NOTE: If
you do not wish further correspondence from me, please see the
last paragraph of this email for instructions.
To: Fellow Mensans
From: John 'Birdman' Bryant (www.thebirdman.org)
Re: The Uno Hooz
Date: March 8, 2003
Dear Fellow Mensans:
Well, golly gee! It has now been a shade over three years since I
started
publicly pointing out to Mensans the vital necessity of
discussing the
Jewish Question, and guess what, boys and girls? Why it does
rather seem
that the Self-Chosen have positioned us on the cusp of World War
Three!
Now was I right in spades, or what? Of course the Powers-That-Be
in Mensa
have done their very best to suppress that discussion, including
adding some new
twists that I will tell you about shortly. But first, let's deal
with all
those boyz 'n' girlz who think this stuff about the Eupees
(that's UPs, or
Uncriticizable Persons), or TYCCs (Not bloodsuckers -- just Those
You Can't
Criticize!), or -- my favorite -- Foreskinners is a lot of
hogwash. Hint:
It ain't, and I'ma gonna PROOOOVE it, right here and now, Baby!
So jes'
yew woit!
Now to put it bluntly, those who think the Foreskinners' hands
are clean
are just those who haven't been paying attention. So to get you
to pay
attention, let me ask you a few questions.
* Question: Who
are the most prominent members of the War Party?
(I could
say Iraq war party, but it seems that these folks
really want a war
involving Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, North Korea, Pakistan, and
just
about every other place on the globe that is not currently
prostrate in
front of Amerika.)
Toward an answer:
You will probably recognize the names Wolfowitz and
Perle, but have you checked the ethnicity of the many other
people pushing
for war that surround the president, including the neocon
Israeli-firsters
like the Kristols who started planning the war before BushBaby
ever took
office? Try it -- you might be surprised.
* Question:
Cui bono?, or, for all
you boys and girls who haven't finished
Latin 101, "Who benefits?"
Toward an answer:
Well, sure, there's the oil boys and the Empire-
builders, but did you notice that Saddam and Israel don't get
along too
well together, and that the Izzies wouldn't mind a hand in
controlling all
that oil and territory? And don't overlook the wonderful
opportunity a war
will provide those very same Izzies for genociding the
Palestinians by
'running them into the sea' or nuking them or whatever. I mean,
after all
the war crimes the Izzies have committed in their latest
incursions into
Pal territory (You do know about those war crimes, don't you?),
it is
pretty clear that the only 'settlement' they are interested in is
where all
the Pals are settled in their graves (Oslo Accords, RIP -- and I
mean
rrriiiippppp!!!!). And what, indeed, is all the talk in
Jerusalem-on-the-
Potomac about taking out Syria and a few other of them baaad-ass
Ay-rab
countries "while we're restin'". (You have
heard the talk, have you not?)
Well, gee whillikers, it couldn't be because the Izzies want to
make sure
they control all those Towelheads now, could it? Of course
letting the
stupid Americans fight and die for Israel is rully
sooo much more
convenient, now isn't it Dahling, and since Congress is
Israeli-occupied
territory, hey, no problemo. After all, like the
Tal-Mud-Slingers say, a
zillion gentiles aren't worth a Jewish fingernail, or some such.
* Question:
Who said, "Don't worry about the Americans. We control
Washington." (OK, sorry, the quote isn't exact, but the
sentiment is.)
Toward an answer: Well,
I do believe it was Ariel Sharon, the well-known
'butcher of Beirut' (That's war criminal to you, Jack
-- Belgium wants to
put the bloody mutha on trial, y'know), and current Prime Number
of the
Izzy cardinals. And I don't think he said what he did because he
was just
repeating in Hebrew what Pat Buchanan said about Congress being
'Israeli-
occupied territory'. Pat, of course, was roundly (and squarely!)
denounced
as an 'anti-semite'. So what shall we call Sharon? May I suggest
'anti-
gentile'?
* Question: Who was behind 911? (And I am not referring
to a phone call
to your friendly local jack-booted thugs.)
Toward an answer: If your only source of news is the
Jewsmeida, then you
'know' it wuz them baaaad-ass Ay-rabs. Needless to say,
'Jewsmedia' is a
Horrible Racist Immoral Antisemitic Slur, except that if you
believe that,
then you haven't read Dr Pierce's essay "Who Rules
America" on the National
Vanguard website, not that I would expect Mensans to be that
sophisticated.
But another major part of the problem is that you 'know' what
just so
happens to be NOT SO. The facts clearly point to the Foreskinners
as being
up to their eyeballs in 911, altho it is equally clear that
Washington was
too. Except that 'Washington' is just the secondary name for
Jerusalem-on-
the-Potomac, and does the phrase 'Israeli-occupied territory'
ring a bell
with you? Hello? Hello?
So let's look at a few of the facts which point to Israeli
involvement in
911 -- just a few, because there is no way that we can cover this
immense
subject in a single letter. (If you really want to read deeply on
the
subject, visit WhatReallyHappened.com).
Point:
The number of Israelis who died in the WTC was ZERO, and that in
spite of the fact that a LOT of Israelis worked there. Beyond
that, there
were all kinds of warnings, which included the Izzy Prime
Minister and a
host of others. Some Izzy firms even moved out of the WTC just
before 911.
All of which things are obviously random, Dahling.
Point:
Izzies were caught filming the WTC collapse, laughing and
shouting
and having a good time. Beyond this, the biggest spy ring in the
nation
was exposed shortly after 911, and guess what nationality was
involved?
(Hint: It wasn't the Bantus, Jack.) Not to mention the Izzies
caught with
explosives, and caught filming the Sears Tower and other
potential attack
points. Not to mention the Izzies caught in the Mexican
congress with a
fuckin' arsenal! But of course none of these gentle
folk were put on
trial, because Jerusalem-on-the-Potomac, which was complicit with
them,
didn't want them on trial, lest they expose the Conspiracy (Did I
say that?
Why I must be crrraaazyy!) Instead, they were 'sent home'. Now
why does
all this make me think of that Pentagon memo of a few years ago
which said
that Foreskinners were security risks? Could it have been a
fleeting
memory of Jonathan Jay Pollard, who, incidentally, happens to be
a hero in
Izzyland? Jeezez, how antisemitic can you get???!!!
Point:
Like they say in Rome, Cui
bono? And no, that is not a
reference
to Sonny. It's just like we mentioned before. And what was the
benefit?
Well, maybe you don't remember all the bad press that Izzyland
was getting
before 911 for its treatment of the Pals. So, hey, what better
thing to do
than demonize dem baaaad-ass Towelheads? That way, you can kill
the muthas
without anybody objecting much. And, as an added benefit, you can
turn the
American people against Araby, and get more aid to boot (What is
it this
year? $14 billion?) And maybe even get those stupid 'Mericans to
do yr
fighting fer ya! Hey, Groovy!
Point:
911 has been the Big Excuse for shredding our Constitution, and
it
is pretty clear that the Dad Gummit was responsible in a major
way because
there has been no serious investigation of it, or any resolution
of the
many indications that government agents were involved (failure to
scramble
air force jets promptly, insider option trading never
investigated, the
impossibility of the famous cell phone call from the plane, Arabs
spending
their last night violating their religion in a strip club, etc,
etc, etc).
But what ethnicity is it that controls Jerusalem-on-the-Potomac,
whose
central agency is 'Israeli-occupied territory' and whose
President is awash
in a sea of Foreskinners and their shabby goy factotums. Let me
answer
that by asking another question: What ethnicity has been the
force majure
behind the following policies -- policies which not merely shred
the
Constitution, but seem clearly designed to destroy America and
Western
civilization, and especially its tradition of freedom?
** Gun control (it
makes totalitarian control easier)
** Anti-militia statutes (ditto)
** Hate-crime laws (ie, thought-crime laws)
** Immigration (ie, taking our country away from its native
inhabitants,
and filling it with people who have no appreciation of the
Constitution or
Western values generally)
** Integration (ie, the abolition of freedom of association, and
miscegenation, ie, destruction of the (white) race which produced
Western
civilization)
** Feminism (ie, male castration, which makes totalitarian
control easier)
** Civil rights (ie, special privileges for minorities, which
replaces
legal equality; Jews founded the NAACP and headed it till the
70s; the
'freedom riders' were mostly Jews)
** The Bolshevik Revolution (60 million dead, and guess what law
was first
to be promulgated by Lenin? Right! A law against antisemitism!)
** America's entry into WW1 (The Balfour Declaration was the
payoff to the
Zionist Jews for using their influence on President Wilson)
** The abuses of the Versailles treaty (More than 100
Foreskinners were at
the conference, and most historians agree that the conditions
imposed on
Germany virtually guaranteed another world war)
** WW2 (Churchill was paid off by Foreskinners, who saved his
Chartwell
estate from the auctioneer; Roosevelt was Jewish: His
original Dutch family
name was Rosenveldt)
** Atomic spies for the Soviets (Rosenbergs, David Greenglass,
Theodore
Hall, Martin Sobel, and many other Foreskinners)
** The laws against 'racism', 'xenophobia' and -- especially --
questioning the Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust (mostly
in Europe,
but coming soon to a country near and dear to you! And of course
if the
OJV were true then they wouldn't have to make laws
against questioning it,
but since it is such a big source of shakedown money -- the Swiss
being
only the most public example -- it is pretty clear why there is
so much
effort to keep Big Questions from being put in front of the
public about
this Jewish Big Lie.)
** The Federal Reserve (Owned by the Rothschilds; it has been
responsible
for all our depressions (by contracting the currency) and
inflation
(robbing our wealth); Foreskinner Paul Warburg wrote the Federal
Reserve
Act)
** Control of both political parties (Hey, money talks, and you
can take
that to the bank!)
** Most major contemporary financial scandals (Need we mention
such well-
known Foreskinners as Ivan Boesky, Marc Rich, and Michael Milken?
And let
us not forget the two major operatives in the Enron scandal, Andy
Fastow
and Ken Lay, who were responsible for the largest bankruptcy in
US history.
The historical record is similar: For example, Rothschild agent
JP Morgan
created the panic of 1907 which led to the establishment of the
Federal
Reserve; and Rothschild agent Nicholas Biddle, president of the
Second Bank
of the US, engaged in a long struggle with Andrew Jackson over
money power,
which Jackson won only barely.)
** Assassination of JFK (Michael Collins Piper has made a strong
case for
this in his book Final Judgment - The reason for the
hit was JFK's fervent
opposition to Israel's nuclear arsenal)
** The Mob (Yes, Italians have been significantly involved, but
Jews have
long held principal sway, from Meyer Lansky onward, and the
problem is now
even more acute with the importation of the 'refugees' of the
'Russian
mayfia', who are far more brutal than even the domestic Jewish
mob)
** Accusations against Libya resulting in the Reagan bombing (the
accusations were the result of a 'false flag' operation by the
Mossad, as
described by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky in his book
By Way of
Deception.)
** Attack on the USS Liberty
** MLK (His chief handler was communist Jew Stanley Levison)
** White slavery (The Jews love gentile women -- in bed, and
Israel is the
center of trade in the sexual enslavement of white women)
** Kiddie porn (2 big Foreskinner rings recently exposed -- in
Italy and
Brazil)
** Torture (It's state policy in Izzyland; it was used with great
efficiency on German prisoners at the Nuremberg trials, where
dozens had
their testicles beaten to a pulp by members of the overwhelming
Jewish
presence there, and it doesn't take an Einstein to figure out
what their
'confessions' are worth); in America, torture is defended by
prominent Jews
like Alan Dershowitz and CCNY Prof Michael Levin, and it won't be
long
before you, too, can experience it if the Foreskinners have their
way!)
** MK-Ultra (This infamous CIA mind-control program -- exposed by
the
Church committee hearings in the 70s -- was headed by Foreskinner
Sidney
Gottleib)
** Cruelty (The quarter-Jew and Yiddish-speaking Lenin praised
Jews for
their cruelty, and encouraged it as part of the largely-Jewish
Russian
revolution)
** Ecstasy (The trade in this drug is dominated by Foreskinners,
and
experience has shown that rabbis make excellent mules. Hey, leave
it to
the Foreskinners to be mule drivers!)
** Destruction of South Africa (The South African Communist Party
was
headed by Lithuanian Jew Joe Slovo, who was Nelson Mandela's
handler, and
isn't it wonderful that Johannesberg is now the Rape Capital of
the World
and that SA is now a Turd-World cesspool?)
** Hitler (He was the grandson of a Rothschild, and very possibly
in
league with them. Certainly he had no problem with his Jewish
bankers, the
Warburgs.)
** And on and on, literally. Of course, with the Jewsmedia as
your only
source of information, you probably haven't had a clue as to what
is really
going on, but then that is precisely why you should be reading my
website,
www.thebirdman.org, and similar sites which cover these things.
We have
piles of documentation every day for this stuff, and while one
swallow
doesn't make a drunkard, after reading us for awhile, even
liberals can
start to get the picture -- at least sometimes, if their minds
haven't been
terminally poisoned.
So what, then, am I getting at? Here is a paragraph I recently
wrote on
the subject:
It is wrong to assign the blame for the crimes of individual Jews
to the
Jewish people as a whole. But it is not wrong to notice that the
Jewish
people are a seething nexus of crime against gentiles -- a locus
whose
probability of producing any given assault on white Western
civilization
exceeds randomness by seven leagues and a country mile. The 20th
century
has been replete with Jewish-led movements which wormed, chipped,
chewed,
hacked and battered their way across American and European
civilization,
from the Jewish-led and Jewish-financed Bolshevik revolution thru
political
correctness, hate crimes and the Holohoax to Palestinian
genocide, State-
sponsored torture, the shredding of the American Constitution, US
and
Israeli war crimes and placing the world on the precipice of
World War
Three. The list could literally go on and on, even as the media
-- and
indeed the bulk of its dumbed-down thoroughly-conditioned
politically-
correct citizenry -- are paralyzed by the threat of Jewish wrath
and the
meaningless yet anaphylactically venemous charge of
'antisemitism', with
the result that the few of us who have been screaming that the
king has no
clothes watch helplessly as our beloved civilization and its
traditions of
freedom and opportunity disappear with increasing rapidity down
the gaping
and unforgiving maw of the Orwellian memory hole. Under these
circumstances it is no moral crime to be antisemitic; rather it
is a moral
obligation.
OK, maybe the last sentence is a bit hyperbolic, but the point is
that all
of us -- both gents and Jews -- must do some serious thinking
about the
role of Jews in gentile society. There is, of course, at one
extreme the
'gas all Jews now' crowd, of which I am not a member; and at the
other, the
miscegenationist crowd, who believe that intermarriage -- now at
a 50%
rate, up from only 6% a generation ago -- will take the sting out
of the
Jewish scorpion and make him sufficiently domesticated to not
require a
Jewish Star on his sleeve. Another crowd -- the informationist
crowd -- is
one that seeks to educate both Jews and gentiles on the former's
nasty
habits, with the hope of reforming them and domesticating them
while
keeping the gents on their guard. In between these extremes there
are of
course the Zionists, or separationists, who simply desire to be
rid of the
Jewish presence, as so many countries have wished down thru the
ages. As
for myself, I have not settled on any of these Final Solutions,
but I do
believe that they ought to be discussed.
So what then is the matter with Mensa? What is the matter with an
organization whose very purpose was to bring together the Best
and the
Brightest that they might discuss such Big Questions as these?
The answer,
of course, is that Mensa is significantly Jewish, and the
remainder of it
is significantly Ignorant; and the combination has attempted to
suppress
discussion of what is clearly the elephant in the livingroom.
Actually, I am not being quite accurate. I have mailed my musings
on the
Foreskinners during the last 3 years to numerous Mensans, and the
statistics are that about 1/3 of them ask to be removed from
future
mailings, but 2/3 seem content to remain on my list and hear my
message.
This, then, means that there is a probable majority of Mensans
who are
interested in my message, but most of them do not have the
courage to band
together and make the Jewish Question an issue in Mensa.
And there we have it, folks -- courage. Mensans --
brainy as they
supposedly are -- simply lack the courage to debate this matter.
OK, some
of them may simply not be interested, but let's face it folks,
this
elephant has been in the livingroom now for at least 3 years, and
can you
really say that intelligent people are not interested in all the
damage it
is doing? Frankly, I don't believe it. I find it much easier to
believe
that Mensans are just cowards. But go ahead -- prove me wrong.
In conclusion, I would like to briefly mention a subject that I
rarely talk
about, the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion. Now the
Protocols are interesting because, as Henry Ford
remarked, while their
provenance may be questionable, they certainly seem to describe
what the
Jews are actually doing. But on the other hand, why get tangled
up in a
controversy over the Protocols when you have the
Internet? After all, you
can argue forever about whether the Protocols are
'forgeries', but you
can't argue with the news stories that daily confirm the
Protocols by
fleshing out the image of the Jewish establishment as an
800-pound gorilla
on steroids.
Till next time,
Birdman
PS: The following letter was written for mailing to Mensans last
fall, but
did not get mailed for various reasons. Since it contains useful
information, I am including it now.
Dear Fellow Mensans:
There have been some new developments on the 'Jewish Question'
front which
I thought you would like to know about.
First, in reading the Mensa Bulletin, it is hard to
keep from noticing that
cracks are beginning to appear in the wall of silence that the
Powers That
Be in Mensa have erected to suppress discussion of the Jewish
Question. I
refer specifically to three (count 'em: THREE) letters in the
most recent
Bulletin (August 2002) on 'Anti-Semitism', no fewer
than TWO of which took
a critical attitude toward the Self-Chosen, or Foreskinners, as I
prefer to
call them. Oh, sure, they weren't rabidly 'antisemitic', but the
point is
that the fact that THREE letters were published on this topic
almost
certainly means that there were quite a few MORE than three
received, and
that the Bulletin letters editor felt compelled by the
pressure of numbers
to publish what she did. Obviously we are seeing a lot more
consciousness
of this issue, and it is hard to believe that my efforts --
including my
website, which was put up in direct response to the censorship
that Mensa
exercised against me -- and my many letters to every Mensan whose
email
address has been published in the Bulletin -- have not had a
critical
effect on this consciousness-raising.
But there's more, so don't go away yet! In my last letter to
Mensans, I
described the fact that my website is now in the top half percent
of more
than 20 million websites worldwide as rated by Alexa.com, and
that this
popularity -- due purely to word-of-mouth -- seemed to be because
people
were hungry for honest discussion of the Jewish Question, and
that my site
was one of the very few where a forthright yet balanced
discussion could be
found. This letter, however, seems to have set off a grand
mal seizure in
the Mensa Censors, who succeeded in getting my ISP account
canceled, not by
alleging that I had violated any policy of the ISP (I hadn't),
but rather
that my letter somehow violated the policy of the ISP's
phone company, with
the result that the phone company was threatening the ISP with
cancellation
unless my account was closed. Now this is significant not merely
by being
an obscene exhibition of raw naked Jewish power, but also as a
demonstration of the very things which I have been saying,
namely, that the
Jewish establishment has significant control of our country, that
they do
not hesitate to use their money or power or connections to
strongarm their
way to dominance of our institutions and culture, and that this
influence
extends to the most minute activities, such as my letter to you.
But
besides this, there is something else of significance that this
little
vignette shows, namely, that the Foreskinners and their shabby
goy censors
in Mensa are getting rather desperate in their attempts to shut
me up. Do
you suppose that they will be able to find another phone company
that they
can strongarm into pulling another event like the one they pulled
last
time? I of course have no idea, but I do know that this kind of
tactic is
guaranteed to generate a truckload of resentment when it is
exposed, and
that -- one way or another -- I shall continue these letters, and
continue
to expose this kind of ugly Foreskinner behavior.
As a footnote to the above, the ISP who booted us was Jewish, and
actually
a rather nice fellow; and my wife had a long discussion of
conspiracy
theory and the Jewish Question with him over the phone. It was
obvious
that he, like many Jews who are not affected with the chauvinism
of the
Jewish Establishment, was not resentful of our message, if for no
other
reason than that it is as much PRO-JEWISH as it is pro-white. The
reason
for this is quite simple: As the Jewish Establishment attempts
more and
more to dominate American and Western society, there will be more
and more
resentment caused, and more and more people who will become wise
to what is
happening. And that is not good for Jews as a whole, no matter
what their
feeling toward gentiles, because it means that this attempt of
the tiny
elite of a tiny 2 1/2 percent minority to dominate the other 97
1/2 percent
might just mean that this time around, somebody will be building
some REAL
gas chambers.
As a final note, my website, www.thebirdman.org, continues to
grow in
popularity, and indeed has significantly improved its Alexa.com
ranking in
only the last month or so. My point is not just that
'antisemitism' is
becoming a moral imperative (yes, folks, a MORAL IMPERATIVE), but
that the
kind of material on my site appeals to a LOT of people, and that
we are not
going away, not by a long shot. This is stuff of mountain-moving
importance, and you ignore it only at your peril. I might add
that I have
just concluded a correspondence with well-known novelist Tom
Clancy on the
Race and Jewish questions, and that Mr Clancy ended up like
virtually
everyone else who debates with me -- with foot-in-mouth and
head-up-butt.
You can see the complete correspondence by visiting the Net
Losses section
of my website -- the Clancy correspondence is the last entry of
the
Missile-Anus section.
The wall of silence is crumbling; the politically (and
SEMITICALLY) correct
Mensa establishment is beginning to collapse. I shall not cease
to inform
Mensans of what is happening until the Jewish Question is
discussed as
freely in Mensa as any other.
Till next time, Birdman.
PS: Some of you undoubtedly knew Mensan Gary Eisler who recently
died from
cancer. He was author of one of the several letters published in
the two-
page spread of the March 2000 Bulletin
devoted to denouncing me for my
views on Jews. Well, not long after the publication of his
letter, Gary
contacted me, and we had a long and generally friendly
correspondence that
continued right up until his death (He even subscribed to my
Weekly
Letter). Gary was one of those truly intelligent Jews who could
see that
there is another side to the Jewish Question besides the
Establishment one;
and while we had significant disagreements, there was no
hostility between
us, nor anything inhibiting our airing of differences. Gary was a
unique
and specially valuable individual, and I would hope that in death
he would
serve as a role model for other Jewish Mensans, many of whom
desperately
need a role model in view of their obscene behavior as recorded
in the
letters posted on my website. Rest in peace, friend Gary.
TO BE REMOVED from my mailing list, just send me a note. (If you
send me a
nasty note, you can expect to receive one in return.) I mail only
to
Mensans who have published their addresses in Mensa publications,
thus
indicating consent to be written to by other Mensans. I do my
best to
remove all those who request it, but I sometimes make mistakes.
Also, I
will sometimes inadvertently put people back on my list if their
address
appears again in the Bulletin or other Mensa
publication, but I try to
check each name against a 'remove' list. Sometimes a person will
have
changed his/her name or address and I do not recognize it. While
there
have been many remove requests, the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE
MENSANS I
HAVE CONTACTED REMAIN ON MY LISTS, clearly indicating that I am
bringing
them information that they want to have. So in spite of Mensa's
notorious
liberal streak, us 'bigots' seem to have more than a few allies.
Think we
should form a 'Bigot SIG'?
YOUR DONATION = OUR SURVIVAL!
Please contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *