Subj: ADV9-4-99: Jewish Democracy
Date: 9/4/99 2:28:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: (American Dissident Voices)
To: (National Alliance)

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of September 4, 1999

Jewish Democracy
by Dr. William Pierce

Well, there's been another dragging, this one just last week in Martin,
South Dakota. Three Indians from a reservation there severely beat a
White man, 21-year-old Brad Young, tied a rope around his neck and to
the back of their truck, and dragged the White man until they thought he
was dead. Then they cut the rope loose from their truck and drove off,
leaving their unconscious and badly injured victim lying in a field,
where he was later found. His ears had been torn off, and his face and
neck were so badly lacerated that his family couldn't recognize him. The
sheriff, noting the viciousness of the attack and that the victim was
White and his attackers were Indians, told reporters that it was clearly
a "hate crime."

The fascinating thing about this particular incident is that it is
practically a mirror image of the dragging of a Black by three White men
in Jasper, Texas, last year: three White men and a Black victim in the
first case; three Indians and a White victim in the second case. In both
cases the victims had known and been drinking with their assailants.
Both draggings were unplanned and simply grew out of drunken fights. In
both cases a beating preceded the dragging. The really interesting
difference between the Jasper, Texas, case and the Martin, South Dakota,
case is the way in which the controlled news media have responded to
them. The Jasper, Texas, case was immediately on television screens
around the world and remained on the screens for months. It periodically
comes back on the TV screens as the deliberately spaced trials of the
three perpetrators come up. Bill Clinton addressed the nation about it.
Every Jewish propaganda organization and every Politically Correct
columnist and commentator had something to say about it. But unless
you're an Internet news junkie or a very careful newspaper reader you
haven't even heard about the Martin, South Dakota, case. You certainly
will never see it on television or hear Bill Clinton comment on it.

In the South Dakota case the media people have been trying to pressure
the sheriff into backing down from his initial assertion that the
dragging was a "hate crime." Since the victim knew his assailants and
was voluntarily drinking with them before they beat and dragged him, it
wasn't really a "hate crime," the media people have been saying; it was
simply a bit of drunken hooliganism that got out of hand. You know, they
could have said exactly the same thing about the Texas case, but they
didn't, did they? In Texas their motivation was to exaggerate the
atrociousness and malice involved, not to minimize it as they have done
in the South Dakota case.

And for real media minimalization, consider the dragging murder of
Patricia Stansfield by a Black near Streator, Illinois, on August 1 last
year. I first reported this dragging to you nearly three months ago, in
my broadcast of June 12. The 46-year-old White woman, a registered
nurse, was deliberately dragged three miles to her death along a country
road. Police found blood spots, body tissue, and bits of her clothing
along the road. Sounds a bit like the dragging of James Byrd in Jasper,
doesn't it, with all of those little painted circles on the road which
we saw a hundred times on television? Patricia Stansfield's Black
murderer was 26-year-old Christopher Coleman. But you haven't heard even
the slightest peep from the Jewish media about the Stansfield dragging,
have you?

You might ask, why couldn't the media simply have presented the facts in
each case, giving them approximately equal coverage and let the public
make up their own minds and form their own opinions about them?

Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? The controlled
media are not interested in presenting facts; they are interested in
shaping public opinion, so they present the facts which serve their
purpose, but not those facts which don't. We have three atrocious
interracial draggings in the past 15 months, one with a Black victim and
two with White victims. Even if you didn't already know, you wouldn't
have to puzzle very long trying to figure out which one the controlled
media would choose to report.

You know, even when the facts don't fit, the Jews sometimes will try to
use them anyway. The media liars still refer to the two killers at
Columbine High School this summer as "neo-Nazis" and "racists." They
know that one of the killers, Dylan Klebold, was a Jew, and that both
were not racists but rather were anti-racists. They know that Eric
Harris had an Internet web site in which he talked about how much he
hated White racists. Now, those facts don't fit the image the Jews have
been forging in the public mind of people who go on shooting sprees as
being White racists or neo-Nazis. But they couldn't really suppress the
story of the Columbine High murders, like they did the story of the
dragging murder of Patricia Stansfield. The Columbine High story was too
big to kill, so they just twisted it a bit. They repeated over and over
the rumor that the two killers had targeted Blacks, even though only one
of the 13 people they killed was a Black. They parlayed this false rumor
about targeting Blacks into the characterization of the two killers as
"neo-Nazis." And the general public, never too difficult to fool, has
swallowed it.

At least, much of the general public has swallowed it. And most of the
rest are such lemmings that even if they don't literally believe the
Jewish party line on racial matters they pretend that they do. They are
afraid of being out of step with everyone else. They are the ones who
understand the danger and the unpleasantness of living with non-Whites,
but who won't admit that they understand. They flee to White suburbs or
to Whiter parts of the country to get away from non-Whites, but they'll
never give you a straight answer about why they fled. Maybe it's a good
thing that we're running out of places to flee to and soon will be
obliged to stand and fight. At least, some of us will stand and fight.
Many will just grovel and beg for mercy. That's the kind of White people
we've been raising in America for the past 50 years.

I have a story on my desk about a murder in Salt Lake City last month. I
suspect that this is a story you haven't heard before, because like so
many others it doesn't fit. Early on the morning of August 3 a Black
male slipped into a condominium where three young White women were
sleeping. He stabbed one of the young women, 22-year-old Amy Quinton, to
death, and tried to kill 19-year-old Erin Warren by stabbing her in the
stomach. Erin was taken to a hospital in critical condition. The third
woman, in a separate bedroom, was able to telephone police and escaped
injury. You know, this sort of thing happens all the time; you just
don't hear about it.

What I found especially poignant about this story was the reaction of
one of the girls' neighbors. Bill McDade lives in the apartment just
above the one in which the girls were attacked. He's 41 years old, and
he moved from southern California to Salt Lake City with his elderly
father several years ago to escape the non-White crime in California. He
told reporters: "We moved up here from L.A. to escape this kind of
thing. When I moved here it was very peaceful, very quiet, and very
serene, but now it has gotten worse." He sighed and said that maybe now
he would have to move again.

Well, here we are, the descendants of the pioneers who fought the
Indians, conquered America, and built a White civilization on this
continent -- here we are at the end of the millennium, just running,
running, running, afraid to fight, afraid even to name our enemies. It
certainly looks as if both the moral and physical quality of White
Americans has declined during the last couple of hundred years. We
really need to think seriously about the ways in which we can improve
the breed when we move into the next millennium. But of course, our
plight today is the consequence of more than bad breeding. It is to a
very large degree the consequence of psychological manipulation.

I've said this to you 100 times, but I'll say it again now, because it
is the single most salient fact of our present situation: Whoever
controls the mass media of news and entertainment is able to control
most of the public's perception of what is fashionable -- in ideas, in
policy, in behavior. And for most of the public, their perception of
what is fashionable determines what they say and do -- and to a large
extent what they think. And in a democracy, where people who are easily
manipulated by the media are permitted to vote, whoever controls the
mass media also controls the government, for all practical purposes.

I'll give you a very specific example of the way in which this works:
Every listener certainly remembers Buford Furrow's shooting spree in Los
Angeles on August 10. The way the controlled media have harped on his
non-lethal foray into the Jewish community center there, it'll be a long
time before anyone forgets Buford Furrow. Well, of course, all of the
publicity attracted politicians, the way a candle attracts other types
of insects. They smelled votes. And one of these vote-sniffing
politicians was California's governor, Gray Davis. He noted the
publicity. He noted the hysterical reaction of various minority groups
and women's groups and lemming groups. He saw an opportunity to win
votes and a pat on the head from the media masters at the same time. He
focused on the fact that Buford Furrow was characterized by the media as
a "hater," that Furrow had belonged to a Politically Incorrect church in
Idaho which the Jews have labeled a "hate group." Last week Governor
Davis called a press conference and announced that California needs new
laws -- quote -- "to fight hate groups." He said that he was appointing
a panel to study ways in which California's laws might be used to impose
civil or criminal penalties on so-called "hate groups," their leaders,
and their members. He wants, he said, to -- quote -- "curtail the
unlawful acts of these dangerous bigots." -- end quote --

That's worrisome talk. I believe that the police, the courts, and
everyone else concerned already have figured out how to impose civil or
criminal penalties on people who shoot other people, whether the
shooters have been labeled by the media as "dangerous bigots" or not.
Laws covering that sort of thing have been on the books for a long time.
What Governor Davis's talk suggests to me is that he would like to
punish people not so much for committing a crime as for having the wrong
beliefs, going to the wrong church, having the wrong friends -- that is,
for falling into the "dangerous bigot" category. His comments suggest
that he believes that the laws should be applied differently to
so-called "dangerous bigots" than they are to Politically Correct
people. He wants his panel to study ways of getting around the First
Amendment guarantees of freedom of religion, freedom of association, and
freedom of speech. He sniffs a willingness of the lemmings to give up
these freedoms in response to the media-generated hysteria, and he's
eager to show that he's willing too.

I suppose that the most worrisome thing of all about this talk by
Governor Davis of finding ways to impose penalties on "dangerous bigots"
is the question of who decides who's a "dangerous bigot" and who's not.
And I suspect that most of you already know who it is that makes
decisions of that sort. Governor Davis doesn't make those decisions. The
police don't make them. The courts don't make them. Jewish so-called
"human rights" organizations, such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the
Southern Poverty Law Center, and the mob-affiliated Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith, working together with the Jewish media bosses,
decide who's a "dangerous bigot." And whatever the Jews decide, that is
A-OK with Governor Davis, who understands which side his bread is
buttered on.

But you know, this is not what the Founding Fathers had in mind when
they made a revolution against King George's government and fought the
Redcoats in order to secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and
their posterity. Our ancestors did not fight in the American Revolution
and give us a Constitution so that Bill Clinton wannabees like Gray
Davis can trash it in order to garner the votes of lemmings and please
their Jewish paymasters.

I know that there are lots of ordinary folks out there who don't really
want to abolish the Constitution, but they have let themselves be
stampeded by the media into the belief that we really do need to accept
some new limitations on our liberty in order to protect little children
from crazed haters like Buford Furrow. These folks are not deep
thinkers, and they're easily distracted by media sleight-of-hand. They
are convinced now that people like Buford Furrow are the principal
threat to little children and others, because that's all they hear
about. They're also convinced that all of the outrage about Furrow
they're hearing from media spokesmen is genuine. They don't have a clue
as to what the true agenda of the media bosses is. But let me tell you:
it isn't to protect little children from crazed killers.

Consider this: On May 3, three months before Buford Furrow shot up the
Jewish community center, killing no one, a man named Steven Abrams
deliberately rammed his Cadillac into a crowd of children on the
playground of a preschool in Costa Mesa, California, just a few miles
from the Jewish community center visited by Buford Furrow. Abrams
spotted the children on the playground of the Southcoast Early Childhood
Learning Center as he drove past in his Cadillac. He made a U-turn,
aimed his Cadillac at the children, and accelerated toward them. He
jumped the curb, tore through a chain-link fence, knocked a jungle gym
aside, and plowed into the kids. Two of the children, a four-year-old
girl and a three-year-old boy, were mangled to death under Abrams' car
when it roared onto the playground. Five others were hurt, two of them
with serious head injuries.

When the police arrived Abrams told them, and I quote: "I was going to
execute these children because they were innocent." -- end quote --
I'll repeat Abrams' statement to the police: "I was going to execute
these children because they were innocent." Does that sound like Abrams
is dangerous or not? You know, Abrams' murderous assault on the
Southcoast Early Childhood Learning Center did make the newspapers --
for about a day, and then it was quietly dropped. No breathless coverage
on national television; no interviews with spokesmen from the
Anti-Defamation League; no televised comments from Mr. Clinton. I'll bet
you don't even remember reading about it. The Jewish media bosses
weren't really interested in it. Governor Davis didn't interrupt his
golf to comment on it. I mean, the school wasn't a Jewish school or a
Black school, and a firearm wasn't used, so what's the point in making a
big fuss about it? How's that going to help us get rid of the First and
Second Amendments? And besides, when the murderer has a name like
Abrams, the less said about it the better.

I'm sure that you get my point here. All of the outrage we're hearing
from the media and the politicians about Buford Furrow isn't genuine.
These people aren't really interested in protecting little children from
dangerous nuts. The media bosses don't care about little children. They
do care about disarming and silencing the public. They don't want
dissent, and they don't want firearms in the hands of dissidents. And
they are able to keep the couch potatoes and the lemmings hypnotized.
Which is why the politicians, like Governor Gray Davis, dance to their

What all of this amounts to is a disgusting caricature of civilized
government. It's a preview of democracy in the 21st century, as the Jews
would like it to be: at the top a Jewish elite of string-pullers and
media bosses and money men; at the bottom a degraded and easily
manipulated electorate of sports fans and hereditary lemmings; and in
between a class of thoroughly corrupt and amoral politicians and
bureaucrats to front for the Jewish elite and help keep the electorate
in line.

One of the most interesting aspects of our situation is that a number of
White Americans who don't fall into any of these classes more or less
understand these things, but they don't do anything about them. They
keep up with what's happening, even when it doesn't appear on network
television. They think about these things, but only in a personal
context. They don't worry about what these things are doing to the
country or to the race, but only about how they themselves are affected.
They try to adapt to this Jewish democracy in a way that will be
beneficial to themselves. They are not corrupt in the same sense, or at
least not to the same degree, as the politicians and the bureaucrats,
but they have abdicated their responsibilities as White Americans. And
they are dangerously short-sighted if they believe that they can
separate their own fate, their own destiny, their own well-being, from
that of their people.

My reason for saying that this abdication of responsibility is
short-sighted is this: It's not just that here in America we have a
disgusting caricature of a civilized society. America's sickness is
spreading out and affecting much of the rest of the world. And much of
the rest of the world is quite concerned and quite unhappy about that.
In the remaining time today I'll mention only the example of Serbia's
Kosovo province. Unfortunately, exactly what I predicted back during
Madeleine Albright's bombing of Serbia has come true. The ethnic
cleansing of Serb civilians in Kosovo began as soon as the Clinton gang
forced the Serb military and police to leave the province. The NATO
occupation forces are not keeping the peace in Kosovo at all. They are
simply providing cover for the KLA to run the remaining Serbs out of the
province and to murder those who don't run fast enough.

The one atrocity committed by the KLA against Serb civilians which
received enough publicity over here to gain the notice of the couch
potatoes was the massacre of 14 Serb farmers six weeks ago, on July 23.
That sort of thing or worse has been happening every week. Mass graves
of Serbs murdered by the KLA since the bombing stopped in mid-June are
uncovered every few days. More than 90 per cent of the Serbs who lived
in Kosovo in June have now been driven out in terror or have been
murdered: more than 90 per cent. Most of the American electorate -- most
of the lemmings -- don't know that; most of them believe the fairy tales
the Clinton administration tells them about "peacekeeping" in Kosovo.

The world, however, doesn't believe those fairy tales. The world can see
what is happening. The world understands what America has become.
America is seen not only as sick and irrational, but as dangerously sick
and irrational. It is not a question of if but only of when patriots
elsewhere will strike in order to safeguard their own nations.
Responsible patriots here really shouldn't just sit around and wait for
that to happen.
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribes of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to:

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at or

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

or e-mail: please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address

--> TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to: which has "unsubscribe" as the subject of the

(c) 1999 National Vanguard Books

----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Received: from ( []) by (v60.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Sep 1999 14:28:43 -0400
Received: from ( []) by (v60.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Sep 1999 14:28:25 -0400
Received: from ( by with
SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2); Tue, 28 Aug 1956 13:45:57 +0000
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 07:14:26 -0700
Message-Id: <>
Subject: ADV9-4-99: Jewish Democracy
From: "American Dissident Voices"
To: National Alliance
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: Bulk