We, the Salt of the Earth, Take Precedence
by Paul Craig Roberts
July
2, 2008
Which country is the rogue nation? Iraq? Iran? Or the United
States?
Syndicated columnist Charley Reese asks this question in a recently
published article.
Reese notes that it is the US that routinely
commits "acts of
aggression around the globe."
The US government has
no qualms about dropping bombs on civilians
whether they be in Serbia, the
Middle East, or Africa. It is all in
a good cause – our cause.
This
slaughtering of foreigners doesn't seem to bother the American
public.
Americans take it for granted that Americans are superior
and that American
purposes, whatever they be, take precedence over
the rights of other people
to life and to a political existence
independent of American hegemony.
The Bush regime has come up with a preemption doctrine that
justifies attacking a country in order to prevent the country from
possibly becoming a future threat to the US. "Threat" is broadly
defined. It appears to mean the ability to withstand the imposition
of
US hegemony. This insane doctrine justifies attacking China and
Russia, a
direction in which the Republican presidential candidate
John McCain seems
to lean.
The callousness of Americans toward the lives of other peoples
is
stunning. How many Christian churches ask God's forgiveness for
having been rushed into an error that has killed, maimed, and
displaced
a quarter of the Iraqi population?
How many Christian churches ask God
to give better guidance to our
government so that it does not repeat the
error and crime by
attacking Iran?
The indifference of Americans to
others flows from "American
exceptionalism,
mission to impose their virtue on the rest of the
world. Like the
French revolutionaries, Americans don't seem to care how
many people
they kill in the process of spreading their exceptionalism.
American exceptionalism has swelled Americans' heads, filling them
with hubris and self-righteousness and making Americans believe that
they are the salt of the earth.
Three recent books are good
antidotes for this unjustified self-
esteem. One is Patrick J. Buchanan's
Churchill, Hitler, and the
Unnecessary War. Another is After the Reich: The
Brutal History of
the Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh, and a third is
John
Pilger's Freedom Next Time.
Buchanan's latest book is by far
his best. It is spell-binding from
his opening sentence: "All about us we
can see clearly now that the
West is passing away." As the pages turn, the
comfortable myths,
produced by history written by the victors, are swept
aside. The
veil is lifted to reveal the true faces of British and American
exceptionalism: stupidity and deceit.
Buchanan's strength is that he
lets the story be told by Britain's
greatest 20th century historians and the
memoirs of the participants
in the events that destroyed the West's
dominance and moral
character. Buchanan's contribution is to assemble the
collective
judgment of a hundred historians.
As I read the tale, it
is a story of hubris destroying judgment and
substituting in its place
blunder and miscalculation. Both world
wars began when England, for no sound
or sensible reason, declared
war on Germany. Winston Churchill was a prime
instigator of both
wars. He seems to have been a person who needed a war
stage in order
to be a "great man."
The American President Woodrow
Wilson shares responsibility with
Britain and France for the Versailles
Treaty, which dismembered
Germany, stripping her of territory and putting
millions of Germans
under foreign rule, and imposed reparations that
Britain's greatest
economist, John Maynard Keynes, correctly predicted to be
unrealistic. All of this was done in violation of assurances given
to
Germany that there would be no reparations or boundary changes.
Once Germany
surrendered, the assurances were withdrawn, and a
starvation blockade forced
German submission to the new harsh terms.
Hitler's program was to put
Germany back together. He was succeeding
without war until Churchill
provoked Chamberlain into an insane act.
Danzig was 95 percent German. It
had been given to Poland by the
Versailles Treaty. Hitler was negotiating
its return and offered in
exchange a guarantee of Poland's frontiers. The
Polish colonels,
assessing the relative strengths of Poland and Germany,
understood
that a deal was better than a war. But suddenly, the British
Prime
Minister issued Poland a guarantee of its existing territory,
including Danzig, whose inhabitants wished to return to Germany.
Buchanan produces one historian after another to testify that
British miscalculations and blunders, culminating in Chamberlain'
worthless and provocative "guarantee" to Poland, brought the West
into a
war that Hitler did not want, a war that destroyed the
British Empire and
left Britain a dependency of America, a war that
delivered Poland, a chunk
of Germany, all of Eastern Europe, and the
Baltic states to Joseph Stalin, a
war that left the Western allies
with a 45-year cold war against the
nuclear-armed Soviet Union.
People resist the shattering of their
illusions, and many are angry
with Buchanan for assembling the facts of the
case that
distinguished historians have provided.
Churchill admirers
are outraged that their hero is revealed as the
first war criminal of World
War II. It was Churchill who initiated
the policy of terror bombing
civilians in non-combatant areas.
Buchanan quotes B.H. Liddell Hart: "When
Mr. Churchill came into
power, one of the first decisions of his government
was to extend
bombing to the non-combatant area."
In holding
Churchill to account, Buchanan makes no apologies for
Hitler, but the ease
with which Churchill set aside moral
considerations is discomforting.
Buchanan documents that Churchill's plan was to destroy 50% of
German homes. Churchill also had plans for using chemical and
biological
warfare against German civilians. In 2001 the Glasgow
Sunday Herald reported
Churchill's plan to drop five million anthrax
cakes onto German pastures in
order to poison the cattle and through
them the people. Churchill instructed
the RAF to consider
drenching "the cities of the Ruhr and many other cities
in Germany"
with poison gas "in such a way that most of the population would
be
requiring constant medical attention."
"It is absurd to consider
morality on this topic," the great man
declared.
Paul Johnson, a
favorite historian of conservatives, notes that
Churchill's policy of terror
bombing civilians was "approved in
cabinet, endorsed by parliament and, so
far as can be judged,
enthusiastically backed by the bulk of the British
people." Thus,
the terror bombing of civilians, which "marked a critical
stage in
the moral declension of humanity in our times," fulfilled "all the
conditions of the process of consent in a democracy under law."
British historian F.J.P. Veale concluded that Churchill's policy of
indiscriminate bombing of civilians caused an
unprecedented "reversion
to primary and total warfare" associated
with "Sennacherib, Genghis Khan,
and Tamerlane."
The Americans were quick to follow Churchill's lead.
General Curtis
LeMay boasted of his raid on Tokyo: "We scorched and boiled
and
baked to death more people in Tokyo that night of March 9–10 than
went up in vapor in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined."
MacDonogh's
book, After the Reich, dispels the comfortable myth of
generous allied
treatment of defeated Germany. Having discarded all
moral scruples, the
allies fell upon the vanquished country with
brutal occupation. Hundreds of
thousands of women raped; hundreds of
thousands of Germans died in
deportations; a million German
prisoners of war died in captivity.
MacDonogh calculates that 2.5 million Germans died between the
liberation of Vienna and the Berlin airlift.
Nigel Jones writes in
the conservative London Sunday
Telegraph: "MacDonogh has told a very
inconvenient truth," a story
long "cloaked in silence since telling it
suited no one."
The hypocrisy of the Nuremberg trials is that the
victors were also
guilty of crimes for which the vanquished were punished.
The purpose
of the trials was to demonize the defeated in order to divert
attention from the allies' own war crimes. The trials had little to
do
with justice.
In Freedom Next Time, Pilger shows the complete
self-absorption of
American, British and Israeli governments whose policies
are
unimpeded by any moral principle.
Pilger documents the demise of
the inhabitants of Diego Garcia. The
Americans wanted Diego Garcia for an
air base, so the British packed
up the 2,000 residents, people with British
passports under British
protection, and deported them to Mauritius, one
thousand miles away.
To cover up its crime against humanity, the British
Foreign and
Commonwealth Office created the fiction that the inhabitants,
which
had been living in the archipelago for two or three centuries,
were "a floating population." This fiction, wrote a legal adviser,
bolsters "our arguments that the territory has no indigenous or
settled
population."
Prime Minister Harold Wilson and Foreign Secretary Michael
Stewart
conspired to mislead the UN about the deported islanders by, in
Stewart's words, " presenting any move as a change of employment for
contract workers – rather than as a population resettlement.
Pilger interviewed some of the displaced persons, but emotional
blocs will shield patriotic Americans and British from the
uncomfortable
facts. Rational skeptics can find a second documented
account of the
Anglo-American rape of Diego Garcia online. An entire
people were swept
away.
Two thousand people were in the way of an American purpose – an
air
base – so we had our British dependency deport them.
Several
million Palestinians are in Israel's way. Pilger's
documented account of
Israel's crushing of the Palestinians shows
that our "democratic ally" in
the Middle East is capable of any evil
and has no remorse or mercy. Israel
is an apt student of the British
and American empires' attitudes toward
lesser beings. They simply
don't count.
Those who are the salt of
the earth take precedence over everything.
Paul Craig Roberts is a former
Assistant Secretary of the US
Treasury and former associate editor of the
Wall Street Journal, has
been reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial
abuse for two
decades. A new edition of his book, The Tyranny of Good
Intentions,
co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how
Americans lost the protection of law, has just been released by
Random
House.
Copyright © 2008 Creators
Syndicate
************
WORLD
VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@
NEWS
ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.
Need
some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS
today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.
To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@