Subj: ADV6-5-99: State-Sponsored Terrorism
Date: 6/5/99 12:10:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: ADVlist@ListServe.com (American Dissident Voices)
Reply-to: National@natvan.com
To: national@natvan.com (National Alliance)

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of June 5, 1999

State-Sponsored Terrorism
by Dr. William Pierce

The people who are trying so desperately to destroy Serbia now are a
pretty weird bunch. The latest tactic they've come up with is to have
computer hackers and cryptography experts in the "dirty tricks" division
of our Central Intelligence Agency break into the computers of various
banks around the world where Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic is
rumored to have his personal bank accounts, so that they can steal his
money from him. It makes me think that the word "Intelligence" needs to
be removed from the name of the agency.

I mean, what a dumb stunt! But it's about what one would expect of these
Viet Cong enthusiasts left over from the 1960s who are trying to be
movers and shakers on the world scene today by bullying little countries
into doing what they say. Milosevic won't take orders from Tony Blair
and Bill Clinton and the rest of these aging adolescents who haven't a
clue about the effective use of real power, so they will punish him by
stealing his personal bank accounts. There must have been a lot of
giggling going on among them when they came up with this scheme.

You know, I really hope they go ahead with this idiotic plan to hack
into the bank computers and steal Milosevic's savings, and I hope the
plan is successful. It's not that I wish Milosevic ill, but such a stunt
will go a long way toward sawing off the branch all these birds are
sitting on. It will do wonders for people's confidence in the security
of banks and will push this whole, rotten structure just a little closer
to te brink.

They also arranged to have Milosevic indicted as a war criminal and have
an international warrant issued for his arrest. That doesn't do much to
persuade Milosevic to surrender to NATO, but it does set an interesting
precedent. I like it on both grounds. I was becoming a little worried
that Milosevic would make some sort of compromise settlement with NATO;
now he has another strong reason not to. And I look forward to the day
when a bunch of real war criminals, including one at 10 Downing Street
and another at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, can be put on public trial,
convicted, and hanged, along wih all of their willing accomplices in the
government and the media. The criminals themselves are in charge of the
International War Crimes Tribunal at the moment, but fortunes change,
and it's good to have this precedent. I mean, compare what Milosevic is
alleged to have done -- killing 340 Albanians, according to the
indictment -- compare that with what the Clinton gang clearly has done.
What could be more criminal than engaging in the systematic bombing of
another country which has not in any way harmed or threatened us; a
systematic bombing intended to destroy the country's infrastructure and
which already has killed more than 2,000 civilians? Ted Kaczynski and
Jack the Ripper were pikers compared to Bill Clinton and Tony Blair.

Milosevic undoubtedly has treated the Albanians roughly, but let us
remember that there was a large, well-armed terrorist army of Albanians
-- the KLA -- operating in Serbia's Kosovo province. Milosevic crushed
them last year, and his police dealt harshly with Albanians they
suspected of aiding the terrorists. But that was nothing compared to
what is happening now. When Madeleine Albright began dropping her bombs
on Kosovo in March of this year, real suffering was inflicted on the
Albanians. Virtually all of the Albanian refugees who have fled Kosovo
or who still are in Kosovo became refugees after the bombing started.

Many of them are fleeing the bombs, and for good reason: about as many
Albanians as Serbs have been killed in Kosovo by Madeleine's bombs,
rockets, and missiles. Whether a bomb lands on your village by accident
or on purpose, the consequences are the same for you, and so the
villagers head for the border to get away from the bombing. And some of
the Albanians are fleeing the stepped up anti-terrorist efforts of
Milosevic's police. These efforts have been stepped up because of the
bombing, not despite it. One may tolerate a certain degree of
disaffection in time of peace, but in time of war one cannot afford to
be so tolerant. The Serbs are cracking down on Albanians inside Serbia
now for exactly the same reason Americans cracked down on Japanese
inside the United States after Pearl Harbor. I am sure that this
crackdown on the Albanians is rough and in some cases atrocious, but the
Serbs are fighting for the preservation of their country and their
people. Most Americans cannot even imagine what that is like because
they never have experienced it -- yet. They just sit on their couches
and watch the war on TV, then switch channels to the ball game. The
Serbs have to worry about being killed at any second, and so they
sometimes act in a way that may seem rough or intolerant to American
couch potatoes.

Clinton and his Jews, of course, are blaming the suffering of both the
Serbs and the Albanian refugees entirely on Milosevic. Their reasoning
is that if Milosevic would just surrender to NATO, then the bombing
could stop, and no more people would be killed or injured. "As long as
you refuse to surrender, then you have only yourself to blame for the
bombing." That's like blaming a robbery victim who is shot during a
holdup: "If you had just given him your wallet like he demanded, then he
wouldn't have shot you. You have only yourself to blame, because you
resisted." I guess a lot of Americans see nothing wrong with that sort
of reasoning. We've really been feminized. American men have been
conditioned to think and react like women.

But even Americans should be able to understand that stealing the money
from Milosevic's personal bank accounts and then issuing an
international warrant for his arrest so that he can be tried as a war
criminal doesn't make sense in the context of the stated war aims of the
Clinton gang, which is to force Milosevic to sign the agreement they
have prepared. If Milosevic has a few million dollars stashed in a
foreign bank account and can retire to a life of ease somewhere, and if
he really is just a typical politician like those in Washington, with no
real patriotism in him, then he might be persuaded to surrender and let
the Clinton gang have its way with his country. But with no money and
nowhere to go where he and his family can be safe, he'll fight to the
bitter end, patriot or not. Wouldn't you? So either these thugs in the
Clinton government are really stupid, or they've been lying to us all
along about their intentions in Yugoslavia, just like everything else.

Well, I promised you last week that I'd tell you about some of the lies
the government and the media have been using to fool us about the war,
and this question of just why the Clinton gang started the war is a good
place to begin. The Clinton gang all tell us that their reason for
starting an unprovoked war against Yugoslavia was to protect the
Albanian ethnic minority in the country from the Serb majority. The war
is strictly a humanitarian effort to keep Albanians from being
brutalized and massacred by the Serbs. Madeleine Albright figured that
the best way to show our humanitarian concern for the Albanian minority
was to drop cluster bombs on Serb hospitals and schools and use F-16s to
shoot up Serb passenger trains.

Now, let me tell you, these people do some dumb things, but they really
aren't quite as stupid as this lamebrain excuse for starting a war would
indicate. Madeleine Albright is no "humanitarian," I'll guarantee you.
Just look at that cold, cruel, predatory, Jewish face on her.

In the Clinton gang, of course, the abolition of national sovereignty
everywhere, establishing the supremacy of the New World Order, and
making sure that there is a proper "racial balance" in every country --
a proper amount of ethnic and racial "diversity" -- are cocktail party
clichés. The twittering Gentile air-heads in the gang are as
enthusiastic for these goals as are the Jewish heavyweights who have
been writing the script. But forcing the Serbs to be good
multiculturalists is not really the ultimate reason for the current
bombing of Serb schools and hospitals. In the long run the New World
Order enthusiasts plan to "multiculturalize" everyone -- except
themselves, of course. But multiculturalism is really only a means to an
end, and that end is world domination, world ownership. The principal
threat to that goal is nationalism. Multiculturalism is their antidote
against nationalism.

And Serbia makes a good choice for their first victim for several
reasons. For one thing the Serbs are strongly nationalistic; they are a
nut that sooner or later would have to be cracked. For another they are
in a part of the world that the New World Order gang are interested in
for other reasons, a principal one of which is Russia. When the Soviet
Union self-destructed at the beginning of this decade, the New World
Order gang saw an opportunity not for peace, stability, and coexistence,
but for aggressive expansion into the power vacuum left by the defunct
Soviet Union. They've been working hard in recent years to cement
relationships with a number of former Soviet republics, to integrate
them into the New World Order in a preliminary way. In recent months
NATO and U.S. delegations have been to Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and
Turkmenistan -- all formerly parts of the Soviet Union -- promising them
aid and encouraging them to distance themselves from Russia politically,
economically, and militarily.

The governments of Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan already have formed an
alliance with three other former Soviet republics -- Georgia, Ukraine,
and Moldavia -- all of whom also are being pulled into a NATO orbit.
Only Romania separates Moldavia from Serbia. The Serbs certainly are
more pro-Russian than any other country in the region. In the conflict
between Muslim Albanians and Christian Serbs, the New World Order gang
certainly have taken into consideration the fact that the three former
Soviet republics they have been wooing most intensely during the past
year -- Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan -- are all Muslim. In
addition, the latter are the key to acquiring control over the
enormously rich Caspian petroleum resources. Why not cripple Serbia now,
take her mineral-rich Kosovo province away from her, and acquire the
image of a friend and protector of Muslims? I doubt that that will
impress Osama bin Laden and other Muslims who have a major grievance
against America, but it might help a bit with the Azerbaijanis.

There's more than oil and other minerals involved here. Russia is still
big enough and well armed enough to defend itself. As in Serbia, there's
much nationalist sentiment in Russia, and the New World Order gang are
quite concerned about what may happen if Russia ever acquires patriotic
leadership. They have tried hard to prevent that. They worked hard
behind the scenes to get Boris Yeltsin elected, and they have propped
him up with loans and promises. Yeltsin is a front man for the Jewish
billionaires and mafia bosses who are bleeding Russia dry. But there are
genuine nationalists among the Russian leaders who may replace Yeltsin,
and there is a great deal of public hostility to the Jewish despoilers
of Russia. With a strong nationalist leader enjoying popular support, it
is entirely possible there could be a crackdown which would leave Jewish
plutocrats and mafia bosses alike swinging from lampposts all over
Moscow and Saint Petersburg. A rebuilt Russia under nationalist
leadership could derail the entire New World Order. **************

This is a good time to deal with one other deception about this war.
That is the effort to persuade people -- including the American public
and the Serbs -- that this isn't a Jewish war. Go to just about any
antiwar demonstration in the United States today, and among the speakers
there will be a Jew on the platform who will proclaim the friendship of
the Jews for the Serbs. "You were on our side against Hitler during the
Second World War," the Jewish speaker will announce, "and we never will
forget that. Now we are on your side." And the foolish Serbs will clap
and cheer. Perhaps they forget that it was the Americans who really
pulled the Jews' chestnuts out of the fire in the Second World War. Do
the Serbs see any evidence of gratitude for that in what the Jews have
done to America in the last 50 years?

And I also have had listeners to my broadcasts write to me that they
have found several Jewish groups on the Internet or have heard Jewish
callers to talk radio programs saying that Jews support the Serbs and
are against the NATO bombing. And in response to that I will tell you
that this business of confusing and disarming the opposition by
pretending to be on both sides of an issue is one of the oldest tricks
in the Jews' book.

Consider the effort to take guns away from Americans. Jews are
overwhelmingly in favor of just about every gun control move that has
come along. The Jewish media are hysterically opposed to the private
ownership of firearms by American citizens. Furthermore, most of the
leaders of the gun control effort in the Congress are and have been
Jews. At this time the noisiest and pushiest of these is New York's
Senator Charles Schumer.

This doesn't mean, of course, that there aren't plenty of feminized,
feather-brained Gentiles who believe we'd all be better off if we had no
means to defend ourselves. And, with six million Jews living in the
United States, I am sure that there are a few individual Jews among them
who do not favor gun control. But the fact remains that the
Jew-controlled mass media and Jewish legislators and powerful Jewish
organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith are the
primary moving force behind the effort to abolish the Second Amendment,
and knowledgeable patriots always have recognized this fact.

So a few years ago a handful of Jews set up an organization called Jews
for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and their principal activity
has been to proclaim loudly that gun control is not a Jewish but a
"Nazi" scheme. They run around the country announcing, "We're Jews, and
we're against gun control." They also buy advertisements in gun
magazines which assert that Hitler's first move after he became
chancellor of Germany was to round up all privately owned firearms, so
that the German people could not rebel.

That is the opposite of the truth. Actually, Hitler's government
abolished many restrictions on buying and carrying firearms which had
been established by the preceding, liberal government. The Nazis
believed in self-defense and encouraged firearms ownership and
proficiency among German civilians. Hitler was the most popular leader
the Germans have had in this century, and he was not afraid of his
fellow citizens. He rode slowly through crowds of cheering Germans in an
open car. No bulletproof glass, no police screening of the people who
were allowed to shake his hand, no metal detectors. Quite a difference
from Bill Clinton!

When I first encountered the lies of Jews for the Preservation of
Firearms Ownership, I went to the trouble of digging up the original
German law digests from the 1920s and 1930s which contained the exact
texts of the German firearms laws, published at the time the laws were
enacted, and I translated them into English and published my English
translations along with photo-facsimile copies of the original German
laws. And yet the Jews have succeeded in confusing many patriots -- an
all too easy task, unfortunately -- and convincing them that Hitler was
the father of all gun-grabbers, that Jews in America are divided on the
issue of gun control, and that people who propose new gun control laws
are likely to be admirers of Hitler.

The Jews who confuse the issue of the war against Serbia by claiming to
be on the side of the Serbs today are like the Jews who confuse the
issue of gun control by claiming to be against it. The fact is that
every major Jewish organization in the United States has publicly
declared its support for the war against Serbia. In fact, they were
behind this war even before it started. Anyway, I have in front of me
dozens of press releases, news interviews, and advertisements in the New
York Times by Jewish organizations supporting the war. On March 29 --
that's five days after the bombing started -- B'nai B'rith International
put out a press release headed "B'nai B'rith Supports U.S.-NATO Action
in Yugoslavia." B'nai B'rith, which is the parent organization of the
Anti-Defamation League, claims branches in 57 countries and bills itself
as the world's largest Jewish organization. On April 3 a reporter for
the Jewish Telegraphic Agency interviewed a number of prominent Jewish
leaders and summed it up with the statement, and I quote: "The organized
Jewish community has . . . declared unwavering support for U.S.
intervention in Kosovo." -- end quote --

And what the organized Jewish community is supporting now is nothing
less than state-sponsored terrorism and genocide against Serbs for the
purpose of advancing Jewish schemes for a New World Order. The
Jew-serving politicians in Washington and in NATO are talking now about
re-arming the KLA and sending that gang of drug smugglers, cutthroats,
and professional terrorists into Kosovo against the Serbs ahead of NATO
troops, sort of a human shield.

Do you know what terrorism is? Jadranka Djordjevic, a 64-year-old Serb
woman who lives in Belgrade, does. She worked in the U.S. Embassy there
for 30 years. She's dodging missiles and bombs now and worrying about
how to stay alive. When a newspaper reporter told her recently that
Hillary Clinton had said that the flight of the Albanian refugees from
Kosovo reminded her of "Holocaust" scenes in the Steven Spielberg film
Schindler's List, Ms. Djordjevic replied, "People who learn history from
Spielberg movies should not tell us how to live our lives." When told
that one of the aims of the NATO bombing is to demoralize the Serbs and
make them rise against the government of Slobodan Milosevic, she noted
that that exactly fits the internationally recognized definition of
terrorism: violence against a civilian population intended to
destabilize a government. She said that the people responsible for the
terror-bombing campaign against Serbia should be put on trial by the
International Court of Justice. "You cannot terrorize civilians in this
way," she said. "We are talking about millions of people who are
deprived of basic necessities."

Well, Jadranka Djordjevic, you are wrong. You can terrorize millions of
people, if B'nai B'rith and all of the other New World Order boosters
are behind you.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribes of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to: ADVlist@NatVan.com

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

or e-mail: national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

--> TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:
ADVlist@NatVan.com which has "unsubscribe" as the subject of the
message.

(c) 1999 National Vanguard Books




----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path:
Received: from rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (rly-yc05.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.37]) by air-yc05.mail.aol.com (v59.34) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 1999 12:10:18 -0400
Received: from smtp4.listserve.com (smtp4.listserve.com [206.55.18.125]) by rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (vx) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 1999 12:10:06 -0400
Received: from star.listserve.com (Star.ListServe.com [206.55.18.12])
by smtp4.listserve.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA00169;
Sat, 5 Jun 1999 12:03:59 -0400
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 12:01:13 -0400
Message-Id: <375949C8.207143C1@neumedia.net>
Subject: ADV6-5-99: State-Sponsored Terrorism
From: "American Dissident Voices"
To: National Alliance
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: Bulk
Reply-To: National@natvan.com