Subject: Fw:[think-outside-the-box] Oh my!!! The Plot
Thickens?
Henri,
Sending this to you special in case you can't open
the attachment.
Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: Bea
Bernhausen To: think-outside-the-box@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Sunday, November 09, 2008 1:07 PM Subject: [think-outside-the-box] Oh my!!!
The plot thickens?
Bea Note: Can you imagine????? The 'world
president' dethroned?
This is a bit confusing however--I can't find
any article in today's USA Today online---but the ad is supposed to go in
tomorrow. I guess we will see....I also don't see this on Rense--and he would be
right on it. But for what it's worth here it is... http://www.wethepeo plefoundation. org/UPDATE/
misc2008/ Obama-USA- TODAY-ad. htm ************ **
From an
e-mail correspondent
THE CRISIS DEEPENS!!!!! !
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE AS CIVILIZED PEOPLE IGNORE THE "RULE
OF LAW."
The truth is the truth even if no one believes it, and a
lie is a lie even if everyone believes it. ~Tim Reeter ^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ************
********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ***** Never doubt
that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world;
indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead ^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^
Subject: BERG v. OBAMA ; WE THE PEOPLE - USA TODAY FULL PAGE
Article Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 4:02 PM
BERG v. OBAMA ; WE
THE PEOPLE - USA TODAY FULL PAGE Article 26kb
Two BREAKING NEWS
DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA ; WE THE PEOPLE - USA TODAY FULL PAGE
Article
Pass this one on far and wide. Its the truth. Produce or
withdraw. Friday, November 7, 2008 BREAKING: Two Developments NUMBER
ONE
If The Supreme Court Decides...?
At this point, Supreme Court
Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the
case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th
election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to
the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by
December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth
certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do
that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed
to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who
refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous
Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth
certificate, " says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do
otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution.
Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still
consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of
its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect. "
Also
remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to cast its votes. If
it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore
ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be
duty-bound to honor the Constitution.
NUMBER TWO
Draft of WTP
full-page ad to be published in USA TODAY the week of November 10,
2008:
An Open Letter to Barack Obama:
Are you a Natural Born
Citizen of the U.S.?
Are you legally qualified to hold the Office of
President?
Dear Mr. Obama:
On October 24, 2008, a federal
judge granted your request to dismiss a lawsuit by Citizen Philip Berg, who
challenged your qualifications under the "Natural Born Citizen" clause of the
U.S. Constitution to legally hold the office of President of the United States
of America.
Mr. Berg presented factual evidence to the Court in support
of his claim that you are either a citizen of your father's native Kenya by
birth, or that you became a citizen of Indonesia, relinquishing your prior
citizenship when you moved there with your mother in 1967.
In your
response to the lawsuit, you neither denied Mr. Berg's claims nor submitted any
evidence which would refute his assertions. Instead, you argued that the Court
lacked the jurisdiction to determine the question of your legal eligibility
because Mr. Berg lacked "standing."
Astonishingly, the judge agreed,
simply saying, "[Mr. Berg] would have us derail the democratic process by
invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and underwent
excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly contested presidential
primary [sic] in living memory."
Unfortunately, your response to the
legal claim was clearly evasive and strikingly out of character, suggesting you
may, in fact, lack a critical Constitutional qualification necessary to assume
the Office of President: i.e., that you are not a "natural born" citizen of the
United States or one who has relinquished his American
citizenship.
Before you can exercise any of the powers of the United
States, you must prove that you have fully satisfied each and every eligibility
requirement that the Constitution mandates for any individual's exercise of
those powers.
Regardless of the tactics chosen in defending yourself
against the Berg lawsuit, significant questions regarding your legal capacity to
hold this nation's highest office have been put forth publicly, and you have
failed to directly refute them with documentary evidence that is routinely
available to any bona fide, natural born U.S. Citizen.
As one who has
ventured into the fray of public service of his own volition, seeking to possess
the vast powers of the Office of President, it is not unreasonable to demand
that you produce evidence of your citizenship to answer the questions and allay
the concerns of the People. Indeed, as the one seeking the office, you are under
a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence to establish your
qualifications as explicitly mandated by Article II of the
Constitution.
Should you proceed to assume the office of the President of
the United States as anything but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United
States that has not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a
national disaster, placing our Republic at great risk from untold consequences.
For example:
· Neither the Electoral College on December 15, nor the
House of Representatives on January 6 would be able to elect you, except as a
poseur - a usurper;
· As a usurper, you would be unable to take the
required "Oath or Affirmation" of office on January 20 without committing the
crime of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible for the Office of the
President you cannot faithfully execute the Office of the President of the
United States;
· Your every act in the usurped Office of the President
would be a criminal offense as an act under color of law that would subject the
People to the deprivation of their constitutional rights, and entitling you to
no obedience whatsoever from the People;
· as a usurper acting in the
guise of the President you could not function as the Commander in Chief of the
Army and Navy and of the militia of the several states, as such forces would be
under no legal obligation to remain obedient to you;
· No one in any
civilian agency in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of your
proclamations, executive orders or directives, as such orders would be legally
VOID;
· Your appointment of Ambassadors and Judges to the Supreme Court
would be VOID ab initio (i.e., from the beginning), no matter what subsequent
actions the Senate might take as well as rendering any such acts by such
appointed officials void as well;
· Congress would not be able to pass
any new laws because they would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona
fide President, rendering all such legislation legally VOID;
· As a
usurper, Congress would be unable to remove you from the Office of the President
on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including a potential for armed
conflicts within the General Government or among the States and the People to
effect the removal of such a usurper.
As an attorney and sitting U.S.
Senator, I'm sure you agree that our Constitution is the cornerstone of our
system of governance. It is the very foundation of our system of Law and Order –
indeed, it is the supreme law of the land. I'm sure you also agree that its
precise language was no accident and cannot be ignored if Individual,
unalienable, natural Rights, Freedoms and Liberties are to be protected and
preserved.
As our next potential President, you have a high-order
obligation to the Constitution (and to those who have fought and died for our
Freedom) that extends far beyond that of securing a majority of the votes of the
Electoral College. No matter your promises of change and prosperity, your
heartfelt intent or the widespread support you have garnered in seeking the
highest Office of the Land, the integrity of the Republic and Rule of Law
cannot, -- must not -- be put at risk, by allowing a constitutionally
unqualified person to sit, as a usurper, in the Office of the
President.
No matter the level of practical difficulty, embarrassment or
disruption of the nation's business, we must -- above all -- honor and protect
the Constitution and the divine, unalienable, Individual Rights it guarantees,
including the Right to a President who is a natural born citizen of the United
States of America that has not relinquished his American citizenship. Our nation
has endured similar disruptions in the past, and will weather this crisis as
well. Indeed, it is both yours and the People's mutual respect for, and
commitment to, the Constitution and Rule of Law that insures the perpetuation of
Liberty.
As a long time defender of my state and federal Constitutions,
and in consideration of the lack of sufficient evidence needed to establish your
credentials as President, I am compelled to lodge this Petition for Redress of
Grievances and public challenge to you.
Make no mistake: This issue IS a
Constitutional crisis. Although it will not be easy for you, your family or our
Republic, you have it within your ability to halt this escalating crisis by
either producing the certified documents establishing beyond question your
qualifications to hold the Office of President, or by immediately withdrawing
yourself from the Electoral College process.
With due respect, I hereby
request that you deliver the following documents to Mr. Berg and myself at the
National Press Club in Washington, DC at noon on Monday, November 17,
2008:
(a) a certified copy of your "vault" (original long version) birth
certificate; (b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth
certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama,
Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham; (c) a certified copy of your Certification
of Citizenship; (d) a certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon
age of maturity; (e) certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental
College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and (f) certified
copies of any court orders or legal documents changing your name from Barry
Soetoro.
In the alternative, in defense of the Constitution, and in honor
of the Republic and that for which it stands, please announce before such time
your withdrawal from the 2008 Presidential election process.
"In a
government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it
fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the
omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its
example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy." Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 469-471.
Thank you
for your understanding and cooperation in this
matter.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Schulz, Founder and Chairman, We
The People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc.
http://www.wethepeo plefoundation. org/UPDATE/
misc2008/ Obama-USA- TODAY-ad. htm -- The authentic human being is
one of us who instinctively knows what he should not do, and, in addition, he
will balk at doing it. He will refuse to do it, even if this brings down dread
consequences to him and to those whom he loves. This, to me, is the ultimately
heroic trait of ordinary people; they say no to the tyrant and they calmly take
the consequences of this resistance. Their deeds may be small, and almost always
unnoticed, unmarked by history. Their names are not remembered, nor did these
authentic humans expect their names to be remembered. I see their authenticity
in an odd way: not in their willingness to perform great heroic deeds but in
their quiet refusals. In essence, they cannot be compelled to be what they are
not. -----