----- Original Message -----
From: John E Marsh
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:57 PM
Subject: Our debt to Jimmy Carter - editorial in Ha'aretz

The highly reputable Israeli daily newspaper, Ha'aretz, in its issue of April 15th, takes on directly the Zionist establishment, in Israel and elsewhere, over the work and the recent Middle East sojourn of ex-President Jimmy Carter.  Would that leading American journals adopted the laudable standards of Ha'aretz.

 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn..jhtml?itemNo=974893
 
QUOTED EXCERPT:    The government of Israel is boycotting Jimmy Carter, the 39th president of the United States, during his visit here this week. Ehud Olmert, who has not managed to achieve any peace agreement during his public life, and who even tried to undermine negotiations in the past, "could not find the time" to meet the American president who is a signatory to the peace agreement with Egypt. . . . The boycott will not be remembered as a glorious moment in this government's history. Jimmy Carter has dedicated his life to humanitarian missions, to peace, to promoting democratic elections, and to better understanding between enemies throughout the world. . . . Israelis have not liked him since he wrote the book "Palestine: Peace not Apartheid."   Israel is not ready for such comparisons, even though the situation begs it. It is doubtful whether it is possible to complain when an outside observer, especially a former U.S. president who is well versed in international affairs, sees in the system of separate roads for Jews and Arabs, the lack of freedom of movement, Israel's control over Palestinian lands and their confiscation, and especially the continued settlement activity, which contravenes all promises Israel made and signed, a matter that cannot be accepted. The interim political situation in the territories has crystallized into a kind of apartheid that has been ongoing for 40 years. . . . In the peace agreement with Egypt, 30 years ago, Israel agreed to "full autonomy" for the occupied territories, not to settle there.   These promises have been forgotten by Israel, but Carter remembers.   Whether Carter's approach to conflict resolution is considered by the Israeli government as appropriate or defeatist, no one can take away from the former U.S. president his international standing, nor the fact that he brought Israel and Egypt to a signed peace that has since held. Carter's method, which says that it is necessary to talk with every one, has still not proven to be any less successful than the method that calls for boycotts and air strikes. In terms of results, at the end of the day, Carter beats out any of those who ostracize him. For the peace agreement with Egypt, he deserves the respect reserved for royalty for the rest of his life.    END QUOTE
 
Regards,  John


Upgrade Your Email - Click here!