Western scientists refused to take on board the Russian technology of deep
drilling for oil. Now, because of this technology, Russia's oil reserves
currently exceed those of the middle-east combined. Oil is abundant and
hydrocarbons are everywhere in the solar system and some of the planets in this
one have measurable and vast amounts of simple hydrocarbons on and below the
surfaces. Meteorites contain petroleum, so even there we may see the
fallacy of the "fossil fuel" (dead dinosaurs) theory which sprang up in the
19th century without another look since then as it benefits the "scarcity and
control" freaks. What is gathering momentum is the undeniable miracle of
Russian oil reserves and to deny this abiotic origins that deep drilling
technology relied upon in its development is to deny economic salvation for any
country which desires to dig deep enough to find oil everywhere, as Vietnam did
with assisitacne of the USSR with its TIGER oil field. Vietnam was NEVER
known to have any petroleum available. But economic independence is not
the desired reality of the oligarchs which control the "spice," or hydrocarbon
energy. Nations which desire energy indpendence are immediately crushed by
these oligarchs using the US military as its agent. The Bataan nuclear
powerplant is left incomplete when that was shutdown in the Phillippines a few
decades ago. The Phillippines was occupied by the US and posed no nuke
threat, especially back then.
I'm sorry to say that Mark has caught the might as well "bend-over"
bug and this is the disempowerment of individual humans which is sought
by the elite. In 20 years, he will see himself as silly, as those who
believed oil was running out 30 years ago with the FAKE oil embargo and those
who thought the world was headed for a new ice age.
Here's a quote for Mark from a seemingly "benign" European think-tank whose
policies seem to gather ground after disclosure. This is amazing since
these ideas come from what we are told are benign entities with members of the
old-line aristocracy as members:
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with
the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human
intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they
can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder and secretary, respectively,
of the Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
Now, check this out regarding life sprining forth from another space-time
(to see the pics of this spontaneous life, click HERE
PACHECO'S AMAZING EXPERIMENT
As one great example of "spontaneous generation" — complete with the
photographs you can barely wait to lay your eyes on as we continue — take the
case of Dr. Ignacio Ochoa Pacheco, and his intimidating-sounding paper
Ultrastructural and light microscopy analysis of SAPA bions formation and growth
in vitro, from the orgone.org
This paper was published in 2000 and I found it early in 2001, thanks to my
incessant, unending trawling of the Net for goodies.
Pacheco's experiment is very simple. Heat beach sand to white-hot
luminescence, killing all known lifeforms that could live inside. Then deposit
the sand into a test tube, partially filled with some distilled water.
Hermetically seal the test-tube shut with a Bakelite cover, and let the
mixture cool down for an hour. Then pop it in an autoclave and sterilize it.
The autoclave uses temperatures and pressures scientifically proven to kill
all forms of life we now know to exist. Nothing can possibly live through that
treatment. This is how surgical instruments are sterilized so they don't
introduce bacteria into the body of the patient.
Then give your sterilized mixture 24 hours to sit undisturbed. Stand by as
hidden, unacknowledged 'torsion fields' gather up the raw materials in your
tubes and start creating DNA — and life. Fast!
After the 24 hours, skim off the top layer and study the results under a
microscope. Repeat the same sterilization process two more times and continue to
sample and study the results. That's it!
THEN THE UNTHINKABLE HAPPENS…
Remember — all living material should have expired inside that tube after
the first "fractional sterilization". Since the tube was sealed, nothing new
could get in — not bacteria from the air, nor anything else. Nothing at all.
Despite all these obvious facts, a thin layer of 'scum' appeared on the
surface… filled with little living critters! Pacheco referred to this
layer with the technical-sounding term 'supernatant'. Here's a brief excerpt of
the setup in more scientific terms, if you're interested:
Ocean sand was obtained from Mochima National Park in Venezuela. The low
levels of pollution in this area makes it an ideal place for biological studies
of different marine species.
Approximately 1.5 gr. of oceanic sand was placed on a spatula and heated
for 1 minute to [white-hot] incandescence, using the flame of a Bunsen gas
burner (1400 oC).
The heated sand was then introduced in a series of 10 experimental test
tubes (Sx) containing 10 ml of distilled water. The tubes were closed with a
bakelite lid, and kept at room temperature for 1 hour.
A control series of 10 tubes (Sc ), using an equal amount of non-heated
sand and distilled water, was prepared.
In all tubes, the heavier sand particles are deposited under gravity at the
bottom, forming a sediment, while a suspension of particles, mainly soluble salt
and small molecules, form a clear supernatant.
The composition of the control media (supernatant) in the control series
was analyzed using a scanning analyzer Kevex EDX, model D 3.
This supernatant was called Resuspended Marine Media (RMN), since it is
composed of the minerals, salts, proteins and other bio-components present in
the sea sand…
Both series, Sx and Sc, were placed in sterilizing conditions (121 o C, 15
pounds, 40 min.) After that, the tubes were allowed to incubate at room
temperature for 24 hours.
Sterilization was repeated twice during a 48 hour period, allowing 24 hours
of incubation between each sterilization. This process is called fractional
sterilization, and it is used to destroy both spores and vegetative cells in
Pacheco then goes on to explain how he looked at the 'supernatant'
under a light and scanning-electron microscope. He also videotaped some of the
results and studied the X-ray emanations.
THE ENVELOPE, PLEASE…
This is where the fun begins. The samples of sand that had NOT been
heated to white-hot luminescence showed nothing 'alive' after the fractional
On the other hand, fascinating little critters grew out of the
super-heated, sterilized cultures!
One common form Pacheco saw were little fleshy orbs that would start
growing or gathering mineral crystals around their centers. Thus, what you see
here appears to be the very first (microscopic) stages of a clam or shellfish,
arising from inanimate material, gathering minerals around itself to form its
If you look closely you can already see the Golden Mean spiral shape of the
shell forming around the fleshy center:
The next three images are truly stunning. Each of them depict a microscopic
version of a common 'sea fan,' technically known as gorgonia. In order to
set it up, here is a picture of a dried gorgonia specimen:
Pacheco thus named his specimen 'microgorgonia,' and believes he has
discovered a new form of marine life in the process. Here is a view of one
single leaf that probably broke off in the transfer process to the microscope
Here is a close-up on that same leaf, allowing us to see the fine,
porous and obviously living structure within it:
Here is a sample of an unbroken specimen, where the leaves are growing
Here are two pictures of what appear to be simple, microscopic fleshy
Saving the best for last, here we have what appears to be a complex,
multi-cellular organism! This little guy comes fully equipped, in 24 hours flat,
with a head, a large ovoid body and multiple spiny growths as an apparent form
THINKING THE UNTHINKABLE: BURIED EVIDENCE SEES THE LIGHT OF
Again — none of these obvious living organisms could have survived the
sterilization process. Yet, when we give this inert mixture just 24 hours to do
its magic, we're already seeing fantastically complex lifeforms appearing.
It is again interesting to remind ourselves that the samples that did
not use sterilized sand showed no growths of this type. in order to get
the best effect, your source minerals must be as pure as possible.
This, of course, also validates the work of my colleague Dr. Dan Burisch,
, who has taken
the process even further and observed what appear to be micro-wormhole
structures emerging from "the vacuum". They seem to act as precursors to
primitive cellular structures developing spontaneously.
There is much more to this story that I am aware of — including some
astonishing photographic evidence — but it cannot be made public until March of
next year. I will uphold the honor of my promise.
I will say that Burisch became quite concerned when more complex cellular
structures started growing. He killed them off, concerned that they might lead
to a pathogenic virus or some other danger to human life.
SCIENCE TOOK A WRONG TURN IN THE 1800'S
If this is for real, then many scientists should have discovered it
throughout our recent history. Not only does this appear to be true — with
evidence cited in Science of Peace — but there seems to have been a concerted
effort — some might say conspiracy (never!) — to bury all evidence of it.
The Harvard University Press book "Sparks of Life" by James E. Strick sheds
light on a vigorous debate that occurred between 1860 and 1880, regarding
whether such 'spontaneous generation' was possible or not.
A scientific conspiracy is revealed in which legitimate evidence, of the
sort we've just described, was suppressed and buried by luminaries like Louis
Pasteur. The 'authorities' simply refused to believe spontaneous generation was
possible, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Pasteur himself had repeatable results appearing, under sterile laboratory
conditions — but he suppressed his own research in favor of the current model.
Although that model is now almost completely unquestioned, it has left us
with annoying paradoxes like "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
The answer, of course, is "Both exist together as an Intelligent Design, written
into the very energy that makes up our Universe."
This 'conspiracy' aspect of Pasteur and his colleagues is not emphasized in
online write-ups of "Sparks of Life", apparently so as not to dissuade skeptical
scientists from purchasing it.
The important point is that all opposition to this strict, atheist
interpretation of Darwinian evolution — in which no life can form without other
life acting as a precursor — was systematically hammered down into
Then the cover-up came into play. We're only just now breaking free of the
130-year scientific imprisonment that has resulted.
Again, today — August 12, 2007 — the whole playing field has changed.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Lifeforce <lifeforce43@rockymountains..net>
Hi Mark: OUCH!!!!
Your words cut like a knife. Surely you don't mean these
things. To answer your question I am not interested in articles of
faith. But I can see that you are. And I am certainly not a part
of the nutter religious community. A fact that has been some source of
pain for me throughout my life. I am only interested in FACTS and
EVIDENCE. I have been involved in the field of geophysics and law
most of my life. I have been on the inside of the oil industry, and I
hate to disappoint you, but the fight over oil is not about scarcity of
oil. There is an abundance of hydrocarbon fuels. The fight is over
control. And at the very heart, this fight is driven by hard core
zionists who want control of the world. The green agenda has always been
about money, power, and control. It is anti human. It is anti
life. And, energy is one the main levers of power and he who controls
hydrocarbon fuels (that is really what we are talking about) controls the
world. They also seek to control religionists, media, banking,
drugs, and of course the most important-----money and credit. I
think all of that has been accomplished. The only thing left
is total control of energy (hydrocarbons) and the subjugation of
the arab/muslim world. The muslims just don't fit into the new world
odor. And, that is what is going on in the Balkans and the middle
east. That is what the green agenda is all about----power and
control. Am I creationist? No, but I am certainly not a
Darwinist. No evidence to support his "theory." As Dr. Hoyle
once said: "If you accept Darwin's theory of evolution then you might as well
believe that a tornado can sweep through a junkyard and assemble a Boeing
747." On the other hand, I am a student of
quantum/particle physics. If you study that field you will
come to the conclusion that life does in fact spring spontaneously from an
energy field (lifeforce) that every physicist can identify, but no
physicists has ever been able to define, measure, explain or
understand. It is an energy that is everywhere, all of the time.
I believe that energy force is the mind of God. And, that is
my article of faith. You can draw your own conclusions. Keep
your mind open Bud. The world is going to change and the mutants are
losing. We will wean ourselves off the curse of hydrocarbon fuels.
It will take time, but it is coming. The world is evolving into a
higher level of consciousness. Tom
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 6:09
Subject: Re: Fw:
[think-outside-the-box] Arctic ice refuses to melt as ordered--au
In another year or 2 any sane
person will have little doubt oil is running out and any
sane person now knows global warming is real. We're headed for a
massive die-off and new stone age for those unlucky enough to survive and so
what if some predicted it too early. The writing is on the wall at this
late stage. Are you a creationist also? The other people I know who believe
the stuff you do think people used to have pet dinosaurs and that no
one was around, including dinosaurs, before 10,000 years ago. Give me a
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 12:52 PM
Subject: Fw: Fw: [think-outside-the-box] Arctic ice refuses to
melt as ordered--au contraire...
melting of the polar ice, I just got the following comment from a friend who
flies "over the pole" all the time for a major airline. Just
anecdotal, but I had the same observation in March. I was privileged
to fly over the Bering Straights at 39,000 feet and as far as I could
see was nothing but ice in all directions. I think the polar
bears are safe... Tom
We often fly over Greenland, especially on the Moscow runs and I asked
an old-timer captain if the ice looked anymore retreated than when he used
to fly over it back in the early 90s. He said it didn't look any
different from an anecdotal observing point of view. Greenland melt
would be easy to detect, as there would be much more "beach" visible if the
glaciers, snow and ice were retreating.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Lifeforce
OH!!!!! SOMEBODY BETTER CALL AL....
|Arctic ice refuses to melt
15 Aug 08 - "Just a few weeks ago, predictions of Arctic ice
collapse were buzzing all over the internet. Some scientists were
predicting that the "North Pole may be ice-free for first time this
summer". Others predicted that the entire "polar ice cap would
disappear this summer".
"The Arctic melt season is nearly done for this year. The sun
is now very low above the horizon and will set for the winter at the
North Pole in five weeks. And none of these dire predictions have
come to pass. Yet there is, however, something odd going on with the
"The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder,
Colorado released an alarming graph on August 11, showing that
Arctic ice was rapidly disappearing, back towards last year's record
minimum. Their data shows Arctic sea ice extent only 10 per cent
greater than this date in 2007, and the second lowest on record (see
link below to view graphs).
However, a comparison of maps derived from NSIDC data shows
that "Arctic ice extent was 30 per cent greater on August 11, 2008
than it was on the August 12, 2007. (2008 is a leap year, so the
dates are offset by one.)
"... ice has grown in nearly every direction since last summer
- with a large increase in the area north of Siberia. Also note that
the area around the Northwest Passage (west of Greenland) has seen a
significant increase in ice. Some of the islands in the Canadian
Archipelago are surrounded by more ice than they were during the
summer of 1980.
"(The NSIDC graph) appears to disagree with the maps by a
factor of three (10 per cent vs. 30 per cent) - hardly a trivial
"The Arctic did not experience the meltdowns forecast by NSIDC
and the Norwegian Polar Year Secretariat. It didn't even come close.
Additionally, some current graphs and press releases from NSIDC seem
less than conservative. There appears to be a consistent pattern of
overstatement related to Arctic ice loss.
And what of the Antarctic? Down south, ice extent is well ahead
of the recent average. Why isn't NSIDC making similarly high-profile
press releases about the increase in Antarctic ice over the last 30
See entire article by Steven Goddard
groups in the
and favorite meals.
Best of Y! Groups
and nominate your
group to be featured.
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has first
destroyed itself from within." Will Durant
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has first
destroyed itself from within." Will Durant