Subj:	Fwd: ADV9-26-98: Fashion for Genocide
Date:	98-09-26 13:40:47 EDT
From:	Twaecap
To:	jlkucek@juno.com, NotAZombie, AR@amren.com
To:	help@sobran.com, PRFORD, NewSocit2m, JMRDREAMER


-----------------
Forwarded Message: 
Subj:	 ADV9-26-98: Fashion for Genocide
Date:	98-09-26 13:17:44 EDT
From:	ADVlist@NatVan.com (American Dissident Voices)
Reply-to:	National@NatVan.com
To:	national@NatVan.com (National Alliance)

American Dissident Voices of September 26, 1998

Fashion for Genocide
by Dr. William Pierce


A month ago I told you about the murder of two White girls, Tracy
Lambert and Susan Moore, in Fayetteville, North Carolina, as part of the
initiation of new members into the Black and Hispanic Crips gang. I'm
still receiving comments about that program. Apparently many listeners
-- especially those with Internet access -- checked out the facts as
reported in the Fayetteville newspaper, and they were shocked that, just
as I said, there was no media coverage of these terrible murders outside
the Fayetteville area. They were shocked that virtually all of the
mainstream media around the country would deliberately hide the news of
these racially motivated murders from the White public -- and these were
the same media which had made such a sensation about the killing of a
convicted Black drug dealer and his girlfriend in Fayetteville by a
White soldier, James Burmeister, in December 1995.

But really, no one who has been listening to my broadcasts should have
been shocked. I have commented over and over again about the virtual
control of all of America's mass media by the Jews, and I have pointed
out many times that the Jews' policy is to disarm the White population
morally as well as physically by deliberately creating the false
impression that Whites are oppressors and victimizers, and non-Whites
are our innocent victims. They want us to feel guilty. They want us to
feel that it would be immoral for us to resist any of their schemes for
more non-White immigration, for more so-called "diversity" and
"multiculturalism," for more racial mixing and racial intermarriage.

That is what the Jewish media bosses are deliberately pushing: the
destruction of our people through racial mixing, and they don't want us
to put up any resistance. And I am sorry to say, their program is
succeeding. When they send their step'n'fetchit Bill Clinton around the
country making speeches about how much he is looking forward to an
America with a non-White majority, about how any resistance to the
government's programs for the darkening of America would be un-American,
he is applauded by brainwashed young Whites who have been deceived by
this deliberately falsified media impression of Whites as oppressors.

Now you know, I am making a pretty serious accusation. I am accusing the
Jewish population as a whole -- and the Jewish media bosses in
particular -- of planning our annihilation as a race, of planning to
commit genocide against us. And I don't want anyone to think that I am
basing my accusation on only the few instances of racially motivated
killings I already have cited: their suppression of the news of the
Fayetteville murders of two White girls by the Crips and their
sensationalizing of the news of the Fayetteville shooting of a Black
drug dealer and his girlfriend by a White soldier and of the dragging
death of another convicted Black criminal in Teaxas by three Whites. And
so today I'll talk a bit more about anti-White crimes which the Jewish
media have deliberately covered up. The details aren't pleasant -- in
fact, they are shocking -- but I believe that many listeners need to be
shocked.

Let's begin with another crime which occurred in Fayetteville. This is
timely because the trial of the criminals began just last week. Here's
what happened: Donald Lange, a 25-year-old White soldier at Fort Bragg
was leaving an International House of Pancakes in Fayetteville. He
accidentally bumped into a group of seven Black soldiers who were going
in. The Blacks began punching Lange while shouting racial insults at
him. They dragged him into the adjacent parking lot and stomped and
kicked him while continuing to shout racial epithets.

A witness in the trial of the Blacks, Tracye Cochran, was in the parking
lot where the assault took place. She told the court last week, -- quote
--  "The Black person who threw the first punch was the one who knocked
him down. . . . It dropped him down to his knees. He got back up and got
hit again. . . . I was walking toward the fight screaming and hollering
for them to leave him alone. . . . By then he was just getting hit by
people left and right." Another witness, Gina Perez, testified that she
saw eight or ten Blacks kicking and stomping Lange as he lay on the
pavement. She told of seeing one Black kicking Lange in the face,
causing his head to slam into the pavement and bounce back. The Black
would then kick him again, over and over. Perez said, "They just kicked
him to death. I remember him being on his side, being kicked over and
over again."

Actually they didn't quite kick Lange to death. They just destroyed his
brain. He has neither moved nor spoken since the beating. His brain was
so badly damaged that doctors say that he will never again be more than
a vegetable.

Now, if you live outside the Fayetteville area, I'll wager that you've
heard not a word about what happened to Donald Lange before this
broadcast. Imagine what you would have heard if Donald had been Black
and the soldiers who destroyed his life had been White. The networks
would have shown Mr. Clinton denouncing the attack on television and
calling for new laws against "hate crime." In fact, that's exactly what
they had Clinton doing last year when a White teen-ager beat up a Black
teen-ager who had come into his White Chicago neighborhood. Clinton
referred to the incident in his weekly radio address and used it as an
example of why we must do something about "race hate." But Mr. Clinton
has responded to the stomping of Donald Lange with silence.

If Donald Lange had been Black and his attackers White, the media bosses
would have had Janet Reno on television announcing that she was sending
in the FBI. The media would have been interviewing every professional
hate merchant: the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Anti-Defamation League
of B'nai B'rith, Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty Law Center, and
all the rest. The media would have made a real circus of it, and the
whole world would have had it drummed into their consciousness: another
hate crime against a poor, innocent Black by White racists in
Fayetteville.

In order to convince the media bosses that he was doing something to
"end hate" after the Burmeister shooting of the Black drug dealer, the
commanding general of Fort Bragg ordered a witch hunt among the White
soldiers on the base. Every White soldier was checked for tattoos that
might suggest a skinhead affiliation. As the media frenzy continued, the
witch hunt for White racists in the Army eventually spread to other
bases. Now, don't hold your breath waiting for the general at Fort Bragg
to start questioning Black soldiers about their racial beliefs and their
gang affiliations because of what Blacks from the base did to White
soldier Donald Lange. The media pressure just isn't there, and the
general has better things to do with his time.

Last month a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, which is a suburb of St.
Louis, beat a White man to death who had made the mistake of coming into
their neighborhood looking for his stolen television set. As they were
beating and kicking 48-year-old Richard Skelton to death on August 10,
the Blacks hooted, laughed, and shouted racial insults, according to a
number of eye-witnesses.

Now, it's possible that you may have read a few words about this
racially motivated murder -- if you're a careful reader of the small
news items in the back pages of your newspaper. But you certainly didn't
see anything about it on television or read any detailed news accounts,
unless you live in the immediate vicinity of Alton. Even the news
accounts in Alton tried to excuse the Black murderers by suggesting that
Skelton may have precipitated the attack on himself by using racially
insensitive language in asking about his stolen television set. But
there is no dispute about the facts. Blacks began beating the unarmed
White man. Black bystanders watched and shouted encouragement to the
attackers. Others joined in the attack, and soon as many as 25 Blacks
were beating and kicking Skelton. They continued kicking him until he
was dead.

Again, imagine the response of the controlled mass media if the races of
the victim and the killers had been reversed: a Black wanders into a
White neighborhood and is beaten to death by a mob of 25 Whites who
laugh and shout racial insults as the Black dies. My god, the media
would be apoplectic! They would be calling for martial law and a roundup
of all heterosexual White males who weren't registered Democrats.
Everybody in the world would be hearing about the killing over and over
and over again, along with sermons against White racism. But as it is,
most of my listeners are now hearing about last month's racially
motivated mob murder of Richard Skelton for the first time.

Here's another one that you may have read a few words about if you're a
news hound or if you live in eastern New York state. Earlier this month
in Poughkeepsie, New York, a town on the Hudson River about 70 miles
north of New York City, police discovered the decomposing corpses of
seven White women and one Black woman in the house of Kendall Francois.
The women had been murdered over a two-year period, with the latest
being killed just a month ago. Francois is a 27-year-old Black man who
works as a hall monitor in a nearby high school. Affirmative action got
him the school job even though he had a previous arrest record. Francois
was living with his mother and father and younger sister -- and eight
decaying corpses. Police found the dead women lying on beds and in the
midst of piles of rotting garbage in various rooms of his house.
Francois's parents and his sister, who is employed as a nurse at a
nearby hospital, said that they hadn't worried about the stench from the
dead women because they thought it was the odor of the garbage which had
been allowed to accumulate in the house. Francois had picked up the
women, one at a time, taken them to his house, had sex with them, and
then strangled them.

Now, in a sense the murders of these women may not have been race
crimes. The women were all prostitutes, and aside from the fact that
Francois had a preference for killing White prostitutes, we don't really
know what his motive was for killing them. And I should add that I
believe that any White woman, prostitute or not, who consents to sexual
relations with a Black deserves death, so I cannot really condemn
Francois for killing them.

The real racial angle to these killings is the media response -- or lack
thereof. Do you remember John Wayne Gacy or Jeffrey Dahmer? I'm sure you
do, even though Gacy was arrested 20 years ago and Dahmer more than
seven years ago. Both of them also were serial killers who stashed the
bodies of their victims in or under their houses. Both received enormous
publicity when police caught them -- so much that we still remember them
many years later. But they were both White.

Gacy and Dahmer, of course, received extraordinarily heavy media
coverage not because they were White, but because their shocking crimes
were extraordinarily newsworthy. Francois has received almost no media
coverage outside the Poughkeepsie area, not because his shocking crimes
were not extraordinarily newsworthy, but because he is Black and most of
his victims were White.

Earlier this month a court in Colorado convicted Francisco Martinez of
participating in the abduction, gang rape, torture, and murder of a
14-year-old White girl, Brandy Duvall. Martinez and six other members of
the Black and Hispanic Bloods gang grabbed Brandy from a bus stop in
Denver on the night of May 30, last year. They took the young White girl
to the house of one of the gang members and spent several hours raping
her and then sexually torturing her with a knife and a broomstick.
During the trial one of the gang members told the court how Martinez
laughed as he repeatedly rammed a broomstick into the body of the
bleeding girl while she screamed and pleaded for her life. Later they
stabbed the 14-year-old girl 28 times and dumped her body in a ditch.
Then they went home and disposed of the bloody mattress on which she had
been raped and tortured.

Four of the Bloods gang members have pleaded guilty, one other besides
Martinez has been tried and convicted, and one is still awaiting trial.
This case is reminiscent of the Fayetteville murders last month of two
White girls by members of the Crips. The Crips and the Bloods are the
two largest non-White gangs in the United States. Like the Fayetteville
murders, Brandy Duvall's murder and the subsequent trials have received
virtually no national news coverage, although Denver-area newspapers did
report them.

Once again, imagine the reaction of the television networks and all of
the other national media if instead of the Bloods raping, sexually
torturing, and murdering a 14-year-old White girl, seven Ku Klux Klan
members had done that to a Black girl or a Mexican girl. The gruesome
details would be on every television screen in America night after night
after night, and there would be no end to the parade of politicians and
preachers and professional hate merchants telling us about the evils of
White racism. We know that's what would happen, because we have seen it
before in far less egregious cases, most recently in the dragging death
of the Black convict in Jasper, Texas, this summer.

Now, all of the Black-on-White crimes I've just mentioned -- the
stomping of Donald Lange by Black soldiers in Fayetteville until he
became a mindless vegetable; the kicking of Richard Skelton to death by
a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, when he tried to retrieve his stolen
television set; the murder of seven White prostitutes by a Black school
monitor in Poughkeepsie, New York; the horrible rape, torture, and
murder of 14-year-old Brandy Duvall by members of the Bloods gang in the
Denver area after they had snatched her from a bus stop -- all of these
either occurred during the past month or came to trial during the past
month. And I could have given you twenty more recent examples of
horrible race crimes committed by non-Whites against Whites which have
received the silent treatment by the media, except in the areas where
they occurred. And these are all crimes which would have received
extensive national publicity if they had been White-on-Black crimes.

Anyway, I hope that I've made my point. And my point is that the
controlled media are far more likely to publicize White-on-Black crimes
than Black-on-White crimes. And this is not just a fluke. It's not that
I have carefully selected a few Black-on-White crimes which somehow
escaped the attention of the media. No, their way of dealing with
interracial crime is systematic. It is consistent. We all understand
that. If the Ku Klux Klan does something, the Jewish media act as if the
sky is falling. If the Bloods or the Crips do something, they ignore it.
There is no denying that. We know it's true.

So why do they do it? If I ask a non-Jewish newspaper writer or
television reporter or magazine editor: "Why do you and your colleagues
minimize the news of Black-on-White crime? Why are you protective of
non-White organizations such as the Bloods and the Crips? Don't you
believe that you have a responsibility to warn the White public about
the dangers posed for us by non-White crime in general and by non-White
gangs such as the Bloods and the Crips in particular?

"And why do your colleagues maximize the news of any White-on-Black
crime? Why do you go ballistic if there's any possibility of a White
organizational connection, even if some racially oriented literature is
found in the White offender's possession? Don't you understand that the
Bloods and the Crips are essentially anti-White criminal organizations,
while the Klan can only be accused of having members who sometimes do
stupid things? Why do you deliberately create the false impression in
the public mind that White-on-Black crime -- that's what you call "hate
crime" -- is a big problem in our society, and at the same time you hide
from the public the truly horrendous and dangerous problem of
Black-on-White crime? Why do you do it?"

I've never gotten really clear and honest answers to these questions.
But what is clear is that they all know how they're expected to report
the news. They know what the party line is. They know which side their
bread is buttered on. It's clear that the top media bosses have set the
fashion for reporting interracial crime, and no one who works for them
is willing to depart from the fashion.

That fashion, which is almost never stated explicitly, which is only
implied, is this: White people are evil -- especially heterosexual White
males. They have persecuted non-Whites for hundreds of years. White
people really shouldn't complain if non-Whites sometimes strike back at
them. That's only justice. When Blacks and Mexicans organize in gangs,
it's only to protect themselves from Whites. But when Whites organize,
it's to oppress non-Whites. Whites need to be reminded that they are
oppressors. That's why White crimes against non-Whites should be
emphasized. And if we're to have a happy and prosperous multicultural
society with lots of diversity, which is of course a wonderful thing,
then Whites need to mix more with non-Whites . . . so we shouldn't give
them any news which might make them reluctant to mix. We shouldn't tell
them about Black crimes against Whites, because that might frighten
White women away from Black men. It might even lead Whites to organize
against non-Whites. In the long run the only sure way to have a peaceful
society, in which everyone gets along with everyone else, is to get rid
of the White majority: to replace the present White majority with a
non-White majority. A lot of racial mixing and racial intermarriage will
help to achieve that, and we should report the news with that aim in
mind.

That is the prevailing fashion in the controlled mass media today,
whether the media people will admit it or not. That fashion has been set
deliberately by the media bosses. And I, curious and inquisitive person
that I am, have looked at where that fashion is taking us, and when I
have done that I have looked into the face of death: racial death,
racial extinction. And I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have decided that
the Jewish media bosses who designed the current fashion in reporting
the news have in fact designed it with that aim in mind. And I also have
decided that it is our responsibility to ourselves, to our posterity, to
our ancestors, and to the God of Nature which made us what we are to use
any and all means -- any and all means -- to combat these Jewish media
bosses and their collaborators in the government, in the schools, in the
churches, and wherever else we find them.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

-->  TO BE REMOVED from this mailing list, send an e-mail
message to:  ADVlist@NatVan.com  which has "unsubscribe"
as the subject of the message.  (Don't type the " marks.)

(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books




----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: 
Received: from  rly-zb04.mx.aol.com (rly-zb04.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.4]) by air-zb01.mail.aol.com (v50.15) with SMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:17:43 -0400
Received: from name.look.net (Name.Look.net [206.55.18.14])
	  by rly-zb04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
	  with ESMTP id NAA01811;
	  Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from star.listserve.com (206.55.18.12) by name.look.net with SMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.1); Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:10:57 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:05:44 -0400
Message-Id: <360D1EE8.67C9E79D@neumedia.net>
Subject: ADV9-26-98: Fashion for Genocide
From: "American Dissident Voices" 
To: National Alliance 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: Bulk
Reply-To: National@NatVan.com