Occasionally I have written that placing women in
physically demanding jobs in the military, as for example combat, is
stupid and unworkable. Predictably I've gotten responses asserting that
I hate women, abuse children, cannibalize orphans, and can't get a date.
A few, with truculence sometimes amplified by misspelling, have demanded
supporting data.
OK. The following are from documents I found in a
closet, left over from my days as a syndicated military columnist
("Soldiering," Universal Press Syndicate). Note the dates: All of
this has been known for a long time.
From the report of the Presidential Commission on the
Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces (report date November 15, 1992,
published in book form by Brassey's in 1993): "The average female Army
recruit is 4.8 inches shorter, 31.7 pounds lighter, has 37.4 fewer
pounds of muscle, and 5.7 more pounds of fat than the average male
recruit. She has only 55 percent of the upper-body strength and 72
percent of the lower-body strength… An Army study of 124 men and 186
women done in 1988 found that women are more than twice as likely to
suffer leg injuries and nearly five times as likely to suffer [stress]
fractures as men."
Further: "The Commission heard an abundance of expert
testimony about the physical differences between men and women that can
be summarized as follows:
"Women's aerobic capacity is significantly lower,
meaning they cannot carry as much as far as fast as men, and they are
more susceptible to fatigue.
"In terms of physical capability, the upper five
percent of women are at the level of the male median. The average
20-to-30 year-old woman has the same aerobic capacity as a 50 year-old
man."
From the same report: "Lt Col. William Gregor, United
States Army, testified before the Commission regarding a survey he
conducted at an Army ROTC Advanced Summer Camp on 623 women and 3540
men. …Evidence Gregor presented to the Commission includes:
"(a) Using the standard Army Physical Fitness Test, he
found that the upper quintile of women at West point achieved scores on
the test equivalent to the bottom quintile of men.
"(c) Only 21 women out of the initial 623 (3.4%)
achieved a score equal to the male mean score of 260.
"(d) On the push-up test, only seven percent of women
can meet a score of 60, while 78 percent of men exceed it.
"(e) Adopting a male standard of fitness at West Point
would mean 70 percent of the women he studied would be separated as
failures at the end of their junior year, only three percent would be
eligible for the Recondo badge, and not one would receive the Army
Physical Fitness badge…."
The following, quoted by Brian Mitchell in his book
Women in the Military: Flirting With Disaster (Regnery, 1998) and
widely known to students of the military, are results of a test the Navy
did to see how well women could perform in damage control -- i.e., tasks
necessary to save a ship that had been hit.
"Test
......................................................................%
Women failing .................................................% Men
failing
..................................................................................Before
training /After .............................................Before
training/After
Stretcher carry, level
..............................................63
.......................38
.................................................0
............................0
Stretcher carry/up, down ladder
..............................94 .......................88
..................................................0..............................0
Fire
hose
....................................................................19
.......................16
.................................................0
............................0
P250 pump, carry down
.............................................99
.......................99
..................................................9..............................4
P250
pump, carry up ...................................................73
.......................52
.................................................0
............................0
P250, start pump
.........................................................90
......................75
..................................................0
...........................0
Remove SSTO pump
..................................................99
.......................99
..................................................0.............................0
Torque
engine bolt .......................................................78
........................47
.................................................0
...........................0"
Our ships can be hit. I know what supersonic stealthed
cruise missiles are. So do the Iraqis.
Also from the Commission's report: "Non-deployability
briefings before the Commission showed that women were three times more
non-deployable than men, primarily due to pregnancy, during Operations
Desert Shield and Storm. According to Navy Captain Martha Whitehead's
testimony before the Commission, 'the primary reason for the women being
unable to deploy was pregnancy, that representing 47 percent of the
women who could not deploy.'"
Maybe we need armored strollers.
My friend Catherine Aspy graduated from Harvard in 1992
and (no, I'm not on drugs) enlisted in the Army in 1995. Her account was
published in Reader's Digest, February, 1999, and is online in the
Digest's archives.
She told me the following about her experiences: "I was
stunned. The Army was a vast day-care center, full of unmarried teen-age
mothers using it as a welfare home. I took training seriously and really
tried to keep up with the men. I found I couldn't. It wasn't even close.
I had no idea the difference in physical ability was so huge. There were
always crowds of women sitting out exercises or on crutches from
training injuries.
"They [the Army] were so scared of sexual harassment
that women weren't allowed to go anywhere without another woman along.
They called them 'Battle Buddies.' It was crazy. I was twenty-six years
old but I couldn't go to the bathroom by myself."
Women are going to take on the North Korean infantry,
but need protection in the ladies' room. Military policy is endlessly
fascinating.
When I was writing the military column, I looked into
the experience of Canada, which tried the experiment of feminization. I
got the report from Ottawa, as did the Commission. Said the
Commission:
"After extensive research, Canada has found little
evidence to support the integration of women into ground units. Of 103
Canadian women who volunteered to joint infantry units, only one
graduated the initial training course. The Canadian experience
corroborates the testimony of LTC Gregor, who said the odds of selecting
a woman matching the physical size and strength of the average male are
more than 130-to-1.
From Military Medicine, October 1997, which I
got from the Pentagon's library:
(p. 690): "One-third of 450 female soldiers surveyed
indicated that they experienced problematic urinary incontinence during
exercise and field training activities. The other crucial finding of the
survey was probably that 13.3% of the respondents restricted fluids
significantly while participating in field exercises." Because peeing
was embarrassing.
Or, (p. 661): " Kessler et al found that the lifetime
prevalence of PTSD in the United States was twice as high among women…"
Depression, says MilMed, is far commoner among women, as are
training injuries. Et cetera.
The military is perfectly aware of all of this. Their
own magazine has told them. They see it every day. But protecting
careers, and rears, is more important than protecting the
country.
Anyway, for those who wanted supporting evidence, there
it is.