Open Letter to Mensans from the Birdman

By John "Birdman" Bryant

NOTE: If you do not wish further correspondence from me, please see the
last paragraph of this email for instructions.


To: Fellow Mensans
From: John 'Birdman' Bryant (www.thebirdman.org)
Re: The Uno Hooz
Date: March 8, 2003

Dear Fellow Mensans:

Well, golly gee! It has now been a shade over three years since I started
publicly pointing out to Mensans the vital necessity of discussing the
Jewish Question, and guess what, boys and girls? Why it does rather seem
that the Self-Chosen have positioned us on the cusp of World War Three!
Now was I right in spades, or what? Of course the Powers-That-Be in Mensa
have done their very best to suppress that discussion, including adding some new
twists that I will tell you about shortly. But first, let's deal with all
those boyz 'n' girlz who think this stuff about the Eupees (that's UPs, or
Uncriticizable Persons), or TYCCs (Not bloodsuckers -- just Those You Can't
Criticize!), or -- my favorite -- Foreskinners is a lot of hogwash. Hint:
It ain't, and I'ma gonna PROOOOVE it, right here and now, Baby! So jes'
yew woit!

Now to put it bluntly, those who think the Foreskinners' hands are clean
are just those who haven't been paying attention. So to get you to pay
attention, let me ask you a few questions.

*
Question: Who are the most prominent members of the War Party? (I could
say Iraq war party, but it seems that these folks really want a war
involving Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, North Korea, Pakistan, and just
about every other place on the globe that is not currently prostrate in
front of Amerika.)
Toward an answer: You will probably recognize the names Wolfowitz and
Perle, but have you checked the ethnicity of the many other people pushing
for war that surround the president, including the neocon Israeli-firsters
like the Kristols who started planning the war before BushBaby ever took
office? Try it -- you might be surprised.
*
Question: Cui bono?, or, for all you boys and girls who haven't finished
Latin 101, "Who benefits?"
Toward an answer: Well, sure, there's the oil boys and the Empire-
builders, but did you notice that Saddam and Israel don't get along too
well together, and that the Izzies wouldn't mind a hand in controlling all
that oil and territory? And don't overlook the wonderful opportunity a war
will provide those very same Izzies for genociding the Palestinians by
'running them into the sea' or nuking them or whatever. I mean, after all
the war crimes the Izzies have committed in their latest incursions into
Pal territory (You do know about those war crimes, don't you?), it is
pretty clear that the only 'settlement' they are interested in is where all
the Pals are settled in their graves (Oslo Accords, RIP -- and I mean
rrriiiippppp!!!!). And what, indeed, is all the talk in Jerusalem-on-the-
Potomac about taking out Syria and a few other of them baaad-ass Ay-rab
countries "while we're restin'". (You have heard the talk, have you not?)
Well, gee whillikers, it couldn't be because the Izzies want to make sure
they control all those Towelheads now, could it? Of course letting the
stupid Americans fight and die for Israel is rully sooo much more
convenient, now isn't it Dahling, and since Congress is Israeli-occupied
territory, hey, no problemo. After all, like the Tal-Mud-Slingers say, a
zillion gentiles aren't worth a Jewish fingernail, or some such.
*
Question: Who said, "Don't worry about the Americans. We control
Washington." (OK, sorry, the quote isn't exact, but the sentiment is.)
Toward an answer: Well, I do believe it was Ariel Sharon, the well-known
'butcher of Beirut' (That's war criminal to you, Jack -- Belgium wants to
put the bloody mutha on trial, y'know), and current Prime Number of the
Izzy cardinals. And I don't think he said what he did because he was just
repeating in Hebrew what Pat Buchanan said about Congress being 'Israeli-
occupied territory'. Pat, of course, was roundly (and squarely!) denounced
as an 'anti-semite'. So what shall we call Sharon? May I suggest 'anti-
gentile'?
* Question: Who was behind 911? (And I am not referring to a phone call
to your friendly local jack-booted thugs.)
Toward an answer: If your only source of news is the Jewsmeida, then you
'know' it wuz them baaaad-ass Ay-rabs. Needless to say, 'Jewsmedia' is a
Horrible Racist Immoral Antisemitic Slur, except that if you believe that,
then you haven't read Dr Pierce's essay "Who Rules America" on the National
Vanguard website, not that I would expect Mensans to be that sophisticated.
But another major part of the problem is that you 'know' what just so
happens to be NOT SO. The facts clearly point to the Foreskinners as being
up to their eyeballs in 911, altho it is equally clear that Washington was
too. Except that 'Washington' is just the secondary name for Jerusalem-on-
the-Potomac, and does the phrase 'Israeli-occupied territory' ring a bell
with you? Hello? Hello?
So let's look at a few of the facts which point to Israeli involvement in
911 -- just a few, because there is no way that we can cover this immense
subject in a single letter. (If you really want to read deeply on the
subject, visit WhatReallyHappened.com).
Point: The number of Israelis who died in the WTC was ZERO, and that in
spite of the fact that a LOT of Israelis worked there. Beyond that, there
were all kinds of warnings, which included the Izzy Prime Minister and a
host of others. Some Izzy firms even moved out of the WTC just before 911.
All of which things are obviously random, Dahling.
Point: Izzies were caught filming the WTC collapse, laughing and shouting
and having a good time. Beyond this, the biggest spy ring in the nation
was exposed shortly after 911, and guess what nationality was involved?
(Hint: It wasn't the Bantus, Jack.) Not to mention the Izzies caught with
explosives, and caught filming the Sears Tower and other potential attack
points. Not to mention the Izzies caught in the Mexican congress with a 
fuckin' arsenal! But of course none of these gentle folk were put on
trial, because Jerusalem-on-the-Potomac, which was complicit with them,
didn't want them on trial, lest they expose the Conspiracy (Did I say that?
Why I must be crrraaazyy!) Instead, they were 'sent home'. Now why does
all this make me think of that Pentagon memo of a few years ago which said
that Foreskinners were security risks? Could it have been a fleeting
memory of Jonathan Jay Pollard, who, incidentally, happens to be a hero in
Izzyland? Jeezez, how antisemitic can you get???!!!
Point: Like they say in Rome, Cui bono? And no, that is not a reference
to Sonny. It's just like we mentioned before. And what was the benefit?
Well, maybe you don't remember all the bad press that Izzyland was getting
before 911 for its treatment of the Pals. So, hey, what better thing to do
than demonize dem baaaad-ass Towelheads? That way, you can kill the muthas
without anybody objecting much. And, as an added benefit, you can turn the
American people against Araby, and get more aid to boot (What is it this
year? $14 billion?) And maybe even get those stupid 'Mericans to do yr
fighting fer ya! Hey, Groovy! 
Point: 911 has been the Big Excuse for shredding our Constitution, and it
is pretty clear that the Dad Gummit was responsible in a major way because
there has been no serious investigation of it, or any resolution of the
many indications that government agents were involved (failure to scramble
air force jets promptly, insider option trading never investigated, the
impossibility of the famous cell phone call from the plane, Arabs spending
their last night violating their religion in a strip club, etc, etc, etc).
But what ethnicity is it that controls Jerusalem-on-the-Potomac, whose
central agency is 'Israeli-occupied territory' and whose President is awash
in a sea of Foreskinners and their shabby goy factotums. Let me answer
that by asking another question: What ethnicity has been the force majure
behind the following policies -- policies which not merely shred the
Constitution, but seem clearly designed to destroy America and Western
civilization, and especially its tradition of freedom?
**
Gun control (it makes totalitarian control easier)
** Anti-militia statutes (ditto)
** Hate-crime laws (ie, thought-crime laws)
** Immigration (ie, taking our country away from its native inhabitants,
and filling it with people who have no appreciation of the Constitution or
Western values generally)
** Integration (ie, the abolition of freedom of association, and
miscegenation, ie, destruction of the (white) race which produced Western
civilization)
** Feminism (ie, male castration, which makes totalitarian control easier)
** Civil rights (ie, special privileges for minorities, which replaces
legal equality; Jews founded the NAACP and headed it till the 70s; the
'freedom riders' were mostly Jews)
** The Bolshevik Revolution (60 million dead, and guess what law was first
to be promulgated by Lenin? Right! A law against antisemitism!)
** America's entry into WW1 (The Balfour Declaration was the payoff to the
Zionist Jews for using their influence on President Wilson)
** The abuses of the Versailles treaty (More than 100 Foreskinners were at
the conference, and most historians agree that the conditions imposed on
Germany virtually guaranteed another world war)
** WW2 (Churchill was paid off by Foreskinners, who saved his Chartwell
estate from the auctioneer; Roosevelt was Jewish: His original Dutch family
name was Rosenveldt)
** Atomic spies for the Soviets (Rosenbergs, David Greenglass, Theodore
Hall, Martin Sobel, and many other Foreskinners)
** The laws against 'racism', 'xenophobia' and -- especially --
questioning the Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust (mostly in Europe,
but coming soon to a country near and dear to you! And of course if the
OJV were true then they wouldn't have to make laws against questioning it,
but since it is such a big source of shakedown money -- the Swiss being
only the most public example -- it is pretty clear why there is so much
effort to keep Big Questions from being put in front of the public about
this Jewish Big Lie.)
** The Federal Reserve (Owned by the Rothschilds; it has been responsible
for all our depressions (by contracting the currency) and inflation
(robbing our wealth); Foreskinner Paul Warburg wrote the Federal Reserve
Act)
** Control of both political parties (Hey, money talks, and you can take
that to the bank!)
** Most major contemporary financial scandals (Need we mention such well-
known Foreskinners as Ivan Boesky, Marc Rich, and Michael Milken? And let
us not forget the two major operatives in the Enron scandal, Andy Fastow
and Ken Lay, who were responsible for the largest bankruptcy in US history.
The historical record is similar: For example, Rothschild agent JP Morgan
created the panic of 1907 which led to the establishment of the Federal
Reserve; and Rothschild agent Nicholas Biddle, president of the Second Bank
of the US, engaged in a long struggle with Andrew Jackson over money power,
which Jackson won only barely.)
** Assassination of JFK (Michael Collins Piper has made a strong case for
this in his book Final Judgment - The reason for the hit was JFK's fervent
opposition to Israel's nuclear arsenal)
** The Mob (Yes, Italians have been significantly involved, but Jews have
long held principal sway, from Meyer Lansky onward, and the problem is now
even more acute with the importation of the 'refugees' of the 'Russian
mayfia', who are far more brutal than even the domestic Jewish mob)
** Accusations against Libya resulting in the Reagan bombing (the
accusations were the result of a 'false flag' operation by the Mossad, as
described by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky in his book By Way of 
Deception.)
** Attack on the USS Liberty
** MLK (His chief handler was communist Jew Stanley Levison)
** White slavery (The Jews love gentile women -- in bed, and Israel is the
center of trade in the sexual enslavement of white women)
** Kiddie porn (2 big Foreskinner rings recently exposed -- in Italy and
Brazil)
** Torture (It's state policy in Izzyland; it was used with great
efficiency on German prisoners at the Nuremberg trials, where dozens had
their testicles beaten to a pulp by members of the overwhelming Jewish
presence there, and it doesn't take an Einstein to figure out what their
'confessions' are worth); in America, torture is defended by prominent Jews
like Alan Dershowitz and CCNY Prof Michael Levin, and it won't be long
before you, too, can experience it if the Foreskinners have their way!)
** MK-Ultra (This infamous CIA mind-control program -- exposed by the
Church committee hearings in the 70s -- was headed by Foreskinner Sidney
Gottleib)
** Cruelty (The quarter-Jew and Yiddish-speaking Lenin praised Jews for
their cruelty, and encouraged it as part of the largely-Jewish Russian
revolution)
** Ecstasy (The trade in this drug is dominated by Foreskinners, and
experience has shown that rabbis make excellent mules. Hey, leave it to
the Foreskinners to be mule drivers!)
** Destruction of South Africa (The South African Communist Party was
headed by Lithuanian Jew Joe Slovo, who was Nelson Mandela's handler, and
isn't it wonderful that Johannesberg is now the Rape Capital of the World
and that SA is now a Turd-World cesspool?)
** Hitler (He was the grandson of a Rothschild, and very possibly in
league with them. Certainly he had no problem with his Jewish bankers, the
Warburgs.)
** And on and on, literally. Of course, with the Jewsmedia as your only
source of information, you probably haven't had a clue as to what is really
going on, but then that is precisely why you should be reading my website,
www.thebirdman.org, and similar sites which cover these things. We have
piles of documentation every day for this stuff, and while one swallow
doesn't make a drunkard, after reading us for awhile, even liberals can
start to get the picture -- at least sometimes, if their minds haven't been
terminally poisoned.

So what, then, am I getting at? Here is a paragraph I recently wrote on
the subject:

It is wrong to assign the blame for the crimes of individual Jews to the
Jewish people as a whole. But it is not wrong to notice that the Jewish
people are a seething nexus of crime against gentiles -- a locus whose
probability of producing any given assault on white Western civilization
exceeds randomness by seven leagues and a country mile. The 20th century
has been replete with Jewish-led movements which wormed, chipped, chewed,
hacked and battered their way across American and European civilization,
from the Jewish-led and Jewish-financed Bolshevik revolution thru political
correctness, hate crimes and the Holohoax to Palestinian genocide, State-
sponsored torture, the shredding of the American Constitution, US and
Israeli war crimes and placing the world on the precipice of World War
Three. The list could literally go on and on, even as the media -- and
indeed the bulk of its dumbed-down thoroughly-conditioned politically-
correct citizenry -- are paralyzed by the threat of Jewish wrath and the
meaningless yet anaphylactically venemous charge of 'antisemitism', with
the result that the few of us who have been screaming that the king has no
clothes watch helplessly as our beloved civilization and its traditions of
freedom and opportunity disappear with increasing rapidity down the gaping
and unforgiving maw of the Orwellian memory hole. Under these
circumstances it is no moral crime to be antisemitic; rather it is a moral 
obligation.

OK, maybe the last sentence is a bit hyperbolic, but the point is that all
of us -- both gents and Jews -- must do some serious thinking about the
role of Jews in gentile society. There is, of course, at one extreme the
'gas all Jews now' crowd, of which I am not a member; and at the other, the
miscegenationist crowd, who believe that intermarriage -- now at a 50%
rate, up from only 6% a generation ago -- will take the sting out of the
Jewish scorpion and make him sufficiently domesticated to not require a
Jewish Star on his sleeve. Another crowd -- the informationist crowd -- is
one that seeks to educate both Jews and gentiles on the former's nasty
habits, with the hope of reforming them and domesticating them while
keeping the gents on their guard. In between these extremes there are of
course the Zionists, or separationists, who simply desire to be rid of the
Jewish presence, as so many countries have wished down thru the ages. As
for myself, I have not settled on any of these Final Solutions, but I do
believe that they ought to be discussed.

So what then is the matter with Mensa? What is the matter with an
organization whose very purpose was to bring together the Best and the
Brightest that they might discuss such Big Questions as these? The answer,
of course, is that Mensa is significantly Jewish, and the remainder of it
is significantly Ignorant; and the combination has attempted to suppress
discussion of what is clearly the elephant in the livingroom.

Actually, I am not being quite accurate. I have mailed my musings on the
Foreskinners during the last 3 years to numerous Mensans, and the
statistics are that about 1/3 of them ask to be removed from future
mailings, but 2/3 seem content to remain on my list and hear my message.
This, then, means that there is a probable majority of Mensans who are
interested in my message, but most of them do not have the courage to band
together and make the Jewish Question an issue in Mensa.

And there we have it, folks -- courage. Mensans -- brainy as they
supposedly are -- simply lack the courage to debate this matter. OK, some
of them may simply not be interested, but let's face it folks, this
elephant has been in the livingroom now for at least 3 years, and can you
really say that intelligent people are not interested in all the damage it
is doing? Frankly, I don't believe it. I find it much easier to believe
that Mensans are just cowards. But go ahead -- prove me wrong.

In conclusion, I would like to briefly mention a subject that I rarely talk
about, the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Now the
Protocols are interesting because, as Henry Ford remarked, while their
provenance may be questionable, they certainly seem to describe what the
Jews are actually doing. But on the other hand, why get tangled up in a
controversy over the Protocols when you have the Internet? After all, you
can argue forever about whether the Protocols are 'forgeries', but you
can't argue with the news stories that daily confirm the Protocols by
fleshing out the image of the Jewish establishment as an 800-pound gorilla
on steroids.

Till next time,

Birdman


PS: The following letter was written for mailing to Mensans last fall, but
did not get mailed for various reasons. Since it contains useful
information, I am including it now.


Dear Fellow Mensans:

There have been some new developments on the 'Jewish Question' front which
I thought you would like to know about.

First, in reading the Mensa Bulletin, it is hard to keep from noticing that
cracks are beginning to appear in the wall of silence that the Powers That
Be in Mensa have erected to suppress discussion of the Jewish Question. I
refer specifically to three (count 'em: THREE) letters in the most recent
Bulletin (August 2002) on 'Anti-Semitism', no fewer than TWO of which took
a critical attitude toward the Self-Chosen, or Foreskinners, as I prefer to
call them. Oh, sure, they weren't rabidly 'antisemitic', but the point is
that the fact that THREE letters were published on this topic almost
certainly means that there were quite a few MORE than three received, and
that the Bulletin letters editor felt compelled by the pressure of numbers
to publish what she did. Obviously we are seeing a lot more consciousness
of this issue, and it is hard to believe that my efforts -- including my
website, which was put up in direct response to the censorship that Mensa
exercised against me -- and my many letters to every Mensan whose email
address has been published in the Bulletin -- have not had a critical
effect on this consciousness-raising.

But there's more, so don't go away yet! In my last letter to Mensans, I
described the fact that my website is now in the top half percent of more
than 20 million websites worldwide as rated by Alexa.com, and that this
popularity -- due purely to word-of-mouth -- seemed to be because people
were hungry for honest discussion of the Jewish Question, and that my site
was one of the very few where a forthright yet balanced discussion could be
found. This letter, however, seems to have set off a grand mal seizure in
the Mensa Censors, who succeeded in getting my ISP account canceled, not by
alleging that I had violated any policy of the ISP (I hadn't), but rather
that my letter somehow violated the policy of the ISP's phone company, with
the result that the phone company was threatening the ISP with cancellation
unless my account was closed. Now this is significant not merely by being
an obscene exhibition of raw naked Jewish power, but also as a
demonstration of the very things which I have been saying, namely, that the
Jewish establishment has significant control of our country, that they do
not hesitate to use their money or power or connections to strongarm their
way to dominance of our institutions and culture, and that this influence
extends to the most minute activities, such as my letter to you. But
besides this, there is something else of significance that this little
vignette shows, namely, that the Foreskinners and their shabby goy censors
in Mensa are getting rather desperate in their attempts to shut me up. Do
you suppose that they will be able to find another phone company that they
can strongarm into pulling another event like the one they pulled last
time? I of course have no idea, but I do know that this kind of tactic is
guaranteed to generate a truckload of resentment when it is exposed, and
that -- one way or another -- I shall continue these letters, and continue
to expose this kind of ugly Foreskinner behavior.

As a footnote to the above, the ISP who booted us was Jewish, and actually
a rather nice fellow; and my wife had a long discussion of conspiracy
theory and the Jewish Question with him over the phone. It was obvious
that he, like many Jews who are not affected with the chauvinism of the
Jewish Establishment, was not resentful of our message, if for no other
reason than that it is as much PRO-JEWISH as it is pro-white. The reason
for this is quite simple: As the Jewish Establishment attempts more and
more to dominate American and Western society, there will be more and more
resentment caused, and more and more people who will become wise to what is
happening. And that is not good for Jews as a whole, no matter what their
feeling toward gentiles, because it means that this attempt of the tiny
elite of a tiny 2 1/2 percent minority to dominate the other 97 1/2 percent
might just mean that this time around, somebody will be building some REAL
gas chambers.

As a final note, my website, www.thebirdman.org, continues to grow in
popularity, and indeed has significantly improved its Alexa.com ranking in
only the last month or so. My point is not just that 'antisemitism' is
becoming a moral imperative (yes, folks, a MORAL IMPERATIVE), but that the
kind of material on my site appeals to a LOT of people, and that we are not
going away, not by a long shot. This is stuff of mountain-moving
importance, and you ignore it only at your peril. I might add that I have
just concluded a correspondence with well-known novelist Tom Clancy on the
Race and Jewish questions, and that Mr Clancy ended up like virtually
everyone else who debates with me -- with foot-in-mouth and head-up-butt.
You can see the complete correspondence by visiting the Net Losses section
of my website -- the Clancy correspondence is the last entry of the
Missile-Anus section.


The wall of silence is crumbling; the politically (and SEMITICALLY) correct
Mensa establishment is beginning to collapse. I shall not cease to inform
Mensans of what is happening until the Jewish Question is discussed as
freely in Mensa as any other.

Till next time, Birdman.


PS: Some of you undoubtedly knew Mensan Gary Eisler who recently died from
cancer. He was author of one of the several letters published in the two-
page spread of the March 2000
Bulletin devoted to denouncing me for my
views on Jews. Well, not long after the publication of his letter, Gary
contacted me, and we had a long and generally friendly correspondence that
continued right up until his death (He even subscribed to my Weekly
Letter). Gary was one of those truly intelligent Jews who could see that
there is another side to the Jewish Question besides the Establishment one;
and while we had significant disagreements, there was no hostility between
us, nor anything inhibiting our airing of differences. Gary was a unique
and specially valuable individual, and I would hope that in death he would
serve as a role model for other Jewish Mensans, many of whom desperately
need a role model in view of their obscene behavior as recorded in the
letters posted on my website. Rest in peace, friend Gary.


TO BE REMOVED from my mailing list, just send me a note. (If you send me a
nasty note, you can expect to receive one in return.) I mail only to
Mensans who have published their addresses in Mensa publications, thus
indicating consent to be written to by other Mensans. I do my best to
remove all those who request it, but I sometimes make mistakes. Also, I
will sometimes inadvertently put people back on my list if their address
appears again in the Bulletin or other Mensa publication, but I try to
check each name against a 'remove' list. Sometimes a person will have
changed his/her name or address and I do not recognize it. While there
have been many remove requests, the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE MENSANS I
HAVE CONTACTED REMAIN ON MY LISTS, clearly indicating that I am bringing
them information that they want to have. So in spite of Mensa's notorious
liberal streak, us 'bigots' seem to have more than a few allies. Think we
should form a 'Bigot SIG'?

 

YOUR DONATION = OUR SURVIVAL!

Please contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!

* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *