this is some months old but I decided to send it anyway... I read invisible
some 15 years ago and it has proven true and truer.
****Google "Invisible Contracts" for the whole
(There is a) private agreement (that) you continue
to maintain with the
Secretary of the Treasury (which agreement places you
into a written, equity
relationship with the United
(P)rivate agreements will always overrule the Constitution and
the Bill of
Rights. Thus, specific agreements governing individual
always overrule broad general clauses found in the
words, one does not get to use the Bill of Rights to
weasel out of private
agreements, while retaining the gain that the agreement
gave him in the
You probably have heard it said that
Federal Judges will tell defendants and
counsel in Section 7203
Willful Failure To File criminal trials that "..
the Constitution does not
That statement shocks most people up a wall but it
is an accurate and
correct statement. The Judge will never tell you why,
because the Judge is merely enforcing private agreements the
signed with the Secretary of the Treasury.
The agreement the Judge
front of him is not the defendant's 1040 or the defendant's W-2/4;
merely declarations of facts and no profit or gain is experienced
(B)anks are instrumentalities of the Congress. In other words,
interstate system of banks is the private property of the King. This
that any profit or gain anyone experienced by
institution carries with it as an operation of law the
full force and effect as if the King himself created the gain.
So as an
operation of law, anyone who has a depository relationship, or a
relationship, with a bank, such as checking, savings, CD's, charge
car loan, real estate mortgages, etc., is experiencing profit and
created by the King so says the Supreme Court.
In the words of
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter: "Equity is brutal
" but we are
merely enforcing agreements.
If you would go back to your bank and ask
the manager to show you your
signature card again, in small print you will
see the words: "The
undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of
Have you ever asked to see a copy of the bank rules? If you
have, you will
read and find out that you agreed to abide by all of the
rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury, among many other
(T)he Judge is operating on the penal clause to a civil
(T)he King creates a "juristic personality" at the time you
open your bank
account. And it is that juristic personality (its
income and assets) that
the King's Agents are "excising" back to the King.
But in any event, the
taxing power of the Congress attaches by contract or
use of the King's
property. The Congress does not have the jurisdiction to
use the police
powers to raise revenue.
That is the
which Federal Judges are enforcing the law not
by ruling over Gestapo Star
(I)f the 16th Amendment were somehow repealed tomorrow morning
at 9:00 a.m.
it would not change a single thing (other than the IRS would
have to start
giving people a correct presentation of the law to justify the
IRS and the excise tax on juristic persons would continue on as
(Y)ou are in written contractual equity with the
When you trace back the genealogy of your signature on your bank
will find that you agreed to be bound by Title 26
handles this "bank account = equity relationship" on a military
"need-to-know" only type basis.
This type of equity jurisdiction
attaches by written consent.
(Y)ou are in an equity relationship with
the King and private agreements
overrule the Bill of Rights.
Hoffman says, "If you owe taxes, you must pay them. Period." On
activity, absolutely; the Constitution agrees. Privileged
taxable. On the other hand, government cannot tax us for the
exercise of our
rights, or they are no longer truly rights.
comments at http://truthofthestory.blogspot.com/
The Truth of the
Story is not for everyone.