Subject: Jewish Ritual Murder is true, NOT a lie as Turki
Abdullah al-Sudeiri says
Date: 8/8/02 8:47:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time
In the August 1 edition of the Israeli
paper Ha'aretz ("French court summons Egyptian editor over anti-Semitic
article"), it suggests that claims about Jewish Ritual Murder are baseless.
The article goes on to say that while your paper, Al-Riyadh, had an
article that said it was true, it says that your paper now recognizes Jewish
Ritual Murder as a mere fabrication:
"Al Riyadh editor Turki Abdullah
al-Sudeiri wrote that he regretted the publication of the articles, which he
said appeared while he was away, because they were 'not supported by any
scientific or historic facts.'"
I would like to debate this Mr. Turki
Abdullah al-Sudeiri about the facts concerning Jewish Ritual Murder. It
certainly seems to be an historical fact.
Now, no one would seriously
argue that "all" Jews commit such wicked crimes. These vicious crimes have
reportedly been committed by small numbers of fanatics within the Jewish
religion who adhere to the most perverse interpretations of their religious
doctrines. If Jewish Ritual Murder still occurs today, it is in relatively
There are many well-respected authors who have attested
to this fact of Jewish Ritual Murder, for it is not the uneducated who make such
claims. Sir Richard Francis Burton described the Jewish Ritual Murder of
Father Thomas and others in his manuscript "Human Sacrifice among the Sephardim
or Eastern Jews" (which was later published, in part, as "The Jew, the Gypsy,
and el Islam"). Well-respected Russian writer V.V. Rozanov described such
activities in his book "The Relationship of Jews to Blood." Dr. Vladimir
Ivanovich Dal, a Russian physician and author of the Dal Living Dictionary (who
even has a current postage stamp in his honor), described this in his book
"Searching for the Jews who Murder Christian Babies, and How These Jews Use the
Babies' Blood" (later published as "Notes about the Ritual Murders").
Well-respected veterinarian Dr. Arnold Leese, whose books about animals
even impressed the queen, wrote about these wicked crimes in his book! "Jewish
Ritual Murder." Likewise, Hellmut Schramm, Ph.D., described such vicious
crimes in his book "Jewish Ritual Murder: An Historical Investigation."
Russian attorney and Duma member G.G. Zamyslovsky described these vicious
crimes in his book "The Murder of Andrei Youshchinsky." Recently, in the United
States, Philip DeVier, Ph.D., wrote about this in his brilliant 256-page book
"Blood Ritual." Matt Hale, J.D. (doctor of law), published a book (2002)
based on a speech entitled "Jewish Occult Murders: How and Why Jews Sacrificed
Non-Jewish Children as Part of Their Religion." Harrell Rhome, Ph.D., also
describes these wicked acts in his book (2002) "Debacle in Damascus: The 1840
Jewish Ritual Murder Case of Father Thomas."
Even many Popes
throughout history have admitted this. Some Jews have been tried by Papal
courts and have been found guilty. Pope Benedict XIV admitted to this, and he
described many such instances in his Bull Beatus Andreas. Likewise, the
Catholic magazine "La Civilta Cattolica" has attested to this in the past.
It is not merely Catholics who have admitted that Jews have committed such
vicious crimes. Many well-respected Muslims, Protestants, pagans, and
atheists too have spoken out on the reality of such vicious crimes.
The video "Human Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other
Cults from Ancient Times to the Present" (which can be found at www.wcotc.com)
describes many such people who have recognized this as an historical fact.
Even agents of the French government admitted to the truth of
these incidents in the 1840 case of Father Thomas. An interesting 300-page
book that was published in France (before the politically correct Thought Police
started dictating what can and cannot be read) was "Le Crimes Rituel chez le
Juifs" by Albert Monniot.
I ask you: Can such a wide body
of people around the entire world, representing all races and religions, make up
such crimes attributed to Jews? And these accusations against Jews
take place on a regular basis from ancient times to even now.
Even in the Old Testament of the Bible, we read about children "passing
through the fire." This is a euphemism, of course; for this actually
referred to Jews, who followed occult rites, tossing children in a burning pit
called a Tophet. In fact, the term "holocaust" itself is actually derived
from the practice of Jews making a burning sacrifice to their deity, as English
dictionaries prior to 1950 will attest.
Let me briefly quote Dr.
Vladimir Ivanovich Dal from the above-cited book on these crimes:
"It was not just one group of people who have accused
Jews of committing such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times of that in
court by a variety of people. On the whole, there was not only their own
confession in addition to other evidence; but there were such examples where the
Jews were exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being true.
One such event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real
existence of such villainous human mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say
something quite different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore,
proves nothing. Assuming, however, this argument is true, too, and believing all
that was ever said and written on this problem in favor of Jews, with respect to
forced confessions, there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is
never paid enough attention. This circumstance not only remains as unexplained
by Jews but also is the proof of the crime it! self--namely, it is not doubtful
that, from time to time, the corpses of babies, who were missing, were
eventually discovered in such distorted conditions and with such signs of
external violence that they attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths.
This is the kind of murder for which the Jews are accused. Also, the
incidents of this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews
live. We must ask ourselves: In what type of circumstance can we attribute
the renewed cases of babies who suffered painful deaths--babies who were
carefully tortured up to the point of their tragic deaths--if an accusation is
not fair? What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a baby,
if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external signs on corpses
indicate each time this is discovered, positively, that the death could not be
accidental in any case but intentional. And, it is obvious that these
injuries sustained by the babie! s are deliberately done and take place over a
long time: The whole body is poked or pricked. Then, scraps of skin are
cut. The tongue was often cut out. The intimate parts of boys are
either cut out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally, other parts of the
body are cut out, and the palms are punctured. Signs of bruises from tight
bandages put on and removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has
abrasions as if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it.
Sometimes, the corpse was even washed, with it being discovered without
any blood in it; nor was there any blood on the undergarments or clothes,
demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and, afterwards, put on
again. The parents and siblings of babies who have experienced such tragic
deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people commit such deplorable acts
to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it could never be done; yet it continues
to happen repeatedl! y over time. The ordinary killer, in any case, would be
satisfied with one murder. But a murderer who kills for some type of mysterious,
important purpose cannot be rejected here.
unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of Jews, their
impudent and stubborn denial, not infrequently a bribery, the confidence by the
majority of educated people in that an accusation is merely the infamous slander
and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws--all these things saved the
Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from deserved execution. And they--by
using their machinations, by giving false oath assurances of innocence, and by
using false propaganda that suggested such accusations were merely theresult of
accomplished injustice with slander built on them--almost always were well
prepared for such accusations. The Jews punished those who demonstrated
credible evidence against them. In the year 1817 [in Russia], a law was
enacted on February 28 that the Superior Command announced on March 6: It was
prohibited to even suspect the Jews of such crimes, and the opinion that the
Jews needed no! n-Jewish blood was called a prejudice. Meanwhile, an examination
of the places where the secret training of Talmudists took place recognizes the
realization of this mutilation-murder, and the impartial view put forth in these
case productions convinces, without doubt, the truth of their validity."
Dal also cites many Jews who had converted to Christianity who admitted
that their brethren had committed such vicious crimes. He even mentions one Jew
who had been a grand rabbi.
Many websites tell of the nature of these
vicious crimes. You might want to reference http://www.RitualMurder.org to
read more about this.
You must ask yourself: Has the entire free world
been involved in a massive conspiracy against Jews in which false crimes were
attributed to them? Or have some wicked but small fanatical cults been
active within the Jewish people since ancient times?
For those who
suggest that Jews are incapable of such vicious hatred, lest I remind you of the
vicious nature of crimes occurring in Palestine? How many children have
died as a result of religious-inspired hatred by Zionists? While the
purpose may not be to consume the blood, the blood is nonetheless drained when a
Zionist terrorist shoots a Palestinian baby while in the hands of his mother.
Again, I challenge Mr. Turki Abdullah al-Sudeiri--or even one of his
Zionist designees--to a public debate over this. But I doubt if he is up to the