Subject: Our debt to Jimmy Carter - editorial in
Ha'aretz
The highly reputable Israeli daily newspaper,
Ha'aretz, in its issue of April 15th, takes on
directly the Zionist establishment, in Israel and elsewhere, over the
work and the recent Middle East sojourn of ex-President Jimmy Carter.
Would that leading American journals adopted the laudable standards of
Ha'aretz.
QUOTED EXCERPT: The
government of Israel is boycotting Jimmy Carter, the 39th president of the
United States, during his visit here this
week. Ehud Olmert, who has not
managed to achieve any peace agreement during his public life, and who even
tried to undermine negotiations in the past, "could not find the time" to meet
the American president who is a signatory to the peace agreement with Egypt. .
. . The boycott will not be remembered as a glorious moment in this
government's history. Jimmy Carter has dedicated his life to humanitarian
missions, to peace, to promoting democratic elections, and to better
understanding between enemies throughout the world. . . . Israelis have not
liked him since he wrote the book "Palestine: Peace not
Apartheid." Israel is not ready for such comparisons, even though
the situation begs it. It is doubtful whether it is possible to complain when
an outside observer, especially a former U.S. president who is well versed in
international affairs, sees in the system of separate roads for Jews and
Arabs, the lack of freedom of movement, Israel's control over Palestinian
lands and their confiscation, and especially the continued settlement
activity, which contravenes all promises Israel made and signed, a matter that
cannot be accepted. The interim political situation in the territories
has crystallized into a kind of apartheid that has been ongoing for
40 years. . . . In the peace agreement with Egypt, 30 years ago,
Israel agreed to "full autonomy" for the occupied territories, not
to settle there. These promises have been forgotten
by Israel, but Carter remembers. Whether Carter's approach to
conflict resolution is considered by the Israeli government as appropriate or
defeatist, no one can take away from the former U.S. president his
international standing, nor the fact that he brought Israel and Egypt to a
signed peace that has since held. Carter's method, which says that it is
necessary to talk with every one, has still not proven to be any less
successful than the method that calls for boycotts and air strikes. In terms
of results, at the end of the day, Carter beats out any of those who ostracize
him. For the peace agreement with Egypt, he deserves the respect reserved for
royalty for the rest of his life. END QUOTE