Subj: Racial Double Standards
Date: 98-06-28 12:38:32 EDT
From: Twaecap
To: EamonnT, jlkucek@juno.com, AR@amren.com, PRFORD
To: NewSocit2m
Subject: Racial double standards
Date: Sat, Jun 27, 1998 18:33 EDT
From: Twaecap
Message-id: <1998062722334700.SAA26851@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Did you know that the Los Angeles Police Department has orders not to
arrest or disturb in any way certain lawbreakers who just happen to
belong to an influential minority group?
Did you know that openly racial organizations receive large sums of U.S.
taxpayer's money on a regular basis? But that other racial
organizations, which just happen to represent traditional Americans, are
treated essentially as outlaws?
There is a racial double standard in America and throughout the Western
world. It's a double standard that says that Black, Chicano and Jewish
racial feelings are good and healthy; whereas any manifestation of White
racial awareness is somehow evil. It's a double standard that says that
this program and the organization behind it ought to be outlawed and
ought to be shunned by all right-thinking servants of Big Brother;
whereas similar organizations and radio programs which speak up for the
interests of Mexicans, Jews, or Africans, are not only laudable but
deserve to and do actually receive taxpayer funding. It's a double
standard that says non-Whites with poorer standardized test scores
deserve preference in hiring or college admission, while millions of the
sons and daughters of the race that founded and built this country are
left out in the cold and will ultimately be asked to pay the bills for
this treason. And it's a double standard that looks the other way at the
rampant lawbreaking of minority criminals, while making the slightest
infraction by a so-called "prejudiced" White person into a Federal case
with accompanying national headlines.
We're going to pierce the curtain of media censorship and expose this
double standard for what it really is, next, on American Dissident
Voices.
I have before me an exact reproduction of a motion adopted by the Los
Angles City Council, as introduced by 14th District Councilman Richard
Alatorre, and seconded by Councilman Farrell. Many of you won't believe
this, but I'll be happy to send a photocopy of this public document to
anyone who sends us a contribution this week to keep us on the air. This
motion consists of a series of official changes in policy, limiting the
powers of the Los Angeles Police Department with regard to one specific
category of lawbreaker - specifically, illegal aliens, who, as we all
know, are with very few exceptions in the LA area, Chicanos from Mexico
or other parts of Central America. In this motion, they generally use
the euphemism "undocumented" when describing these flagrant violators of
our laws and invaders and occupiers of our country.
Let me read you just a bit of this incredible document:
In section one, it states "it is the policy of the Los Angeles Police
Department that undocumented alien status in itself is not a matter for
police action." In other words, if you or I violate a law, no matter how
small or insignificant the infraction, we can expect to be arrested,
prosecuted, and punished. But if a Chicano breaks what ought to be one
of the most important laws of all, the laws protecting our borders from
invasion, his crime is not even to be noticed or reported, according to
the official policy of the Los Angeles City Council.
In section two, it states, beginning in large capital letters: "NO
ARRESTS BASED SOLELY ON IMMIGRATION STATUS. No officer of the Los
Angeles Police Department shall initiate an enforcement activity or
police action against an individual solely on the basis of an
individual['s] immigration status." It seems a certain class of
criminals is now immune to arrests and can break the law with virtual
impunity. The hands of the police are tied. I ask, whatever happened to
equal protection under the law? It seems that some groups, to paraphrase
George Orwell, are now "more equal" than others.
In section three, this LA City Council resolution states: "...no officer
of the Los Angeles Police Department shall cooperate with the
Immigration and Naturalization service to inquire into the immigration
status of an individual, except and unless required by city, county,
state or federal law to inquire into the immigration status of an
individual seeking LAPD employment." So the police are now forbidden to
cooperate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and the only
circumstances under which an LAPD officer can do so is when they're
hiring new employees and unfortunately some outdated laws still on the
books force them to hire individuals who are at least nominally
Americans.
But it goes even further than that. In section four, it states: "...no
officer of the Los Angeles Police Department shall assist or cooperate
with any Immigration and Naturalization Service investigation,
detention, or arrest procedure ... except or unless... the Department
has probable cause to believe that the subject of the investigation has
committed or is committing a felony."
Section five: "...under no circumstances shall officers of the
Department detain witnesses or victims or assist the INS in such
detention..." Section six: "...neither any officer of the Los Angeles
Police Department or Department administration shall release or threaten
to release information [to anyone] regarding an individual's immigration
status..." unless a long and strict laundry list of conditions are met.
Section seven states: "...no officer of the Los Angeles Police
Department shall release or threaten to release any information
regarding the immigration status of a child under the age of 18 under
any circumstances except and unless that child has been previously
adjudicated for a delinquent act." In other words, if you are an LA
police officer, and you newly arrest a Chicano delinquent, and you find
out he is in the United States illegally, not only may you not enforce
the immigration laws of our country, but you are forbidden from passing
on the information about his lawbreaking to any other agency that still
might have the authority to enforce those laws.
It seems unbelievable - yet there it is in black and white. The Los
Angeles City Council, effectively taken over by non-Americans and by
traitors, openly declaring that its police department is forbidden to
enforce the laws securing our borders against invasion, and putting
every stumbling block possible in the way of the other agencies charged
with protecting our borders.
How much clearer do I have to make it, my fellow Americans? There's been
a revolution in this country, and you lost.
Do you expect any police force, politically controlled by groups hostile
to White survival, to be of any substantial protective value in the
riots and bloodbaths that are sure to be in our future in the racial
cauldrons that our major metropolitan areas have become? How much use
was the LA police force when Black violence came to that city following
the Rodney King verdict? And, Mr. and Mrs. Ordinary American, if you are
forced to defend yourself in such a situation in the future, possibly
wounding or killing a marauding rioter in the process in order to
protect your family's life and property - just who do you think will
charged with a crime? The marauding rioters - or you? And what kind of a
jury do you think you're going to get to judge your case when you are
charged with a "racist hate crime?" And if the jury does by some miracle
vote in your favor, do you think that the political establishment is
going to let it go at that? What happened to the LA officers in the
Rodney King trial when the jury acquitted them the first time? Something
to think about, my friends. Something that you ought to sit down and
think about for a long, long, time. While you were watching "Happy Days"
or "Star Trek," your country has been stolen from you. It has been truly
said that the price of Liberty is eternal vigilance. And you, Mr. and
Mrs. American, have been asleep on the watch.
I've got some more documents for you today that you've probably never
heard of.
How many of you have heard of a Chicano organization called "La Raza?"
That group, whose name literally means "The Race," is much more than you
have been led to believe. They distribute a publication entitled "El
Plan de Aztlan." "El Plan de Aztlan" is much more than a plan - more
than a manifesto - it's really a declaration of war against us. They
even have it available in English so that we Americans can read it too -
so we certainly can't call their war against us a "conspiracy" or claim
that they've been hiding their intentions.
Let's take a close look at this "Plan de Aztlan."
"In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud
history but also of the brutal Gringo invasion of our territories, WE,
the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan
from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and
consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, DECLARE that
the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our
inevitable destiny."
I'm beginning to get the impression that when these Mexicans say
"Aztlan," what they're referring to is really what is now called the
United States of America and Canada. Let's see if that impression is
justified.
I continue with the Chicano document, "El Plan de Aztlan:"
"Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and
gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. We do not recognize
capricious frontiers on the bronze continent."
Again, it's quite clear that by "the bronze continent," he means all of
North America. I continue with the quotation:
"Brotherhood unites us, and love for our brothers makes us a people
whose time has come and who struggles against the foreigner Gabacho who
exploits our riches and destroys our culture. With our heart in our
hands and our hands in the soil, we declare the independence of our
mestizo nation. We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the
world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the
bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we
are Aztlan. [last two phrases translated] FOR THE RACE, EVERYTHING.
OUTSIDE THE RACE, NOTHING."
Now first let me say that I have nothing at all against Mexican
Nationalism, as long as they confine both themselves and their ambitions
to South of the Rio Grande.
But I must also say that "El plan de Aztlan" sounds to me like a racial
declaration of war against White Americans. It certainly is not a
manifesto of integration and interracial "brotherhood," is it? Yet where
are the television and newspaper reporters, where are the editorial
writers and commentators, where are Geraldo Rivera and Donahue when it
comes to threat of "Chicano Hate Groups" or "Mexican racism?" Here is a
well-organized group, calling itself "The Race" no less, which receives
recognition and even funding from major institutions like city
governments and colleges and universities, and which therefore receives
support and funding from you and me; a group which preaches the end of
America as we have known her, and the foreign takeover of our entire
continent - none of which they even try to hide behind code words or
clever euphemisms - and the controlled media are virtually silent.
Yet let even the slightest peep be emitted in favor of the values or
even the very survival of ordinary White Americans, the people who
founded and built this country, and the vicious media attacks come
screaming and spitting "racist - hatred - bigot - anti-semitic" from
every direction. What an obvious double standard. What an obvious
anti-American agenda. We Americans need to learn that the controlled
media in this country represent the greatest threat to our continued
survival as a people.
The controlled media not only lie to us by twisting the facts and
selective reporting; they also engage in brainwashing on a mass scale by
embedding their multiracial, multicultural, One World agenda into the
plots and characters of their television dramas and comedies.
Don't believe it? Listen to this, from the horse's mouth, so to speak,
of the controlled media: Reprinted in Michael Hoffman's Researcher
newsletter, this quote is from Newsweek of March 29, 1993 -
"The White male ... in the world of images and ideas ... he's taking a
clobbering. On TV, the White male is a boob or a villain, not just in
such shows as Roseanne but in the ads too.... Everywhere in the culture,
from low to high, is the image of the White male as Ice Person: can't
jump, can't dance, can't feel.... Up to a point, trashing White males
was good clean fun, in the all-American tradition of deflating the
pompous and the powerful: the insufferable Jim Anderson of Father Knows
Best richly deserved getting Simpsonized.... Turnabout is fair play."
Well, I wonder just who it is that is "turning the tables" on us?
Newsweek's writer didn't say. It is clear though, that the controlled
media have an agenda, a plan for the future of this continent, that
definitely doesn't include any place for White Americans except perhaps
as tax-paying serfs. So keep your mouth shut and work hard!
Unless, of course, you actually do care about the future of our nation
and our people, if don't want your children to grow up as slaves or
victims in a Third World miasma that would be America in name only - in
that case, my friend, welcome to the growing ranks of the politically
incorrect, the thought criminals who actually dare to cry out against
the engineers of America's destruction. I suggest you unplug your
television for at least a year, get a copy of our book catalog, start
reading, and start thinking.
I think I've made it abundantly clear that there is a glaringly obvious
double standard with regard to race in this country. Certain favored
groups can insult and assault us, and nothing is said or done. Certain
favored groups can issue manifestos calling for the invasion and
takeover of this country, yet the establishment turns a blind eye.
Certain favored groups can break the law with impunity.
Yet let a patriotic White American speak his mind, which happens very
infrequently these days, and judging by the media reaction, you'd think
a felony had been committed. Does anyone think that the above injustices
against whites will improve race relations?