Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:17:13 -0800
(PST)
From: Mark Franklin <nonzion@yahoo.com>
Subject:
Questionable Leadership: Whose War, Indeed?
To:
nonzion@yahoo.com
Questionable Leadership:
Whose War, Indeed?
By Mark Franklin
March 25,
2003
"But, today I weep for my country. I have watched the
events of recent months with a heavy, heavy heart. No more is the image of
America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. The image of America has
changed. Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our
intentions are questioned. ... We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance.
We treat UN Security Council members like ingrates who offend our princely
dignity by lifting their heads from the carpet. Valuable alliances are split.
After war has ended, the United States will have to rebuild much more than the
country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America's image around the globe. ...
Why can this President not seem to see that America's true power lies not in
its will to intimidate, but in its ability to inspire?" Senator Robert Byrd
asked this prior to Bush War.
http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_speeches/byrd_speeches_2003march/byrd_speeches_2003march_list/byrd_speeches_2003march_list_4.html
America
has now become involved in another bloody and vicious war. We are told
that we are liberating the Iraqi people: "America the beautiful" is freeing
the Iraqi people from a vicious dictator so that the people there can live
their lives American-style. While we bring them good whiskey,
cigarettes, feminism, mini-skirts, and homosexuality, the evil Iraqi
leadership tries to stop us. But we know what is best for them, and we
must share our "freedom." No one dares to question this freedom here,
lest he end up in jail or lose his job. The rest of the world just does
not seem to understand our "honorable" goal and us.
American
troops amass - innocent children doing the bidding of their leader. The
troops valiantly stand behind the President of the United States, George W.
Bush, ready to follow his every command. The President cannot be wrong;
after all, he is the President.
Bush proclaims to his
troops: "Go to Baghdad, and murder its President!" The troops go off to
follow his command. We invade a foreign country in a pre-emptive war, a
war that Bush - contradicting what was once a U.S. Constitutional law - was
given the power to start by Congress. Nearly the entire world calls us
arrogant. Certainly, they just do not understand; the rest of the world
must be too simple to understand our "greater wisdom," we
think.
How did this happen? What in the world is going
on? What are the forces behind this vicious war?
Patrick Buchanan mentioned some of the forces behind this war
in a revealing 8-page article entitled, "Whose War?" that appeared in the
magazine "The American Conservative" of March 24, 2003. Buchanan called
these forces surrounding President Bush as the "neoconservatives." But
that name does not do them justice.
At center stage, we see
President George W. Bush, our Supreme Leader in this war. His war
credentials seem quite good initially: He is President. He had
been trained as a pilot back during Viet Nam. But that is where his war
credentials end. He was asked to take a drug test while in the armed
services in 1972 and refused. The website http://www.talion.com/ exposed this with
copies of the actual records online:
"Instead of being arrested
for failure to appear when ordered, Bush disappeared from duty until the Viet
Nam war ended, apparently using political influence to duck into civilian
duties. At that time, documents show that he reappeared and was assigned to
punishment duty in Denver."
He apparently never served
the punishment there either, again using his father's political influence to
later gain an honorable discharge without having served his full-term of
service. Talion.com reveals this bit of Bush's background:
"He
did not volunteer for service in Vietnam; in fact, he failed to report for
duty in his Air National Guard Unit and skipped off to Alabama to work on a
political campaign."
Bush went to Harvard, where he scored
mediocre grades of Cs. About a year ago, the highly popular Russian
magazine Arguments and Facts' website, under the title "George Bush: [A] Real
Cowboy," suggested that Bush's IQ was a little lower than the average person:
about 80 compared with the average of 100. Perhaps, they made the
comment as a joke. Perhaps, they have no real sources to back up such a
statement. Perhaps, they were a bit mean-spirited in this article.
Or perhaps they are right, for Bush's choice of advisors must be questioned
and seems to be a most curious assortment of individuals.
There
is a vast circle of Zionist Jews surrounding Bush. And these Zionist
Jews are beating the war drums. Of course, the media like to downplay
this, suggesting that it is absurd. To anyone who openly recognizes this
obvious fact, the media often yell and scream at the top of their lungs,
"Anti-Semite!" Those of us who have bothered to look into these claims
made by patriotic Americans, who are concerned about where this country is
headed, think differently. Where does the list of Bush's Jewish advisors
end, and where does it begin?
We see the mighty
Richard Perle at the helm, beating the war drums hard for his Zionist
cohorts. Perle, the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, was
once reportedly caught by the National Security Agency back in the 1970s
passing Classified information to the Israeli Embassy. This reportedly
caused Perle to be expelled from Sen. Henry Jackson's office. Jews are
naught but 2 percent of America's population. If it was just Perle, we
might ignore this. But the list of the Jewish kabal surrounding Bush is
quite lengthy:
Paul Wolfowitz, Bush's Jewish Deputy Defense
Secretary and campaign advisor; Robert Satloff, U.S. National Security Council
Advisor; Dov Zekheim, Under Secretary of Defense and Comptroller; Robert
Satloff, U.S. National Security Council Advisor; Douglas Feith, Under
Secretary of Defense and the Pentagon's Policy Advisor; Elliott Abrams,
National Security Council Advisor; Marc Grossman, Under Secretary of State for
Political Affairs; Richard Haass, Director of Policy Planning at the State
Department and Director of National Security Programs; Henry Kissinger,
a Pentagon advisor who sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board; James
Schlesinger, another Pentagon advisor who also sits on the Pentagon's Defense
Policy Board; Robert Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative; Mel Sembler,
President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States; Israeli citizen Ari
Fleischer, the official White House spokesman for th e Bush administration; J
oshua Bolten, Bush's Chief Policy Director; Steve Goldsmith, Senior Advisor to
the President and domestic policy advisor; Adam Goldman, the White House
Special Liaison to the Jewish Community; Joseph Gildenhorn, the Bush
Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community; Christopher Gersten, the
former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition and husband of
Labor Secretary Linda Chavez (whose children are being raised Jewish); Daniel
Saul Goldin, Head of NASA; Mark Weinberger, the Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury; Samuel Bodman, Deputy Secretary of Commerce; Bonnie Cohen, Under
Secretary of State for Management; Ruth Davis, the Director of the Foreign
Service Institute; Lincoln Bloomfield, Assistant Secretary of State for
Political Military Affairs; Jay Lefkowitz, General Counsel of the Office of
Budget and Management; and David Frum, White House speechwriter. Added
to this list might be Colin Powell, who reportedly speaks Yiddish and whose
father is part-Jewis h. And let's not e ven begin to talk about the
Federal Reserve, a Jewish-closed shop.
This circle of Jews has
long been advocating America's involvement in the Bush War. And what do
Jews think of Bush? How do they pay respect to the U.S. President?
Behind his back, many Jews openly mock him; Jews openly brag about how they
control U.S. President George W. Bush. The Australian Jewish News of
February 15, 2002, showed a caricature of Bush, depicted as a little wooden
puppet pulled by Jewish strings. According to the IAP, Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon once even went on public radio on October 3, 2001, and
proclaimed:
"We the Jewish people control America, and the
Americans know it."
Against this background stand the Jewish
Media Barons: Those Jews who overwhelmingly control the media and distort
reality. They are force-feeding American patriots their made-for-Israel
lies in the form of daily propaganda. This is why you seldom here about
their vicious nature. In another article, I described who these people
are. I feel it is worth mentioning again. If you already read
about this, skip ahead a few paragraphs.
Look at the heads of
almost all the major news sources: Gerald Levin is the CEO of CNN, AOL,
and Time Warner. Peter Chernin is president and CEO of the FOX
Group. Sumner Redstone, also known as Murray Rothstein,
recently acquired CBS and controls the book publishing companies Simon &
Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, and Pocket Books. Redstone's Viacom
also controls Showtime, MTV, and Nickolodeon, among other TV networks.
Steven Borenstein is CEO of ESPN. Michael Eisner controls Walt Disney,
Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television, and ABC, not to mention dozens
of radio stations. Ronald Perleman owns New World Entertainment. Jeffrey
Katzenberg, Steven Spielberg, and David Geffen own DreamWorks. The
brothers Samuel and David Newhouse, the children of media baron Samuel
Newhouse, control 26 newspapers, 12 television stations, 87 cable TV systems,
and about two-dozen popu lar magazines. Edgar Bronfman Jr., President
and CEO of Seagrams, controls MCA and Universal Pictures which recently merged
under the name of Universal Studios and controls Interscope Records and
PolyGram as well. Mortimer Zuckerman controls U.S. News & World
Report. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. controls The New York Times, 33 other
newspapers, and about a dozen magazines. Until her recent death,
Katherine Meyer Graham controlled Newsweek and the Washington
Post. The same can be said of Canada where Israel Asper controls
numerous newspapers and has reportedly fired employees for being critical of
Israel. This list was actually made 3-4 years ago, and may need a little
updating. The names may change, but the Jewish Media Barons' practices
and monopoly continue.
Well-known Jewish writer Ben Stein
recently wrote a most revealing article about this Jewish control for
Entertainment Online. The title of it is, "Do Jews Run Hollywood?
You bet they do--and what of it?" Stein begins with a quote by Marlon
Brando, who once reportedly stated on Larry King
Live,
"Hollywood is run by Jews; it is owned by Jews--and they
should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering.
Because...we have seen...the greaseball, we've seen the Chink, we've seen the
slit-eyed dangerous Jap, we have seen the wily Filipino, we've seen everything
but we never saw the kike. Because they knew perfectly well, that that is
where you draw the [line]."(2)
Brando's point appears to have
some merit, as Jews are seldom portrayed in a negative light on television or
in the movies. If anything, Jews are often shown as the victims of
unfettered hatred, perhaps to elicit feelings of sympathy among viewers.
In other roles, they are typically chosen as the elite, the comical, the wise,
et cetera, ad nauseam. In fact, the number of times Jews have been
portrayed as less than wholesome can probably be added up on one hand (if not
one finger). Concurring with Stein's article, popular Jewish
publications in the past have said something similar:
"Jews
dominate Hollywood today as they did in the industry's infancy, in the acting,
directing and producing departments, Tom Tugend writes in The Jewish Chronicle
of London. 'On the whole,' he asserts, 'the Jewish presence in Hollywood is
taken as a historic fact of life and few insensitivities are aroused by the
number, influence, or character of Jews in the movie industry.' ... Moving
over into the realm of the producers and directors, Tugend says the 'majority
. . . are Jewish while the Writers Guild is practically a Semitic closed shop
with Jews making up 70 to 80 percent of the
membership."(3)
Stein, of course, says that all these Jews in
the media should be ignored. It's not a conspiracy, he says. Jews
just decided one day to monopolize the media, spread their propaganda, and
charge ridiculous sums for commercials that boost everything up in cost
(giving them more money to monopolize other fields). Stein says that
Jews, who are about 2.5 percent of America's population, only make up 60
percent of the media. What he fails to mention is that they are the
media elite; they are Jewish Media Barons, who are in the controlling
positions. (The other 40 percent, who Stein claims are not Jews, are the
ones who do the dirty work, and this figure of 40 percent seems a bit large at
that.) Stein argues that Gentiles should ignore all this.
President Nixon even recognized that Jews control the media,
and things have gotten much worse since he was in office. Of course,
this is why Jews tend to portray Nixon in a negative light, trying to write
off his comments as being merely "anti-Semitic." As noted in Leonard
Dinnerstein's book Anti-Semitism in America, President Nixon
informed,
"[People] have to realize that Jews in the U.S.
control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers,
the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And
there is a force we have to take into consideration."
Indeed it
is a force that we have to take into consideration. And it is the same
Jewish force that is beating the war drums and telling us
lies.
It should not be viewed as mere coincidence that Bush said
he was going to take action on the night of March 17, 2003, which was when the
Jewish holiday of Purim began, and started the war on March 19, when the Purim
holiday ended. The holiday Purim is best known by the book of Esther in
the Bible. It is a celebration of when in ancient times Jews tricked the
non-Jewish King Ahasuerus of Persia (modern-day Iraq) into murdering the Jews'
non-Jewish enemies; in today's case, President Bush is the modern-day
Ahasuerus and the victims, both Americans and Iraqis.
We are
told that we are liberating Iraq. But the truth of the matter is that
while Saddam Hussein may very well be a vicious tyrant, the Iraqi people
perceive the American government as much worse. They look at us
with anger due to our incessant support of Israel, whose soldiers regularly
murder men, women, and children. They hear about the scraps of bombs
left from Israeli-flown Apache helicopters and F16 Fighters in Palestine with
little tags that say "Made in America" on them.
The media spits
out lies to us. The media tell us that "Iraqi soldiers" who are
disguised as "civilians" shoot at our troops; the truth is that the Iraqi
civilians are really shooting at our troops. It has been said that the
American combat-trained soldiers and their equipment are vastly superior to
that of Iraq. This is true. However, we have 250,000 troops in a
society where probably about 16 million people (out of 24 million total
people) are hostile to us. And Hussein has armed all of them with
rifles.
The people of Iraq do not care if they live or
die. They are angry. The U.S. has regularly bombed them for 10
years. Sanctions imposed against them have resulted in the deaths of
approximately 500,000 children. Their water supplies and purification
plants were destroyed during the last war, and no equipment has been allowed
to renew them. Many live in shambles without electricity already
from the last war. When you have nothing, you have nothing to
lose.
Recently, 32 Apache helicopters suffered damage and were
pulled back, noted the New York Times of March 24, 2003. The Iraqis
captured one or two of them. Some of the U.S. troops have been caught,
others murdered.
The Iraqi people do not perceive us as
"liberating" them from Saddam Hussein; many like him. Hussein is an
admirer of Stalin, and perhaps he bears some similarity to him in one respect:
Despite Stalin having been involved in the murder of 40-60 million Russians,
most Russians broke down and cried when he died. And why not?
Stalin had already killed or imprisoned those who disliked him. Some
claim that Hussein has not engaged in mass murders, but that claim is of
little importance. What is important is that he seems to have much
support - or we Americans are simply hated more than he is due to our support
of Israel and the past Iraqi war and its aftermath.
This is not
going to be an easy war, despite some who argue otherwise. We are the
invaders in many of the Iraqis' eyes. We are bombing their businesses,
their homes - maybe even unintentionally for the most part. They
perceive us as bombing their people, and it seems that they are right in many
cases, even if by accident. And perception is what counts. In the
middle of Iraq at night time, can you tell a good Iraqi from a bad one?
If an Iraqi, whose English is as good as your Arabic, approaches American
soldiers at night, how will they determine if he is friend or foe? How
can such a war be won?
Indeed, this war is going to be
very difficult. But more difficult than this war against Iraq is another
war that must be won if America is to continue existing: the propaganda war
against the Jewish Zionists who are guiding America with a dark
hand.
---------------------------------
Mark Franklin is the
producer of the video "Zionist War Crimes: The Case for the
Prosecution." If you would like to find out about his video, contact EagleNewsTips@aol.com
No
copyright; feel free to circulate.
To get on this mailing list,
put the words "Zionists suck" in the subject header.
To get off
this mailing list, put "Zionists are God's chosen people" in the subject
header.
Do
you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live
on your desktop!