"A national park for Jews, built on Germany's Penal Code"
Berliner Zeitung attacks Germany's Holocaust-Creed-Enforcement-Law

No doubt, the vast majority of the German people no longer entirely believes what is propagated by the "Holocaust Industry". No wonder, when a creed is imposed upon a nation, the people naturally refuse to believe it. In all sections of society most doubt the official holocaust stories. The Germans are aware of the fact that journalists must propagate "the criminal law enforced image of history" in order not to go to prison. The renowned "Berliner Zeitung" was quite blunt when the editors condemned "governments that hijack historiography." The paper asserted that "the image of history, decreed by Germany, does not say anything about the truth of the holocaust, but says everything about Germany."

Berliner Zeitung, Tuesday, 27 April 2004:
http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/meinung/335951-1.html

The criminal-law-enforced holocaust creed exists in Germany, but which of the many holocaust versions are to be believed. Below are just two examples:

1989: Chief Prosecutor Majorowsky at the District Court Wuppertal stated in his indictment (file no: - 12 Js 1037/89):

"Auschwitz became the symbol for all murders, committed by the National So-cialists on the Jews. The camp, located south of Kattowitz in Poland, were about four million people were killed during World War II."

1996: Chief Prosecutor Meier-Staude at the District Court Munich I asserted that only 470,000 died in Auschwitz (file no:112 Js 12055/96):

"The fact that Pressac concluded, follo-wing his research, that 470,000 to 550,000 Jews were killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, does not consti-tute the criminal offence of trivialisation of the holocaust, according to 130."

"The number of Germans who believe that Jews exploiting the holocaust for their end, has risen from 48,3 to 63,7 percent."

The Jewish leader, Paul Spiegel
Die Welt, April 28, 2004, p. 9

Thus, the leader of the Jews in Germany spelled it out: It is anti-Semitism, if Ger-mans believe, Jews are exploiting the ho-locaust for their own ends. However, it was Jewish Professor Norman Finkelstein who claimed in his famous book "The Holocaust Industry" that "our present inter-pretation of the Holocaust has been deliberately devised by Ameri-can Jewish groups for purposes of ethnic supremacy, political advantage and financial gain ... In more recent years, the Holocaust industry has effectively turned into a shake-down racket in which more and more countries throughout Europe are being bludgeoned into coughing up compen-sation."

Germany's protection of historical monuments

By Christian Bommarius

Ten years ago the German parliament made the so-called "Auschwitz-Lie" explicitly punishable [up to five years in prison]. The relevant paragraph [130] of the law reads: "A prison sentence of up to five years will be imposed if the acts, committed under the rule of National Socialism, as defined under the international 'Law of Genocide', are publicly approved, denied or belittled, in a way, suitable to incite people."

If one of the delegates of the International Conference on anti-Semitism, starting tomorrow in Berlin, should want to know, who in Germany is responsible for the fight against anti-Semitism, he would get the following answer: The prosecution services and the police are responsible, but not the people.

The ban of the "Auschwitz-Lie" is bizarre. Not only is the putative battle against the discrimination of Jews being perpetuated in a subtle way. Moreover, the fact that Jews need protection against anti-Semitism in their own homeland is no less humiliating than anti-Semitism itself.

It was for this reason that the then President of the "Council of Jews in Germany", Hendrik van Dam, opposed years ago the intention, to create "a national Park by the criminal law" for Jews in Germany - in Germany, of all countries. This is the way Germany protects her historical monuments. ... By protecting the "Auschwitz-Lie" the law really protects a legal right that was, for good reasons, unknown in the history of democratic states: a law that enforces a state-created image of history.

The mathematic formulas, used by Old- and Neo-Nazis in an attempt to reduce the victim numbers, may be repulsive. Any such trivialisation is repellent and rightly perceived as offensive by those concerned. However, it will not help the truth of the holocaust if it is only laid down in the books of law, when it has not entered into people's minds and souls. It is of little help to the truth when people are forced to believe, not because the truth is irrefutable, but because people are ordered to believe in the truth. States are writing history, but when states seize hold of history, when they deny society the image of history, when they instead decree history, then nothing is said about the truth, but everything is said about such states.

Writing history with an enforced penal code, says a lot about the trust of such states in their democratic substance and says a lot about their trust in the people's awareness in the rule of law.

The participants of the International Conference on anti-Semitism should know that there does not exist anti-Semitism in Germany, simply because anti-Semitism is banned by law and any violation would be punished.

The truth about democratic German:
80,703 cases of criminal persecutions have been launched between 1994 and 2002. In all cases the offences were: Doubting holocaust stories and criticising Germany's immigration policy. The German law is tailored to make every national thinking person automatically a criminal:

According to the Annual Reports of the 'German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution' (George Orwell could not have invented a more sinister title) the German persecution machinery prosecuted the following totals of citizens for expressing politically incorrect opinions in Germany:

Year of
Persecution

Number of victims

  Reason for being prosecuted by the German persecution machinery:
1994 5.562   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
1995 6.555   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
1996 7.585   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
1997 10.257   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
1998 9.549   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
1999 8.651   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
2000 13.863   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
2001 8.874   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
2002 9.807   For not believing holocaust stories and objecting to the flood-waves of immigration
http://globalfire.tv/nj/04en/persecution/bz_130_en.htm