Did you know ???
In 1950, white people of European ancestry comprised approximately 89% of the population of the United States. In 1965, (now Sen.) Edward Kennedy and the other sponsors of the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act repeatedly promised the American people that their proposal (1) would not increase annual levels of immigration, (2) would not lower standards for admission, (3) would not redirect immigration away from Europe, (4) would not alter the demographic make-up of the United States. Since passage of the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act, annual legal immigration has risen from 300,000 a year to just under 1,000,000 a year. Of the almost one million legal immigrants we now allow in each year, over 40% are high school drop-outs. Of those nearly one million legal immigrants per year, over 90% are non-white. (Illegal immigration is almost entirely non-white. For example, of the 2,684,892 illegal immigrants granted amnesty by the 1986 Immigration and Control Act, more than 98% came directly from the Third World- Africa, Asia, Latin America or the Caribbean.) Immigration and births to immigrants have accounted for 70% of the increase in the American population since 1970. Consequently, within the last 25 years, whites have been reduced to less than 74% of the U.S. population. Whites now account for less than 69% of births... and by 2030, less than 50% of the population under 18 years of age will be white. In less than 50 years therefore, we are cheerfully informed by the Census Bureau, whites will have been reduced to less than 50% of the population as a whole. This gift of "diversity" that Mr. Kennedy and company have given the American people has not come without costs. Since 1970, the number of elderly immigrants in the U.S. has more than tripled, and the number of elderly immigrants who receive Supplementary Security Income has grown by 580%. Estimates are that over the next decade the deficit to social security will total $30 billion. By 1993, the cost of bilingual education in America had already risen to $12 billion per year. 53% of all the "refugees" who have settled in California since 1973 are on public support of some kind. Now even illegal immigrants routinely receive a dizzying array of social services at taxpayer expense... for example, the average cost of an uncompensated admission of an illegal alien to a publicly supported hospital is $4,700. It now costs the taxpayers of California $2 billion a year to educate illegal alien school children, who are seven percent of the school population. And yet, each succeeding generation of Mexican-Americans is less likely to graduate from high school than its parents. In 1970 there were 2,369,000 Hispanics living in California. By 1994, that figure had risen to 8,939,000. It is estimated that the net national cost of immigration to U.S. taxpayers was $65 billion in 1996, or the equivalent of $981 for every American family of four. Within the decade, the cost of immigration is projected to rise to $108 billion per year. Besides the extra tax burden on white Americans, and soaring insurance rates of all kinds, etc., there is the far greater cost of ever expanding legal discrimination against whites in the form of "affirmative action." Affirmative action has now been expanded from its original clientele of American-born blacks to include virtually all non-whites... so that now non-whites fresh off the boat receive preferences over the children of whites who have been here for generations Nearly one million Arabs nearly all of whom have arrived since 1965 now live in America, and are lobbying for racial preferences. More than half of all faculty in American universities under the age of 36 are foreign-born. More than one quarter of the inmates of federal prisons are aliens. Illegal immigrants, who cannot vote (yet), are counted for Congressional and other districting purposes, so non-whites can often be elected to office with a much smaller number of votes than whites need. And now immigration activists are demanding voting rights even for non-citizens???
Did you know these things???
Don't feel "funny" if you didn't. Very few people do.
These are facts of the type our news media now chooses to ignore.
The mainstream press in America today simply refuses to address the issue of single greatest impact to our future as a nation.
The chart below [omitted] shows the demographic change of the US population from 1950 to the present. Extending that line for two additional 50 year periods, it shows the demographic change that may be expected to occur during the next century, if we allow our dispossession to proceed at merely its current level.
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
But is it realistic to expect our displacement to proceed at merely its current rate? Unfortunately, it is not. The rapidity with which we are being replaced shows every sign of continuing to increase during the next several decades much as it did over the past several decades.
As more and more non-whites become naturalized citizens with the right to sponsor their relatives from back home... as the rate of illegal immigration by South and Central Americans continues to climb and go essentially un-opposed... and as more and more of the South Asian third-world realizes our lack of resolve to defend our borders... and as increasing numbers of resident non-whites strengthen their political base and intensify their demands that we further liberalize (or abandon) even our current limits on immigration... the situation is sure to worsen unless something is done to turn the tide.
Whites are now only 8% of the world's population, and are having only 4% of the world's babies. While most of the third world continues to over-populate itself, we, by accepting the overflow from places like Haiti, Jamaica, Cuba and Mexico, only foster the illusion that these countries do not have population problems, delay their solution, and insure that our children will face new and even greater waves of immigrants in the future.
Unless we drastically change our immigration policies, and very soon, the demographic make-up of the nation we leave our grandchildren will almost surely resemble more the bottom line of the graph above than the still 30% white America we may expect if our replacement continues at only its current rate.
Can you believe it is the will of the majority of the American people to leave to their posterity such a nation?
No, neither do we. When these facts become more widely known, the American people will demand a change in our immigration policy, and the only reason they haven't yet, is because these facts continue to go un-publicized.
Nothing could be more obvious than that an overwhelming majority of the American people would consider to be quite news worthy the fact that our present immigration policy insures that the nation which we will leave our children will, within this century, be less than 30% white. Nevertheless, the popular media persists in its refusal to bring this issue to the attention of the public much less encourage that it be publicly examined and debated, or submitted to the will of the voters.
Not only does the popular media prefer not to examine these issues, but increasingly, it refuses even to mention the racial component behind most of the thousands of stories it daily produces covering the consequent deterioration of cohesion and civility in this country.
In fact, merely to put the words race, immigration, and civility" in the same sentence is to step across a line that now separates what may be said publicly in America from what may not.
Despite the American tradition of free speech and the fervor with which we claim to defend it, nearly every American takes the greatest care not to cross that line. There are subjects on which the debate has been ended... on which the book has been closed... and this is to be so no matter how much the reality of our daily lives clashes with these conclusions that have been declared as final.
In fact, because of the exploding numbers of black and Hispanic immigrants, America is daily becoming an increasingly dangerous and disagreeable place. As any white person who has experienced firsthand what the "cultural enrichment" of living in a "diverse" or "changing" neighborhood is actually like can tell you, more and more parts of the United States are becoming, for whites, essentially uninhabitable.
Yes, it may still be physically possible for whites to live with the Mexicans of Brownsville, TX, or with the blacks of Camden, NJ, but such places have become almost as alien and as uninviting as Oaxaca or Mombassa. Actually, they have become more uninviting. The people of Oaxaca and Mombassa like and admire white Americans, whereas those of Brownsville and Camden have a strong and sometimes violent dislike for whites. And this is now true of the "inner city" populations generally (and most certainly of the "youths") of every major American city. For the most part, they despise whites.
Crime statistics provide one extremely vivid illustration of the reality of this growing anti-white sentiment in America.
In 1994 (the most recent year for which there is complete data) Department of Justice statistics tell us that for every black in the U.S. who suffered a physical assault by a white, 55 whites were physically assaulted by a black. In the case of robbery ("muggings"), blacks were 103 times more likely to go after whites than the reverse. For group attacks against a lone individual, the lop-sidedness of the rates was even worse. For inter-racial group violence overall, the black-on-white rate was 102 times the reverse, and for robbery the rate was 277 to one!
Disparities of this magnitude in the rates of inter-racial crime are ubiquitous and have remained constant for years and yet somehow they never seem to make the news. Can you imagine the uproar that would be raised if it were discovered that blacks were, say, merely twice as likely as whites to be denied fishing licenses, or three times as likely to be issued parking tickets? The din would be deafening!
Why then is there never one peep in our newspapers over the fact that our government has embarked on a course that is making ever larger parts of this country inhospitable, even off-limits, to whites?
Why is there almost complete silence in our popular media about a population shift that, if it takes place, will transform much of our country beyond recognition? Why is there no debate about what this will mean for the future of the democratic process, national unity, foreign policy, racial friction, crime, the viability of the jury system, education, labor productivity, our tax burden, and virtually every other indicator of our quality of life in this country?
Why? Because most whites have become afraid to say openly what we know to be true. And because so many other whites sincere, thoughtful, concerned Americans have been convinced that it is improper, or even immoral, for white people to think of themselves as a group with legitimate interests, or to speak out on behalf of themselves as white people.
Today the mainstream media is so terrified of being called "racist" that it simply will not address the most important issue to our future as a nation.
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *