From: BiomagScience
[mailto:office@BiomagScience.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 12:38 AM
To: com1@magnetfoundation.org
Subject: Solution to dangerous cellphone radio waves 09/05/08
|
Welcome to our Science Series from
the Foundation for Magnetic Science and BiomagScience®. We hope the following
information is helpful in understanding Biomagnetism and that knowledge
produces comfort and wellness. This report is important to your health.
Please take the time to read it. Article
4, SS Volume 8, September 03, 2008 The below information [sent to us]
is about the harmful effects of Information Carrying Radio Waves (ICRWs) on
human cells from cell phones and wireless routers – particularly the
weakening and loss of cellular vitality, the loss of intracellular
communication, the development of membrane sensitivity, the increase of brain
tumors and the possible cause of large increases in autism. We have been
following this information since the first findings of Apple’s Microwave News
in the 80s. We report the following problems from ICRWs and electrical pulsed
magnetic fields and what you can do about this problem. The electrical value of cells Based on electrical measurements
of the cells using Bioelectrical
Impedance Analysis
(BIA) which has been a medical measuring tool since 1939, it is understood
that cells with high voltage exhibit good health while cells with low voltage
show poor health and dysfunction. Basic science teaches it is the
spin of the electrons that creates the electrical charge of the atoms that
make up the molecular material of our bodies. As the electrons maintain their
natural spin, they help maintain the electrical energy of the cell(s). Electricity, electrons, radio frequencies
and magnetic fields
Electricity is made by exciting
electrons [in wire] with magnetic fields. 60 cycle AC current is created by
running the wire through 60 magnetic positive and negative pulses a second.
Science also teaches that it not only takes magnetic fields to make
electricity, electricity gives off magnetic fields - which affect any
electrons within their range. Microwave ovens, blenders, irons,
computers, radios, and many more give off 60 pulsed positive and negative
magnetic fields a second. Cell phones, wireless routers, microwaves and other
radio waves with their varied frequencies per second are just another form of
magnetism which also makes electrons react. When any living cells
are within range of these electromagnetic fields: The natural free spin of
the cell’s electrons is magnetically disturbed by each pulsed magnetic field. This type of electron
disturbance
over a period of time can reduce the electrical energy and
vitality of the cell. This loss of cellular energy
reduces the cell’s:
All of the above can unfortunately
progress into many types of illness including aberrant tissue growth. The living answer It is impossible to live in a
contemporary society without being surrounded by these ubiquitous dangerous
magnetic fields. Walk by a home, store, restaurant using a wireless router or
work next to a computer, run the blender, use the cell phone and you are within
the damaging fields. However, it is possible to have a
good daily defense against these magnetic fields. What we have been doing for
years to keep safe from these fields is the BiomagScienceDaytime
therapy.
Confirmed by BIA tests:
BiomagScience Daytime
therapy
supplements the individual with electromotive vitality. This daily energy
supplementation keeps the cells at high voltage which defends them from these
dangerous fields.
People from all over the world
have reported the Daytime therapy helps to maintenance good health. If you are interested in the daily
energy supplementation from the Daytime therapy to support healthy
maintenance or to defend against pulsed or ICRW magnetic fields and do not
have a 2-stack of BiomagScience Power Wafers, order one of ourPain Relief/ Vitality Kits. The kit comes with 2 sets of
Power Wafers good for two adults or an adult and two children. If you really want to protect
yourself and your family, drink magnetized water along with the Daytime therapy. Testing shows it helps elevate most of
the body’s metabolic functions. Of course the Wellness Kit [which is on sale] has six Power Wafers for Daytime therapy, all the various sizes of Biomagnets
to do advanced therapy and emergencies, the water jar energizers, a bottle of
excellent liquid oxygen supplement, therapy book, and pictorial therapy
instructions. We hope this information about
defending against cellular damage from appliances, phones and radio
frequencies has been helpful. The rest of the material below this newsletter
is a bit scary, but the individual and or child can overcome the problem with
supplemental energy. The Daytime Therapy is one of the best
preventative supplements available in the world. Regarding the very bad bee problem
mentioned below, the Foundation would like to conduct some experiments by
putting a strong magnetic structure with each bee hive. Any bee keepers out
there that want to play? We have the magnets. Please contact us. Best of health, Peter Kulish, Founder Disclaimer: The use of magnetism or any of the products offered herein are
intended to benefit normal structure and function and is not prescribed as
treatment for medical or psychological conditions, nor for diagnosis, care,
treatment or rehabilitation of individuals, nor to apply medical, mental
health or human development principles. Testimonial results are not typical.
Translations and content subject to errors and omissions. The following is a
lengthy report taken from a series of researchers who are telling it like it
is.
Read
the WHOLE page and you will be shocked at what we are doing to our children
and how we are responsible for depleting our FOOD SUPPLY (pay
attention to the information about magnetites in bees)...learn why large sea
mammals beach themselves or get confused and swim up-stream in rivers...or
why birds are also losing their way... AND pay attention to what
Albert Einstein said in 1940 about the bees and mankind. THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE SENT TO EVERYONE on this
PLANET!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I HAVE ALWAYS
THOUGHT THAT CELL PHONES ARE DANGEROUS, BUT DID NOT HAVE ANY PROOF. Therefore,
I have always had a cell phone, but never gave the number to anyone and only
used it for emergencies and absolute necessity. I've had a mobile phone
since 1970. I just waited until I was near a "Land Line" and
then called whomever. Yet, my daughter and granddaughters just use the
hell out of them. They are typical women. If I mention anything
about the cell phones being dangerous, they just think I'm an 'ole fashioned
geezer' and not up with the times. Besides, you can't hear on them
properly anyway.
Sir Charles
Seabert
Hi,
friends. I took substantial time to transcribe the key points of three
important interviews on KPFK radio, on the subject of the hazards of wireless
technology. I hope you will review it and consider forwarding it to people
you care about. Please, if nothing else, read the hot-pink highlights
before you delete this message. Perhaps most important
is this, toward the bottom: Please do not have wireless routers in
your home!! Remove ALL wireless devices from your children's access. Do not
put a cell phone in your child's hands, and do not use a cell phone in a car
with children in it! This is a transcript of
KPFK's July 11, 2007 "Healthy Planet, Healthy Me" podcast,
available at http://64.27.15.184/parchive/mp3/kpfk_070711_140222kpfkserials.mp3.
The serious hazards of wireless technology Guest #1. Interview with Dr. George L. Carlo,
founder and chairman of the nonprofit Science and Public Policy Institute.
Scientist, lawyer, and author of Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age. · Three billion cell-phones currently in use: The cell phone
first came into use in 1984. It took 20 years, until 2004, for the number of
cell phone users to reach a billion. 18 months later we had the second
billion. 9 months after that (about two months ago), we had the third
billion. · Information-carrying radio waves (ICRWs): These cell phones
need to be in touch with cell phone towers constantly. We have created a
matrix of exposure to these "information-carrying radio
waves" (ICRWs) that are now in our background environment in
unprecedented levels. · ICRWs beget disease: These ICRWs do not
exist anywhere in nature, so our biological tissues are not accustomed to
being exposed to them, and they interpret them as invaders. This triggers a
series of biological responses within our cells that is now known to be very
hazardous. The attempt to protect biological tissue from ICRWs causes the
onset of symptoms of disease. · No safety testing: The mobile phone
industry was able to convince the FDA in 1984 that cell phones would not be
dangerous, so they
were released onto the market and into commerce with no safety testing. So through the
1990s, I ran a $28.5 million program funded by the mobile-phone industry and
overseen by the US government. The program was intended to fill in the data
gaps due to the lack of safety testing. · "Near-field plume" (proximity) exposure: In the 1990s and
early 2000s, we focused on the near-field plume, about 6-7 inches around the
cell phone antenna, where the highest concentration of ICRWs existed. People
could protect themselves by wearing a headset. Moving the phone 6-7 inches away from the
body was thought to protect us. · Background/ambient exposure: What we did not
expect at the time was that the exponential increase in the number of cell
phones would create high concentrations of ICRWs in the background, ambient
environment...the waves emitted by the cell phones. · Non-cell-phone-users are now affected: Our nonprofit
project in Washington runs a registry that collects information from patients
with symptoms associated with exposure to ICRWs and other forms of
electromagnetic radiation (EMR). When we opened the registry in 2001, the
vast majority of registrants were people who used cell phones. In the past 24
months, the vast
majority of registrants/patients are now people who do not use cell phones. · "Membrane sensitivity syndrome": Patients suffer
from electrohypersensitivity -- allergic reactions to the ICRWs. It's a continuum.
At one end there's people who report short-term memory loss, unexplained
anxiety attacks, unexplained sweating, difficulty sleeping, loss of energy,
falling asleep in the middle of the afternoon, blanking out during a
conversation. At the other end are people who are not even able to be in a room with
somebody using a cell phone. They can't be in offices or hotels where there's
Wi-Fi. The reaction is debilitating. They begin to sweat and shake.
They have to leave the room. And when they go to the bathroom, they have
blood in their stool. So that indicates organ involvement. This
is not a trivial medical problem. · Disruption of intracellular communication: This is absolutely
consistent with the mechanism of harm, which is disruption of intracellular
communication. Cells become energy deficient and cannot communicate with
surrounding cells, so you see attention deficit, short-term memory loss,
etc. And over time, exposure causes cell-membrane damage, which results
in this allergic reaction to ICRWs and other forms of EMR. · Brain tumors: Back in the early 1990s, the big
concern was brain cancer. A number of studies have shown an
increase in brain tumors associated with cell-phone use. We have enough
causation proof to warrant intervention. We now know that using a cell phone
is associated with an increased incidence of brain tumors. And there's a
correlation with the side of the head where the phone is used and brain
tumors. · Canary
in the coal mine: But these other more acute conditions are
much more prevalent. They offer us an opportunity, almost like the canary in
the coal mine, to learn clues to prevent hundreds of millions of people from
becoming ill. · Disruption of DNA repair: Children are more
susceptible. They are our main concern, because up until about age 21,
cells are differentiating more than they are proliferating. There's more
exposed DNA. DNA is the most scary target of the damage from ICRWs. Studies
show that these ICRWs cause disruption of DNA repair. Every day our
bodies have millions of DNA breaks. And the reason we look the same
today as we did yesterday is because our body knows how to put broken
DNA back together pretty efficiently. The reason that my high school
graduation picture looks a lot different from the way I look now is that our
bodies become less efficient in fixing broken DNA as we age. And ICRWs
disrupt the body's ability to put broken DNA back together again. So they not
only accelerate aging but they are also one of the progenitors of the development
of tumors. Micronuclei clone and proliferate and develop into tumors. · Science confirms hazards: There are probably
around 900 studies in the open peer-reviewed literature that address every
aspect of this, including: o Cell
membrane damage
o Closing
down of active transport channels o Disruption
of intracellular communication
o Disruption
of DNA repair
o Disruption
of mitochondrial function
o Disruption
of cellular respiration
o Development
of brain and eye tumors · Wireless
technology should never have been released!: One of our big
frustrations is that the scientific database is strong enough now, in terms
of the dangers of wireless technology such as cell phones and Wi-Fi,
that had this
information been gathered during pre-market testing, we would not have
wireless technology in the same form we have today. It would never
have been allowed into the market if the FDA had required free-market
testing. That's how serious and confirmatory the science is. · We need to maximize fiber optics
and minimize wireless: Is any other industry working on a
whole different technology that would enable us to use cellular phones but
not have the EM radiation? The irony is that we don't need a new technology;
we need an old technology. The solution is a telecommunications infrastructure that
maximizes the amount of information carried through fiber-optic cables and
minimizes the amount of information that is carried wirelessly. If wireless
signals only have to travel a few hundred feet, then we can treat them
through technologies like "noise fields," a protective technology
first developed by the US military, which can help deliver the convenience of
this telecommunications technology without the dangers... Guest #2: Milt Bowling, Canadian activist and sr.
associate of the nonprofit Science and Public Policy Institute, and director
of Risk Management Partners Consultancy. · I
got personally involved in this issue when my son's elementary school was
going to have microwave transmitters put on the roof for a cell-phone
network. · Colony
Collapse Disorder: I
come from a long line of beekeepers, back to at least the 1800s. I've been
reading about the devastation of the honeybee population worldwide, called
"colony collapse disorder." Normally over winter, beekeepers lose 10 to 20% of
their bees. But this last year, they've reported 90 to 100% are gone. They've
died right off. And the queens and the brood are still in the hive. So
the worker bees have gone out to forage and haven't been able to find their
way back. · Bees have "magnetites" in their abdomens to
orient themselves to the earth's natural electromagnetic field. But the problem is
the exponential increase of background radiation is interfering with their natural
communication and navigation capabilities. · Since
1999, background radiation has increased in cities by 500,000-fold! Any
large city with Wi-Fi, Wi-Max ... if your neighbors have wireless
computer routers, satellite TV, video games, anything to do
with wireless: they all have ICRWs, which don't exist in nature. So our
cells don't know how to react to them. It's either fight or flight, so they
take precautionary measures, which turns out to be harmful on a long-term
basis. · So
the bees get lost and end up starving to death. What's even more strange is that other insects that would
normally descend on the hives and take the honey aren't touching it.
They just don't go there.
· There
are various studies about birds, one published recently about homing pigeons.
They take them up to 6-800 miles away from their homes and let them go, and
they have these races. Normal loss is 10 to 15%. About a year ago, they lost 85% of the
homing pigeons; they never ever showed up. They have the magnetites in their
brains and beaks, which help them orient to the earth's natural
electromagnetic field. · About
a third of our food is pollinated, and 80 to 90% of it is pollinated by bees.
I've heard an estimate that in the US the bee problem is about a $15 billion
problem. Other pollinators like butterflies and bats are also being affected,
as are amphibians. It's a worldwide problem. · Our authorities are looking to solve a new problem with
old thinking. They're looking at mites, viruses, pesticides ... all
these different possible causes, which are all bad. But the spread
patterns of these things are not consistent with the spread pattern of
the problem. For example, they blame nicotinoid pesticides. But certain
countries with the bee dieoff don't use those pesticides; they're banned. So
we're saying that the ICRWs are the leading culprit. · Organic bees have to be raised several miles from an
urban center, a landfill, a golf course, an urban highway. All of those things
are where high concentrations of ICRWs are. So the further these bees are
away, and raised organically, the stronger they are, and they're not having
colony collapse disorder. · Why
are we not hearing from the government or the wireless companies about this
fact that's going on right now? This is huge! You have a couple of things going on
here when you move out of the realm of science and into the realm of
politics. It was the FDA following the influence of the mobile phone industry
that got us into this mess in the first place by not requiring testing in
1984. And then in 1996 the telecommunication act was passed, giving
facilitation to the mobile phone industry to be able to disperse towers,
Wi-Fi, and Wi-Max without any type of intervention all across North America
and the world. The
industry and the government are in bed together, causing the problem. · We've
had seven class action lawsuits since
2002 against the mobile phone industry: They knew and didn't
tell us. Most of them had to do with brain cancer, but the most interesting
ongoing case is based on "unjust enrichment": The cell phone
industry did not let consumers know from 1999 forward that there was
controversy with regard to safety. The cell phone manuals said "there
are no studies that show that cell phones are dangerous." Thus, they
induced consumers to buy phones and minutes, which they would not have done
willy nilly if they had known of the controversy. The lawsuit is seeking that
all profits from 1999 to now be returned to consumers. That is a huge number!
Those profits are in the several hundred-billion-dollar range. · Following the publication of my book, the cell phone
industry lost their product liability insurance for health risk claims,
because they paid $28.5 million to get answers to scientific questions, and
then they summarily ignored the answers. So the insurance
companies said we're not going to protect you anymore. So the big
mobile-phone companies -- AT&T, Sprint, Cingular, all of them -- have no
insurance to cover these health-risk claims. And if they were to take any action at all to
protect consumers or let people know about these hazards, that would be
considered in the litigation a "tacit admission of guilt," meaning
that they're now taking steps to show that they were wrong back then. That
would be used in the litigation against them. So consumers are really on
their own now, with regard to protecting themselves. · We
can't see EMR with our eyes. Imagine what it would be like if we actually
could see it! · The
bees really are the best way for us to see what's going on. The colony
collapse disorder is the result of the bees' intracellular communication
being disrupted. And therefore they can't orient themselves and find their
way home. The bees are an indicator that we
are reaching a saturation point in terms of this exposure in the environment.
With three billion cell phone users and millions and millions
of other wireless devices scattered throughout the globe, we're reaching a
saturation point where the indicator is what we're seeing in the biological
systems. The bees are the indicators, but WE are the guinea pigs. · Back
in the 1940s, Albert Einstein was reflecting upon the fact that we had moved
into a nuclear age. He said that we are now going to be insulting our
environment in ways that we cannot predict. And Einstein said, "Watch the
bees," because they are an extremely sensitive indicator. He is reported
to have said that when the bees disappear, mankind will disappear four years
later. This is
serious! We are looking at all kinds of signs that are telling us we
need to take steps. · We
do risk assessments for communities, and I consult all over the world on this
issue. We also perform risk management and advise communities on mitigating
their risks. No one wants to acknowledge the elephant in the room. Listeners
can go to www.safewireless.org to
contact me. Guest #3: Tamara Merrier, founder and director of
Internal Balance, Inc. Biochemist and certified clinical nutritionist.
(45:00) · In
the past five years, I've been working with a great deal of autism. 80% of my practice is currently children on the autism
spectrum (autism, ADD, ADHD, and other diagnosed psychiatric conditions). It
has been very interesting to correlate EMR as a part of their etiology. We believe
they are definitely related. · Dr.
George Carlo met me in January of 2006 when I was giving a presentation
regarding some of my findings and concerns. And we have been collaborating
now for the past year and a half to publish several papers validating the
mechanism of harm that he was describing. · With
the Safe Wireless Initiative, we belief that there is a link, more of an
epigenetic exposure correlation, that has a
synergistic effect with the toxicity within the child. We're looking at a
generation of children who are being born more toxic than you and I
were, post 1938, post WWII. Our chemical interventions in this country
are astronomical. Well over a thousand chemicals are in use out there, and no
one really knows how they can harm. · These children now number one in 150, and some of us
believe it's much more severe than that. In the late 70s, the number was one
in 10,000. · Now,
I don't want to ignore the fact that there is a great deal of evidence that
mercury toxicity is closely related and a key player in this discussion, both
thimerosal in vaccines and mercury bioaccumulation over several generations. · I'd
like to comment on the magnetite in the bees: It has been posited that
children on the autism spectrum have a higher level of magnetite in their
brain. Isn't that interesting? · George
and I have been very diligently in discussion regarding the cell-to-cell
communication disruption that occurs in an autistic child, or a child who is
on the spectrum. It's interesting to hear the magnetite correlation here and
to understand that that's exactly what we're seeing in these children. · Do
you think that children are harmed in vitro? I've interviewed hundreds of parents
now over several years, and their children are primarily born
neurodevelopmentally normal, or "neurotypical." So we have to
conclude that there is a genetic predisposition that has been carried out
over generations. But, within this generation of children, the genetic expression that
we're seeing is somehow different. These children are not able
to detoxify their bodies and compensate for the level of toxicity.
· I
began detoxifying children back in 2002 with mechanisms and interventions
that were helping me personally, as well as adults and a few other children
in my practice in Houston . I began to look into electricmagnetic pulse field
therapy, and then I began to look at electropollution as an area in our
environment that we needed to pay attention to while detoxifying the human being.
The EMR issue hit my radar screen in 2005, and I began looking for ways to
mitigate the environment in my own clinic while detoxifying children, as well
as to teach families to create a safe environment for the child who is being
detoxified, so we can improve the outcome. · Disney came up with a cell phone plan for kids that
features built-in GPS tracking, called the Disney Kids Starter Phone.
Don't buy one! · On
my Web site, I have a link to a new site we're creating called www.YourKidsCellPhone.com..
We fully intend to use it as an advocacy site for parents. It's linked from www.InternalBalance.com
and www.SafeWireless.com.
· Limit
and eliminate exposure first! It would be irresponsible for me not to say please do not have wireless routers in
your home!! Remove wireless devices from your children's access. Do not put a
cell phone in your six- or twelve-year-old's hands. Even up to eighteen years
old, this is prudent. Elimination is VERY important. This is a very serious
situation. · Also,
work with schools who are promoting a wireless (Wi-Fi) environment for
students. It's very dangerous. It's scientifically supported, and we just
need to stand up for our children, because they can't talk for themselves.
In Norway , they are removing wireless from schools, and I believe the
US will follow suit, once this is publicized well enough. · You can use this noise-field technology for protecting
yourself, if you are using a cell phone. · We
ask parents, do not use
a cell phone while you are in the car with your child! You are creating a
radiation cage, basically, where the radiation moves through all of you in
the car.
The child in a car seat is being damaged. An elevator is the same thing. · George and I are publishing a paper that will be out by
late summer. When a person detoxifies in an environment that is clean of
electromagnetic radiation, they will naturally let go of heavy metals at much
higher rates, fecally, and through hair and urine. A child on the autism
spectrum will have to be pushed and coaxed and prodded to do that, and
repair mechanisms will also have to be in place with nutrition. We will be
bringing up clinics throughout the country that can do this safely and
effectively for seriously affected children. Conclusion:
The first step is making people aware that there is a problem here. But the
most important message is that there are solutions to the problems. People
like Milt can assess and mitigate those risks. Tamara can clinically deal
with people who are already suffering from diseases as a result of these
problems. |
|
|
View
this message in the iContact Community: |
|
Share
this message with others: |
To
be removed click here 
View
message 
Comment
on this message 
Receive
as RSS 
del.icio.us
Digg 
reddit 
Facebook
StumbleUpon