Subj: Coverup
Date: 8/30/98 12:05:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: Twaecap
To: AR@amren.com, JMRDREAMER, NewSocit2m
To: jlkucek@juno.com, help@sobran.com, NotAZombie


Subj: ADV8-29-98:The Fayetteville Murders
Date: 8/29/98 1:24:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: ADVlist@NatVan.com (American Dissident Voices)
Reply-to: National@NatVan.com
To: national@NatVan.com (National Vanguard Books)

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of August 29, 1998

The Fayetteville Murders
by Dr. William Pierce


It's really too bad Bill Clinton put on such a weak performance in his
televised apology to the nation a couple of weeks ago. He could have
done much better if he hadn't worn himself out trying to appear
cooperative while waffling and dodging questions from the grand jury the
whole afternoon before his speech. As it was, I believe his poor
performance left a lot of his supporters feeling uneasy.

He certainly left a lot of people who aren't his supporters feeling a
bit uneasy about the country's future. I mean, knowledgeable people in
other countries already were pretty cynical about the U.S. government.
They understand the extent to which it is under the control of the Jews,
simply from observing its unquestioning backing of Israeli policy in the
Middle East, when that policy is clearly detrimental to American
interests. And they certainly haven't failed to notice Washington's
obedient support of the Jews' current extortion efforts against
Switzerland and other countries from which the Jews are in the process
of successfully gouging billions of dollars in World War Two
reparations.

Now the cynicism of foreign observers is turning to contempt. Clinton
has become a laughingstock around the world. People are amazed that the
United States has a President who says he believes that oral sex doesn't
really count and who has so little control over his urges that he lets
himself get into such an embarrassing mess.

What all of this means is that when Mr. Clinton goes on television, puts
on a serious face, and tells the world that his government will not
tolerate having its embassies blown up, people are less inclined to take
him seriously. Actually, it shouldn't matter, since it's not Clinton but
the FBI and other police and military agencies which are supposed to
counter terrorism, but in fact, it does matter. Certainly, if I were a
terrorist leader wanting to strike at the United States I'd be greatly
encouraged to see the U.S. government headed by a clown like Clinton. I
wouldn't worry half so much about all of America's Tomahawk cruise
missiles if I knew that the man in charge of those missiles is a fool
and a self-indulgent weakling.

I believe that we will see an increase in terrorism against the United
States during the next two years, and I believe that most reasonable
people will agree with me that the weaker image of America caused by
Clinton's deplorable behavior will be a contributing factor.

It's really amazing, isn't it? We can put people on the Moon and send
robot explorers to Mars, but our political system is a basket case,
which seems to permit only moral cripples to rise to positions of
leadership. It's the sort of political system you might expect to find
in a banana republic or in Africa or the Middle East. Because it's not
just Bill Clinton. If the system were sound, someone like Bill Clinton
could never have gotten near the White House. I mean, look at the
situation we have now, in which all of the media people seem to be in
agreement that Bill Clinton's fate depends not on the specific evidence
of criminal behavior Kenneth Starr produces in his report to the
Congress but rather on how the opinion polls go. It's not the law which
really counts here, but public opinion. If the man's approval rating
drops significantly, then the Congress will fall on him like a pack of
wolves. But if his approval rating stays high, then the politicians
won't try to touch him. It reminds me of the Colosseum in ancient Rome,
where the fate of a gladiator was determined by whether he got a
thumbs-up or a thumbs-down sign from the emperor, and the emperor made
his decision based on the shouts of the mob. It's not just foreign
terrorists who've lost their respect for the U.S. government; it's
everybody.

Is this an organic development -- which is to say, a natural development
-- or is it artificial? There are political theorists who believe that a
civilization -- and that includes its governments -- has a life cycle
which is analogous to that of a living organism: it goes through a
youthful period of vigorous and healthy growth, reaches maturity, and
then gradually becomes senile and dies. They would attribute the Clinton
phenomenon to the senility of American civilization.

Then on the other hand there are the conspiracy theorists, who attribute
the decline of American prestige to deliberate sabotage. I take a middle
position, about halfway between the Spenglerians and the conspiracy
theorists. That is, there certainly is some truth in the Spenglerian --
or organic -- view. This country started off with a much higher quality
electorate than it has now. Through the processes of non-selective
immigration, dysgenic breeding, and an irresponsible and reckless
extension of the franchise to broader and broader classes of the
population, an electorate has devolved in the United States which would
make the Roman mob in the Colosseum seem like a gathering of
distinguished, upright, and responsible citizens. Democracies tend to
become senile faster than other forms of government through the process
of extending the vote. This process, like giving candy to a baby, goes
in only one direction, and that's down. But I believe that it's been a
natural process in the United States, for the most part, based on
intrinsic weaknesses in the democratic system rather than on deliberate
sabotage.

But certainly there has been plenty of sabotage. Look at the crew around
Clinton, for example. What a collection of camel faces! You'd think he
was in the Knesset instead of the White House. In particular, every time
Clinton blows up a pharmaceutical factory in some other country in order
to divert the attention of the public from his zipper problems, the
advisers and functionaries around him -- his secretary of state and all
of her assistant secretaries; his secretary of defense; his national
security adviser and his deputy national security adviser; his new
ambassador to the United Nations; his policy advisers, headed by the
Israeli agent Emanuel Rahm; his speechwriters; even his soon-to-be new
press secretary -- these people could more naturally carry on their
deliberations in Yiddish than in English. There's hardly a Gentile among
them. Actually, Clinton's former Gentile press secretary, Mike McCurry,
will still be around for a few more weeks, but with his Jewish
girlfriend Monica Lewinsky so much in the news these days, I guess he
decided he needed to replace McCurry with a Jewish press secretary to
explain the details of the relationship to the media. I mean, the
environment around Clinton is so kosher that if someone from Mars landed
on the White House lawn he would conclude that the U.S. population is 90
per cent Jews instead of just over two per cent.

And really, this all-too-obvious, this all-too-visible, domination of
our government by Jews isn't even necessary from the Jews' point of
view. They have a deathgrip on the country which they can maintain just
as effectively from behind the scenes. They don't need all of those Jews
out in plain sight, where someone other than a Martian might notice them
and begin thinking.

You know, the politicians in Washington express varying views on many
different subjects. Some are in favor of unlimited abortion, and some
are not. Some are in favor of bigger welfare checks for the drones, and
some are not. Some are tree-cutters and polluters, while others
occasionally will speak in favor of protecting the environment. Some are
for so-called "gay rights," and some are not. But there is not one of
them who will oppose the Jews on anything at all; not one of them who
will say out loud, "Hey, we have too many Jews in this government."

And that's not a natural development. That's the result of a carefully
planned and well organized campaign of subversion. We have a gang of
politicians who always dance to the Jews' tune, no matter what tune the
Jews choose to play, because the system has been subverted so that only
such politicians can succeed in it. The Jews' tools for subversion have
been the mass media of news and entertainment.

You know, I've talked about the Jewish control of the media often, but
I'm sure that many people still don't believe what I say on that
subject. They can't bring themselves to believe that in a country with
so many newspapers and news magazines and radio stations and television
stations, all trying to make money by reporting the news, any small
group of people can keep all these media under control; they can't
believe that a minority making up only a little over two per cent of the
population can censor the news tightly enough to control what Joe and
Jill Sixpack think; they can't believe that the Jews are able to use the
media in such a disciplined way that they can change the outcome of any
election.

Let me give you a very forceful and a very current example of Jewish
media control which shows just how tight and how vicious it is. On
Monday of last week -- that was the 17th of August -- two young, White
women were murdered in Fayetteville, North Carolina, near Fort Bragg,
the big Army base which is home to the 82nd Airborne Division. The
murdered women were 18-year-old Tracy Lambert and 25-year-old Susan
Moore, both of them remarkably pretty blondes. Tracy and Susan were
driving home after work, late at night. On their way home they were
abducted by a group of seven Blacks and mixed-race Hispanics, all
members and prospective members of a non-White gang known as the Crips.
The prospective members had been assigned the initiation task of
murdering two White people: any two White people. If they wanted to be
members of the Crips they had to find and murder two White people as
their initiation into the gang.

They found Tracy and Susan driving home in Susan's car. They abducted
the girls by stopping the car and forcing their way in--what's known
these days as a "car-jacking." They locked the two White girls in the
trunk of the car, drove them to a vacant field just outside Fort Bragg,
made them kneel on the ground, and then, a little after three o'clock
Monday morning, shot them in the head. The bullets which killed the
girls and which were removed from their heads by the medical examiner
had been painted with blue fingernail polish. Blue is the Crips'
identifying color. The bodies were found by a farmer early in the
morning, just four hours after they had been murdered.

Two of the gang members were arrested the next day in Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina, driving Susan's car and using Susan's cellular phone.
The other five were arrested in the next two days. Two of the arrested
gang members immediately confessed. All seven were arraigned on
Thursday. So what this means is that the news media had the whole story
of these sensational, racially motivated gang murders, with all of the
lurid details, by Thursday, August 20. Stories began appearing in the
Fayetteville Observer-Times, the local newspaper, and in a few other
local papers near Fayetteville on Friday. And the story also was
reported on the local television news program.

But that's all. The murders were not reported at all outside North
Carolina. I've talked with people all around the country and asked them
if they've heard anything about the murders, and none have. I'll wager
that this broadcast is the first you've heard of these murders. Now,
isn't that remarkable? I mean, that is disciplined censorship. No one in
the mainstream media has broken ranks, even on such a sensational story.
And of course, it's not that they didn't know. The information was
available on the Internet, to anyone who knew how to look for it, from
the Fayetteville Observer-Times and other Fayetteville sources. But the
word went out that these murders were not to be reported outside North
Carolina, and by God, they weren't.

Do you remember another racial killing which occurred in Fayetteville, a
little over two and a half years ago? I'm sure you do. A White soldier
from Fort Bragg, James Burmeister, got tanked up on beer one night in
December 1995, along with a couple of his buddies from the base. While
in a mood of drunken belligerency Burmeister ran into a convicted Black
drug dealer and the drug dealer's Black girlfriend in Fayetteville, and
he shot them to death. He was arrested shortly afterward, and the case
immediately -- immediately -- became a cause celebre. It was a headlined
story in the New York Times and the Washington Post and the Wall Street
Journal and Time and Newsweek and every other newspaper and newsmagazine
in the country. It was on all of the national television news programs
-- all of them. The controlled media spread the story around the world
with breathless haste. And they didn't drop it either. They reported on
it over and over and over again for months. Every little detail of the
case which came out made new headlines all across America.

They found what they called "racist literature" in Burmeister's room,
and that was big news too. No organization. No gang. No gang initiation.
Just "racist literature." But that was enough for Janet Reno to come
onto television and announce that she was sending in the FBI. And of
course, Bill Clinton also was on television talking about the case and
holding it up as a terrible example of "White racism." And the
professional hate merchants like Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty
Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and the Simon
Wiesenthal Center and all of the other Jewish groups commented on the
case endlessly. A race killing: how terrible! That's what we heard over
and over again for more than a year. The Jewish organizations which are
behind Clinton's plan for a non-White America in the coming decades --
the Jews who scripted that plan for him -- used the Burmeister shooting
in Fayetteville as a propaganda club to make White Americans feel
sheepish and keep their heads down. "See how awful White racism is?"
they screamed at us; "see where it leads?"

But, hey, Tracy Lambert and Susan Moore? Forget them. They weren't
convicted drug dealers, and they weren't Black. They were just two
pretty, young White women trying to get home from work. And their
killers weren't White. So they're not news. Actually, it's more than the
fact that the murder of Tracy and Susan don't fit the pattern that the
Jews have been promoting with the media for so long: the pattern of
White racists and non-White victims. What has caused news of this case
to be stifled is that it fits so perfectly the opposite pattern:
non-White murderers deliberately hunting down and killing White victims.
Janet Reno won't be sending the FBI to Fayetteville for this hate crime.
Bill Clinton won't be on television about it either. And except for
those Americans listening to this broadcast, people outside North
Carolina won't even hear about it.

And this is not an oversight. This is deliberate. This is planned. The
last thing in the world the Jewish media bosses want is for White
Americans to hear about these murders, because it'll dawn on some of
those White Americans that this is the sort of thing they can look
forward to when America has a non-White majority a few decades hence.
The Crips, after all, are spread all across the country, the biggest
criminal gang in America. They are a lethal threat to unsuspecting White
people everywhere. They will be an even bigger threat in the future. But
that's all right. The Democrats need their votes.

You know, even in Fayetteville, where the media could hardly have kept
quiet about these murders, there has been no mention at all of the
Burmeister shooting in connection with them, no drawing of parallels.
That's such an obvious thing, contrasting these racial murders with
Burmeister's shooting of the Black drug dealer and his girlfriend in
1995 in the same place, but it's clear that even the Fayetteville media
are deliberately steering clear of making that connection. Deliberately.
They don't want anybody thinking of these murders in racial terms. The
image they have established in the minds of the lemmings is one of White
racists, White haters, attacking poor, defenseless non-White victims,
and they don't want reality to intrude on that image.

Now, I don't want to overwork the story of these August 17 Fayetteville
murders. But I think that you'll agree with me that it's not an ordinary
news story. It's not the sort of story that the media bosses decided
wouldn't be interesting to the American people. It's not just another
one of those ho-hum stories about Black criminality of the sort we have
every day. It's an extraordinarily important story, a significant story,
a story which provides the opportunity for all sorts of commentary and
drawing all sorts of parallels, the sort of story which makes people
think.

That's clear. The media bosses all understood that instantly. And with a
nationwide criminal gang like the Crips behind these race murders in
Fayetteville, it's the sort of story that the media have a
responsibility to get to the people, in order to warn them of a very
real and growing danger. And that's why the media bosses deliberately
suppressed the story. They don't want to mess up the false image of
White racists and Black victims they have worked so long and hard to
plant in the heads of the lemmings, of the couch potatoes, of the Joe
and Jill Sixpacks who vote in elections. They don't want the voters to
think. They don't want them to know what's really happening in America.
They don't want them to form their own opinions about things. The Jewish
media bosses want to continue controlling public opinion and controlling
the outcome of elections. They do that by suppressing stories like the
one I've just told you about the Fayetteville murders.

So you see, a big part of America's decline is the consequence of
deliberate Jewish subversion, deliberate Jewish sabotage. Through their
media control the Jews do change the way Americans see the world. The
Jews do change public opinion. The Jews do use their media control
effectively enough to determine the outcome of elections. If they can
hammer the story of James Burmeister's drunken shooting of a couple of
Black low-lifes into the consciousness of every American and then
successfully suppress the story of the cold-blooded murder, the
initiation murder, of Tracy and Susan by a Black gang, they can change
the way Americans respond to the Jews' racial programs. They can
persuade the lemmings to go along willingly with their plan for a
non-White America: an America which they can control and expolit even
more easily.

Anyway, the total suppression of the news of the murder of Tracy and
Susan is an exceptionally convincing illustration of the power wielded
by the Jewish media bosses and of the destructive way in which they use
that power. And it should help us to understand not only why we have a
clown at the head of our government -- a clown completely surrounded by
Jews -- but also why we must have a full-scale revolution in America to
clean things up.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

or e-mail: national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.