Is There Evidence of Ancient Atomic Warfare?

mushroom cloud

The LORD saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain. So the LORD said, "I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face of the earth--men and animals, and creatures that move along the ground, and birds of the air--for I am grieved that I have made them."

Genesis 6......

flying a swift and powerful vimana
hurled a single projectile
Charged with all the power of the Universe.
An incandescent column of smoke and flame
As bright as the thousand suns
Rose in all its splendour...
a perpendicular explosion
with its billowing smoke clouds...
...the cloud of smoke
rising after its first explosion
formed into expanding round circles
like the opening of giant parasols... was an unknown weapon,
An iron thunderbolt,
A gigantic messenger of death,
Which reduced to ashes
The entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas.
...The corpses were so burned
As to be unrecognizable.
The hair and nails fell out;
Pottery broke without apparent cause,
And the birds turned white.
After a few hours
All foodstuffs were infected... escape from this fire
The soldiers threw themselves in streams
To wash themselves and their equipment.

Ancient verses from the Mahabharata: (6500 B.C.?)


As we look at a bit of what is being called evidence of ancient atomic warfare (or simply atomic explosions), I think its important to make a distinction. (Here I'm speaking to Believers). It is important that we can establish through available evidence, some seen on other pages here-- that: the Bible does in fact mention dinosaurs, that man and dinosaurs co-existed as the Bible would indicate; that DNA is proof of a creator, that the worldwide flood of Noah did happen, and that the world was created in one week as the Word says. It's not that every believer needs to have these things proved, but it is at least interesting to know that there is scientific evidence that supports the Bible.

In the case of this examination of ancient atomic capability, there is no Biblical principal, doctrine or account that we need to support. Christians, as far as I can see have no stake in this one way or the other. We think we have established on other pages here that there were pre-flood civilizations unaccounted for in traditional science. We have pondered the question of the technological sophistication of these pre-flood civilizations. Atomic warfare or capability would be another indication of this sophistication and little else. (With one Exception--when you read about the ancient atomic nuclear power plant at OKLO,below, understand that the "explanation" that scientists now give for its existence, as far fetched as it is requires 1.7 to 2 billion years). If you think prior ancient atomic capability nonsense--and you don't believe the world is billions of years old--that presents a nice problem for you). It may be that if such capability existed it was part of the wickedness that God saw, as referenced by the quote from Genesis 6 at the top of this page.

On the other hand, I personally would enjoy the consternation that would result among materialists/evolutionists, if it could be proven that this technology did in fact previously exist. It would be very difficult to fit that knowledge into the current paradigm, wouldn't it? A nuclear physicist from Lawrence Berkeley Labs , took note of the ancient nuclear activity and came up with his own novel theory to explain it. An excerpt from that article appears below as well.

As for believers such a confirmation could only bolster our confidence that when we say to materialists "there are things in Heaven and earth that are not dreamed of in your philosophy", that it is proving truer every day.(Perhaps ancient weapons capability was why some were living in caves in the first place--with mobile art on the walls as technically proficient as the best art of the Renaissance--or today for that matter).

My take then is that there are some interesting things to consider, and that we should just take a look at it and form a conclusion. It may well be that we will reject all of the "evidence" or merely some of it. It's certainly worth a couple of minutes of our no doubt valuable time to give a look. It could make you go hmmmm.

The evidence will largely fit in four categories. 1)Descriptions in what are thought to be the oldest written texts by man still in existence. 2)Discovery of archeological sites which demonstrate characteristics, including high levels of radiation, consistent with an atomic explosion and)3)physical evidence (changes in the sand) similar to those found at the site of current day atomic explosions.4)Bingo! Evidence of depleted uranium with plutonium products!

Atomic Explosions Produce Glass

The following item appeared in the New York Herald Tribune on February 16, 1947 (and was repeated by Ivan T. Sanderson in the January 1970 issue of his magazine, Pursuit):

When the first atomic bomb exploded in New Mexico, the desert sand turned to fused green glass. This fact, according to the magazine Free World, has given certain archaeologists a turn. They have been digging in the ancient Euphrates Valley and have uncovered a layer of agrarian culture 8,000 years old, and a layer of herdsman culture much older, and a still older caveman culture. Recently, they reached another layer of fused green glass.

It is well known that atomic detonations on or above a sandy desert will melt the silicon in the sand and turn the surface of the Earth into a sheet of glass. But if sheets of ancient desert glass can be found in various parts of the world, does it mean that atomic wars were fought in the ancient past or, at the very least, that atomic testing occurred in the dim ages of history?

This is a startling theory, but one that is not lacking in evidence, as such ancient sheets of desert glass are a geological fact. Lightning strikes can sometimes fuse sand, meteorologists contend, but this is always in a distinctive root-like pattern. These strange geological oddities are called fulgurites and manifest as branched tubular forms rather than as flat sheets of fused sand. Therefore, lightning is largely ruled out as the cause of such finds by geologists, who prefer to hold onto the theory of a meteor or comet strike as the cause. The problem with this theory is that there is usually no crater associated with these anomalous sheets of glass.

Brad Steiger and Ron Calais report in their book, Mysteries of Time and Space,1 that Albion W. Hart, one of the first engineers to graduate from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was assigned an engineering project in the interior of Africa. While he and his men were travelling to an almost inaccessible region, they first had to cross a great expanse of desert.

"At the time he was puzzled and quite unable to explain a large expanse of greenish glass which covered the sands as far as he could see," writes Margarethe Casson in an article on Hart's life in the magazine Rocks and Minerals (no. 396, 1972).

She then goes on to mention: "Later on, during his life he passed by the White Sands area after the first atomic explosion there, and he recognized the same type of silica fusion which he had seen fifty years earlier in the African desert."
David Hatcher Childress in Nexus magazine


Pieces of Libyan Desert Glass weighing as much as 16 pounds are found in an oval area measuring approximately 130 by 53 kilometers. The clear-to-yellowish-green pieces are concentrated in sand-free corridors between north-south dune ridges. The origin of this immense deposit of glass has been attributed by some to ancient nuclear explosions and alien activities, but investigating scientists have always been satisfied with a meteor-impact hypothesis. A recent study (abstract below) also opts for this explanation, although no one has found a crater of suitable size or other supporting evidence.

Science Frontiers On Line

Re: More on Libyan Desert Glass
by Gerhard Mehle
February 1998
Libyan Desert Glass is found widely scattered over an area 130 km north to south by 53 km east to west.

The Libyan Desert of Egypt is one of Earth's most remote and inhospitable regions. Uninhabited, windblown and foreboding, the Sand Sea, near the Gilf Kebir Plateau, was nonetheless the site of a remarkable discovery in 1932.

The Egyptian Desert Surveys under the able direction of Englishman Patrick A. Clayton (1896-1962) recovered specimens (about 50 kg) of an unusual, often beautiful, translucent to transparent, yellowish-green gem-like, high silica natural glass.

The Area Where The Glass Is Found

After the 1932 discovery of Libyan Desert Glass, only two other expeditions (both of the 1930s) were undertaken to the location until 1971. This latter exploration involved three scientists stopping over for only two hours and collecting some 24 samples of the glass. During this brief visit, the expedition accidentally found the site of a forced landing of an Egyptian aircraft with the remains of nine men. The failure of Egyptian authorities to find the downed airplane for over three years is solemn validation of the remoteness of this arid region.

In light of the foregoing, it is perhaps remarkable that a greater abundance of Libyan Desert Glass has been made available recently for collections and study than at any time since its discovery 65 years ago.

Libyan Desert Glass is classified by most meteoriticists with the group of curious natural glasses known as tektites. In 1900, Professor Franz E. Suess of Vienna coined the term tektite from the Greek tektos meaning "melted or molten." Tektites are compositionally restricted, high silica, natural glasses distinguishably different from other, volcanically derived, natural glasses. Tektites range in size from microscopic (less than 1mm) to macroscopic weighing many kilograms.

They exhibit a marvelous range of colors from water clear, gem quality, deep forest greens of moldavites to the soothing pale to dark yellow and yellow-greens of Libyan Desert Glass as well as the stygian, impenetrable black of Australites.

Mankind has wondered about, and cherished, these enigmatic, exotic objects for hundreds of years, perhaps much longer. In the Cro-Magnon Venus of Willendorf site (Austria), dated at 29,000 BC, small moldavite flake blades were found (now lost!).

The earliest written records come from mid-10th century China referring to the black, shiny objects found after rainstorms as lei-gong-mo, "inkstones of the thunder-god". Australian Aborigines called Australites ooga, "staring eyes". The origin and source of tektites remains a mystery.

This Libyan Glass
Object was Found
in King Tut's Tomb

... relation to all other tektite groups, Libyan Desert Glass exhibits a noteworthy number of unique attributes.

Lowest refractive index: 1.4616
Lowest specific gravity: 2.21
Highest silica content: 98%
Highest lechatelierite particles: fused quartz
Highest water content: 0.064%
Highest viscosity: almost 6X greater than Australites at the same temperature Other unique attributes: Color, Bubble types: 100% of included bubbles are lenticular or irregular.

..There is no evidence whatsoever, of atmospheric aerodynamic shaping and it is therefore presumed that Libyan Desert Glass formed as a melt sheet of some sort, possibly by meteoritic impact some 28.5 millions years ago. Recent French studies concluded that meteoric elements in the glass, of almost chondritic proportions, "points to an impact origin".

Interestingly, the inclusion of the high number of lechatelierite (fused quartz) particles in Libyan Desert Glass also points to an extremely high, up to 1700 C, formation temperature. Impacts of large bodies at high velocity are certainly capable of creating such high temperatures. But, the central issue in determining the impact origin of tektites remains, that is, how to transform a mass of crushed rock into a homogeneous and relatively bubble free liquid which rapidly cools to a glass.

Even the commercial production of glass takes many hours to relieve the melt of its volatile components. No partially melted material, or target rock inclusions, have ever been found in Libyan Desert Glass. Furthermore, other known impact glasses (impactites) such as Darwin Glass are bubbly, frothy, scoriaceous and contain partially melted materials. So the controversy continues.

This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Bryant Stavely. Excerpt from the World Island Review, January 1992.

Evidence of Ancient Atomic Explosion

Radiation still so intense, the area is highly dangerous A heavy layer of radioactive ash in Rajasthan, India, covers a three-square mile area, ten miles west of Jodhpur. Scientists are investigating the site, where a housing development was being built.

For some time it has been established that there is a very high rate of birth defects and cancer in the area under construction. The levels of radiation there have registered so high on investigators' gauges that the Indian government has now cordoned off the region.

Scientists have unearthed an ancient city where evidence shows an atomic blast dating back thousands of years, from 8,000 to 12,000 years, destroyed most of the buildings and probably a half-million people. One researcher estimates that the nuclear bomb used was about the size of the ones dropped on Japan in 1945.

The Mahabharata clearly describes a catastrophic blast that rocked the continent. (quoted at top of this page)


Historian Kisari Mohan Ganguli says that "Indian sacred writings" are full of such descriptions, which sound like an atomic blast as experienced in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He says references mention fighting sky chariots and final weapons. An ancient battle is described in the Drona Parva, a section of the Mahabharata. "The passage tells of combat where explosions of final weapons decimate entire armies, causing crowds of warriors with steeds and elephants and weapons to be carried away as if they were dry leaves of trees," says Ganguli.

"Instead of mushroom clouds, the writer describes a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds as consecutive openings of giant parasols. There are comments about the contamination of food and people's hair falling out."


Archeologist Francis Taylor says that etchings in some nearby temples he has managed to translate suggest that they prayed to be spared from the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the city. "It's so mind-boggling to imagine that some civilization had nuclear technology before we did. The radioactive ash adds credibility to the ancient Indian records that describe atomic warfare."

Construction has halted while the five member team conducts the investigation. The foreman of the project is Lee Hundley, who pioneered the investigation after the high level of radiation was discovered.

This material is copyright. Reproduction and printing of single copies of this material is permitted if it is done in study, research, quotation and fair play. All further reproduction or any alteration of the text for other uses may be done only by permission of the copyright holder (usually the author). Please acknowledge the author in any quotation from this material.

If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.

Evidence at Mohenjo-Daro

When excavations of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro reached the street level, they discovered skeletons scattered about the cities, many holding hands and sprawling in the streets as if some instant, horrible doom had taken place. People were just lying, unburied, in the streets of the city.

Research Indicates that these walls were
Subjected to temperatures over 1500 degrees.

And these skeletons are thousands of years old, even by traditional archaeological standards. What could cause such a thing? Why did the bodies not decay or get eaten by wild animals? Furthermore, there is no apparent cause of a physically violent death.

These skeletons are among the most radioactive ever found, on par with those at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. At one site, Soviet scholars found a skeleton which had a radioactive level 50 times greater than normal. Other cities have been found in northern India that show indications of explosions of great magnitude. One such city, found between the Ganges and the mountains of Rajmahal, seems to have been subjected to intense heat. Huge masses of walls and foundations of the ancient city are fused together, literally vitrified! And since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption at Mohenjo-Daro or at the other cities, the intense heat to melt clay vessels can only be explained by an atomic blast or some other unknown weapon. The cities were wiped out entirely.

While the skeletons have been carbon-dated to 2500 BC, we must keep in mind that carbon-dating involves measuring the amount of radiation left. When atomic explosions are involved, that makes then seem much younger.

Interestingly, Manhattan Project chief scientist Dr J. Robert Oppenheimer was known to be familiar with ancient Sanskrit literature. In an interview conducted after he watched the first atomic test, he quoted from the Bhagavad Gita: "'Now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.' I suppose we all felt that way." When asked in an interview at Rochester University seven years after the Alamogordo nuclear test whether that was the first atomic bomb ever to be detonated, his reply was, "Well, yes, in modern history."

Scientists Discover Six Ancient Zones of Depleted Uranium with Plutonium Products

Here we go again, and I smell a rat. Notice within this short article below "Oklo, An Unappreciated Cosmic Phenomenom",that "scientists" have applied several of their tried and true methodologies to "orthodoxize" that which otherwise would be a very strange and startling occurrence. There are six to sixteen zones of depleted uranium (usually means mined)with plutonium as a by product!

You've got to really be trying to manufacture plutonium--it's a complicated process. Yet, scientists studying these zones have A Prori of course, decided not to consider that man was involved. 1)They place its occurrence safely "billions" of years ago. 2)They assume that a breeding reaction could occur naturally when no such evidence of that exists 3)They theorize that although it must have happened naturally in the distant past, that we need not worry about it occurring now, as conditions differ. Scientists usually try to use the principal of uniformism to draw conclusions about the future and the past. If they cannot use this "principle", then they can not draw any conclusions because they could not state that the conditions in the universe that exist now, always existed. Here though as often happens, they have to assume that the past was vastly different as it related to the possibility of naturally occurring breeder reactions.

I went back and read a few articles in the popular and scientific press back in '72 and '73 when these ancient mines were first discovered. (Remember, not one reactor, but up to sixteen separate reactors at that location!)It (the discovery) shocked/freaked everyone out because this was right in the midst of intense controversy over several types of nulear designs for power plants, and nuclear scientists knew how difficult it was to build these types of power plants.

Breeder reactors as OKLO was supposed to be--were just coming on line--or were about to and were extremely controversial.

"Surprisingly, this uranium mine's nuclear reactor was well designed. Studies indicate that this reactor was several miles in length. However, for such a huge nuclear reactor, the thermal impact to its environment was limited to 40 meters on all sides. Even more astonishing is the fact that the radioactive wastes have still not migrated outside the mine site. They are held in place by the surrounding geology."

A natural reactor was the last thing that entered these scientists minds--it was to incredible. Nuclear scientists working on Canada' CANDU reactor--one that burned natural uranium like OKLO, were particularly skeptical that they could be natural reactors when the theory was initially floated. Not only that, the theory itself was most charitably described as "imaginative".

Said noted Cal-tech physicist Donald Burnett, "There are plenty of explanations I could give you, but none are less exotic!

Unfortunately, these scientists had nothing else that they could believe--a previous civilization had atomic power? What was initially just an imaginitive theory became like a life preserver--and today is dogma.

Not only that, but the belief that OKLO is billion of years old is used by scientists as evidence that it is safe to bury nuclear waste products in your back yard!


In 1972, French scientists discovered that several natural concentrations of uranium ore had become critical and flared up some "2 billion" years ago at Oklo, Gabon. The concentration and configuration of the natural uranium and surrounding materials at that time had been just right to sustain fission.

In fact, the analysis of the nuclear waste in the burned rocks demonstrated that plutonium had also been created. This implies that natural breeder reactors are also possible, raising the possibility of hitherto unappreciated, long-lived heat sources deep in the earth, in the other planets, and inside some of the stars.

Don't worry that the Oklo phenomenon might occur today on the earth's surface. The concentration of fissionable U-235 has fallen considerably in the last 2 billion years due to its radioactive decay. But, deep inside the earth and other astronomical bodies, nuclear criticality might still be possible due to different pressures, densities, etc.

In a stimulating and generally overlooked paper in Eos, J.M. Herndon proffers four important natural phenomena that may involve natural fission reactors.

Geomagnetic reversals. In the deep earth, where pressures and densities are high, natural nuclear reactors may generate intermittent bursts of heat -- just as they did at Oklo -- and thereby cause the earth's dynamo to falter and reverse.

Planetary heating. Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune emit much more energy than they receive from the sun. Natural nuclear reactors could be the reason.

Stellar thermonuclear ignition. Astronomers assume that the high temperatures required to ignite the thermonuclear reactions powering stars come from gravitational collapse, but this source does not seem adequate to some scientists. Nuclear fission reactors could ignite stars just as they do H-bombs.

Missing matter.

Natural nuclear reactors are finicky. There may be many star-sized, non-luminous objects out there that were never ignited and that we cannot see through our telescopes.

Science Frontiers Online

Giant Unexplained Crater Near Bombay

Another curious sign of an ancient nuclear war in India is a giant crater near Bombay. The nearly circular 2,154-metre-diameter Lonar crater, located 400 kilometres northeast of Bombay and aged at less than 50,000 years old, could be related to nuclear warfare of antiquity.

No trace of any meteoric material, etc., has been found at the site or in the vicinity, and this is the world's only known "impact" crater in basalt. Indications of great shock (from a pressure exceeding 600,000 atmospheres) and intense, abrupt heat (indicated by basalt glass spherules) can be ascertained from the site.
David Hatcher Childress in Nexus Magazine

Nuclear Catastrophe in PaleoIndian Times?
Theory from Scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley Nuclear Laboratory


We introduce here a remarkable theory of terrestrial catastrophism that seems to be supported by evidence that is equally remarkable. One of the authors of this theory (RBF) is identified as a nuclear scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley Nuclear Laboratory. The second author (WT) is a consultant. The authors' credentials seem so good that we must take a close look at their extraordinary claims concerning a natural phenomenon that they believe reset radiocarbon clocks in north-central North America and---potentially---elsewhere on the planet.

We will be most interested in the reception accorded these claims by the scientific community.

The claims. In the authors' words:

Our research indicates that the entire Great Lakes region (and beyond) was subjected to particle bombardment and a catastrophic nuclear irradiation that produced secondary thermal neutrons from cosmic ray interactions. The neutrons produced unusually large quantities of ^239 Pu and substantially altered the natural uranium abundances (^235 U/^238 U) in artifacts and in other exposed materials including cherts, sediments, and the entire landscape.

These neutrons necessarily transmuted residual nitrogen (^ N) in the dated charcoals to radiocarbon, thus explaining anomalous dates. Some North American dates may in consequence be as much as 10,000 years too young. So, we are not dealing with a trivial phenomenon!

Supporting evidence. Four main categories of supporting evidence are claimed and presented in varying degrees of detail. #Anomalously young radiocarbon dates in north-central North America. Example: the Gainey site in Michigan. [Other map sites include Thedford & Zander, Ont.; Potts, NY; Shoop, Penn.; Alton, Ind.; Taylor, Il.; Butler & Leavitt, Mich.; and far to the north Grant Lake, Nunavut; and in the far southwest Baker, N.M. - TWC] #Physical evidence of particle bombardment. Example: chert artifacts with high densities of particle-entrance wounds. #Anomalous uranium and plutonium abundance ratios in the affected area. #Tree-ring and marine sediment data.

The authors claim that the burst of radiation from a nearby supernova, circa 12,500 years ago, not only reset radiocarbon clocks but also heated the planet's atmosphere, melted ice sheets, and led to biological extinctions.

If verified, the claimed phenomenon would also "reset" archeological models of the settlement of North and South America. To illustrate, we may have to add as many as 10,000 years to site dates in much of North America!

(Firestone, Richard B., and Topping, William; "Terrestrial Evidence of a Nuclear Catastrophe in Paleoindian Times," *The Mammoth Trumpet*, 16:9, March 2001. Cr. C. Davant III. This off-mainstream journal is published by the Center for the Study of the First Americans, 355 Weniger Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-6510.)

Comment. Thus we add another potential cause of an often-hypothesized 12,500-BP catastrophe that is said to have changed the world's history. Competing theories involve asteroid impact, volcanism, a Venusian side-swipe, etc.

Science Frontiers Online

Sources and Additional Information

More Info on Ancient Indian Technology

Nexus Magazine: Source of David Hatcher's Article

Some photos from the Sahara Meteorite Prospecting Site

The Suppression Of Anomalous Science

Astounding Oopart! Russian scientists find "120 million year old" (Evol years)3D Aerial Relief MapThe ancient map of the Ural area made with an unknown technology shows details of an incredible dam and water system that modern science could not duplicate. Who made the map with the place names in an unknown and undeciphered language? An unknown pre-flood civilization? Let the Suppression begin!

..Materialists; "You can't handle the truth!" The Solar System, the Ultimate Oopart! Absolute proof that the solar system was designed! G.E.S. Curtis discovers an equation (in 1980)that proves that the orbits of the planets in our solar system are non random.

The big bang theory says that the solar system is the result of a huge explosion (from nothing yet) leading to the capture of the planets and their random orbits around the sun. What if it could be proven that there is absolutely nothing random about the orbits of the planets in our solar system at all. What if it could be shown that each was carefully placed in their exact orbits,as Curtis' Equation does? This is a death knell for Materialism, for the Big Bang theory, the Nebular Hypothesis and is proof that the solar system was created and designed!

Because there is some math involved, most layman won't understand the significance of this discovery but in truth, next to DNA, it is one of the most astounding "ooparts" on these pages. Scientists, mathematicians, astronomers etc. have been exchanging information about Mr. Curtis' discovery and the enigma it raises, among themselves for 20 years. They continually troop to his page because they understand the implications. They are trying to discredit the equation before the world finds out about it because the math itself is not that difficult. You won't need to be a math major however to understand the implications of this discovery An Astronomical Enigma

"Special" Hope for Disabled Christians--and for All Christians

My Message Board! - Talk Back! (Quietly)

The Suppression Of Anomalous Science

True Suppressions; Archeological Cover-Ups, Who, What, When and How

Psalm 119:72 "Your hands made me and formed me;
give me understanding to learn your commands."
Jack Holding Maneesha,1993 by Anne Geddes Parkway church of Christ

What Does the Bible Say About Being Saved? - by Mark Roberts !

The "Sinner's Prayer": Where It Came From, Who Created It, Can You Be Saved By Using It?-Staten

The Biologist:Why Survival of the Fittest for Biologist Could Require Schizophrenia

Undersea Explorer Finds New Evidence of Noah's Flood

Ancient Unknown Submerged City, 1/2 Mile Down Off the Coast of Cuba

The Coats Foundation: Educational Scholarships for Christian Colleges--Building better futures Through Education

God Did Not Create, Evil, Cold or Darkness, Part 1
Does the Existence of Good and Evil Prove God Exists? Part 2

Which One of these Twins' beliefs are threatened by Basic Science? Which one's beliefs are sustained by FAITH? Which is the Christian, the Materialist/Evolutionist? They look like matching bookends, but are different as night and day! Fun and Educational!

Noah's Ark Photographed By The CIA?

Another Great Reason Cousins Shouldn't Marry! Geneticists Discover Lack of Human Genetic Variabilty. Its Exactly as If We Were Virtually Wiped Out by Some Worldwide Catastrophy! ...Hmmmmm

A Simple Experiment That "Should" Refute Creationism: What Happened? by Andy Nobles

Plastic Surgery on Neanderthal? Scientists Didn't Like What His Bones Told Them; So They Rearranged His Face!?

In Buried Alive author Jack Cuozzo relates what happens when a creationist gets to roam around loose in the halls of the major Evolutionary Temples of Europe measuring stuff and peering in boxes.Oops.

Cuozzo has an intersting theory about some of the men classified as Neanderthals. What if, individuals had actually lived for hundreds of years each prior to the Flood as the Bible says? What would their bones look like? Would this explain why evidence shows that we have actually "deevolved"--that is ancient man was bigger, stronger, smarter, had better eye sight, lived longer and ate at better restaurants? This also fits with the Bible as we are told that God began to shorten lifespans after death came into the world.

Church of Darwin - The Evolution Religion VS Catholicism & Protestantism!


Page 1 Ooparts, Anomalies & Ancient Technology - Evidence of Noah's Flood?

Dinosaurs In History, Art and Literature