huntleigh USA had been acquired by ICTS International in 1999. ICTS is
controlled by two Israelis; Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon. 92 In
short, security at Boston's Logan airport was handled (or mishandled) by an
Israeli controlled company. Is there a connection here? Could agents have been
infiltrated into Logan Airport under Israeli owned Huntleigh's cover? It's quite
possible. In the days following the 9-11 attacks, Israeli security professionals
began aggressively marketing themselves in order to gain more airport security
jobs. 93 Americans
should be grateful to have such wonderful allies who care about our airport
security so much!
Could some of the failure of our defense systems be
attributed to a cyber attack from computer hackers? Our defense and intelligence
systems are very dependent upon technology. A well coordinated attack on these
systems may also have contributed to our inability to expose and prevent the
attacks. There is one group that has the capability to attack our military
computer systems.
In July of 1999, Ha’aretz (Israel) ran a story
headlined: "Hackers Using Israeli Net Site to Strike at Pentagon": Ha’aretz
reported:
"An Israeli Internet site is being used by international
computer hackers as a base for electronic attacks on US government and military
computer systems, according to Pentagon officials who were quoted in a
Washington Timnes report yesterday."
"According to the Times, the real
danger to US national security is the threat posed by foreign intelligence
services or governments that could launch electronic warfare against the United
States" 94
And look
what the US Department of Justice wrote in this 1998 press
release:
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- "The Department of Justice, in
conjunction with the FBI, the Air Force Office of Special Investigation, the
National Aeronautic and Space Administration and the Naval Criminal
Investigative Service, announced today that the Israeli National Police arrested
Ehud Tenebaum, an Israeli citizen, for illegally accessing computers belonging
to the Israeli and United States governments, as well as hundreds of other
commercial and educational systems in the United States and
elsewhere." 95
No
doubt about it. Covert elements in Israel have been targeting the US military’s
defense systems for some time now. This could very well have been yet another
instrument played during the great orchestrated concert of 9-11.
LEFT: GENERAL HAMID
GUL: "CLEARLY AN INSIDE JOB."
RIGHT: BUSH: "LET US NEVER TOLERATE OUTRAGEOUS
CONSPIRACY THEORIES."
THE CURIOUS COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS
The government/media approved version of events
insists that the fires in the World Trade Center burned so hot that they
caused steel supports to melt and buckle, thus triggering a total collapse
of the towers. This is a strange theory for a number of reasons:
1. The
architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it to withstand the
direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash. Aaron Swirsky, one of
the architects of the WTC described the collapse as "incredible" and
"unbelievable." 96
Lee
Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I designed it for a 707
to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity comparable to the 767." 97
2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case histories of
buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from a fire.
3. The
collapse of both towers were both perfectly symmetrical and methodical. The
straight down collapse was identical in appearance to a well engineered,
controlled implosion. A demolition company could not have done it better. Now
that we know that all one has to do to bring a tall building straight down is
set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts who work for demolition
companies should all be out of a job by now!
Even a layman with no
explosives background should be able to see this. But many specialists in
the explosives and structural engineering have also made this observation and
commented on these inconsistencies. After the WTC collapse, the Vice President
of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave an interview to the Albuquerque Journal. He
stated plainly that he believed that the WTC collapse was too methodical
and that explosive devices must have been placed in key points of both
buildings. Romero said:
"It would be difficult for something from the
plane to trigger an event like that. It could have been a relatively small
amount of explosives placed in strategic points. One of the things that
terrorists are noted for is a diversionary attack and a secondary device."
98
In that
same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington DC when the attacks
took place. He and a colleague were there to discuss defense research programs
for New Mexico Tech. A few days after his interview, Romero abruptly
changed his opinion and told the Albuquerque Journal that he no longer believed
that bombs brought down the towers. 99 Romero, who relies
upon the Zionist occupied Pentagon for funding, had suddenly flip-flopped and
joined the "melted steel" theorists.
There is more than just my own
common sense and Romero's expert opinion to support the belief that the towers
were imploded from within. Several witnesses and survivors reported hearing
bombs going off inside the World Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a firefighter
with Engine 47 in Harlem, New York. Cacchioli told People Magazine the
following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th
floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went
off. We think there were bombs set in the building." 100
Now
this whole controversy between the "melted steel" scenario and the detonation
scenario is one that could be very easily resolved. All we have to do is dig up
the steel beams and examine each and everyone of them. If an explosive device
caused the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale indications for the engineers
to see. But if it was intense heat that caused the steel to "melt" or "buckle",
there will be tell-tale signs of that as well. All we have to do to put an end
to this controversy is to closely examine the steel. Right?
Well, don't
hold your breath. That's never going to happen. Thanks in large part to Time
Magazine's "Man of the Year 2001", New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the steel beams
were quickly recycled before investigators even had the chance to look at them!
A media darling and lifelong supporter of Israel, Saint Rudy Giuliani made sure
that the "smoking gun" evidence was destroyed and right quick too. Much of the
steel was recycled in America, but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC
steel was sold to Metals Management - a New York company with a jewish
(Zionist?) president named Alan Ratner. Ratner then turned around and shipped
the WTC’s steel to China and India for recycling! 101
China
Radio International’s English Edition also reported:
"New York's
Metals Management is among the firms taking steel from the huge project to clear
Ground Zero. The company says it has bought 70,000 tons of scrap from the ruined
twin towers. Some of the scrap has been shipped across the Pacific to Asian,
including China and India. Among the consignments of scrap are the "very dense"
steel girders from Ground Zero, which could finally yield 250,000 to
400,000 tons of scrap for recycling." 102
Imaine
that! The largest criminal investigation in history and the investigators
weren't even permitted to see the most important evidence of all - the steel!
During the time that Saint Rudy and Ratner the Recycler were destroying
evidence, many of the most respected engineers in the country complained not
only about the recycling, but also about the Federal government's suffocating
control of their investigation. On December 25, 2001, the New York Times ran a
story about the frustrations of some of the engineers who were called in to
study the cause of the collapse:
"Interviews with a handful of members
of the team, which includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also
uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled with
bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses,
examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like
recorded distress calls to the police and fire
departments..." 103 (emphasis
added)
They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of
the 125 year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange difference between
the WTC investigation and other major fire investigations in New York City’s
history. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from
the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy
land social club fire?...That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center.
The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately." 104
One
investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team
of engineers in the country working on this, and our hands are tied," said one
team member who asked not to be identified. Members have been threatened with
dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the team
member said. " 105
Dr.
Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the University of
Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which
important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling." 106
Finally,
the Times story made this interesting little revelation about St. Rudy the
Recycler:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to
written and oral requests for comment over a three- day period about who decided
to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the
investigation.." 107
It is a
very odd form of science that the government and some of its house scientists
practice these days. Without a shred of physical evidence, these modern-day
alchemists have been able to "prove" their theory fire caused the towers to
collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous lie. Why else would you
destroy the "melted steel"? Ask Rudy.
LEFT; EXPLOSIVES EXPERT VAN ROMERO: "THE COLLAPSE WAS
TOO METHODICAL."
RIGHT: SAINT RUDY THE RECYCLER AT A PRO-ISRAEL RALLY. HE WAS
ALSO NAMED "MAN OF THE YEAR" BY ZIONIST CONTROLLED TIME MAGAZINE..
GO TO PART 4
Return to top of What Really
Happened