From: Lifeforce
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:49 PM
To: AB
Subject: Fw: Australian PM Kevin Rudd - “Nuke strike would make 9/11 insignificant”

Australian PM Kevin Rudd - “Nuke strike would make 9/11 insignificant” and other weird warnings

By: D. H. Williams @ 6:38 PM - EST

Over the last 72 hours there has been a strange melange of cryptic messages leaked from world political leaders about what could be in store for America over the next few months.

These predictions of impending doom come from England, France, Australia and the United States. In each case there has been a press releases or news expose’ predicting huge and building threats emerging from faceless enemies in shadowy places.

Crisis will lead to unpopular decisions by Barack Obama

Joe Biden set the stage at a Seattle fund raiser for VIP’s last Sunday when he told the audience about an “international crisis” that will test Barack Obama’s Presidency should he be elected.

Biden told the top Democratic donors that a “generated crisis” will develop within six months and Barak Obama will need the help of community leaders to control the population as unpopular decisions are made and Americans resist.

Biden speaking at the fundraiser, “I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate, And he’s gonna need help. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you - not financially to help him - we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”

Colin Powell and Madeline Albright confirm Biden’s warnings

Biden’s ominous language at the Seattle Sheraton are followed with statements by long time establishment insiders Colin Powell and Madeline Albright both say there is a massive crisis on the horizon and Biden was simply making a statement in fact.”

“The problems will always be there and there’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.” Powell told Meet the Press.

Premonitions of dire consequences emerge from Europe

Meanwhile in England were they are trying desperately to pass a draconian measure allowing for the 42 day imprisonment of any citizen without charges or access to bail.

Lord West, adviser to Prime Minister Gordon Brown on national security says, “There is another great plot building up again and we are monitoring. It dipped slightly and is now rising again within the context of severe. The threat is huge. We have done all the things that we need to do, but the threat is building - the complex plots are building,”

Lord West like Biden, Albright and Powell does not elaborate on the precise details of the threat or the source of his intelligence information just that the situation is dire.

Across the channel from England you have the French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner warning the press that he believes Israel will strike Iran before they can develope nuclear weapons completley ignoring the fact that the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammed ElBradei, said that Iran lacks the key components to produce an atomic weapon.

Israel is believed to have 300 to 400 tactical nuclear weapons ready for deployment at a moments notice and is under no real threat from Iran who has never attacked another nation and has a defense budget equivalent to 1% of the United States.

It’s a miracle there hasn’t been a nuclear catastrophe

Only a few hours ago Agence France-Presse published a press release about the Sydney meeting of the international Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament presided over by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd who said that the world is facing a threat that will dwarf the September 11 attacks.

“The devastation that could be wreaked by one major nuclear weapons incident alone puts 9/11 and almost everything else [in] to the category of the insignificant,” Rudd said.

Members of the commission warned of reaching an avalanche of danger due to the high number and general lack of control over nuclear devices and components.

Former Australian Foreign Minister in the Labor Government Gareth Evans says it’s “really a bit of a miracle” referring to one the 13,000 to 16,000 nuclear weapons known to exist not being detonated, presumable by “terrorist” causing a catastrophe.

What are they preparing us for?

Why are there so many high level politicians around the world in a seemingly coordinated effort warning of huge threats and developing crisis’ that may include a nuclear device? Are they preparing the masses for an event or series of events that have been in the making for some time? Is the public being prepared for new and forming enemies with a potential to plunge the entire world into war?

Prior to 9/11 William Kristol’s Project for a New American Century called for a catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor” to bring about a “transformational” change in U.S. foreign policy and military spending.

Many believe a false flag strike on a major western city involving a nuclear device would be the Holy Grail to those who are working so hard to manifest “transformational” change on the world stage bringing with it the complete political, economic and military transformation toward fascist world government.

Best regards,.
Bob Taft
The Taft Ranch
Upton, Wyoming
(307) 465-2206
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint
the great ones to public office." Aesop

From: mary rose
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 10:59 AM
To: ; Discussion Forum for Global Justice
Subject: Fw: Fw: [globalnetnews-summary] Obama advisers discuss preparations for WAR ON IRAN

----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Rima Laibow
To: mary rose
Cc: Rima E. Laibow
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [globalnetnews-summary] Obama advisers discuss preparations for WAR ON IRAN

Mary Rose,
     This news should scare every American down to their gizzards.  When the last Administration took over, it could not wait to get to war.   It was like the night before Christmas and if they did not rush out to the store right NOW they would not have gifts under the tree.  It is easy for someone who has not seen WAR or been in WAR to decide to try it out (like the current crew), just out of curiosity.  When you have been there and lived it, WAR takes on a very different set of parameters. 
     I do not know the names of the advisors who council WAR to our President elect, nor do I know the intelligence upon which they base their decisions.  As a retired Army General Officer with considerable experience in the military intelligence business at both the tactical and strategic levels, I do know that "intentionality" always remains a tough call to make unless you have verifiable inside information or a preconceived idea of what you want the answer to be.  I might add that the intelligence for Obama better be one hell of a lot better than the garbage used as an excuse by the current administration. 
     Further, I lived through the Cold War with Russia and they had many more nukes and many more troops than Iran ever even dreamed about.  We kept WAR off the table with the Soviets.  I have trouble believing that WAR should come down as Obama's FIRST CHOICE with Iran.
     Bottom line:  WAR should be the LAST CHOICE NOT THE FIRST CHOICE!!!
     Yours in Health Freedom         Albert N Stubblebine  MG US Army Retired
Dear General Stubblebine - thank you for this very important comment. I do believe that humanity is in a very precarious position right now. This is why I feel it is so important for us to create a Learning Space and Think Tank composed of 1 million Cultural Creatives vis the website.  We-the-people need to not only send "good energy" into areas of concern such as this, but to also have teams that are prepared to be in positions to exert influence on situations that may get out of hand if we are not vigilant. Formerly this was the position the Senate and the House were supposed to hold; however, these institutions have become so corrupted that they are no longer able do the job.  And, as well, I do believe that the challenges the human family faces today have become so overwhelming and complex that government alone is no longer able to handle the situation. As a responsive citizenry, I do believe that we must aid in every way we can.  Certainly, what you and Dr. Rima are doing is most valuable, and i congratulate you on your efforts which create a model for others to follow, but we need more people getting involved and taking action to ensure our continued viability as the human family. And as well, to assure that the Planet -- our life support system -- is carefully tended to so as to ensure that future generations receive their entitlement here on this Paradise as well.  Let us work more closely together to create new social systems that work for us and not against us.  
with love and appreciation for all that you and Dr. Rima do and for all we do together.  mary rose           

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, mary rose <> wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "TradingPostPaul" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:06 AM
Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Obama advisers discuss preparations for war on Iran

This is where we need to create inteference through sending positive love-filled energy messages "in the best interests of all concerned." to those in the decision-making process.

While those involved continue to talk about Iran's nuclear weapon's program, of note is that Iran is only one of six countries left in the world that does not have a central
bank and thus operates outside of the influence of the power elite's financial system.

Please consider setting aside time every day to meditate and and send positive loving energy into the minds of those involved in making the decisions here, and especially to Mr Barak in the best interests of all concerned.

We can do this Dear Ones -- we can change the course of history -- we need only believe that we can and then take action.

with love and in gratitude for all that we do.  mary rose

We must be the change we wish to see in our lives.  M. Gandhi

Obama advisers discuss preparations for war on Iran
By Peter Symonds
6 November 2008

On the eve of the US elections, the New York Times cautiously pointed
on Monday to the emergence of a bipartisan consensus in Washington
for an aggressive new strategy towards Iran. While virtually nothing
was said in the course of the election campaign, behind-the-scenes
top advisers from the Obama and McCain camps have been discussing the
rapid escalation of diplomatic pressure and punitive sanctions
against Iran, backed by preparations for military strikes.

The article entitled "New Beltway Debate: What to do about Iran"
noted with a degree of alarm: "It is a frightening notion, but it not
just the trigger-happy Bush administration discussing-if only
theoretically-the possibility of military action to stop Iran's
nuclear weapons program. [R]easonable people from both parties are
examining the so-called military option, along with new diplomatic

Behind the backs of American voters, top advisers for President-elect
Barack Obama have been setting the stage for a dramatic escalation of
confrontation with Iran as soon as the new administration takes
office. A report released in September from the Bipartisan Policy
Center, a Washington-based think tank, argued that a nuclear weapons
capable Iran was "strategically untenable" and detailed a robust
approach, "incorporating new diplomatic, economic and military tools
in an integrated fashion".

(message truncated in the interests of bandwidth) 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1773 - Release Date: 11/7/2008 9:08 AM