FEDERAL JUDGE SLAPS VOTERS IN FACE, ENERGIZES PATRIOTS
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com
Before I cover the current status
and action plan regarding Berg v. Obama, et al, I want
to address the McCain-Palin Compliance Fund which I wrote about in my last
column. A couple of people in denial emailed that it just isn't so, I made
it all up or distorted the facts. You may verify for yourself that the
McCain-Palin Compliance Fund was incorporated in the State of
File Number 4509524
MCCAIN-PALIN COMPLIANCE FUND
This is not a statement of good standing
File Number: 4509524
Incorporation Date / Formation
(mm/dd/yyyy) Entity Name: MCCAIN-PALIN COMPLIANCE FUND
Entity Kind: Corporation Entity Type: Non-Profit or Religious
Registered Agent Information:
Name: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY
The registered agent information is defined here. Who or what is The Corporation Trust Company? Please bear with me as this gets a bit convoluted as you extract each thread. First, let me take you to a posting two days ago on Larry Sinclair's web site; he is the man who has accused Obama of cocaine use and a sexual encounter. Please note the statement Sinclair makes at that link questioning who actually wrote the Berg decision for Judge Surrick:
"The original faxed decision from the Clerk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA to attorney Philip J Berg appears to have been faxed to Judge Surrick for him to sign. But if this is the case, the questions becomes who wrote the decision and faxed it for the Judges signature?...What is interesting is not at the TOP of the fax pages; it is at the bottom. The ruling issued by Judge Surrick (?) was actually faxed to the Judge by someone (?) at and the question is who? Did the Obama Attorney's or Surricks old Law Clerk, Christopher Seaman, (who just happens to be employed by Sidley-Austin, the former employer of Barack & Michelle Obama, et al.) write the ruling dismissing the Berg suit?"
What immediately jumped out at me is the name Sidley-Austin. You see, when I did a search for The Corporation Trust Company on Orange Street, Wilmington, DE., this came up (SEC is Security and Exchange Commission):
SEC Info - Ais Futures Fund IV LP
- 10-12G - On
"... in the State of Delaware is
The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street,
Wilmington, New Castle County.
Proceeding to the SEC web site, what did I see?
2. Registered Office. The address
of the registered office of the Partnership in the State of
3. Registered Agent. The name and
address of the registered agent for service of proceae on the Partnership in the
And, who is the agent listed at
the top? Sidley-Austin LLP/FA. AIS Futures Fund's registered agent is
Sidley-Austin. The McCain-Palin Compliance fund incorporated in the State of
McCain announces on
Federal judge slaps the face of voters; spits on the U.S. Constitution
Phil Berg's lawsuit to force production of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate is not a political game, it's a constitutional issue. The most cogent narrative, including excerpts from Judge Surrick's decision is found here. To say millions of us are outraged is putting it mildly. Enraged is more appropriate. If one reads the dishonorable Surrick's words, it becomes apparent this judge, if he is the one who actually wrote the decision, thinks we the people are too stupid to understand his outrageous remarks:
"…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate's ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election."
According to this bench warmer, a candidates INELIGIBILITY to run for office doesn't present an injury to voters! We just accept fraud as eligibility! "Theoretical constitutional harm" experienced by we the people doesn't change as the fraud passes from one phase of the election cycle to another! Surrick is lost in purple haze. Typical of these weenie federal judges, when they can't find the guts to do the right thing, they take the cheap way out and try to pass the buck to the other incompetents, Congress:
"So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide.
"If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint."
In other words, we the people are supposed to sit back and allow a candidate who doesn't meet constitutional requirements for eligibility go ahead, run, get elected via massive vote fraud and hope that down the line Congress might decide to pass some law giving we the people some say in OUR government and election process? Surrick's words must have given Arnold Schwarzenegger a nocturnal emission.
This is beyond outrageous. What
Surrick, who by the way is a
Surrick called Phil's lawsuit to get the truth frivolous. Only after Obama defaulted on the Requests for Admissions did Surrick rule against Phil. All of this could have been avoided if Obama had simply provided a real birth certificate instead of a copy off a laser printer. Since Obama steadfastly refuses to do so, how can anyone (except Obama drones) rationally believe he can prove his citizenship?
The dishonorable Judge Surrick made a very cowardly statement in his ruling: ""Plaintiff would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly contested presidential primary [sic] in living memory."
Obama vetted? There's a rich one. By who? Let's take the FBI files on Obama and his communist mentors; see here.
Obama vetted? How about his life long friendships and relationships with people like Rev. Jeramiah Wright, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, housing slum lord, Resko and Khalid al-Mansour?
Vetted by who, Judge Surrick? The
DNC? Derail the election process by invalidating a candidate on constitutional
grounds because millions of people were lied to about his legal status regarding
eligibility? What a slap in the face to every American who believes in the
supreme law of the land. Guess, what, Judge Surrick: You're damn straight we're
going to get to the bottom of this and if it creates a constitutional crisis, so
be it. Are we a nation of laws or lies? Obama is a nothing more than a
There is something else very
strange about the decision from Surrick and news coverage. Early Saturday
"After reviewing evidence presented by Attorney Philip Berg, US District Court Judge Honorable R. Barry Surrick has ruled that Barack Hussein Obama was not a "natural born" or "naturalized" citizen and is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States."
Surrick's office faxed Phil the
decision at on
Additionally, it appears the decision was faxed to Surrick from an outside source for his signature. After signing the decision, Surrick then faxes it to Phil. Here is the time line. Phil has suggested Surrick might have sent the fax from his home to his office so his office could then send it to Phil. There is an hour difference from the first fax and then Surrick's to Phil. Why the almost hour delay in sending on a Friday after normal business hours? These are some questions that beg answers for clarification.
As for the Andy
Martin lawsuit in
Please bear in mind that nothing in politics happens by accident. These dates are all important.
Obama knows on
Judge Surrick (or a surrogate)
issues his decision in Berg v Obama at
There are now lawsuits in eight
What happens next? I spoke briefly with Phil via phone on Saturday. He said he would file a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit on Monday and then file a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court as time is of the essence.
What can you do? Copy
the press release here. It pretty much sums up what's going on out there.
FAX it to your Secretary of State, State Attorney General and county clerk with
a short cover letter simply stating that until the issue of Obama's birth
certificate is once and for all adjudicated by the courts, we the people demand
no votes are counted for that candidate on
(Notice: Bill Benson's Sixteenth Amendment lawsuit goes to oral arguments tomorrow. This is one of the most important First Amendment cases in the past century. The 7th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument in the government's case against William J. Benson, author of The Law That Never Was–The Fraud of the 16th Amendment and Personal Income Tax.
This oral argument is set for October 28th at 10:00 a.m. CDST in the Main Courtroom, Room 2721 of the United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. There will be a 3 judge panel and each side will be given 20 minutes to make their argument and supplement their legal briefs already submitted. Anyone can attend. As many as possible should attend. Courtroom decorum is expected. This is a great way to give your support to Bill Benson, a great patriot warrior and to one of the finest tax patriot attorneys in the country, Jeff Dickstein. If you can make it, mark your calendar. If you can't make it, please help with donations; click here and be sure to watch the short video.)
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved