- In the art of surveillance, there is a cunning ploy,
familiar to the readers of Le Carre: the target is followed by a
clumsy gumshoe; he discovers he is being tailed, easily shakes the
tail off and goes on, feeling secure and unobserved. Unbeknownst to
him, there are other detectives who stick to him like glue and follow
him to his perdition. Professionally it is called a "double
tail".
-
- Apparently, some of us were duped by such a ruse in
the peculiar affair of a Zionist plot to infiltrate Wikipedia. This
powerful online encyclopaedia is ostensibly free and open: everyone
can be an editor, add or edit any entry. Editors remain anonymous;
their true identity is hidden behind a nickname. This rule has a
serious drawback: using this anonymity, a dedicated group may
infiltrate the system by stealth, distort reality and create a false
picture of the world in the eyes of billions. Apparently this script
has been recently enacted.
-
- Conspiracy? Yes. Jewish conspiracy? You bet! The
damning email exchange was intercepted and published,
revealing a radical Zionist plot to bend "Wiki." A moderate leftist
(some would call it 'tame') US-based pro-Palestinian site EI revealed
that the radical-extremist Zionist organisation CAMERA called for
"volunteers who can work as 'editors' to ensure" that Israel-related
articles on Wikipedia agree with their right-wing-Zionist agenda. This
effort was to be kept secret from the media and the public. Stealth
and misrepresentation were presented as the keys to success. A CAMERA
official advised the volunteers to sign up as editors for Wikipedia
and afterwards to avoid editing Israel-related material for a while,
in order to "avoid the appearance of being one-topic editors". The
orchestrated effort was to appear as if it were the work of
unaffiliated individuals, and for this reason the editors were to
avoid picking a user name that marked them as pro-Israel, or that let
people know their real name. The emails taught Zionist apprentices how
to act in the interests of Israel while using neutral language. The
emphasis was on the long run side of the operation: "This is a
marathon not a sprint", a Zionist instructor nicknamed 'Zeq' taught
his apprentices in the email exchange.
-
- The EI article about this revelation was quite
sycophantic towards Wikipedia. It presented Wiki as an objective
source at loggerheads with Zionist infiltrators, and even bordered on
advertising: "Openness and good faith are among Wikipedia's core
principles. Any person in the world can write or edit articles, but
Wikipedia has strict guidelines and procedures for accountability
intended to ensure quality control and prevent vandalism, plagiarism
or distortion. It is because of these safeguards that articles on key
elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained
well-referenced, useful and objective."
-
- Still, it was not enough, and on the next day, 22
April 2008, EI updated this article with a triumphal and calming
statement: "a plan by the pro-Israel pressure group CAMERA to skew
Wikipedia in a pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed after it
was exposed by EI". Zeq was dismissed, and anyway, fewer than a dozen
of Camera moles were active at the time EI exposed the scheme. In
short: everything is fine, Wiki is functioning well, and the Zionist
scare is gone, thanks to fearless EI. And anyway, it was only a small
operation by the enemies of freedom, and it is over.
-
- Excuse me, is this an article, or a paid
advertisement for Wikipedia? Did EI receive on evening April 21st an
offer they could not refuse from the owner of Wiki? Only a Zionist can
think that Wiki "articles on key elements of the Palestine-Israel
conflict have generally remained well-referenced, useful and
objective." On the contrary, they are biased in the extreme; just
read, for instance, an exceedingly hostile entry on Hamas, including
its Talk, i.e. discussions of editors, deletions and corrections. It
defines Hamas as " best known for multiple suicide bombings and other
attacks directed against civilians [known to whom? To me it is best
known as the ruling party of Palestine, and secondly, as grassroots
mutual assistance movement ISH] Hamas' charter calls for the
destruction of the State of Israel [while all prominent Israeli
parties joined in destruction of Palestine ISH] the organization
is described by many as antisemitic." Is that objective? Further the
entry says, inter alia: Hamas is considered by the US a terrorist
organisation. This is true, but not the whole truth. I personally
added: However, Russia refused to consider Hamas a terrorist
organisation. My addition was immediately removed by ever-watchful
Zionist case-officer. Hamas is terrorist, full stop.
-
- Only a dishonest fool, or a man who never used
Wikipedia, may think that plan of the Lobby "to skew Wikipedia in a
pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed". The clumsy gumshoe
was shaken off, for Camera is but a bunch of amateurs, extreme Jewish
nationalists with some nuisance value. They do not represent the
Jewish mainstream; but they do play a useful part: they make the
mainstream appear moderate. Being hassled by Camera is like being
hassled by the Klan it proves nothing. They hassle everybody,
even moderate Zionists and other fellow-philosemites whom Camera
fanatics consider insufficiently zealous, such as Johann
Hari, an English professional philosemite who recently
boasted: "I have worked undercover at both the Finsbury Park mosque
and among neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers to expose the Jew-hatred there; I
went on the Islam Channel to challenge the anti-Semitism of Islamists,
I received a rash of death threats calling me 'a Jew-lover''. Later he
strayed farther afield and wrote about Israeli sewage pouring all over
Gaza. Afterwards, he complained, "Camera said I am an anti-Jewish
bigot akin to Joseph Goebbels."
-
- Now, when the amateurs are disgraced and gone, the
professionals remain. Wiki is as partial to Jews as the Jewish
Chronicle. The picture of the world it offers is being edited and
shaped in full accordance with general Jewish world view thanks to a
group of permanent and devoted editors and arbiters.
-
- Freedom to add and edit is just a bait attracting
millions unpaid contributors. If Wiki were truly free, provided that
"ordinary people' are in vast majority, we could expect to find a
democratic world view, not one not perverted by a biased minority, but
the real Wikipedia does not work that way. The apparent chaos of Wiki
is strictly controlled by a hierarchy of Agents Smith, who secure the
Wiki matrix. They delete references to Jewish misdeeds, but emphasize
every good deed by a Jew. Israel/Palestine is just one area in what is
truly universal agenda. For instance, they block and remove attempts
to mention the Jewish origin of the founder of Satanist movement, one
La Vey (originally Levy), though this explains his hatred towards
Christianity. They insist on inferiority of Poincare versus Einstein,
of Jung versus Freud or Proudhon versus Marx. Every act against Jews
is recorded; every act of Jews against goyim is blotted out from this
organised memory of our generation. These editors can manage just
fine, thank you, without amateur infiltrators.
-
- Zeq has been banned for his indiscretions, but the
man he wrote of so admiringly, whom he described as their role model
to his apprentices ("work with him and learn from him"), an ideal,.
effective Zionist Wikipedia editor called Jayjg, is still there. Jayjg
is not just an editor; he is an arbiter, what passes for a judge on
the Wikipedia. He was appointed to that position by the site owner
himself. He is an Agent Smith of the Wiki matrix. One may see his work
in many, many entries: clever and unscrupulous, he is a master of the
subterfuge and deceit.
-
- Another, superior Agent Smith is Cberlet or John
Foster (Chip) Berlet, the scourge of the web. He is acting under many
names. He is a collaborator with the ADL, the Jewish thought police.
Though he previously denied having any relationship to ADL, he
admitted to Israeli Foreign Affairs that he "had had quite a cordial
professional relationship with the ADL" and "had been doing research
in cooperation with ADL". The New York City Jewish newspaper "Forward"
reported that Berlet transferred information from FBI anti-Communist
informer directly to ADL. Ace
Hayes wrote: "John Foster "Chip" Berlet has been involved,
over the past half decade, in attacking virtually every independent
critic of the Imperial State that the reader can name." His operation
is financed by Ford Foundation. Michael Collins Piper in his
monumental book on the Kennedy assassination, Final
Judgment, asserts that Chip Berlet is a CIA agent. Naturally, his
own entry in Wiki is protected from editing. The Arbitration committee
(those who hold the reigns of power on the Wiki) "admit to
hero-worship of Cberlet', as I was informed by a prominent
insider.
-
- These men are discreet, they won't babble about
their devotion to the Jewish cause; they hide it under the veil of
bureaucratic expressions and abbreviations. Their supporting cast
includes some Jewish "antizionists" like RolandR. This is actually a
British Trotskyite trade union apparatchik Roland Rance, who does not
mind to cooperate with convinced anti-Communist, CIA and ADL agent
Berlet and with zealous Zionist Jayjg. So much for his antizionism and
his socialism! He, and thousands of smaller wanna-be Agents Smith did
not need the starry-eyed arch-Zionists of CAMERA, they are already
in.
-
- The "revelation" of EI is nothing but a subterfuge,
a "double tail" executed to increase our trust in Wiki. A similar
"double tail" operation was performed last year, when Wiki
"announced it had found CIA-made edits on a few pages. Careful reading
of that "revelation" was even more disappointing than that of EI. The
worst discovered CIA edit of President Ahmadinejad entry was 'added
exclamation "Wahhhhhh!", while "other changes that have been made are
more innocuous, and include tweaks to the profile of former CIA chief
Porter Goss and celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey." This is
ridiculous: the US secret services spend many billions per annum in
their drive for domination of the Web. A recent report speaks of $30
billion allocated by the Pentagon for an "electronic Manhattan
Project" in order to fight the Web. And they want us to believe that
all these billions produced an exclamation "Wahhhhhh!"? Alas, it is
just another "double tail" sting by the usual suspects.
-
- 2
-
- The Wiki entries on Palestine/Israel are far from
"well-referenced, useful and objective" as the dupes of EI claim. On
the second thought, are they dupes, or willing collaborators? The top
man in EI is Electronic Ali, as Ali Abunima is nicknamed, the man who
began the witch hunt against "Shamir the antisemite". He is the Arab
front for various exclusively Jewish organisations for Palestine, who
rather promote the Jewish cause and fight antisemitism. Such Jewish
bodies like to have a compliant shabbesgoy (as Rosa Luxemburg called
these guys) for a front, and Ali fits the bill perfectly. Even this
article on Wiki has some reference to 'evil antisemites'.
-
- In his attack on me, Electronic Ali acted together
with the execrable Hussein Ibish, but since then, the thieves have
fallen apart. Another prominent EI person is, or was, Nigel Parry, a
British antisemitism-fighter, their webmaster and probably also their
case officer. Nigel Perry is an enforcer of Political Correctness and
is Gatekeeper General of the permitted discourse on Palestine, keeping
it between hard Likud and the soft Peace Now. He proudly mentions many
years of involvement with the Palestinian cause. Well, such guys are a
reason why the Palestinian cause looks the way it does.
-
- Why, we could have One State, a single unified state
in Israel/Palestine by now, but for these guys. Looking back, it was a
possible development in 2001, sometime before 9/11, when my call for
One State was heeded by many Israelis and Americans, and supported by
major American newspapers. Then these men began their campaign to
denigrate me and scared the supporters away. "Shamir is discredited
and marginalised", they wrote with satisfaction. For them, it did not
matter that together with me, they discredited and marginalised the
idea of One State -- the only possible peaceful solution to our
conflict.
-
- The final battle was fought on the Wikipedia site,
where Ali-Ibish-Parry provided ammunition to Zionist Agent Smith Jayjg
and ADL's own Barlet, with the ADL-sponsored block of "antifascist"
e-zines: British Searchlight, Norwegian Monitor, Swedish Expo,
American Trotskyite Socialist Viewpoint et al. These formidable forces
were counteracted by our wonderful friend Joh Domingo, a South African
fighter against apartheid, and our French friend Omnivore. You can
read the protocols of the battle Here
"They decided to make me a Swedish neonazi impostor, instead of the
Israeli writer I am.
-
- All the time this battle was going on, I lived in my
Jaffa house, receiving endless visitors, giving numerous interviews,
going to work, seeing people but I might as well have been dead.
I felt like Doc Daneeka, a character in Joseph Heller's witty
Catch-22, who was declared dead as the plane he was supposed to fly
was downed. "I am alive!" he shouted. "Here we have a paper saying you
are dead", they replied. His wife "inherited" his property, he was
stricken from the lists, they stopped serving him food, and even his
friends and comrades looked askance when he appeared. This is the
power of an official-looking document or a webpage blue with
hyperlinks. Thus I have learned the dreadful power of an
encyclopaedia: it does not reflect the world, but rather creates the
world. Wiki is linked to thousands of sites; whether you look at
answers.com or at an Arab English-language site, you'll be led to Wiki
with its lies.
-
- If an encyclopaedia said I am a Swedish neonazi
antisemite, nothing could change it. I could scream all day long:
"Look, here I am, in Jaffa" but they would reply: "Here we have an
official paper saying that you are not". I am very grateful to Joh
Domingo for his superhuman efforts, but he could not overcome the
Agents Smith. Neither could I. If tomorrow they decide to make you a
little green man from Mars, they will succeed, too. And then, even
your friends will look behind you for your flying saucer.
-
- A few days ago, I spoke to a group of Indian
intellectuals in Delhi, and afterwards I received this touching letter
from Come Carpentier, a French expat writer living in the Indian
capital. He wrote: "I meant to thank you for these enlightening,
balanced and always objective yet passionate words you spoke that
evening...Listening to them dispels even better than reading you the
reputation that you have been given by you-know-who as a firebrand
defamer of Israel, holocaust denier, Nazi apologist and so on and so
forth... Not to mention the rumours about your being a clandestine
Swedish Far Right-winger infiltrated in the Holy Land by
the international Islamo-Fascist Cabal!"
-
- III
-
- In a way, pro-Jewish bias of Wiki is unavoidable
bearing in mind Jewish positions in Western discourse, media and
universities. Jews even people of Jewish origin are likely
to correct discourse in a flattering for them way. They did it hundred
years ago, and five hundred years ago. Provided they do it in one
direction, they constitute the only entity (besides the undermined
Church and its Orders) capable of a marathon (in words of Zeq) - of
sustaining a long-run operation.
- A hundred years ago, a New York lawyer Samuel
Untermeyer financed the first Scofield Reference Bible; since then,
the Scofield Bibles are being republished in newer even more
pro-Jewish editions and they bring in millions of Christian
Zionists.
-
- Joachim Martillo writes in his Judonia:
"Jewish efforts benefit from organizational memory that does not exist
in other lobbying situations. The longevity of Jewish Federation
organizations can give Israel Lobbying efforts a generational aspect
not seen elsewhere. For example, Israel Advocacy organizations worked
for fifty years to delegitimize Arabists in the Foreign Service and
State Department, and replace them with Israel-sympathetic personnel".
-
- Martllo erroneously connects this result with some
specific pro-Israel organisation. Success of Zionism (and incidentally
its crimes) is just the strawberry on top of the Jewish success cake.
The Jews are engaged in advocacy of Jews, and consequently they
delegitimize Arabists, or priests, or independent historians who do
not subscribe to the notion that Jews are special in consistently
beneficial way. Zionism is a result of Jewish pruning of history, and
this pruned history is what we were taught.
-
- There are no Arab sheiks or Russian oligarchs or
American oilmen ready to finance anything long term of no immediate
relevancy. They do not understand that practically every entry of
encyclopaedia, every textbook influence future generations. A correct
entry on, say, Poincare or monotheism or Persian invasion could save
potential Zionists from their delusions of grandeur.
-
- Wikipedia is a great idea for Jews: people of all
nations from all over the world contribute of their knowledge, and
then this Summa is pruned in the way acceptable to the pro-Jewish
gardeners. Despite its "free" image, Wikipedia is part and parcel of
the immense Judaised media holding, and thus is as biased as any other
publication of the group from the New York Times (owned by Sulzberger)
to Liberation (owned by Rothschild) to hundreds of Murdock
papers.
-
- Conclusion
-
- Wikipedia is an important asset, like the New York
Times, but both are in the hands of enemies of freedom. Sometimes good
and truthful articles or entries are to be found in both, but these
are specks of gold dust placed there to salt the dud mine. We
certainly want to democratise both; to make both really democratic and
accessible. Until this is done, we should explain that both are tools
of mind control not to be trusted or taken at face value. If Wiki
wants to preserve some of its reliability, it must get rid of its
Zionist enforcers. Not only of the CAMERA bumpkins, but of the hard
men in black suits, the Agents Smith.
-
-
- In an article
by Osamah Khalil of Berkeley EI deservedly took Ibish to task for his
"defense of Abbas' strategy of deference and obsequiousness to the US
and Israel. According to Ibish's issue paper, Abbas' problem is not
that he is a failed, corrupt and ineffectual leader who appears to
Palestinians as an eager American tool, but that he is "uninspiring"
and "lacks the charisma that many politicians rely upon, and is not an
emotive speaker." Ibish's screed, continues EI, "deliberately ignores
a thugocracy in Palestinian politics as embodied by Mohammad Dahlan,
Jibril Rajoub and their ilk." His idea of an independent secular
Palestinian state is a US-backed government of thieves and their
enforcers Ibish derides reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas as
"utopian", as for him there is no alternative to Abbas' rule, American
hyperpower, and Israel's military and economic dominance in the Middle
East."
-
-
- For your viewing pleasure...
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbbWaUa3oKU
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iefnjc2uhk8
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iefnjc2uhk8
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYIAeGa3oVM
|
