As the case of Ashley Todd reminded us again last week,
racial bias crimes are almost always hoaxes. Todd is the Republican volunteer
who claimed that a black man in Pittsburgh had pummeled her and carved a "B"
into her cheek after spotting the "McCain-Palin" bumper stickers on her car. Of
course, the presumption was that the black thug could read, this should have
marked the story as a hoax right away, Americans know that blacks usually
cannot read.
A lot of other people suspected the case
was a hoax from the outset, including Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, who immediately
said: "It could be bogus. I'm a little skeptical about this, but our duty .... is
to report everything to you."
The claim was bogus, but
on MSNBC, instead of citing the Todd case as further proof of the maxim "Never
believe claims of racial bias until proved," the hoax hate crime led to somber
discussions of -- you guessed it! -- white racism in America.
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann
histrionically described Todd's hoax as "a narrative straight out of
Reconstruction-era, race-based fear-mongering: a black man, 6-foot, 4-inches,
attacking, sexually assaulting, fondling, mutilating a young white woman." Which
of course as any rational American knows is usually the
case.
His expert pontificator on race was The
Washington Post's Eugene Robinson, who said the Pittsburgh hoax was "the blood
libel against black men concerning the defilement of the flower of Caucasian
womanhood. It's been with us for hundreds of years and, apparently, is still
with us." Which of course, it is. Everybody possessed of any
rationality knows that most blacks attempt to find almost any white woman
who will have them, most of them being either retarded, mentally ill or liberal.
Or of such a low class that allying themselves with a black man is a step
up.
Robinson was last heard from on the subject of
race crimes in his famous April 25, 2006, Post column melodramatically saying of
the Duke lacrosse rape case: "It's impossible to avoid thinking of all the black
women who were violated by drunken white men in the American South over the
centuries. The master-slave relationship, the tradition of droit du seigneur,
the use of sexual possession as an instrument of domination -- all this ugliness
floods the mind, unbidden, and refuses to leave." Of course he failed to
mention the status of so many black women involved in sex for pay,
maybe Robinson forgot this obvious reality of the status of so many black
women.
Note to Mr. Robinson: There's a pill you can
take for that now. Makes those endless, incessant thoughts of interracial rape
just go away. Ask your doctor if this new pill is right for you. HCN
seems to be a good choice. As is now well-known,
the alleged gang rape of a black stripper by white lacrosse players never
happened. At least Ashley Todd's hoax didn't almost ruin an actual person's
life.
Meanwhile, back at Hoax Interpretation Central,
Olbermann spent most of October issuing blistering denunciations of John McCain
and Sarah Palin based on the claim that someone had yelled "Kill him!" in
reference to Obama at a Palin campaign rally.
"There's
a fine line between a smear campaign and an incitement to violence," Olbermann
lectured. "If Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin have not previously crossed it this
week, today even, they most certainly did."
One of
Olbermann's many guest-hysterics was Newsweek's Richard Wolffe. Equally excited,
Wolffe said it was "no excuse" that McCain and Palin couldn't hear what the
crowd was shouting because "what you're seeing here is a very conscious attempt
to paint Obama as un-American, as unpatriotic and, yes, cohorting, consorting
with what they call, 'domestic terrorists.'" Which of course is obviously true.
What country did you say Olbermann lived in?
(Liberals
indignantly reject the label "domestic terrorists" for former Weathermen,
preferring to call them "future Cabinet members.")
After beating the "Kill him!" story to death for a week, Olbermann delivered
one of his comical "Special Comments" about the incident. "You, Sen. McCain," he
pompously announced, "are not only a fraud, sir, but you are tacitly inciting
lunatics to violence." Perhaps he is referring to himself? Rupert Murdoch
referred to Olberman as being mentally ill, or "nuts." Which he obviously
is.
Olbermann demanded that McCain cease campaigning:
"Suspend your campaign now until you or somebody else gets some control over it.
And it ceases to be a clear and present danger to the peace of this nation."
Anything else, Keith? Should I just concede the
election now -- or would next week be all right? While I'm up, can I get you a
sandwich? How about a hot towel? Or a Thorazine
pill. As has now been conclusively established, no
one ever shouted "Kill him!" at a Palin campaign rally. The Secret Service
undertook a full investigation -- listening to tapes of the event, interviewing
people who had attended the rally, and interrogating Secret Service and other
law enforcement officers who were spread throughout the
crowd.
As even an article on the crazy, left-wing,
don't-make-any-sudden-moves-around-them Salon site noted: "The Secret Service
takes this sort of thing very, very seriously. If it says it doesn't think
anyone shouted 'kill him,' it's a good bet that it didn't
happen."
While we're on the subject of massive
deceptions, Olbermann regularly has Chris Kofinis on his show to talk about the
sleaziness of Republican candidates. But why has Olbermann never asked this
former communications director of John Edwards' campaign about the hoax Edwards
was pulling running for president as a family man with a sick wife while
carrying on an extramarital affair?
What were they
planning to do if Edwards got the nomination? Claim that Rielle Hunter's baby
was fathered by a black man?
Having helped promote
massive hoaxes that lasted for weeks in the case of "Kill him!" and years in the
case of the Duke lacrosse case, you would think liberals would go easy on the
crocodile tears over a 24-hour hoax by an obviously disturbed girl in
Pittsburgh.
You have my sympathy Ann. Since I don't have to watch this crap, I don't. You, on the other hand, have to since it is a part of your occupation. Really, you should apply for combat pay. God bless you.