The British media were celebrating some wonderful news in 2001: a
report by "an independent health thinktank" called the King's Fund said
that 14.1% of doctors working in general surgery were non-white. That is
roughly 200% – two hundred per cent – more than non-white
representation in the general population, and a sure sign that the
anti-racist recruitment policies of the National Health Service were
working extremely well. Of all medical staff, 18.4% were non-white, an
even more pleasing figure, and though it's true that only 8.9% of
consultants were non-white, that was still nearly double their
representation in the general population, and another sure sign that the
NHS was not discriminating against non-whites.
So here's how Britain's biggest liberal paper reported that
independent health thinktank's reaction to these very pleasing
statistics:
The King's Fund called on the NHS and
professional bodies to introduce reforms to implement last year's Race
Relations Amendment Act. ... Leaders of the medical profession should
do more to eliminate racism from medical schools and monitor the
career paths of black and Asian doctors to make sure nobody was
prevented by ethnicity or colour from reaching their full potential,
the fund said. (The Guardian, June 19, 2001)
Oh dear, oh dear: so things weren't so pleasing
after all. But anyone who is surprised by that obviously doesn't
understand the way liberals use statistics: not as a tool to discover
the truth, but as a weapon against Whites. When non-whites are
under-represented in a particular profession by comparison with
the general population, liberals screech that this is incontrovertible
proof of racism and discrimination. Clearly, therefore, when non-whites
are over-represented, that must, by the same logic, be proof of
racism and discrimination against Whites. But liberals are not
interested in logic and they're always ready to change the rules of the
game to produce the desired anti-White outcome. At 14.1%, non-whites
were hugely over-represented in general surgery, but they were even more
hugely over-represented in general psychiatry (24%), accident and
emergency (27%), and geriatrics (30.4%). So liberals conclude that
non-whites are still being discriminated against!
In other words: if it's heads, Whites lose; if it's tails, non-whites
win. The true purpose of "anti-racism" and "diversity" is not to achieve
justice and equality but to take power and money from Whites until they
have no more left to give. It's a vampire's agenda, so it should come as
absolutely no surprise that the "chief executive" of the King's Fund was
none other than the shrill and self-righteous Rabbi Julia Neuberger, one
of the most revolting of Britain's many Jewish busybodies and "public
consciences". At times I wonder whether women like her can breathe
through their ears, because the anti-White, anti-male yapping that pours
from their fast-moving mouths never seems to stop.
Then again, cranial breathing-tubes would reduce space for that
outsized Jewish brain which has blessed the world so much since Jews
emerged from their ghettos in the eighteenth century. But the funny
thing is that when we look at "Jewish genius", we don't find men like
Beethoven, Shakespeare, and Darwin, who taught us to see and appreciate
the world and its richness and beauty better. No, "Jewish genius"
consists of men like Marx, Freud, and Boas, who taught us to see and
appreciate the evil of Whitey better. Jews are masters at injecting
ideological viruses into the blood-stream of a society to weaken and
harm it, and one of the most potent Jewish viruses is the
Marxo-Freudo-Boasian concept of "racism".
And just like a real virus, it mutates to maintain its potency. In
the 1990s we discovered that not only individuals – White individuals,
that is – could be guilty of racism. No, entire organizations –
White-run ones, of course – could be guilty too, even if the individuals
working in them were not conscious evil-doers. It's called
"institutional racism", and it means even more power and money for the
High Priests of Anti-Racism as they abuse and pervert statistics to
detect racial sins and blasphemies in all corners of public and private
service.
More recently still, a new mutation of this Jew-invented virus has
appeared: the spine-chilling "stealth racism". And once again,
statistics are being abused and perverted to detect its unholy presence.
The British police now force potential recruits to prove their
anti-racism by sitting special tests. However, the tests produced some
unexpected but very pleasing news, according to this report in the ever
race-aware Guardian:
Home Office data showed 42% of Chinese
applicants to the police were rejected on the grounds of "respect for
race and diversity". Similarly, 34% of black and 33% of Asian
applicants were rejected, compared with 23% of their white
counterparts. (June 14, 2004)
Look at that:
Whites have more "respect for race and diversity" than
non-whites! That must show that we're finally winning the decades-long
War on Whitey's Racism! Well, mustn't it? No, of course not. The lawyer
who headed the investigation into these findings, a former Director of
Public Prosecutions called "Sir" David Calvert-Smith (who is either a
race-traitor or a Jew)*, made the following comment:
The precise reasons for this
disturbing racial pattern need to be determined, and the
assessment methods and scoring systems examined more closely. (My
emphasis)
In other words: the conclusion was fixed in advance. The tests were
intended to exclude more Whites than non-whites, because – as we
all know – only Whites can be racist and show disrespect for other races
and cultures. And when the statistics seem to show that this is
completely wrong, it's "disturbing" evidence of
...a new phenomenon, the "stealth racist"
who [has] learned how to remain undetected by the emphasis on what
terminology to use and not use.
This proves that
Whites can never win. Evidence that we're less racist than
non-whites is actually evidence that we're just concealing our racism.
We're guilty till proved guilty, and we have to wake up and understand
the truth about anti-racism and the ever-growing "diversity" industry.
Not only is equality between different races impossible to achieve,
anti-racists and diversocrats do not want to achieve it. They want
non-whites to take everything Whites have got, and the only freedom
they're interested in is the freedom for non-whites to screech louder
and louder about racism as more and more White power and money are
handed over to them. If you want a picture of what's going on, let
ornithology come to your aid:
Non-whites are cuckoos in the White nest, but unlike
cuckoo-parasitized birds, Whites have the intelligence and insight to
realize what's going on and throw them out before they swallow
everything. We better start using that intelligence and insight soon,
because the cuckoos are growing bigger, noisier, and greedier every day.
LUKE O'FARRELL
* David Calvert-Smith, the anti-White
lawyer mentioned above, was "born 6th April 1945 to Arthur and Stella
Calvert-Smith, who met while helping to care for Jewish refugees in
Oxford" and someone of the same name prepared a hostile "documentary"
for the Nazi propaganda film Jew Süss (1940), which was
"released by the Jewish Media Services JWB."
