THE OATH THAT NULLIFIES
The Truth and Nothing but the
By: PT Resource
In America's court system, we
rely on the assumption that all parties, are telling the
truth. Without the truth, justice would be impossible to
obtain. Imagine that someone taking an oath to, "tell the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me
God," had previously taken another oath nullifying all of his
oaths! Bizarre concept? Read on.
Should you ever be involved in a court action, to insure
justice,there may be some additional questions you might want
to add to your discovery or deposition for the judge,
attorney, parties to the action, or members of your potential
This article is not intended to be prejudicial to either
the Masons or the Jewish people, the vast majority of whom are
good God-fearing people. it is merely a comment on those of
any race or religion who could be duped into taking such a
ridiculous, un-American and dangerous oath.
The following is based upon information from Robert Walker,
P.O. Box 301, East Berlin, Pennsylvania, an authority on the
subject, who has used this information to obtain the
resignation of seven judges and public officials, who did not
want this made a matter of public record.
According to the American Heritage Dictionary of the
American Language, "the Kol Nidre, is the opening prayer
recited on the eve of Yom Kippur, containing a declaration of
the annulment of all personal vows and oaths." It is based on
the following declaration from the Talmud;
"He who wishes that his vows and oaths shall no value shall
stand up at the beginning of the year and say: 'all vows which
I shall make during the year shall be of no value. "'
The prayer of "KOL NIDRE" is found in Vol. 8, page 539 of
the Jewish Encyclopedia. It states:
"All vows, obligations, oaths, anthems, whether called
Konan, konas, or by any other name, by which we may be bound,
from this day of atonement unto the next... we do repent. May
they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled and void, and made
of no effect. They shall not bind us nor have any power over
us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall
not be obligatory, nor the oaths be oaths."
This same prayer may also be found almost word for word in
the volume of "REVISED FESTIVAL PRAYERS," published in 1919 by
the Hebrew Publishing Company, New York.
The Mason's have a similar absurd dishonor for oaths. Page
183 of the Masonic Handbook states: Whenever you see any of
our signs made by a brother Mason, and especially the grand
hailing sign of distress, you must always be sure to obey
them, even at the risk of your life. If you're on a jury, and
the defendant is a Mason and makes the grand hailing sign, you
must obey it; you must disagree with your brother jurors, if
necessary, but you must be sure not to bring the Mason guilty,
for that would bring disgrace upon our order. You must conceal
all crimes of your brother Masons except murder and treason,
and these at your own option, and should you be summoned as a
witness against a brother Mason, be always sure to shield him.
Prevaricate, don't tell the truth in this case, keep his
secrets, forget the important points. It may be perjury to do
this true, but you are keeping your obligations."
In October of 1983, Roger Rush of Portland, Maine was sued
by Zane's Department Store through its assignee, the G.E.
Credit Corp. Rush, who had been researching the oaths that
Mason's take, knew the judge and attorney were Masons and
utilized the information in his defense. In the deposition for
the Equity Discovery Proceeding, Rush presented a copy of the
previously cited page of the Mason's Handbook and
presented.the following questions to be answered under oath:
1. Are you, Robert Cohen, a Mason?
2. Is the judge hearing this matter a Mason?
3. Is/are the owner or owners of 'G.E. Corp.'
4. Has anyone involved in this matter taken an oath of
Within a few days, Mr. Rush received a terse, two sentence
letter from attorney Cohen stating, 'We have decided not to
enter the complaint brought you in regard to Zane's Department
Store. There will be no court record."
Editor comment: Can you see the advantage of using
this information? Especially in the nature of 'Judicial
Notice,' with a 'Motion,' supported by an Affidavit. A partial
'sample text' for a Judicial Notice might be:
"COMES NOW THE ACCUSED, in Special Appearance and without
counsel, herein submits this JUDICIAL NOTICE to this Court
Tribunal to appraise the same, that this Accused has the
'expectation of all afforded Rights and to Due Process of Law,
to mean a FAIR TRIAL.' A fair trial, in the understanding of
this Accused, is a trial where there are NO SECRETS NO
SURPRISES, NO PREJUDICE, and NO BIAS, which would have been
established by any 'secret oaths' taken by any 'officer of the
court' including the judge. Such oath(s) to include the 'Kol
Nidre' (Jewish) or the Masonic Oath.
Such 'secret oaths' would work great harm to the Accused
and his Rights by design and such 'oath(s)' are evidence and a
'device' to deny this Accused a fair trial. See attached
Memorandum of Law.
This Accused will not condone nor tolerate any such
'oath(s)' to work against Accused's secured and protected
rights, including a fair trial
This Accused expects 'all officers of the court' to be
truthful as any 'oath(s) and disclosure of same pursuant to
said court officer's fiduciary responsibility (Bruun v.
Hansen, 103 F2d 685 (1939).
In the event that any court officers have taken said
oath(s) and this matter proceeds to trial, this accused will
move to dismiss and reserves the right to bring action for
fraud and or in the interest of justice, this Court or
prosecution (State) may dismiss on its own motion." (Date and
The memorandum is based upon the 'article,' and motion and
order are self explanatory. Have fun!